Brian Bornstein and Monica Miller
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195328677
- eISBN:
- 9780199869954
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195328677.001.0001
- Subject:
- Psychology, Forensic Psychology
The phrase “God in the courtroom” conjures up several images, such as William Jennings Bryan defending religion against the tyranny of evolution, a robed deity passing divine judgment, a witness ...
More
The phrase “God in the courtroom” conjures up several images, such as William Jennings Bryan defending religion against the tyranny of evolution, a robed deity passing divine judgment, a witness swearing to tell “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God,” and so on. But there are numerous other, often subtle ways in which religion and law intersect. This book reviews legal developments and behavioral science research concerning the effects of religion on legal practice, decision making processes of various legal actors, and trial outcomes. For example, religious beliefs might influence the decisions of legal decision makers, such as judges and jurors. Attorneys might rely on religion, both in the way they approach their professional practice generally and in specific trial tactics (e.g., using a scriptural rationale in arguing for a particular trial outcome). This book covers these and related topics in exploring how religion affects the actions of all of the major participants at trial: jurors, judges, attorneys, and litigants.Less
The phrase “God in the courtroom” conjures up several images, such as William Jennings Bryan defending religion against the tyranny of evolution, a robed deity passing divine judgment, a witness swearing to tell “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God,” and so on. But there are numerous other, often subtle ways in which religion and law intersect. This book reviews legal developments and behavioral science research concerning the effects of religion on legal practice, decision making processes of various legal actors, and trial outcomes. For example, religious beliefs might influence the decisions of legal decision makers, such as judges and jurors. Attorneys might rely on religion, both in the way they approach their professional practice generally and in specific trial tactics (e.g., using a scriptural rationale in arguing for a particular trial outcome). This book covers these and related topics in exploring how religion affects the actions of all of the major participants at trial: jurors, judges, attorneys, and litigants.
Karen J. Alter
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- October 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780691154749
- eISBN:
- 9781400848683
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Princeton University Press
- DOI:
- 10.23943/princeton/9780691154749.003.0007
- Subject:
- Political Science, International Relations and Politics
This chapter presents four case studies covering all of the substantive domains in which international courts operate. The case studies show World Trade Organization (WTO) litigation pressuring the ...
More
This chapter presents four case studies covering all of the substantive domains in which international courts operate. The case studies show World Trade Organization (WTO) litigation pressuring the US Congress to change a tax policy that promoted US exports; the Andean Tribunal facilitating a retreat on the issuing of “second use patents”; and the Community Court of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) leading Niger to compensate Hadijatou Mani for enslavement in the customary family law system, as well as the indictment and arrest of Charles Taylor for crimes committed in a neighboring country. In all of these case studies, the ability of ICs to offer a remedy mobilized litigants, and ICs' rulings constructed focal remedies that compliance supporters could demand.Less
This chapter presents four case studies covering all of the substantive domains in which international courts operate. The case studies show World Trade Organization (WTO) litigation pressuring the US Congress to change a tax policy that promoted US exports; the Andean Tribunal facilitating a retreat on the issuing of “second use patents”; and the Community Court of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) leading Niger to compensate Hadijatou Mani for enslavement in the customary family law system, as well as the indictment and arrest of Charles Taylor for crimes committed in a neighboring country. In all of these case studies, the ability of ICs to offer a remedy mobilized litigants, and ICs' rulings constructed focal remedies that compliance supporters could demand.
Monica K. Miller and Brian H. Bornstein (eds)
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- January 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199829996
- eISBN:
- 9780199301492
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829996.001.0001
- Subject:
- Psychology, Forensic Psychology
Stress and trauma have potential to affect the behavior and performance of victims, litigants, witnesses, judges, jurors, police, and attorneys; this in turn can impact the functioning of the legal ...
More
Stress and trauma have potential to affect the behavior and performance of victims, litigants, witnesses, judges, jurors, police, and attorneys; this in turn can impact the functioning of the legal system as a whole. Stress and trauma can also affect the individual on a more personal level, affecting their relationships, job satisfaction and overall health. On the other hand, contact with the legal system has potential to promote wellbeing for many individuals, such as victims who feel that justice was served and jurors and judges who feel they have helped preserve the integrity of the legal system. This book consolidates the theory and research concerning the impact that being involved with the legal system has on a variety of groups. It also discusses the lengths the legal system has gone to in order to protect these individuals, such as counseling for jurors after stressful trials, and allowing children to testify by closed circuit TV. Finally, after reviewing the literature and summarizing the existing research, each chapter points out where research is lacking. In all, the book provides an overview of how being involved in the legal system can affect various groups of people ranging from witnesses to attorneys to victims.Less
Stress and trauma have potential to affect the behavior and performance of victims, litigants, witnesses, judges, jurors, police, and attorneys; this in turn can impact the functioning of the legal system as a whole. Stress and trauma can also affect the individual on a more personal level, affecting their relationships, job satisfaction and overall health. On the other hand, contact with the legal system has potential to promote wellbeing for many individuals, such as victims who feel that justice was served and jurors and judges who feel they have helped preserve the integrity of the legal system. This book consolidates the theory and research concerning the impact that being involved with the legal system has on a variety of groups. It also discusses the lengths the legal system has gone to in order to protect these individuals, such as counseling for jurors after stressful trials, and allowing children to testify by closed circuit TV. Finally, after reviewing the literature and summarizing the existing research, each chapter points out where research is lacking. In all, the book provides an overview of how being involved in the legal system can affect various groups of people ranging from witnesses to attorneys to victims.
Richard Aikens
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199566181
- eISBN:
- 9780191705458
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566181.003.0036
- Subject:
- Law, Legal History
This chapter discusses the historical development of the Commercial Court procedures, how they have adjusted to the needs of the commercial actors, and how they must keep to attempt to meet the needs ...
More
This chapter discusses the historical development of the Commercial Court procedures, how they have adjusted to the needs of the commercial actors, and how they must keep to attempt to meet the needs of commercial litigants.Less
This chapter discusses the historical development of the Commercial Court procedures, how they have adjusted to the needs of the commercial actors, and how they must keep to attempt to meet the needs of commercial litigants.
William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- May 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780195342079
- eISBN:
- 9780199332397
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195342079.003.0016
- Subject:
- Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This introductory chapter sets out the book's focus, namely the deterioration of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. These courts decide over fifty thousand cases per year, out of which the Supreme Court ...
More
This introductory chapter sets out the book's focus, namely the deterioration of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. These courts decide over fifty thousand cases per year, out of which the Supreme Court usually chooses to review fewer than one hundred. Thus, from the litigant's point of view, the decisions of the Courts of Appeals are, for all practical purposes, final—the last stop in the judicial system. While any significant change in so important an institution would be noteworthy, the change that this book treats is remarkable for additional reasons. First, it happened so quickly—over a span of only thirty years, one legal generation. Second, the shift occurred entirely at the impetus of the courts themselves, with no executive and very little legislative input. In other words, the radical shift is entirely of the judges' making. The third reason flows from the second; when stripped of all rhetoric, the reason for the change in the circuit courts is that the judges prefer the new arrangement. The fourth reason is that the change in the courts of appeals represents a major reallocation of government benefits, draining them from the routine middle-class litigants and lavishing them on the wealthiest and most powerful litigants. Finally, the revolution has attracted little attention from the legal profession and even less from the public and, amazingly, even less from the judges themselves. An overview of the subsequent chapters is also presented.Less
This introductory chapter sets out the book's focus, namely the deterioration of the U.S. Courts of Appeals. These courts decide over fifty thousand cases per year, out of which the Supreme Court usually chooses to review fewer than one hundred. Thus, from the litigant's point of view, the decisions of the Courts of Appeals are, for all practical purposes, final—the last stop in the judicial system. While any significant change in so important an institution would be noteworthy, the change that this book treats is remarkable for additional reasons. First, it happened so quickly—over a span of only thirty years, one legal generation. Second, the shift occurred entirely at the impetus of the courts themselves, with no executive and very little legislative input. In other words, the radical shift is entirely of the judges' making. The third reason flows from the second; when stripped of all rhetoric, the reason for the change in the circuit courts is that the judges prefer the new arrangement. The fourth reason is that the change in the courts of appeals represents a major reallocation of government benefits, draining them from the routine middle-class litigants and lavishing them on the wealthiest and most powerful litigants. Finally, the revolution has attracted little attention from the legal profession and even less from the public and, amazingly, even less from the judges themselves. An overview of the subsequent chapters is also presented.
Karen B. Graubart
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- May 2019
- ISBN:
- 9781479850129
- eISBN:
- 9781479838394
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- NYU Press
- DOI:
- 10.18574/nyu/9781479850129.003.0005
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law
Graubart’s essay explores the ways indigenous litigants in and near Lima sought to preserve notions of justice amid the novelty of Spanish law and the pressures of Spanish colonization. She argues ...
More
Graubart’s essay explores the ways indigenous litigants in and near Lima sought to preserve notions of justice amid the novelty of Spanish law and the pressures of Spanish colonization. She argues that customary practices, rooted in precontact legality, became interdependent with Spanish law, leading Indian leaders to become skilled at managing a zone of legal “entanglement” that was anything but fixed and certain. Graubart uses wills, as well as Native regulation of agricultural leases, urban residences, and wage labor, to discuss labor, property, and resource management to reveal how Spanish law became intelligible to Andean litigants, who operated through mixed legal languages that allowed them to maintain ideas of justice under colonial rule.Less
Graubart’s essay explores the ways indigenous litigants in and near Lima sought to preserve notions of justice amid the novelty of Spanish law and the pressures of Spanish colonization. She argues that customary practices, rooted in precontact legality, became interdependent with Spanish law, leading Indian leaders to become skilled at managing a zone of legal “entanglement” that was anything but fixed and certain. Graubart uses wills, as well as Native regulation of agricultural leases, urban residences, and wage labor, to discuss labor, property, and resource management to reveal how Spanish law became intelligible to Andean litigants, who operated through mixed legal languages that allowed them to maintain ideas of justice under colonial rule.
Sandra Fredman
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199272761
- eISBN:
- 9780191709814
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272761.003.0006
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
Even if courts can play a legitimate democratic role through positive human rights adjudication, they remain limited by their institutional structure, and particularly, the adversarial, passive, and ...
More
Even if courts can play a legitimate democratic role through positive human rights adjudication, they remain limited by their institutional structure, and particularly, the adversarial, passive, and retrospective nature of the litigation process. However, there is no reason why the process cannot be adapted. The most sophisticated set of adaptations has been undertaken by the Indian Supreme Court. By recognizing the inherent inequalities in the adversarial court system, the Court has adapted its processes so that the voices of the poor and disadvantaged can be heard. This entails a series of radical adaptations: widening standing to anyone litigating in the public interest; instituting court-initiated fact finding; issuing mandatory orders which give the Court ongoing supervisory powers, and monitoring the implementation of those orders. The chapter critically assesses the Court's role with a view to establishing a model for adapting the competences of courts to address socio-economic rights.Less
Even if courts can play a legitimate democratic role through positive human rights adjudication, they remain limited by their institutional structure, and particularly, the adversarial, passive, and retrospective nature of the litigation process. However, there is no reason why the process cannot be adapted. The most sophisticated set of adaptations has been undertaken by the Indian Supreme Court. By recognizing the inherent inequalities in the adversarial court system, the Court has adapted its processes so that the voices of the poor and disadvantaged can be heard. This entails a series of radical adaptations: widening standing to anyone litigating in the public interest; instituting court-initiated fact finding; issuing mandatory orders which give the Court ongoing supervisory powers, and monitoring the implementation of those orders. The chapter critically assesses the Court's role with a view to establishing a model for adapting the competences of courts to address socio-economic rights.
Daniel A. Crane
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- May 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780195372656
- eISBN:
- 9780199893287
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195372656.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, Competition Law
This chapter considers ways to enhance the enforcement powers of the two agencies: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division, without changing the institutional status quo. It ...
More
This chapter considers ways to enhance the enforcement powers of the two agencies: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division, without changing the institutional status quo. It turns out that the FTC has more to say than the Antitrust Division. There is more latitude for experimentation here. Primarily this concerns the improvements on the norm-creation capabilities and powers in relation to the roles of institutional players such as generalist judges, private litigants, and the juries. The FTC is analyzed as a distinct antitrust institution but the judicial deference raises issues not distinctive to the FTC, rather they are a part of the broader fabric of administrative law.Less
This chapter considers ways to enhance the enforcement powers of the two agencies: the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division, without changing the institutional status quo. It turns out that the FTC has more to say than the Antitrust Division. There is more latitude for experimentation here. Primarily this concerns the improvements on the norm-creation capabilities and powers in relation to the roles of institutional players such as generalist judges, private litigants, and the juries. The FTC is analyzed as a distinct antitrust institution but the judicial deference raises issues not distinctive to the FTC, rather they are a part of the broader fabric of administrative law.
Stephen Carroll and Joseph W. Doherty
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- September 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199914333
- eISBN:
- 9780199980185
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199914333.003.0004
- Subject:
- Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This chapter examines how and why litigant attitudes toward the civil justice system might be changed by participation in a court case. Specifically, it tests how expectations and outcomes relate to ...
More
This chapter examines how and why litigant attitudes toward the civil justice system might be changed by participation in a court case. Specifically, it tests how expectations and outcomes relate to perceptions of procedural fairness among litigants in Federal District Court. It uses the litigant and attorney surveys from the Civil Justice Reform Act Evaluation to calculate the differences between the actual monetary awards and the expected best and worst monetary awards in each case. The difference between expectations and outcomes is then compared to another survey question about the perceived fairness of the court procedures. It is hypothesized that these differences are significantly correlated with a drop in perceived fairness in the system, and that this perception is correlated with confidence in the courts.Less
This chapter examines how and why litigant attitudes toward the civil justice system might be changed by participation in a court case. Specifically, it tests how expectations and outcomes relate to perceptions of procedural fairness among litigants in Federal District Court. It uses the litigant and attorney surveys from the Civil Justice Reform Act Evaluation to calculate the differences between the actual monetary awards and the expected best and worst monetary awards in each case. The difference between expectations and outcomes is then compared to another survey question about the perceived fairness of the court procedures. It is hypothesized that these differences are significantly correlated with a drop in perceived fairness in the system, and that this perception is correlated with confidence in the courts.
William M. Richman and William L. Reynolds
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- May 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780195342079
- eISBN:
- 9780199332397
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195342079.003.0009
- Subject:
- Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This chapter considers the cumulative cost of implementing the entire Appellate Triage regime. It argues that the courts have transformed themselves in the teeth of their enabling statute from courts ...
More
This chapter considers the cumulative cost of implementing the entire Appellate Triage regime. It argues that the courts have transformed themselves in the teeth of their enabling statute from courts of mandatory jurisdiction to certiorari courts. That is a change of major proportion. Despite the statutory guarantee, average litigants are denied a meaningful mandatory appeal heard by the judges, and instead must petition the staff to have their cases included in the select few that receive the traditional appellate treatment and the attention of the judges. The chapter also notes that the impact of the expediting devices is not class neutral; it falls disproportionately on the poor and middle class, whose appeals are deemed less momentous than the “big” cases brought by or against the government or major private economic actors.Less
This chapter considers the cumulative cost of implementing the entire Appellate Triage regime. It argues that the courts have transformed themselves in the teeth of their enabling statute from courts of mandatory jurisdiction to certiorari courts. That is a change of major proportion. Despite the statutory guarantee, average litigants are denied a meaningful mandatory appeal heard by the judges, and instead must petition the staff to have their cases included in the select few that receive the traditional appellate treatment and the attention of the judges. The chapter also notes that the impact of the expediting devices is not class neutral; it falls disproportionately on the poor and middle class, whose appeals are deemed less momentous than the “big” cases brought by or against the government or major private economic actors.
Melissa Milewski
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- November 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190249182
- eISBN:
- 9780190249212
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780190249182.001.0001
- Subject:
- History, American History: 19th Century, American History: 20th Century
From 1865 to 1950, when the financial futures of their families were on the line, black litigants throughout the South took on white southerners in civil suits. In almost a thousand civil cases ...
More
From 1865 to 1950, when the financial futures of their families were on the line, black litigants throughout the South took on white southerners in civil suits. In almost a thousand civil cases across eight southern states, former slaves took their former masters to court, black sharecroppers litigated disputes against white landowners, and African Americans with little formal education brought disputes against wealthy white members of their communities. As black southerners negotiated a legal system with almost all white gatekeepers, they displayed pragmatism and a savvy understanding of how to get whites on their side. They found that certain kinds of cases were much easier to gain whites’ support for than others. In the kinds of civil cases they could litigate in the highest courts of eight states, though, they were surprisingly successful. In a tremendously constrained environment where they were often shut out of other government institutions, seen as racially inferior, and often segregated, African Americans found a way to fight for their rights in one of the only ways they could. This book examines how black southerners adapted and at times made a biased system work for them. At the same time, it considers the limitations of working within a white-dominated system at a time of great racial discrimination and the choices black litigants made to have their cases heard.Less
From 1865 to 1950, when the financial futures of their families were on the line, black litigants throughout the South took on white southerners in civil suits. In almost a thousand civil cases across eight southern states, former slaves took their former masters to court, black sharecroppers litigated disputes against white landowners, and African Americans with little formal education brought disputes against wealthy white members of their communities. As black southerners negotiated a legal system with almost all white gatekeepers, they displayed pragmatism and a savvy understanding of how to get whites on their side. They found that certain kinds of cases were much easier to gain whites’ support for than others. In the kinds of civil cases they could litigate in the highest courts of eight states, though, they were surprisingly successful. In a tremendously constrained environment where they were often shut out of other government institutions, seen as racially inferior, and often segregated, African Americans found a way to fight for their rights in one of the only ways they could. This book examines how black southerners adapted and at times made a biased system work for them. At the same time, it considers the limitations of working within a white-dominated system at a time of great racial discrimination and the choices black litigants made to have their cases heard.
Monica K. Miller and Brian H. Bornstein
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- January 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199829996
- eISBN:
- 9780199301492
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829996.003.0001
- Subject:
- Psychology, Forensic Psychology
All individuals face stress in daily life; this may be particularly true for those who enforce the law, administer justice or are forced into the legal system. Stress can result in negative ...
More
All individuals face stress in daily life; this may be particularly true for those who enforce the law, administer justice or are forced into the legal system. Stress can result in negative behaviors, burnout, reduced efficiency, risk-taking or a range of physical and psychological symptoms. This introductory chapter overviews the main purpose of the book, which is to present theory, research, and scholarship from various disciplines and offer suggestions for those interested in exploring and improving the wellbeing of those who are voluntarily (police, probation officers, litigants, lawyers, judges, etc.) or involuntarily (jurors, civil litigants, criminal defendants, witnesses, etc.) drawn into the legal system. Further, as outlined in the chapter, the book focuses on both negative and positive aspects of wellbeing in order to provide a broad perspective on wellbeing in the legal system. This approach offers insights into how individuals can change the legal system on both an individual basis and on a macro level.Less
All individuals face stress in daily life; this may be particularly true for those who enforce the law, administer justice or are forced into the legal system. Stress can result in negative behaviors, burnout, reduced efficiency, risk-taking or a range of physical and psychological symptoms. This introductory chapter overviews the main purpose of the book, which is to present theory, research, and scholarship from various disciplines and offer suggestions for those interested in exploring and improving the wellbeing of those who are voluntarily (police, probation officers, litigants, lawyers, judges, etc.) or involuntarily (jurors, civil litigants, criminal defendants, witnesses, etc.) drawn into the legal system. Further, as outlined in the chapter, the book focuses on both negative and positive aspects of wellbeing in order to provide a broad perspective on wellbeing in the legal system. This approach offers insights into how individuals can change the legal system on both an individual basis and on a macro level.
Mary White Stewart and Steven M. Wood
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- January 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199829996
- eISBN:
- 9780199301492
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829996.003.0006
- Subject:
- Psychology, Forensic Psychology
There appears to be a prevalent notion that the United States is a highly litigious society, and that individuals sue without considering the tangible and intangible costs of litigation. Such ...
More
There appears to be a prevalent notion that the United States is a highly litigious society, and that individuals sue without considering the tangible and intangible costs of litigation. Such perceptions are one of the many stressors that litigants face. Social scientists and legal researchers are gaining a better understanding of the personal, psychological, and economic stressors that accompany litigation. This chapter focuses on the entire process of litigation—from the initial decision to sue to post-settlement or verdict—from the civil plaintiff’s perspective. In doing so, it highlights the factors that shape the plaintiff’s experience, particularly those that influence the stress and trauma of the litigation process. The chapter concludes by offering several suggestions for ways in which the legal system and its actors may minimize stressors and improve the psychological wellbeing of civil plaintiffs.Less
There appears to be a prevalent notion that the United States is a highly litigious society, and that individuals sue without considering the tangible and intangible costs of litigation. Such perceptions are one of the many stressors that litigants face. Social scientists and legal researchers are gaining a better understanding of the personal, psychological, and economic stressors that accompany litigation. This chapter focuses on the entire process of litigation—from the initial decision to sue to post-settlement or verdict—from the civil plaintiff’s perspective. In doing so, it highlights the factors that shape the plaintiff’s experience, particularly those that influence the stress and trauma of the litigation process. The chapter concludes by offering several suggestions for ways in which the legal system and its actors may minimize stressors and improve the psychological wellbeing of civil plaintiffs.
Brian H. Bornstein, Gwen Hullman, and Monica K. Miller
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- January 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199829996
- eISBN:
- 9780199301492
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199829996.003.0013
- Subject:
- Psychology, Forensic Psychology
This conclusion chapter summarizes, compares, and contrasts the ideas presented across the previous chapters and provides recommendations for areas of future research. The chapter also discusses two ...
More
This conclusion chapter summarizes, compares, and contrasts the ideas presented across the previous chapters and provides recommendations for areas of future research. The chapter also discusses two populations that come into contact with the legal system that likely experience stressors as a result of their involvement, but have yet to be studied: Alternative Dispute Resolution professionals and eyewitnesses. These are important populations to study, and some interventions have already been adopted to address the wellbeing of these populations. These interventions are largely untested, and this chapter offers analysis based on theory and related research. Existing approaches to addressing stress and wellbeing can be categorized as either changing the environment or changing the people. Short-term and long-term recommendations for addressing stress in the legal system are offered.Less
This conclusion chapter summarizes, compares, and contrasts the ideas presented across the previous chapters and provides recommendations for areas of future research. The chapter also discusses two populations that come into contact with the legal system that likely experience stressors as a result of their involvement, but have yet to be studied: Alternative Dispute Resolution professionals and eyewitnesses. These are important populations to study, and some interventions have already been adopted to address the wellbeing of these populations. These interventions are largely untested, and this chapter offers analysis based on theory and related research. Existing approaches to addressing stress and wellbeing can be categorized as either changing the environment or changing the people. Short-term and long-term recommendations for addressing stress in the legal system are offered.
Kathryn Hendley
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- May 2017
- ISBN:
- 9781501705243
- eISBN:
- 9781501708107
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Cornell University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7591/cornell/9781501705243.003.0006
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter examines how litigants experience Russia's justice-of-the-peace courts (JP courts). The views of judges are unlikely to mirror those of litigants. For judges, the judicial process ...
More
This chapter examines how litigants experience Russia's justice-of-the-peace courts (JP courts). The views of judges are unlikely to mirror those of litigants. For judges, the judicial process represents routine behavior, whereas for most litigants, it opens a Pandora's box of formal rules and informal norms that are unfamiliar and mysterious. This is particularly true for the JP courts, which handle the simplest cases. The chapter first provides an overview of access to justice in Russia before turning to legal literacy, and especially how Russians negotiate the JP courts without a lawyer. It then considers the availability and use of legal expertise by Russians, along with litigants' participation in judicial hearings as performance and their satisfaction with the JP courts. It also describes the image of JP courts and suggests that litigants' willingness to turn to the courts provides a window into the demand for law and, more generally, Russian legal culture.Less
This chapter examines how litigants experience Russia's justice-of-the-peace courts (JP courts). The views of judges are unlikely to mirror those of litigants. For judges, the judicial process represents routine behavior, whereas for most litigants, it opens a Pandora's box of formal rules and informal norms that are unfamiliar and mysterious. This is particularly true for the JP courts, which handle the simplest cases. The chapter first provides an overview of access to justice in Russia before turning to legal literacy, and especially how Russians negotiate the JP courts without a lawyer. It then considers the availability and use of legal expertise by Russians, along with litigants' participation in judicial hearings as performance and their satisfaction with the JP courts. It also describes the image of JP courts and suggests that litigants' willingness to turn to the courts provides a window into the demand for law and, more generally, Russian legal culture.
Aruna Sathanapally
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- January 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199669301
- eISBN:
- 9780191744648
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669301.003.0008
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
Chapter 1 identified several rationales for leaving the task of devising human rights remedies to the legislature in the first instance, including the legislature’s superior capacity to make certain ...
More
Chapter 1 identified several rationales for leaving the task of devising human rights remedies to the legislature in the first instance, including the legislature’s superior capacity to make certain remedial decisions and the potential to promote cooperation and deliberation across courts and legislatures. Chapter 7 analyses a series of specific case studies of responsive deliberation (including gender recognition and prisoner voting rights), which provide the opportunity to evaluate whether these rationales bear out in practice. It examines one promising example of a DOI being followed by a reflective deliberative process in the legislature. It also considers what disadvantages arise from relying on a legislative remedy to a human rights violation, and from taking an overly permissive approach to legislative deliberation, surfacing two problematic features of the design of DOIs.Less
Chapter 1 identified several rationales for leaving the task of devising human rights remedies to the legislature in the first instance, including the legislature’s superior capacity to make certain remedial decisions and the potential to promote cooperation and deliberation across courts and legislatures. Chapter 7 analyses a series of specific case studies of responsive deliberation (including gender recognition and prisoner voting rights), which provide the opportunity to evaluate whether these rationales bear out in practice. It examines one promising example of a DOI being followed by a reflective deliberative process in the legislature. It also considers what disadvantages arise from relying on a legislative remedy to a human rights violation, and from taking an overly permissive approach to legislative deliberation, surfacing two problematic features of the design of DOIs.
John Cooper
- Published in print:
- 2003
- Published Online:
- February 2021
- ISBN:
- 9781874774877
- eISBN:
- 9781800340053
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3828/liverpool/9781874774877.003.0007
- Subject:
- Religion, Judaism
This chapter addresses Jews and the courts more generally between the early years of the twentieth century and the Second World War. Jews were keen litigants in the lower-level civil courts, ...
More
This chapter addresses Jews and the courts more generally between the early years of the twentieth century and the Second World War. Jews were keen litigants in the lower-level civil courts, particularly in the Whitechapel and Shoreditch county courts presided over from 1911 by Judge Albert Rowland Cluer. Although an able judge, Cluer possessed many foibles and prejudices, and the chapter assesses whether Jewish litigants had their cases fairly tried and whether they were adequately represented by the Jewish barristers who regularly appeared there. It also considers the small minority of Jewish businessmen who were charged at the Old Bailey and quarter sessions with credit fraud, fraudulent claims against insurance companies, and illegal share-pushing schemes. The number of Jewish bankruptcies was also high, for Jewish businessmen tended to be risk-takers and entrepreneurs, always seeking new opportunities in the market—and sometimes, in the process, exposing themselves to prosecution. After the Second World War, many moved into the urban property market or took over sluggish public companies with hidden assets.Less
This chapter addresses Jews and the courts more generally between the early years of the twentieth century and the Second World War. Jews were keen litigants in the lower-level civil courts, particularly in the Whitechapel and Shoreditch county courts presided over from 1911 by Judge Albert Rowland Cluer. Although an able judge, Cluer possessed many foibles and prejudices, and the chapter assesses whether Jewish litigants had their cases fairly tried and whether they were adequately represented by the Jewish barristers who regularly appeared there. It also considers the small minority of Jewish businessmen who were charged at the Old Bailey and quarter sessions with credit fraud, fraudulent claims against insurance companies, and illegal share-pushing schemes. The number of Jewish bankruptcies was also high, for Jewish businessmen tended to be risk-takers and entrepreneurs, always seeking new opportunities in the market—and sometimes, in the process, exposing themselves to prosecution. After the Second World War, many moved into the urban property market or took over sluggish public companies with hidden assets.
Edward M. Harris
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- January 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780199899166
- eISBN:
- 9780199369690
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899166.003.0006
- Subject:
- Classical Studies, Ancient Greek, Roman, and Early Christian Philosophy
This chapter examines the court's approach to the open texture in Athenian law. It considers six cases for which the court's decision is known or can be inferred. In each case, the court had to ...
More
This chapter examines the court's approach to the open texture in Athenian law. It considers six cases for which the court's decision is known or can be inferred. In each case, the court had to choose between a litigant who based his arguments on a more straightforward reading of the law and one who adopted a new or unusual reading of the statute. It shows that when judges were confronted by two different interpretations of the same statute, they tended to accept the traditional interpretation of its wording and to reject new or unusual readings of the law. They were reluctant to follow clever and ingenious interpretations of the law not because they were suspicious of legal expertise, but because they distrusted intellectuals and those trained in rhetoric.Less
This chapter examines the court's approach to the open texture in Athenian law. It considers six cases for which the court's decision is known or can be inferred. In each case, the court had to choose between a litigant who based his arguments on a more straightforward reading of the law and one who adopted a new or unusual reading of the statute. It shows that when judges were confronted by two different interpretations of the same statute, they tended to accept the traditional interpretation of its wording and to reject new or unusual readings of the law. They were reluctant to follow clever and ingenious interpretations of the law not because they were suspicious of legal expertise, but because they distrusted intellectuals and those trained in rhetoric.
Edward M. Harris
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- January 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780199899166
- eISBN:
- 9780199369690
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899166.003.0007
- Subject:
- Classical Studies, Ancient Greek, Roman, and Early Christian Philosophy
This chapter examines how the Athenians attempted to cope with law's “open texture,” that is, the potential ambiguity of statutes. Some scholars have claimed that the Athenian courts were not ...
More
This chapter examines how the Athenians attempted to cope with law's “open texture,” that is, the potential ambiguity of statutes. Some scholars have claimed that the Athenian courts were not interested in consistency and tended to judge cases on an ad hoc basis. While it is true that litigants did not often cite previous cases in forensic oratory, this was because most trials concerned questions of fact. When questions concerning the interpretation of statute arose, it was not unusual for litigants to appeal to precedents or to the intent of the lawgiver to support their legal arguments. Litigants used precedents to show that their interpretation of the law was the traditional one, accepted by other citizens.Less
This chapter examines how the Athenians attempted to cope with law's “open texture,” that is, the potential ambiguity of statutes. Some scholars have claimed that the Athenian courts were not interested in consistency and tended to judge cases on an ad hoc basis. While it is true that litigants did not often cite previous cases in forensic oratory, this was because most trials concerned questions of fact. When questions concerning the interpretation of statute arose, it was not unusual for litigants to appeal to precedents or to the intent of the lawgiver to support their legal arguments. Litigants used precedents to show that their interpretation of the law was the traditional one, accepted by other citizens.
Edward M. Harris
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- January 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780199899166
- eISBN:
- 9780199369690
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899166.003.0008
- Subject:
- Classical Studies, Ancient Greek, Roman, and Early Christian Philosophy
This chapter begins with an analysis of Aristotle's discussion of epieikeia. It shows that epieikeia is not an appeal to a higher standard of justice above the written law but applies only in unusual ...
More
This chapter begins with an analysis of Aristotle's discussion of epieikeia. It shows that epieikeia is not an appeal to a higher standard of justice above the written law but applies only in unusual circumstances that could not have been anticipated by the legislator who had to formulate a general rule. When a litigant used an argument based on epieikeia, he was not asking the court to reject the written law but was demonstrating that his case was an exception to the general rule contained in a statute and that in his specific case other legal considerations should take precedence. The second part of the chapter examines several passages in which litigants in Athenian courts use the arguments that Aristotle gives as examples of arguments from epieikeia. Several cases where Athenian judges acquitted defendants for reasons of epieikeia are also considered.Less
This chapter begins with an analysis of Aristotle's discussion of epieikeia. It shows that epieikeia is not an appeal to a higher standard of justice above the written law but applies only in unusual circumstances that could not have been anticipated by the legislator who had to formulate a general rule. When a litigant used an argument based on epieikeia, he was not asking the court to reject the written law but was demonstrating that his case was an exception to the general rule contained in a statute and that in his specific case other legal considerations should take precedence. The second part of the chapter examines several passages in which litigants in Athenian courts use the arguments that Aristotle gives as examples of arguments from epieikeia. Several cases where Athenian judges acquitted defendants for reasons of epieikeia are also considered.