Eric Raimy and Charles E. Cairns (eds)
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- August 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780262182706
- eISBN:
- 9780262255325
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262182706.001.0001
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Phonetics / Phonology
The essays in this volume address foundational questions in phonology that cut across different schools of thought within the discipline. The theme of modularity runs through them all, however, and ...
More
The essays in this volume address foundational questions in phonology that cut across different schools of thought within the discipline. The theme of modularity runs through them all, however, and these essays demonstrate the benefits of the modular approach to phonology, either investigating interactions among distinct modules or developing specific aspects of representation within a particular module. Although the contributors take divergent views on a range of issues, they agree on the importance of representations and questions of modularity in phonology. Their essays address the status of phonological features, syllable theory, metrical structure, the architecture of the phonological component, and interaction among components of phonology. In the early 1990s the rise of Optimality Theory—which suggested that pure computation would solve the problems of representations and modularity—eclipsed the centrality of these issues for phonology. This book offers a coherent view of phonology that is not based on Optimality Theory. The chapters demonstrate that computation and representation are inherently linked; they do not deny Optimality Theory, but attempt to move the field of phonology beyond it.Less
The essays in this volume address foundational questions in phonology that cut across different schools of thought within the discipline. The theme of modularity runs through them all, however, and these essays demonstrate the benefits of the modular approach to phonology, either investigating interactions among distinct modules or developing specific aspects of representation within a particular module. Although the contributors take divergent views on a range of issues, they agree on the importance of representations and questions of modularity in phonology. Their essays address the status of phonological features, syllable theory, metrical structure, the architecture of the phonological component, and interaction among components of phonology. In the early 1990s the rise of Optimality Theory—which suggested that pure computation would solve the problems of representations and modularity—eclipsed the centrality of these issues for phonology. This book offers a coherent view of phonology that is not based on Optimality Theory. The chapters demonstrate that computation and representation are inherently linked; they do not deny Optimality Theory, but attempt to move the field of phonology beyond it.
Yuji Takano
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- May 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780199945207
- eISBN:
- 9780199389025
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945207.003.0006
- Subject:
- Linguistics, Syntax and Morphology
This chapter investigates the nature of postposing in Japanese through a detailed comparison with its Turkish counterpart. Two types of postposing are proposed, one carried out by syntactic movement ...
More
This chapter investigates the nature of postposing in Japanese through a detailed comparison with its Turkish counterpart. Two types of postposing are proposed, one carried out by syntactic movement and another taking place in the phonological component. Turkish has the former type, whereas Japanese has both, although the availability of postposing by syntactic movement is limited in Japanese. The chapter argues that postposing in the phonological component is crucially regulated by prosodic factors, while interacting with what happens in the syntax, and that this dual nature accounts for the complex properties of Japanese postposing. It is also claimed that the difference between Japanese and Turkish with respect to postposing arises from a difference in the morphological properties of the functional head C.Less
This chapter investigates the nature of postposing in Japanese through a detailed comparison with its Turkish counterpart. Two types of postposing are proposed, one carried out by syntactic movement and another taking place in the phonological component. Turkish has the former type, whereas Japanese has both, although the availability of postposing by syntactic movement is limited in Japanese. The chapter argues that postposing in the phonological component is crucially regulated by prosodic factors, while interacting with what happens in the syntax, and that this dual nature accounts for the complex properties of Japanese postposing. It is also claimed that the difference between Japanese and Turkish with respect to postposing arises from a difference in the morphological properties of the functional head C.
