Maarten A. Hajer
- Published in print:
- 1997
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780198293330
- eISBN:
- 9780191599408
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/019829333X.003.0007
- Subject:
- Political Science, Environmental Politics
Discusses ecological modernization in the 1990s. Also makes the case that discourse indeed matters in the analysis of politics and policy. Gives a detailed account of the various discursive ...
More
Discusses ecological modernization in the 1990s. Also makes the case that discourse indeed matters in the analysis of politics and policy. Gives a detailed account of the various discursive mechanisms that were at work in the regulation of acid rain. Concludes with a search for a ‘reflexive’ form of ecological modernization in which the new discourse is combined with the introduction of a set of institutional practices that make it possible to combine it with a notion of discursive democracy.Less
Discusses ecological modernization in the 1990s. Also makes the case that discourse indeed matters in the analysis of politics and policy. Gives a detailed account of the various discursive mechanisms that were at work in the regulation of acid rain. Concludes with a search for a ‘reflexive’ form of ecological modernization in which the new discourse is combined with the introduction of a set of institutional practices that make it possible to combine it with a notion of discursive democracy.
Helga Nowotny and Giuseppe Testa
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- January 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780262014939
- eISBN:
- 9780262295802
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014939.003.0007
- Subject:
- Biology, Evolutionary Biology / Genetics
The conviction that we stand before an epochal breakthrough with revolutionary possibilities has accompanied every technological vision. Yet we must not lose sight of the power to persist and the ...
More
The conviction that we stand before an epochal breakthrough with revolutionary possibilities has accompanied every technological vision. Yet we must not lose sight of the power to persist and the so-called “shock of the old”, whereby continuity of societal arrangements manifests itself in the face of the apparently most radical technologies. In this last chapter, we trace the triangulation among science, individuals, and institutions in shaping the future. First, we look at the increasingly global transformation of science into a kind of superorganism whose decentralized parts operate in networks. Its ingenuity impacts the life experiences of individuals whose identity and (multiple) affiliations are being determined anew, genetically as much as socially. In this fluid situation the most creative individuals are ready to take their destiny into their own hands. Yet, they could hardly succeed without robust and flexible institutions. Their task, we argue, is increasingly to align biotechnological and social innovations and to stabilize them in order to enable democratic pluralism. Thus a legitimate and open space for experimenting with new biological forms of life is created which invites also experimenting with new forms of living together. Institutions should empathetically accompany individuals who are ready to experiment so that, in this triangulation between science, individuals and institutions, a space for the primacy of the political is created with the potential to redefine the common weal and the options for society and its individuals alike.Less
The conviction that we stand before an epochal breakthrough with revolutionary possibilities has accompanied every technological vision. Yet we must not lose sight of the power to persist and the so-called “shock of the old”, whereby continuity of societal arrangements manifests itself in the face of the apparently most radical technologies. In this last chapter, we trace the triangulation among science, individuals, and institutions in shaping the future. First, we look at the increasingly global transformation of science into a kind of superorganism whose decentralized parts operate in networks. Its ingenuity impacts the life experiences of individuals whose identity and (multiple) affiliations are being determined anew, genetically as much as socially. In this fluid situation the most creative individuals are ready to take their destiny into their own hands. Yet, they could hardly succeed without robust and flexible institutions. Their task, we argue, is increasingly to align biotechnological and social innovations and to stabilize them in order to enable democratic pluralism. Thus a legitimate and open space for experimenting with new biological forms of life is created which invites also experimenting with new forms of living together. Institutions should empathetically accompany individuals who are ready to experiment so that, in this triangulation between science, individuals and institutions, a space for the primacy of the political is created with the potential to redefine the common weal and the options for society and its individuals alike.
