Shweta Kishore
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- May 2020
- ISBN:
- 9781474433068
- eISBN:
- 9781474453578
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Edinburgh University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474433068.003.0001
- Subject:
- Film, Television and Radio, Film
In India, ‘independent documentary film’ is a term that signifies a body of films that first appeared in 1975 during the Constitutional Emergency, a period when the repressive exercise of state ...
More
In India, ‘independent documentary film’ is a term that signifies a body of films that first appeared in 1975 during the Constitutional Emergency, a period when the repressive exercise of state authority threatened the democratic political foundations of the nation. The initial usage of the term ‘independent’ to denote a production category located outside of state structures is now a misnomer. In the post-economic reform landscape, independent filmmakers operate with greater flexibility and various interdependent and mutually cooperative forms of organisation between filmmakers, the state, international and domestic NGOs, private institutions and individuals are commonplace. My attempt here is to construct an ongoing critical dialogue between broader concepts of documentary studies and the situated perspectives that emerge from individual accounts and the analysis of films produced and circulated using diverse modes and architectures. Emphasising the historical significance of documentary as a space of oppositional representation, the accounts produce a grounded theory of independence structured in relation to institutions, industry practices, individual subjectivities and technology in post-reform India. Combining the study of independent film practice and textual analysis, the mixed methods study investigates how independent Indian documentary is a practice that not only produces political representation but opens up new material relations between culture, society and the individual.Less
In India, ‘independent documentary film’ is a term that signifies a body of films that first appeared in 1975 during the Constitutional Emergency, a period when the repressive exercise of state authority threatened the democratic political foundations of the nation. The initial usage of the term ‘independent’ to denote a production category located outside of state structures is now a misnomer. In the post-economic reform landscape, independent filmmakers operate with greater flexibility and various interdependent and mutually cooperative forms of organisation between filmmakers, the state, international and domestic NGOs, private institutions and individuals are commonplace. My attempt here is to construct an ongoing critical dialogue between broader concepts of documentary studies and the situated perspectives that emerge from individual accounts and the analysis of films produced and circulated using diverse modes and architectures. Emphasising the historical significance of documentary as a space of oppositional representation, the accounts produce a grounded theory of independence structured in relation to institutions, industry practices, individual subjectivities and technology in post-reform India. Combining the study of independent film practice and textual analysis, the mixed methods study investigates how independent Indian documentary is a practice that not only produces political representation but opens up new material relations between culture, society and the individual.
Kalpana Ram
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- November 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780824836306
- eISBN:
- 9780824871307
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Hawai'i Press
- DOI:
- 10.21313/hawaii/9780824836306.003.0003
- Subject:
- Anthropology, Asian Cultural Anthropology
This chapter examines spirit possession as a minor practice in Tamil Nadu as well as the specific Tamil regional traditions of rationalism. In particular, it considers how modern discourses have ...
More
This chapter examines spirit possession as a minor practice in Tamil Nadu as well as the specific Tamil regional traditions of rationalism. In particular, it considers how modern discourses have distinguished and parceled out the range of minor practices that pertain to possession, thus reducing it to an isolated phenomenon that lacks any language of its own. The chapter begins with a discussion of Indian cultural Marxism and its account of folk religion, focusing on the views of Günther-Dietz Sontheimer and Frederick M. Smith. It then explores the implications of modernity for folk and tribal religions in Tamil Nadu, and especially how specific regional histories have shaped modern attitudes toward folk religion. It also shows how spirit possession is made to figure in a generalized war against irrationality.Less
This chapter examines spirit possession as a minor practice in Tamil Nadu as well as the specific Tamil regional traditions of rationalism. In particular, it considers how modern discourses have distinguished and parceled out the range of minor practices that pertain to possession, thus reducing it to an isolated phenomenon that lacks any language of its own. The chapter begins with a discussion of Indian cultural Marxism and its account of folk religion, focusing on the views of Günther-Dietz Sontheimer and Frederick M. Smith. It then explores the implications of modernity for folk and tribal religions in Tamil Nadu, and especially how specific regional histories have shaped modern attitudes toward folk religion. It also shows how spirit possession is made to figure in a generalized war against irrationality.