Florencia Luna
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780719096235
- eISBN:
- 9781781708392
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Manchester University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7228/manchester/9780719096235.003.0007
- Subject:
- Society and Culture, Ethical Issues and Debates
In this chapter I will analyze one characteristic of John Harris’s thinking: its controversial nature. Some of Harris’s formulations and arguments can be read as strong criticisms of the status quo. ...
More
In this chapter I will analyze one characteristic of John Harris’s thinking: its controversial nature. Some of Harris’s formulations and arguments can be read as strong criticisms of the status quo. Is this a fruitful position or is it useless and possibly “detrimental”? Even if the status quo can be viewed positively as condensing common knowledge, it can sometimes be the product of prejudice. Status quo frequently prolongs inherited authoritarian patterns and the “traditional values” that oppress certain members of society, for example, women or minorities, precisely those groups that lack the power to make decisions. Their voices are ignored and are imperceptible to already established and accepted structures. In this chapter I try to examine the role of criticism in the development of thinking and culture in general, as well as the function of intellectuals in society. I consider the role of philosophy and bioethics in these matters. And finally, I outline the implications of Harris’s work in relation to the criticism he proposes.Less
In this chapter I will analyze one characteristic of John Harris’s thinking: its controversial nature. Some of Harris’s formulations and arguments can be read as strong criticisms of the status quo. Is this a fruitful position or is it useless and possibly “detrimental”? Even if the status quo can be viewed positively as condensing common knowledge, it can sometimes be the product of prejudice. Status quo frequently prolongs inherited authoritarian patterns and the “traditional values” that oppress certain members of society, for example, women or minorities, precisely those groups that lack the power to make decisions. Their voices are ignored and are imperceptible to already established and accepted structures. In this chapter I try to examine the role of criticism in the development of thinking and culture in general, as well as the function of intellectuals in society. I consider the role of philosophy and bioethics in these matters. And finally, I outline the implications of Harris’s work in relation to the criticism he proposes.
