Brian Reese and Nicholas Asher
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- February 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199570959
- eISBN:
- 9780191721786
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0007
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Psycholinguistics / Neurolinguistics / Cognitive Linguistics
In chapter 7 ‘Biased questions, intonation, and discourse’, Brian Reese and Nicholas Asher explore how the intonation contributes to what is said through an examination of a particular sentence type, ...
More
In chapter 7 ‘Biased questions, intonation, and discourse’, Brian Reese and Nicholas Asher explore how the intonation contributes to what is said through an examination of a particular sentence type, focusing on interrogative constructions that give rise to biased questions. The authors examine three kinds of interrogative construction, tag questions, negative polar questions and what they call ‘emphatic focus questions’. After a critical review of past approaches, it is argued that prosody and information from the syntax/semantics interface combine in these constructions to produce complex speech acts consisting of both an assertion and a question. It is also argued that the study of such interrogative forms sheds light on the complex interaction between prosodic and lexical and compositional semantic information.Less
In chapter 7 ‘Biased questions, intonation, and discourse’, Brian Reese and Nicholas Asher explore how the intonation contributes to what is said through an examination of a particular sentence type, focusing on interrogative constructions that give rise to biased questions. The authors examine three kinds of interrogative construction, tag questions, negative polar questions and what they call ‘emphatic focus questions’. After a critical review of past approaches, it is argued that prosody and information from the syntax/semantics interface combine in these constructions to produce complex speech acts consisting of both an assertion and a question. It is also argued that the study of such interrogative forms sheds light on the complex interaction between prosodic and lexical and compositional semantic information.
Veneeta Dayal
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780199281268
- eISBN:
- 9780191757396
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281268.003.0008
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Semantics and Pragmatics, Theoretical Linguistics
This chapter discusses the connection between question formation and focus strategies. Two versions of focus semantics for questions are considered. One seeks to explain the variable quantificational ...
More
This chapter discusses the connection between question formation and focus strategies. Two versions of focus semantics for questions are considered. One seeks to explain the variable quantificational force of indeterminate pronouns in Japanese and German. The other seeks to explain intervention effects (the generalization that focus-sensitive expressions cannot occur above wh in-situ). Alternative explanations are also considered. Syntax is shown to mediate between the semantics of focus and prosody, as well as those aspects of prosody that have an impact on focus in questions. The relationship between information structure-based distinctions (topic–comment, focus–background, given–new) and focus semantics in terms of alternatives is articulated. Grammatical and pragmatic differences between polar questions and polar alternative questions are probed, as is the ambiguity of questions with disjunction. The role of prosody in separating out polar questions and alternative question readings of disjunctive questions and the proper analysis of alternative questions are discussed.Less
This chapter discusses the connection between question formation and focus strategies. Two versions of focus semantics for questions are considered. One seeks to explain the variable quantificational force of indeterminate pronouns in Japanese and German. The other seeks to explain intervention effects (the generalization that focus-sensitive expressions cannot occur above wh in-situ). Alternative explanations are also considered. Syntax is shown to mediate between the semantics of focus and prosody, as well as those aspects of prosody that have an impact on focus in questions. The relationship between information structure-based distinctions (topic–comment, focus–background, given–new) and focus semantics in terms of alternatives is articulated. Grammatical and pragmatic differences between polar questions and polar alternative questions are probed, as is the ambiguity of questions with disjunction. The role of prosody in separating out polar questions and alternative question readings of disjunctive questions and the proper analysis of alternative questions are discussed.
Veneeta Dayal
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780199281268
- eISBN:
- 9780191757396
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281268.003.0005
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Semantics and Pragmatics, Theoretical Linguistics
This chapter investigates issues specific to indirect questions. They are separated from morpho-syntactically similar free clauses and exclamatives, as well as from noun phrases with question-like ...
More
This chapter investigates issues specific to indirect questions. They are separated from morpho-syntactically similar free clauses and exclamatives, as well as from noun phrases with question-like interpretations, namely concealed questions. The theory of complement selection, c-selection and s-selection, is probed to determine whether the effects of s-selection at least can be derived from independently needed aspects of grammar. Embeddability of polar vs. constituent questions, and the possibility of inversion under rogative and responsive predicates are probed. Concealed questions require a mapping from noun phrases to question semantics. There are restrictions on the nature of the head noun and on the range of meanings that make this task challenging. Quantificational variability effects are also studied. Responsive predicates typically support this phenomenon but rogative predicates have been argued to do so under specific conditions. The various analyses proposed have different implications for the relationship between the embedded question and the embedding predicate.Less
This chapter investigates issues specific to indirect questions. They are separated from morpho-syntactically similar free clauses and exclamatives, as well as from noun phrases with question-like interpretations, namely concealed questions. The theory of complement selection, c-selection and s-selection, is probed to determine whether the effects of s-selection at least can be derived from independently needed aspects of grammar. Embeddability of polar vs. constituent questions, and the possibility of inversion under rogative and responsive predicates are probed. Concealed questions require a mapping from noun phrases to question semantics. There are restrictions on the nature of the head noun and on the range of meanings that make this task challenging. Quantificational variability effects are also studied. Responsive predicates typically support this phenomenon but rogative predicates have been argued to do so under specific conditions. The various analyses proposed have different implications for the relationship between the embedded question and the embedding predicate.
Veneeta Dayal
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780199281268
- eISBN:
- 9780191757396
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281268.003.0009
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Semantics and Pragmatics, Theoretical Linguistics
This final chapter deals with non-canonical questions, questions that elicit information but also have at least one of the following properties: (i) they convey a bias on the part of the speaker ...
More
This final chapter deals with non-canonical questions, questions that elicit information but also have at least one of the following properties: (i) they convey a bias on the part of the speaker about possible answers; (ii) their syntactic form does not conform to that of normal interrogatives; (iii) their purpose is something other than or in addition to eliciting information. Negative polar questions, declarative questions, echo questions, rhetorical questions, ability/inclination questions, and tag questions are among the constructions studied. The analyses of such questions build on analyses of canonical questions, in combination with appropriate tools for studying conversational dynamics. Although non-canonical questions are a diverse set, they behave alike in two ways. They tend to resist embedding and may be classified as root phenomena. They represent a conscious choice on the part of the speaker over a simpler alternative form available in the language.Less
This final chapter deals with non-canonical questions, questions that elicit information but also have at least one of the following properties: (i) they convey a bias on the part of the speaker about possible answers; (ii) their syntactic form does not conform to that of normal interrogatives; (iii) their purpose is something other than or in addition to eliciting information. Negative polar questions, declarative questions, echo questions, rhetorical questions, ability/inclination questions, and tag questions are among the constructions studied. The analyses of such questions build on analyses of canonical questions, in combination with appropriate tools for studying conversational dynamics. Although non-canonical questions are a diverse set, they behave alike in two ways. They tend to resist embedding and may be classified as root phenomena. They represent a conscious choice on the part of the speaker over a simpler alternative form available in the language.
Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- December 2018
- ISBN:
- 9780198814788
- eISBN:
- 9780191852473
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198814788.003.0005
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Semantics and Pragmatics
Chapter 5 discusses how the meaning of various types of questions in English can be captured in the basic inquisitive semantics framework presented in the previous chapters. Several kinds of ...
More
Chapter 5 discusses how the meaning of various types of questions in English can be captured in the basic inquisitive semantics framework presented in the previous chapters. Several kinds of questions, including polar questions, alternative questions, and wh-questions, are given a formal analysis. Question coordination and conditional questions are also considered.Less
Chapter 5 discusses how the meaning of various types of questions in English can be captured in the basic inquisitive semantics framework presented in the previous chapters. Several kinds of questions, including polar questions, alternative questions, and wh-questions, are given a formal analysis. Question coordination and conditional questions are also considered.
Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk, and Floris Roelofsen
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- December 2018
- ISBN:
- 9780198814788
- eISBN:
- 9780191852473
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198814788.003.0006
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Semantics and Pragmatics
This chapter examines how disjunction interacts with clause typing (declarative versus interrogative) and intonation (intonational phrase structure and final pitch contours) in determining the ...
More
This chapter examines how disjunction interacts with clause typing (declarative versus interrogative) and intonation (intonational phrase structure and final pitch contours) in determining the meaning of various kinds of disjunctive sentence types, including disjunctive statements, polar disjunctive questions, open disjunctive questions, and alternative questions. In inquisitive semantics, disjunction is treated uniformly across all these sentence types as expressing the join operator on propositions (or more generally, on all semantic objects of a conjoinable type). It is shown that this treatment, together with an analysis of the semantic contribution of clause type marking and final pitch contours, yields an account of all the relevant constructions.Less
This chapter examines how disjunction interacts with clause typing (declarative versus interrogative) and intonation (intonational phrase structure and final pitch contours) in determining the meaning of various kinds of disjunctive sentence types, including disjunctive statements, polar disjunctive questions, open disjunctive questions, and alternative questions. In inquisitive semantics, disjunction is treated uniformly across all these sentence types as expressing the join operator on propositions (or more generally, on all semantic objects of a conjoinable type). It is shown that this treatment, together with an analysis of the semantic contribution of clause type marking and final pitch contours, yields an account of all the relevant constructions.
Laura J. Downing and Al Mtenje
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- July 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780198724742
- eISBN:
- 9780191792281
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198724742.003.0011
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Phonetics / Phonology, Language Families
Intonation in African languages remains an especially understudied topic of investigation. Chichewa is, then, rather exceptional, as there exist both purely impressionistic studies of intonation for ...
More
Intonation in African languages remains an especially understudied topic of investigation. Chichewa is, then, rather exceptional, as there exist both purely impressionistic studies of intonation for the language, such as Kanerva (1990), as well as more phonetically informed studies, such as Carleton (1996), Myers (1996, 1999a, b), Downing (2011a, 2017), and Downing et al. (2004). Based on this work as well as our own investigations, the first three sections of the chapter provide an overview of intonation in three basic constructions: declarative sentences (both simple and complex), content questions and answers, and polar questions. Emphasis prosody (as opposed to focus prosody) is also discussed. Intonational phenomena covered include: downstep, final lowering, continuation rise, emphasis raising, suspension of downstep, and polar question intonation. The implications of Chichewa intonation for the typology of intonation in tone languages is discussed in the concluding section of the chapter.Less
Intonation in African languages remains an especially understudied topic of investigation. Chichewa is, then, rather exceptional, as there exist both purely impressionistic studies of intonation for the language, such as Kanerva (1990), as well as more phonetically informed studies, such as Carleton (1996), Myers (1996, 1999a, b), Downing (2011a, 2017), and Downing et al. (2004). Based on this work as well as our own investigations, the first three sections of the chapter provide an overview of intonation in three basic constructions: declarative sentences (both simple and complex), content questions and answers, and polar questions. Emphasis prosody (as opposed to focus prosody) is also discussed. Intonational phenomena covered include: downstep, final lowering, continuation rise, emphasis raising, suspension of downstep, and polar question intonation. The implications of Chichewa intonation for the typology of intonation in tone languages is discussed in the concluding section of the chapter.
Jörg Zinken
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780190210724
- eISBN:
- 9780190210748
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210724.003.0004
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Sociolinguistics / Anthropological Linguistics
This chapter examines the comparability of action across languages. There are grammatical forms that receive the same label in English and in Polish, such as imperative or polar question. But this ...
More
This chapter examines the comparability of action across languages. There are grammatical forms that receive the same label in English and in Polish, such as imperative or polar question. But this does not mean that these are identical forms, or that they enter into social action in the same way. A close examination of the particular actions that are accomplished by drawing, among other resources, on particular grammatical forms such as imperatives or interrogatives, provides a more stable basis for comparison than do decontextualized grammatical categories (such as imperative) or broadly conceived action types (such as REQUEST). This chapter discusses two REQUEST actions, imperative nudges and interrogative requests, and finds that they are a part of both English and Polish family life. These actions are adapted to the same home environments, they are built through similar practices of talking, and they project the same responsive orientations.Less
This chapter examines the comparability of action across languages. There are grammatical forms that receive the same label in English and in Polish, such as imperative or polar question. But this does not mean that these are identical forms, or that they enter into social action in the same way. A close examination of the particular actions that are accomplished by drawing, among other resources, on particular grammatical forms such as imperatives or interrogatives, provides a more stable basis for comparison than do decontextualized grammatical categories (such as imperative) or broadly conceived action types (such as REQUEST). This chapter discusses two REQUEST actions, imperative nudges and interrogative requests, and finds that they are a part of both English and Polish family life. These actions are adapted to the same home environments, they are built through similar practices of talking, and they project the same responsive orientations.
