Bernt P. Stigum
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780262028585
- eISBN:
- 9780262323109
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028585.003.0003
- Subject:
- Economics and Finance, Econometrics
Chapter III explains and illustrates what it means for an economic theory to be empirically relevant. A theory’s empirical relevance depends on the empirical context in which it is tested and on the ...
More
Chapter III explains and illustrates what it means for an economic theory to be empirically relevant. A theory’s empirical relevance depends on the empirical context in which it is tested and on the explication of empirical relevance. In present-day econometrics the empirical context of a test is determined by the characteristics of the data generating process. Also, the theory is empirically relevant if and only if the test gives the researcher no reason to reject the theory. In formal econometrics the empirical context of a test is determined by a probability distribution of the data - the MPD - that is induced by the probability distribution of the theory variables and the bridge principles. Also, the theory is empirically relevant if and only if there is a model of its axioms and a model of the bridge principles that determine a model of the MPD that belongs to a 95% confidence band around a meaningful statistical estimate of the MPD. Examples from experimental economics, consumer choice, simultaneous equations, and choice among safe and risky assets illustrate the contrasting characteristics of the notion of empirical relevance in present-day and formal econometrics.Less
Chapter III explains and illustrates what it means for an economic theory to be empirically relevant. A theory’s empirical relevance depends on the empirical context in which it is tested and on the explication of empirical relevance. In present-day econometrics the empirical context of a test is determined by the characteristics of the data generating process. Also, the theory is empirically relevant if and only if the test gives the researcher no reason to reject the theory. In formal econometrics the empirical context of a test is determined by a probability distribution of the data - the MPD - that is induced by the probability distribution of the theory variables and the bridge principles. Also, the theory is empirically relevant if and only if there is a model of its axioms and a model of the bridge principles that determine a model of the MPD that belongs to a 95% confidence band around a meaningful statistical estimate of the MPD. Examples from experimental economics, consumer choice, simultaneous equations, and choice among safe and risky assets illustrate the contrasting characteristics of the notion of empirical relevance in present-day and formal econometrics.
Bernt P. Stigum
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780262028585
- eISBN:
- 9780262323109
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028585.003.0001
- Subject:
- Economics and Finance, Econometrics
Chapter I begins by describing the salient parts of a formal science of economics that the author has put together in this book and in earlier works (B.P. Stigum 1990 and 2003). The parts comprise a ...
More
Chapter I begins by describing the salient parts of a formal science of economics that the author has put together in this book and in earlier works (B.P. Stigum 1990 and 2003). The parts comprise a unitary methodological basis for a science, an explication of the meaning of facts and fiction in econometrics, and a confrontation of the methods of present-day applied econometrics with the methods that a formal science advocates. Next the chapter discusses interesting ways in which the axiomatic method and the model-theoretic method of developing theories are used in mathematical economics and statistics, and describes the underlying ideas of a formal theory-data confrontation. Thereafter follows a discussion of three controversial aspects of formal econometrics: (1) the essence of an economic theory; (2) the double role of theory in applied econometrics and the need for bridge principles; and (3) why theory is required both for the design of an empirical analysis and for the interpretation of its results. The chapter ends with a brief description of the contents of the remaining nine chapters.Less
Chapter I begins by describing the salient parts of a formal science of economics that the author has put together in this book and in earlier works (B.P. Stigum 1990 and 2003). The parts comprise a unitary methodological basis for a science, an explication of the meaning of facts and fiction in econometrics, and a confrontation of the methods of present-day applied econometrics with the methods that a formal science advocates. Next the chapter discusses interesting ways in which the axiomatic method and the model-theoretic method of developing theories are used in mathematical economics and statistics, and describes the underlying ideas of a formal theory-data confrontation. Thereafter follows a discussion of three controversial aspects of formal econometrics: (1) the essence of an economic theory; (2) the double role of theory in applied econometrics and the need for bridge principles; and (3) why theory is required both for the design of an empirical analysis and for the interpretation of its results. The chapter ends with a brief description of the contents of the remaining nine chapters.
Bernt P. Stigum
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780262028585
- eISBN:
- 9780262323109
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028585.001.0001
- Subject:
- Economics and Finance, Econometrics
Econometrics is a study of good and bad ways to measure economic relations. This book discusses the role economic theory ought to play in such measurements. The role theory should play, depends on ...
More
Econometrics is a study of good and bad ways to measure economic relations. This book discusses the role economic theory ought to play in such measurements. The role theory should play, depends on the researcher’s ideas about the essence of an economic theory. A researcher who believes that his theory is about the actual workings of an economy, can identify his theory’s variables with objects in social reality and solve his measurement problems with the means that present-day econometrics provides. A researcher who believes that his theory is about imaginary matters that have uncertain relations to objects in social reality, faces measurement problems that he can solve with the means that formal econometrics provides. The book presents case studies thatcontrast the empirical analysis of present-day applied econometrics in the tradition of Trygve Haavelmo with the empirical analysis of formal econometrics in the tradition of Ragnar Frisch. The case studies are a varied lot in which the theory is static or dynamic and faces cross-section data or time-series data. In focus are the behaviour of data variables and the inferences about social reality which the empirical analyses yield. The case studies demonstrate that both the statistical analyses and the inferences of present-day and formal econometrics differ in striking ways. In doing that they provide a good basis for discussing the use of theory in measuring economic relations. The book is the last of three books in which the author develops and demonstrates the usefulness of a formal science of economics.Less
Econometrics is a study of good and bad ways to measure economic relations. This book discusses the role economic theory ought to play in such measurements. The role theory should play, depends on the researcher’s ideas about the essence of an economic theory. A researcher who believes that his theory is about the actual workings of an economy, can identify his theory’s variables with objects in social reality and solve his measurement problems with the means that present-day econometrics provides. A researcher who believes that his theory is about imaginary matters that have uncertain relations to objects in social reality, faces measurement problems that he can solve with the means that formal econometrics provides. The book presents case studies thatcontrast the empirical analysis of present-day applied econometrics in the tradition of Trygve Haavelmo with the empirical analysis of formal econometrics in the tradition of Ragnar Frisch. The case studies are a varied lot in which the theory is static or dynamic and faces cross-section data or time-series data. In focus are the behaviour of data variables and the inferences about social reality which the empirical analyses yield. The case studies demonstrate that both the statistical analyses and the inferences of present-day and formal econometrics differ in striking ways. In doing that they provide a good basis for discussing the use of theory in measuring economic relations. The book is the last of three books in which the author develops and demonstrates the usefulness of a formal science of economics.
Bernt P. Stigum
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780262028585
- eISBN:
- 9780262323109
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028585.003.0004
- Subject:
- Economics and Finance, Econometrics
Chapter IV discusseseconometric analyses of qualitative response models. A qualitative response model is an econometric modelin which the dependent variable is either discrete or half continuous and ...
More
Chapter IV discusseseconometric analyses of qualitative response models. A qualitative response model is an econometric modelin which the dependent variable is either discrete or half continuous and half discrete. Each proto-type of such models appears in two forms – a standard model and a latent-variable model. Both forms suffer from a serious defect: they fail to provide 1a researcher with the means he needs to ascertain the empirical relevance of his parameter estimates. That is a serious defect since the relations between dependent and explanatory variables that an empirically irrelevant estimate of a qualitative response model describes are meaningless. In a case study of 1980 US females’ participation in the labor force the chapter uses a Probit version of the two models to contrast present-day econometric analysis of the standard model with a formal econometric analysis of the latent-variable model. The empirical analysis reveals that the Probit versions of the two qualitative response models are not empirically relevant in the given empirical context. The empirical analysis also reveals that a present-day analysis of the standard model may deem it empirically relevant while a formal econometric analysis of the latent-variable model deems the latter empirically irrelevant and vice versa.Less
Chapter IV discusseseconometric analyses of qualitative response models. A qualitative response model is an econometric modelin which the dependent variable is either discrete or half continuous and half discrete. Each proto-type of such models appears in two forms – a standard model and a latent-variable model. Both forms suffer from a serious defect: they fail to provide 1a researcher with the means he needs to ascertain the empirical relevance of his parameter estimates. That is a serious defect since the relations between dependent and explanatory variables that an empirically irrelevant estimate of a qualitative response model describes are meaningless. In a case study of 1980 US females’ participation in the labor force the chapter uses a Probit version of the two models to contrast present-day econometric analysis of the standard model with a formal econometric analysis of the latent-variable model. The empirical analysis reveals that the Probit versions of the two qualitative response models are not empirically relevant in the given empirical context. The empirical analysis also reveals that a present-day analysis of the standard model may deem it empirically relevant while a formal econometric analysis of the latent-variable model deems the latter empirically irrelevant and vice versa.
