Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Ptolemy's Philosophy$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Jacqueline Feke

Print publication date: 2018

Print ISBN-13: 9780691179582

Published to University Press Scholarship Online: May 2019

DOI: 10.23943/princeton/9780691179582.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 09 April 2020

Conclusion

Conclusion

Chapter:
(p.201) 9 Conclusion
Source:
Ptolemy's Philosophy
Author(s):

Jacqueline Feke

Publisher:
Princeton University Press
DOI:10.23943/princeton/9780691179582.003.0009

This chapter summarizes key themes and presents some final thoughts. It suggests that Ptolemy attempted to quantify his astronomical models because astronomy, like astrology, is by definition a predictive science. Ptolemy defines astronomy in juxtaposition with astrology in the first chapter of the Tetrabiblos. Consistent with Almagest 1.1, he claims that the judgments of astronomy are sure, whereas astrology, like every other study of material quality, is conjectural. Yet, the claims of astrology are still possible, as opposed to impossible, and therefore they merit study. The chapter then considers the question of whether Ptolemy's his metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics were influential.

Keywords:   Claudius Ptolemy, astronomy, astrology, metaphysics, epistemology, ethics

University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .