Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Armed State BuildingConfronting State Failure, 1898-2012$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Paul D. Miller

Print publication date: 2013

Print ISBN-13: 9780801451492

Published to University Press Scholarship Online: August 2016

DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9780801451492.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 30 May 2020

The Myth of Sequencing

The Myth of Sequencing

(p.21) 2 The Myth of Sequencing
Armed State Building

Paul D. Miller

Cornell University Press

This chapter analyzes the “sequencing” theory of state building, arguing that there is no master sequence applicable to all failed states because different states fail in different ways. Sequencing is impractical for policymaking due to the complexity of interagency multinational operations, the uncertainties of budget processes, and the vagaries of policy implementation. Advocates of sequencing have never agreed about which sequence is correct, but they agree that there is one. There are three prominent versions of this theory that have appeared over the past two decades: “liberalization first,” “institutionalization first,” and “stabilization first.” Each has its own strengths and drawbacks, but all share crucial weaknesses. The chapter studies these theories and evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of each separately and as a whole.

Keywords:   sequencing theory, state building, policymaking, liberalization first, institutionalization first, stabilization first

University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .