Search Results

This chapter gives some quantitative information about the rates of genetic and environmental deterioration. The first section in this chapter is about history, chance, and necessity, and includes subsections on Lamarckian evolution; the selection of undirected variation; descent; and delection. The second section is about drift and includes subsections concerning the rate of genetic deterioration; two scaled mutation rates; the rate of deleterious mutation; decay of isolate lines in the absence of selection; mutation rate in other replicators; mutation rate in stressful environments; the genomic mutation rate; the effect of mutations; beneficial mutations; the effect of gene deletion on growth; the rate of accumulation of genetic variance in fitness; the replication limit; the size spectrum; the distribution of species abundance; and finally genetic variation and species abundance. The final section is on the rate of environmental deterioration. Subsections in this section concern aggregation; the ecological population concept; dispersal; and the genetic population concept. Five theories of the environment are offered and environmental variation in space; environmental variation over time; and the biotic environment are also detailed.

This chapter follows the size-structure of the entire marine ecosystem. It shows how the Sheldon spectrum emerges from predator–prey interactions and the limitations that physics and physiology place on individual organisms. How predator–prey interactions and physiological limitations scale with body size are the central assumptions in size spectrum theory. To that end, this chapter first defines body size and size spectrum. Next, it shows how central aspects of individual physiology scale with size: metabolism, clearance rate, and prey size preference. On that basis, it is possible to derive a power-law representation of the size spectrum by considering a balance between the needs of an organism (its metabolism) and the encountered prey, which is determined by the spectrum, the clearance rate, and the size preference. Lastly, the chapter uses the solution of the size spectrum to derive the expected size scaling of predation mortality.

Ecological theory indicates that increasing the number of species, the number of interactions, and the strength of these interactions all tend to make communities less stable. Conversely, stability is enhanced by strong intraspecific density dependence, low connectivity, or weak trophic links. These theoretical predictions are borne out in many fish communities. Species diversity is an important metric for ecological communities. Organizing species into groups according to size, function, or diet composition can reduce the dimensionality of fish community models. Analyses of fish communities from around the world lend support to the prediction of strong compensation within functional groups, with weaker predator–prey links among groups. Size spectra describe the distribution of individuals across size classes irrespective of their species. Qualitative models can be used to assess the indirect effects of species on each other and the overall stability of the community.

One of the most fruitful aspects of ecological research is the search for common patterns in the bewildering variability of nature. Given current concerns about global warming, climate change, and habitat degradation, the determination and protection of biodiversity has become paramount. There are essentially three ways of describing an assemblage of organisms, and each of these gives more information on the patterns and interrelationships. First, we have the classical taxonomic method of identifying all species in the assemblage, to the highest taxonomic separation possible (usually to species) and then counting the abundance and weighing the biomass of each taxon. Secondly, we can determine the size and/or biomass spectra of all organisms in the assemblage irrespective of their identities, on the basis that organisms of different sizes or body weights play a different role in the ecosystem. Thirdly, we can determine the role that each organism can play in the system, again irrespective of its name, and define these as ecological groups or guilds—hence separating those feeding in different ways or those building tubes from their free-living associates (e.g. see Elliott et al. 2007 for a discussion of the guild concept). There are many methods of analysing assemblage data; for example Elliott (1994) identified over 25 groups of techniques for macrobenthic analysis (these are mentioned throughout this book and summarized in Chapter 11). Using these methods, when considering assemblages of marine organisms living in sediment, we can ask if there are any ‘rules’ that can be applied to patterns of abundance, size, and biomass distributions and how data on species distributions can be organized. Here, we first treat abundance, then size and biomass spectra, and finally how species assemblages can be assessed. Another way of describing assemblages is to examine the number of species and how abundance is distributed among species, although these are aspects of species diversity which will be addressed in the next chapter. In any sample of a biological community, whether marine, terrestrial, or freshwater, the immediately observable pattern is that most species are rare, represented by one or a few individuals, and only a few species are very common, represented by many individuals.