Timothy J. Bradley
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- April 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780198569961
- eISBN:
- 9780191728273
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198569961.003.0003
- Subject:
- Biology, Animal Biology
The aqueous environments both inside and surrounding animal cells profoundly affect the structure and function of molecules and membranes. Solutes dissolved in water are surrounded by a shell of ...
More
The aqueous environments both inside and surrounding animal cells profoundly affect the structure and function of molecules and membranes. Solutes dissolved in water are surrounded by a shell of water molecules. The polarity of the water molecules in the shell is determined by the solute's ionic charge. The structure of proteins is profoundly affected by the activity of the water in which they reside, and by the types and quantities of ions present. The interactions of lipids with water are dominated by hydrophobic interactions. These interactions dictate the structure of membranes, and influence the locations and functions of proteins associated with membranes. The lipid bi-layer acts as a powerful barrier to trans-membrane movements. Proteins sited within the membrane can therefore play important roles as channels and transport moieties.Less
The aqueous environments both inside and surrounding animal cells profoundly affect the structure and function of molecules and membranes. Solutes dissolved in water are surrounded by a shell of water molecules. The polarity of the water molecules in the shell is determined by the solute's ionic charge. The structure of proteins is profoundly affected by the activity of the water in which they reside, and by the types and quantities of ions present. The interactions of lipids with water are dominated by hydrophobic interactions. These interactions dictate the structure of membranes, and influence the locations and functions of proteins associated with membranes. The lipid bi-layer acts as a powerful barrier to trans-membrane movements. Proteins sited within the membrane can therefore play important roles as channels and transport moieties.
Tal Pupko, Adi Doron-Faigenboim, David A. Liberles, and Gina M. Cannarozzi
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- September 2008
- ISBN:
- 9780199299188
- eISBN:
- 9780191714979
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299188.003.0004
- Subject:
- Biology, Evolutionary Biology / Genetics
Modeling of sequence evolution is fundamental to ancestral sequence reconstruction. Care must be taken in choosing a model, however, as the use of unrealistic models can lead to erroneous ...
More
Modeling of sequence evolution is fundamental to ancestral sequence reconstruction. Care must be taken in choosing a model, however, as the use of unrealistic models can lead to erroneous conclusions. The choice of model and the effects of assumptions inherent within are discussed in this chapter in terms of their effects on probabilistic ancestral sequence reconstruction. This chapter discusses standard probabilistic models, site rate variation to these models, and deviations from the standard (homogeneous, stationary, reversible) models. Model selection, selecting one model from many, given data, and the comparison of different models are included as well as covarion models, the use of outside information when modeling, and the treatment of gaps.Less
Modeling of sequence evolution is fundamental to ancestral sequence reconstruction. Care must be taken in choosing a model, however, as the use of unrealistic models can lead to erroneous conclusions. The choice of model and the effects of assumptions inherent within are discussed in this chapter in terms of their effects on probabilistic ancestral sequence reconstruction. This chapter discusses standard probabilistic models, site rate variation to these models, and deviations from the standard (homogeneous, stationary, reversible) models. Model selection, selecting one model from many, given data, and the comparison of different models are included as well as covarion models, the use of outside information when modeling, and the treatment of gaps.
Andreas Wagner
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- December 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199692590
- eISBN:
- 9780191774829
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692590.003.0066
- Subject:
- Biology, Evolutionary Biology / Genetics
A growing body of evidence points to the existence of genotype networks in both protein and RNA phenotypes, and to their importance for evolutionary innovation. This evidence comes from comparative ...
More
A growing body of evidence points to the existence of genotype networks in both protein and RNA phenotypes, and to their importance for evolutionary innovation. This evidence comes from comparative analysis of protein and RNA genotypes and phenotypes, from laboratory evolution experiments, and from computational analysis of RNA and model protein structures. This evidence shows that many genotypes can form the same phenotype, even for molecules of modest size. They form vast connected networks of genotypes that often nearly span genotype space. This means that two molecules with the same phenotype may share little or no sequence similarity. A series of mutational changes on a genotype network can preserve a phenotype while exploring an ever-changing spectrum of new phenotypes. Laboratory evolution experiments show that these properties facilitate the evolution of new functions by allowing exploration of new phenotypes, while leaving an existing phenotype unchanged.Less
A growing body of evidence points to the existence of genotype networks in both protein and RNA phenotypes, and to their importance for evolutionary innovation. This evidence comes from comparative analysis of protein and RNA genotypes and phenotypes, from laboratory evolution experiments, and from computational analysis of RNA and model protein structures. This evidence shows that many genotypes can form the same phenotype, even for molecules of modest size. They form vast connected networks of genotypes that often nearly span genotype space. This means that two molecules with the same phenotype may share little or no sequence similarity. A series of mutational changes on a genotype network can preserve a phenotype while exploring an ever-changing spectrum of new phenotypes. Laboratory evolution experiments show that these properties facilitate the evolution of new functions by allowing exploration of new phenotypes, while leaving an existing phenotype unchanged.
Ernesto Estrada
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- December 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199591756
- eISBN:
- 9780191774959
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591756.003.0014
- Subject:
- Physics, Theoretical, Computational, and Statistical Physics
This chapter analyses the three-dimensional structure of proteins represented as residue networks. It starts by introducing the structure of proteins and how protein residue networks can be ...
More
This chapter analyses the three-dimensional structure of proteins represented as residue networks. It starts by introducing the structure of proteins and how protein residue networks can be constructed. The chapter then reviews the topics of small-worldness and scale-freeness of residue networks, followed by an analysis of the centrality of amino acids in residue networks and the relationship between closeness centrality and the atomic vibrations produced by thermal fluctuations in proteins. The topological atomic displacements are used to identify regions of small and large packing in proteins; the use of closeness is presented as a tool for identifying enzyme binding sites. The global topological properties of residue networks are presented. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the universality in the topological structure classes of residue networks and the role of holes identification in detecting protein binding sites.Less
This chapter analyses the three-dimensional structure of proteins represented as residue networks. It starts by introducing the structure of proteins and how protein residue networks can be constructed. The chapter then reviews the topics of small-worldness and scale-freeness of residue networks, followed by an analysis of the centrality of amino acids in residue networks and the relationship between closeness centrality and the atomic vibrations produced by thermal fluctuations in proteins. The topological atomic displacements are used to identify regions of small and large packing in proteins; the use of closeness is presented as a tool for identifying enzyme binding sites. The global topological properties of residue networks are presented. The chapter concludes with an analysis of the universality in the topological structure classes of residue networks and the role of holes identification in detecting protein binding sites.
Hallam Stevens
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- May 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780226080178
- eISBN:
- 9780226080345
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226080345.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine
This chapter explores the role of databases in scientific knowledge-making using one prominent example: GenBank. Biological databases, organized with computers, cannot be thought of as just ...
More
This chapter explores the role of databases in scientific knowledge-making using one prominent example: GenBank. Biological databases, organized with computers, cannot be thought of as just collections. Instead, biological databases are orderings of biological materials. They provide ways of dividing up the biological world; they are tools that biologists use and interact with. Databases store information within carefully crafted digital structures. Computer databases construct orderings of scientific knowledge: they are powerful classification schemes that make some information accessible and some relationships obvious, while making other orderings and relationships less natural and familiar. Organizing and linking sequence elements in databases can be understood as a way of representing the connections between those elements in real organisms. The database becomes a digital idealization of living system, emphasizing particular relationships between particular objects.Less
This chapter explores the role of databases in scientific knowledge-making using one prominent example: GenBank. Biological databases, organized with computers, cannot be thought of as just collections. Instead, biological databases are orderings of biological materials. They provide ways of dividing up the biological world; they are tools that biologists use and interact with. Databases store information within carefully crafted digital structures. Computer databases construct orderings of scientific knowledge: they are powerful classification schemes that make some information accessible and some relationships obvious, while making other orderings and relationships less natural and familiar. Organizing and linking sequence elements in databases can be understood as a way of representing the connections between those elements in real organisms. The database becomes a digital idealization of living system, emphasizing particular relationships between particular objects.
Jay F. Storz
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- December 2018
- ISBN:
- 9780198810681
- eISBN:
- 9780191847929
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198810681.003.0001
- Subject:
- Biology, Evolutionary Biology / Genetics, Biochemistry / Molecular Biology
Chapter 1 reviews basic principles of protein structure—the nature of proteins as polymers of amino acids, the variety of amino acids, and the way in which the physicochemical properties of amino ...
More
Chapter 1 reviews basic principles of protein structure—the nature of proteins as polymers of amino acids, the variety of amino acids, and the way in which the physicochemical properties of amino acid side chains influence the folding of a polymer into a three-dimensional protein with specific functional properties. Whereas the main chain polypeptide is linked together by covalent bonds, the three-dimensional structure of native state proteins is mainly stabilized by a multitude of noncovalent, weakly polar interactions. After securing the base camp with this brief overview of protein structure, the subsequent chapters explore the functional properties of hemoglobin, the biophysical mechanisms underlying such properties, and the physiological role of hemoglobin in respiratory gas transport.Less
Chapter 1 reviews basic principles of protein structure—the nature of proteins as polymers of amino acids, the variety of amino acids, and the way in which the physicochemical properties of amino acid side chains influence the folding of a polymer into a three-dimensional protein with specific functional properties. Whereas the main chain polypeptide is linked together by covalent bonds, the three-dimensional structure of native state proteins is mainly stabilized by a multitude of noncovalent, weakly polar interactions. After securing the base camp with this brief overview of protein structure, the subsequent chapters explore the functional properties of hemoglobin, the biophysical mechanisms underlying such properties, and the physiological role of hemoglobin in respiratory gas transport.
R. Chen and D. Fink
- Published in print:
- 1997
- Published Online:
- November 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780195094688
- eISBN:
- 9780197560754
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780195094688.003.0025
- Subject:
- Chemistry, Organic Chemistry
Ribosomes are the sites of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation to protein, and thus are crucial to the normal functioning of all cells. These ...
More
Ribosomes are the sites of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation to protein, and thus are crucial to the normal functioning of all cells. These ribonucleoprotein particles are composed of a small (30S) subunit and a large (50S) subunit. The 30S subunit, in turn, is composed of a strand of RNA (16S rRNA) and 21 proteins ranging in molecular weight from 9 kD to 61 kD. Studies have demonstrated that ribosomal RNA is necessary for normal ribosome function and protein production (Dahlberg, 1989; Noller, 1991). In particular, 16S rRNA is essential for normal assembly and function of the 30S subunit, which is responsible for translation initiation (Hardestyand Kramer, 1985). Elucidating the structure of 16S rRNA could greatly aid our understanding of the molecular mechanisms for protein translation, and such basic structural information could ultimately have wide-ranging importance in fields such as pharmacology and drug design. Because of the difficulties associated with X-ray analysis of large complexes such as the ribosome (Eisenstein et al., 1991), high-resolution structural data for the 16S rRNA remain sparse. However, neutron diffraction studies have determined the relative positions of the 30S proteins (Capel et al., 1988), which, along with the reported 16S rRNA-protein interactions (Noller, 1991, Noller et al., unpublished; Brimacombe, 1991), enable low-resolution structural models—showing how the RNA associates with the protein components—to be built. Several studies have sought to take advantage of these structural data for the 308 subunit. Stern et al. have used interactive model building to produce a three-dimensional 16S rRNA structure (Stern et al., 1988). This method can produce viable models, but is hindered somewhat by subjectivity intrinsic to the process and by the nonexhaustive nature of its conformation search. Hubbard and Hearst have used distance geometry techniques to model the RNA structure, but did not incorporate neutron diffraction data on the protein positions (Hubbard and Hearst, 1991). Malhotra and Harvey have used an energy minimization technique to produce a set of possible conformations for 16S rRNA; their study, however, depends on electron microscopic studies on the molecule to provide initial information on surface topology (Malhotra, 1994).
Less
Ribosomes are the sites of messenger RNA (mRNA) translation to protein, and thus are crucial to the normal functioning of all cells. These ribonucleoprotein particles are composed of a small (30S) subunit and a large (50S) subunit. The 30S subunit, in turn, is composed of a strand of RNA (16S rRNA) and 21 proteins ranging in molecular weight from 9 kD to 61 kD. Studies have demonstrated that ribosomal RNA is necessary for normal ribosome function and protein production (Dahlberg, 1989; Noller, 1991). In particular, 16S rRNA is essential for normal assembly and function of the 30S subunit, which is responsible for translation initiation (Hardestyand Kramer, 1985). Elucidating the structure of 16S rRNA could greatly aid our understanding of the molecular mechanisms for protein translation, and such basic structural information could ultimately have wide-ranging importance in fields such as pharmacology and drug design. Because of the difficulties associated with X-ray analysis of large complexes such as the ribosome (Eisenstein et al., 1991), high-resolution structural data for the 16S rRNA remain sparse. However, neutron diffraction studies have determined the relative positions of the 30S proteins (Capel et al., 1988), which, along with the reported 16S rRNA-protein interactions (Noller, 1991, Noller et al., unpublished; Brimacombe, 1991), enable low-resolution structural models—showing how the RNA associates with the protein components—to be built. Several studies have sought to take advantage of these structural data for the 308 subunit. Stern et al. have used interactive model building to produce a three-dimensional 16S rRNA structure (Stern et al., 1988). This method can produce viable models, but is hindered somewhat by subjectivity intrinsic to the process and by the nonexhaustive nature of its conformation search. Hubbard and Hearst have used distance geometry techniques to model the RNA structure, but did not incorporate neutron diffraction data on the protein positions (Hubbard and Hearst, 1991). Malhotra and Harvey have used an energy minimization technique to produce a set of possible conformations for 16S rRNA; their study, however, depends on electron microscopic studies on the molecule to provide initial information on surface topology (Malhotra, 1994).