Rosemary Deem, Sam Hillyard, and Michael Reed
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- September 2007
- ISBN:
- 9780199265909
- eISBN:
- 9780191708602
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265909.001.0001
- Subject:
- Business and Management, Knowledge Management
The nature of Higher Education in the UK has changed over the last three decades. Academics can no longer be said to carry out their work in ‘ivory towers’, as increasing government intervention and ...
More
The nature of Higher Education in the UK has changed over the last three decades. Academics can no longer be said to carry out their work in ‘ivory towers’, as increasing government intervention and a growing ‘target culture’ has changed the way they work. Increasingly universities have transformed from ‘communities of scholars’ to ‘workplaces’. The organization and administration of universities has seen a corresponding prevalence of ideas and strategies drawn from the ‘New Public Management’ ideology in response, promoting a more ‘business-focussed’ approach in the management of public services. This book examines the issues that these changes have had on academics, both as the ‘knowledge-workers’ managed, and the ‘manager-academic’. It draws on a study of academics holding management roles in sixteen UK universities, exploring their career histories and trajectories, and providing accounts of their values, practices, relationships with others, and their training and development as managers. Examining debates around ‘New Public Management’, knowledge management, and knowledge workers, the wider implications of these themes for policy innovation and strategy in HE and the public sector more generally are considered, developing a critical response to recent approaches to managing public services, and practical suggestions for improvements which could be made to the training and support of senior and middle managers in universities.Less
The nature of Higher Education in the UK has changed over the last three decades. Academics can no longer be said to carry out their work in ‘ivory towers’, as increasing government intervention and a growing ‘target culture’ has changed the way they work. Increasingly universities have transformed from ‘communities of scholars’ to ‘workplaces’. The organization and administration of universities has seen a corresponding prevalence of ideas and strategies drawn from the ‘New Public Management’ ideology in response, promoting a more ‘business-focussed’ approach in the management of public services. This book examines the issues that these changes have had on academics, both as the ‘knowledge-workers’ managed, and the ‘manager-academic’. It draws on a study of academics holding management roles in sixteen UK universities, exploring their career histories and trajectories, and providing accounts of their values, practices, relationships with others, and their training and development as managers. Examining debates around ‘New Public Management’, knowledge management, and knowledge workers, the wider implications of these themes for policy innovation and strategy in HE and the public sector more generally are considered, developing a critical response to recent approaches to managing public services, and practical suggestions for improvements which could be made to the training and support of senior and middle managers in universities.
Steven Brint
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- May 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780691182667
- eISBN:
- 9780691184890
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Princeton University Press
- DOI:
- 10.23943/princeton/9780691182667.003.0007
- Subject:
- Education, Higher and Further Education
This chapter analyzes how, as colleges and universities expanded and became more important features of the American institutional landscape, those who occupied senior managerial positions separated ...
More
This chapter analyzes how, as colleges and universities expanded and became more important features of the American institutional landscape, those who occupied senior managerial positions separated themselves more completely from the faculty. They developed features of a professionalized occupation—including separate training programs and formal knowledge bases—albeit one that remained influenced by traditions of shared governance. This separation led to many complaints by faculty members about the rise of a soulless corporate model of university administration. Professionalized management did not weaken the steering capacity of universities—quite the opposite. Yet bottom-line considerations did often intrude in ways that were counterproductive to the educational mission of the institutions.Less
This chapter analyzes how, as colleges and universities expanded and became more important features of the American institutional landscape, those who occupied senior managerial positions separated themselves more completely from the faculty. They developed features of a professionalized occupation—including separate training programs and formal knowledge bases—albeit one that remained influenced by traditions of shared governance. This separation led to many complaints by faculty members about the rise of a soulless corporate model of university administration. Professionalized management did not weaken the steering capacity of universities—quite the opposite. Yet bottom-line considerations did often intrude in ways that were counterproductive to the educational mission of the institutions.
Brian Harrison
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0025
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines the changes in the University of Oxford's administrative structure during the period from 1914 to 1964. It suggests that the growth in the university's central direction and ...
More
This chapter examines the changes in the University of Oxford's administrative structure during the period from 1914 to 1964. It suggests that the growth in the university's central direction and administration stemmed from its mounting size and complexity and from its tightening relations with outside bodies. It describes the university's structure in three consecutive periods. These include the ancien regime from 1914 up to the early 1930s, the years of Sir Douglas Veale until the mid-1950s, and the age of reform that lasted from then until the mid-1970s.Less
This chapter examines the changes in the University of Oxford's administrative structure during the period from 1914 to 1964. It suggests that the growth in the university's central direction and administration stemmed from its mounting size and complexity and from its tightening relations with outside bodies. It describes the university's structure in three consecutive periods. These include the ancien regime from 1914 up to the early 1930s, the years of Sir Douglas Veale until the mid-1950s, and the age of reform that lasted from then until the mid-1970s.
Anya Jabour
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- May 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780252042676
- eISBN:
- 9780252051524
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Illinois Press
- DOI:
- 10.5622/illinois/9780252042676.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, Social History
Chapter 5 details Breckinridge’s collaboration with Edith Abbott at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration, exploring the pair’s distinctive approach to the ...
More
Chapter 5 details Breckinridge’s collaboration with Edith Abbott at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration, exploring the pair’s distinctive approach to the professionalization of social work and their consistent emphasis on public welfare programs. Building on their previous collaboration at the private Chicago School of Civics and Philanthropy, Breckinridge and Abbott worked in tandem to build the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration and to make it the premier school of social work in the United States. This chapter examines the two women’s distinctive approach to social work, basing social welfare policy on social science research and emphasizing public programs rather than individual responsibility.Less
Chapter 5 details Breckinridge’s collaboration with Edith Abbott at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration, exploring the pair’s distinctive approach to the professionalization of social work and their consistent emphasis on public welfare programs. Building on their previous collaboration at the private Chicago School of Civics and Philanthropy, Breckinridge and Abbott worked in tandem to build the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration and to make it the premier school of social work in the United States. This chapter examines the two women’s distinctive approach to social work, basing social welfare policy on social science research and emphasizing public programs rather than individual responsibility.
Anya Jabour
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- May 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780252042676
- eISBN:
- 9780252051524
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Illinois Press
- DOI:
- 10.5622/illinois/9780252042676.003.0005
- Subject:
- History, Social History
Chapter 4 examines Breckinridge’s participation in social reform in the Progressive era. In conjunction with Jane Addams and other women reformers associated with Hull House, Breckinridge advocated ...
More
Chapter 4 examines Breckinridge’s participation in social reform in the Progressive era. In conjunction with Jane Addams and other women reformers associated with Hull House, Breckinridge advocated for a wide range of reforms and formulated the doctrine of a national minimum standard of living that would inform her later participation in the creation of the welfare state. She also fused her participation in social reform circles with her leadership in the emerging social work profession by using social science as the basis for social reform. Through her teaching and research first at the Chicago School of Civics and Philanthropy and then at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration, Breckinridge established a niche for herself in Progressive-era reform that relied upon her professional status and her scholarly expertise to legitimize political protest and advance social reform.Less
Chapter 4 examines Breckinridge’s participation in social reform in the Progressive era. In conjunction with Jane Addams and other women reformers associated with Hull House, Breckinridge advocated for a wide range of reforms and formulated the doctrine of a national minimum standard of living that would inform her later participation in the creation of the welfare state. She also fused her participation in social reform circles with her leadership in the emerging social work profession by using social science as the basis for social reform. Through her teaching and research first at the Chicago School of Civics and Philanthropy and then at the University of Chicago’s School of Social Service Administration, Breckinridge established a niche for herself in Progressive-era reform that relied upon her professional status and her scholarly expertise to legitimize political protest and advance social reform.
A. H. Halsey
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0026
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines the influence of the Franks Commission on the administrative structure of the University of Oxford during the 1950s. The commission, headed by Sir Oliver Franks, was established ...
More
This chapter examines the influence of the Franks Commission on the administrative structure of the University of Oxford during the 1950s. The commission, headed by Sir Oliver Franks, was established to investigate the concomitant shifts in the relationship between the university and the colleges, between research and teaching, and between private and public funding. The chapter evaluates how effectively the Commission's chosen method of internal appraisal succeeded in turning piecemeal adaptations by the university into a planned and purposive programme.Less
This chapter examines the influence of the Franks Commission on the administrative structure of the University of Oxford during the 1950s. The commission, headed by Sir Oliver Franks, was established to investigate the concomitant shifts in the relationship between the university and the colleges, between research and teaching, and between private and public funding. The chapter evaluates how effectively the Commission's chosen method of internal appraisal succeeded in turning piecemeal adaptations by the university into a planned and purposive programme.
Michael Brock
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0027
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines changes at the University of Oxford during the period from 1970 to 1990. It describes the administrative adjustments made by the university and evaluates the influence of the ...
More
This chapter examines changes at the University of Oxford during the period from 1970 to 1990. It describes the administrative adjustments made by the university and evaluates the influence of the Franks Report on these adjustments. It provides an account of how the university responded to the developing social and educational scene and to the policies and requirements of successive governments. This chapter also attempts to summarize how the changes during these twenty years affected Oxford's reputation and standing.Less
This chapter examines changes at the University of Oxford during the period from 1970 to 1990. It describes the administrative adjustments made by the university and evaluates the influence of the Franks Report on these adjustments. It provides an account of how the university responded to the developing social and educational scene and to the policies and requirements of successive governments. This chapter also attempts to summarize how the changes during these twenty years affected Oxford's reputation and standing.
Paul Addison
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0007
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines the impact of World War 2 on Oxford. It suggests the outstanding wartime characteristic of the university was in its adaptability. During this period, the university was able to ...
More
This chapter examines the impact of World War 2 on Oxford. It suggests the outstanding wartime characteristic of the university was in its adaptability. During this period, the university was able to develop a new model of administration, a new structure of degrees, and a new way of life. The chapter contends that the war partially incorporated the university in the welfare state and that the Education Act of 1944 not only rescued Oxford from growing financial difficulty but also raised academic standards by multiplying the number of candidates competing for places.Less
This chapter examines the impact of World War 2 on Oxford. It suggests the outstanding wartime characteristic of the university was in its adaptability. During this period, the university was able to develop a new model of administration, a new structure of degrees, and a new way of life. The chapter contends that the war partially incorporated the university in the welfare state and that the Education Act of 1944 not only rescued Oxford from growing financial difficulty but also raised academic standards by multiplying the number of candidates competing for places.
John Prest
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0002
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines the formation of the Asquith Commission or the Royal Commission on Oxford and Cambridge Universities to evaluate the value of having two legislative bodies in the University. ...
More
This chapter examines the formation of the Asquith Commission or the Royal Commission on Oxford and Cambridge Universities to evaluate the value of having two legislative bodies in the University. The commission was established on November 14, 1919 with former Prime Minister Herbert Asquith as its head, Gerald Balfour as vice-chairman, Lord Ernle, and representatives of the Privy Council. When it reported it 1922, the commission recommended providing additional powers to the resident teachers and university administrators.Less
This chapter examines the formation of the Asquith Commission or the Royal Commission on Oxford and Cambridge Universities to evaluate the value of having two legislative bodies in the University. The commission was established on November 14, 1919 with former Prime Minister Herbert Asquith as its head, Gerald Balfour as vice-chairman, Lord Ernle, and representatives of the Privy Council. When it reported it 1922, the commission recommended providing additional powers to the resident teachers and university administrators.
Brian Harrison
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0004
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines college life at the University of Oxford during the period from 1918 to 1939. During this period, Oxford's collegiate structure prevailed over criticisms and adapted itself. The ...
More
This chapter examines college life at the University of Oxford during the period from 1918 to 1939. During this period, Oxford's collegiate structure prevailed over criticisms and adapted itself. The containment of the criticisms began with the Asquith Commission and aided the international reaction against German patterns of academic organization and the rapid post-war run-down in reforming enthusiasm in the nation as a whole. Between the wars, it was largely the colleges that controlled Oxford's administrative structure.Less
This chapter examines college life at the University of Oxford during the period from 1918 to 1939. During this period, Oxford's collegiate structure prevailed over criticisms and adapted itself. The containment of the criticisms began with the Asquith Commission and aided the international reaction against German patterns of academic organization and the rapid post-war run-down in reforming enthusiasm in the nation as a whole. Between the wars, it was largely the colleges that controlled Oxford's administrative structure.
Keith Thomas
- Published in print:
- 1994
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198229742
- eISBN:
- 9780191678912
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198229742.003.0008
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter examines college life at Oxford during the period from 1945 to 1970. College life during this period represents a picture of immense vitality and diversity. In addition to the ...
More
This chapter examines college life at Oxford during the period from 1945 to 1970. College life during this period represents a picture of immense vitality and diversity. In addition to the differences in academic performance, the colleges also differed significantly in terms of size, social composition, and sport reputation. This was reflected in the uneven distribution of blues, dining clubs, overseas students, and bachelor fellows. This chapter also discusses the impact of the Franks Commission report on the administrative structure of the university.Less
This chapter examines college life at Oxford during the period from 1945 to 1970. College life during this period represents a picture of immense vitality and diversity. In addition to the differences in academic performance, the colleges also differed significantly in terms of size, social composition, and sport reputation. This was reflected in the uneven distribution of blues, dining clubs, overseas students, and bachelor fellows. This chapter also discusses the impact of the Franks Commission report on the administrative structure of the university.
Brian Pullan and Michele Abendstern
- Published in print:
- 2004
- Published Online:
- July 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780719062421
- eISBN:
- 9781781700624
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Manchester University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7228/manchester/9780719062421.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Modern History
Between 1979 and 1981 all the four principal posts in the University's administration changed hands. It seemed as if a new consortium of managers was assembling and preparing to tackle the problems ...
More
Between 1979 and 1981 all the four principal posts in the University's administration changed hands. It seemed as if a new consortium of managers was assembling and preparing to tackle the problems of a much bleaker era. None, however, was a businessman; all had risen to eminence by climbing academic ladders, albeit in a slightly unorthodox manner, and they did not all share the same values. The University advertised simultaneously the two top jobs of Registrar and Bursar, on the retirement of Vincent Knowles, who had held sway as constitutional authority for a quarter of a century, and on that of Geoffrey McComas, the former colonial officer who had been Bursar of UMIST before coming to Owens. Fred Ratcliffe, the passionate book collector, accepted appointment as Librarian of Cambridge University in the spring of 1980. A joint committee of Council and Senate—appointed to search for a new Vice-Chancellor—met and deliberated at intervals between February and August 1980, whilst its chairman, Sir George Kenyon, consulted advisers in such London venues as the Athenaeum and the Oxford and Cambridge Club, and sounded out potential candidates for the job.Less
Between 1979 and 1981 all the four principal posts in the University's administration changed hands. It seemed as if a new consortium of managers was assembling and preparing to tackle the problems of a much bleaker era. None, however, was a businessman; all had risen to eminence by climbing academic ladders, albeit in a slightly unorthodox manner, and they did not all share the same values. The University advertised simultaneously the two top jobs of Registrar and Bursar, on the retirement of Vincent Knowles, who had held sway as constitutional authority for a quarter of a century, and on that of Geoffrey McComas, the former colonial officer who had been Bursar of UMIST before coming to Owens. Fred Ratcliffe, the passionate book collector, accepted appointment as Librarian of Cambridge University in the spring of 1980. A joint committee of Council and Senate—appointed to search for a new Vice-Chancellor—met and deliberated at intervals between February and August 1980, whilst its chairman, Sir George Kenyon, consulted advisers in such London venues as the Athenaeum and the Oxford and Cambridge Club, and sounded out potential candidates for the job.
Yu Haibo
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- May 2014
- ISBN:
- 9789888208135
- eISBN:
- 9789888268283
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Hong Kong University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5790/hongkong/9789888208135.003.0016
- Subject:
- Education, Educational Policy and Politics
In her chapter, Yu Haibo explores the attitudes of Han university administrators, and stresses the importance of listening to and surveying mainstream attitudes on ethnic minorities and minority ...
More
In her chapter, Yu Haibo explores the attitudes of Han university administrators, and stresses the importance of listening to and surveying mainstream attitudes on ethnic minorities and minority education. Based on in-depth interviews with twenty university administrator in 2010 and 2011, Yu demonstrates how a range of opinions co-exists among Han educators, including discriminatory perceptions of minorities as slow, violent and/or backward. She calls for further education, but also stresses that the minorities themselves have an important role to play in leading by example, allowing their own efforts to shine through with the help of their teachers and other educators.Less
In her chapter, Yu Haibo explores the attitudes of Han university administrators, and stresses the importance of listening to and surveying mainstream attitudes on ethnic minorities and minority education. Based on in-depth interviews with twenty university administrator in 2010 and 2011, Yu demonstrates how a range of opinions co-exists among Han educators, including discriminatory perceptions of minorities as slow, violent and/or backward. She calls for further education, but also stresses that the minorities themselves have an important role to play in leading by example, allowing their own efforts to shine through with the help of their teachers and other educators.
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- March 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780226306254
- eISBN:
- 9780226306261
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226306261.003.0002
- Subject:
- Society and Culture, Ethical Issues and Debates
This chapter discusses the insatiable need of American universities for money. Virtually all universities describe themselves as hard-pressed financially, even as they ingest colossal sums from a ...
More
This chapter discusses the insatiable need of American universities for money. Virtually all universities describe themselves as hard-pressed financially, even as they ingest colossal sums from a variety of sources, accumulate huge endowments, and operate on enormous budgets. Examples are Harvard University which received a total of $29.2 billion in 2006 and the University of Michigan with $4.9 billion. This chapter suggests that the pursuit of money is at the heart of modern university administration and university presidents are judged by their fundraising prowess.Less
This chapter discusses the insatiable need of American universities for money. Virtually all universities describe themselves as hard-pressed financially, even as they ingest colossal sums from a variety of sources, accumulate huge endowments, and operate on enormous budgets. Examples are Harvard University which received a total of $29.2 billion in 2006 and the University of Michigan with $4.9 billion. This chapter suggests that the pursuit of money is at the heart of modern university administration and university presidents are judged by their fundraising prowess.
Stanley Fish
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- November 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780195369021
- eISBN:
- 9780197563243
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780195369021.003.0007
- Subject:
- Education, Higher and Further Education
But you can’t do it in a vacuum. And although academics would be reluctant to admit it, the conditions that make what they do possible are established and maintained by administrators. When I was a ...
More
But you can’t do it in a vacuum. And although academics would be reluctant to admit it, the conditions that make what they do possible are established and maintained by administrators. When I was a dean, the question I was most often asked by faculty members was, “Why do administrators make so much more money than we do?” The answer I gave was simple: administrators work harder, they have more work to do, and they actually do it. At the end of my tenure as dean, I spoke to some administrators who had been on the job for a short enough time to be able still to remember what it was like to be a faculty member and what thoughts they had then about the work they did now. One said that she had come to realize how narcissistic academics are: an academic, she mused, is focused entirely on the intellectual stock market and watches its rises and falls with an anxious and selfregarding eye. As an academic, you’re trying to get ahead; as an administrator, you’re trying “to make things happen for other people”; you’re “not advancing your own profile, but advancing the institution, and you’re more service oriented.” A second new administrator reported that he finds faculty members “unbelievably parochial, selfish, and selfindulgent.” They believe that their time is their own even when someone else is paying for it. They say things like “I don’t get paid for the summer.” They believe that they deserve everything and that if they are ever denied anything, it could only be because an evil administrator has committed a great injustice. Although they are employees of the university (and in public universities, of the state), they consider themselves independent contractors engaged fitfully in free-lance piecework. They have no idea of how comfortable a life they lead. Neither, said a third administrator recently up from the ranks, do they have any idea of how the university operates. They seem proud of their parochialism and boast of their inability to access the many systems that hold the enterprise together.
Less
But you can’t do it in a vacuum. And although academics would be reluctant to admit it, the conditions that make what they do possible are established and maintained by administrators. When I was a dean, the question I was most often asked by faculty members was, “Why do administrators make so much more money than we do?” The answer I gave was simple: administrators work harder, they have more work to do, and they actually do it. At the end of my tenure as dean, I spoke to some administrators who had been on the job for a short enough time to be able still to remember what it was like to be a faculty member and what thoughts they had then about the work they did now. One said that she had come to realize how narcissistic academics are: an academic, she mused, is focused entirely on the intellectual stock market and watches its rises and falls with an anxious and selfregarding eye. As an academic, you’re trying to get ahead; as an administrator, you’re trying “to make things happen for other people”; you’re “not advancing your own profile, but advancing the institution, and you’re more service oriented.” A second new administrator reported that he finds faculty members “unbelievably parochial, selfish, and selfindulgent.” They believe that their time is their own even when someone else is paying for it. They say things like “I don’t get paid for the summer.” They believe that they deserve everything and that if they are ever denied anything, it could only be because an evil administrator has committed a great injustice. Although they are employees of the university (and in public universities, of the state), they consider themselves independent contractors engaged fitfully in free-lance piecework. They have no idea of how comfortable a life they lead. Neither, said a third administrator recently up from the ranks, do they have any idea of how the university operates. They seem proud of their parochialism and boast of their inability to access the many systems that hold the enterprise together.
Rakow Donald
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- January 2020
- ISBN:
- 9781501715280
- eISBN:
- 9781501715303
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Cornell University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7591/cornell/9781501715280.003.0004
- Subject:
- Education, Higher and Further Education
The chapter traces the history of how physicians began prescribing time in nature. Steps in developing a campus-based Nature Rx program include: organizing a committed group with broad representation ...
More
The chapter traces the history of how physicians began prescribing time in nature. Steps in developing a campus-based Nature Rx program include: organizing a committed group with broad representation across campus, securing support among top administrators, inventorying available green spaces, engaging students, intentionally partnering with health and counseling services, developing easily usable apps and/or websites, cultivating relationships with relevant academic programs, developing an approach to effectively evaluating the program, identifying challenges, and finally modelling the desired behavior around time in nature.Less
The chapter traces the history of how physicians began prescribing time in nature. Steps in developing a campus-based Nature Rx program include: organizing a committed group with broad representation across campus, securing support among top administrators, inventorying available green spaces, engaging students, intentionally partnering with health and counseling services, developing easily usable apps and/or websites, cultivating relationships with relevant academic programs, developing an approach to effectively evaluating the program, identifying challenges, and finally modelling the desired behavior around time in nature.
C. T. McIntire
- Published in print:
- 2004
- Published Online:
- October 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780300098075
- eISBN:
- 9780300130089
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Yale University Press
- DOI:
- 10.12987/yale/9780300098075.003.0013
- Subject:
- Religion, Theology
This chapter describes how Butterfield's love for historical thought nourished his imagination after his vice-chancellorship. Thinking in general about history could go on in his head while he was ...
More
This chapter describes how Butterfield's love for historical thought nourished his imagination after his vice-chancellorship. Thinking in general about history could go on in his head while he was doing something else, even university administration. Subtly, without explicit resolve, he occupied himself more and more with the history of historiography. His thinking became comparative, and expanded to cover the whole globe. In spite of his exaltation of “technical history,” he had neither the time nor the interest to resume the minutely detailed and seemingly unending research that his method demanded. He had already demonstrated that general historical thinking could produce far-reaching effects, with the promise of long-lasting results. In the history of historiography, he found new purpose, new inspiration, and when he finally gave himself again to the subject, new excitement in his work.Less
This chapter describes how Butterfield's love for historical thought nourished his imagination after his vice-chancellorship. Thinking in general about history could go on in his head while he was doing something else, even university administration. Subtly, without explicit resolve, he occupied himself more and more with the history of historiography. His thinking became comparative, and expanded to cover the whole globe. In spite of his exaltation of “technical history,” he had neither the time nor the interest to resume the minutely detailed and seemingly unending research that his method demanded. He had already demonstrated that general historical thinking could produce far-reaching effects, with the promise of long-lasting results. In the history of historiography, he found new purpose, new inspiration, and when he finally gave himself again to the subject, new excitement in his work.