Michael Keating
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780199240760
- eISBN:
- 9780191599644
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/0199240760.001.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
Nationality claims are often seen as zero‐sum politics involving incompatible conceptions of the polity. Nationalism and self‐determination are seen as equivalent to separatism. Rethinking the ...
More
Nationality claims are often seen as zero‐sum politics involving incompatible conceptions of the polity. Nationalism and self‐determination are seen as equivalent to separatism. Rethinking the concepts of nationality, self‐determination, and sovereignty and placing them in a historic context allows us to treat them as more tractable and as a form of politics. This is done through a study of the UK, Spain, Belgium, and Canada. Traditions of shared sovereignty are rediscovered. Analysis of the demands of minority nationalisms shows that these do not always entail separate statehood. Public opinion is more open than often assumed. Asymmetrical constitutional arrangements provide a means of accommodating plural national claims. The emerging European polity is a model for a post‐sovereign order in which legal pluralism and constitutional diversity can accommodate multiple nationality claims.Less
Nationality claims are often seen as zero‐sum politics involving incompatible conceptions of the polity. Nationalism and self‐determination are seen as equivalent to separatism. Rethinking the concepts of nationality, self‐determination, and sovereignty and placing them in a historic context allows us to treat them as more tractable and as a form of politics. This is done through a study of the UK, Spain, Belgium, and Canada. Traditions of shared sovereignty are rediscovered. Analysis of the demands of minority nationalisms shows that these do not always entail separate statehood. Public opinion is more open than often assumed. Asymmetrical constitutional arrangements provide a means of accommodating plural national claims. The emerging European polity is a model for a post‐sovereign order in which legal pluralism and constitutional diversity can accommodate multiple nationality claims.
Keith Culver and Michael Giudice
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- May 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780195370751
- eISBN:
- 9780199775903
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195370751.001.0001
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law
Analytical legal theories are increasingly sophisticated, yet their development is uneven. While admirably adapted to explaining the unitary law-state, they are poorly suited to characterizing new ...
More
Analytical legal theories are increasingly sophisticated, yet their development is uneven. While admirably adapted to explaining the unitary law-state, they are poorly suited to characterizing new law-like phenomena. From international law to the new legal order of the European Union, to shared governance and overlapping jurisdiction in transboundary areas, what at least appear to be instances of legality are at best weakly explained by approaches that presume the centrality of legal system as the mark and measure of social situations fully worthy of the title of legality. What next, as phenomena threaten to outstrip theory? Legality's Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence explains the rudiments of an inter-institutional theory of law, a theory which finds legality in the interaction between legal institutions, whose legality is characterized in terms of the kinds of norms they use rather than their content or system-membership. Prominent forms of legality such as the law-state and international law are then explained as particular forms of complex agglomeration of legal institutions, varying in form and complexity rather than sheer legality. This approach enables a fundamental shift in approach to the problems of identity and continuity of characteristically legal situations in social life: once legality is decoupled from legal system, the patterns of intense mutual reference amongst the legal institutions of the law-state can be seen as one justifiably prominent form of legality amongst others including overlapping forms of legality such as the European Union.Less
Analytical legal theories are increasingly sophisticated, yet their development is uneven. While admirably adapted to explaining the unitary law-state, they are poorly suited to characterizing new law-like phenomena. From international law to the new legal order of the European Union, to shared governance and overlapping jurisdiction in transboundary areas, what at least appear to be instances of legality are at best weakly explained by approaches that presume the centrality of legal system as the mark and measure of social situations fully worthy of the title of legality. What next, as phenomena threaten to outstrip theory? Legality's Borders: An Essay in General Jurisprudence explains the rudiments of an inter-institutional theory of law, a theory which finds legality in the interaction between legal institutions, whose legality is characterized in terms of the kinds of norms they use rather than their content or system-membership. Prominent forms of legality such as the law-state and international law are then explained as particular forms of complex agglomeration of legal institutions, varying in form and complexity rather than sheer legality. This approach enables a fundamental shift in approach to the problems of identity and continuity of characteristically legal situations in social life: once legality is decoupled from legal system, the patterns of intense mutual reference amongst the legal institutions of the law-state can be seen as one justifiably prominent form of legality amongst others including overlapping forms of legality such as the European Union.
Steven Wheatley
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- February 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199580910
- eISBN:
- 9780191723025
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0014
- Subject:
- Law, Comparative Law
This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are ‘peoples’ with a right to self-government through ...
More
This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are ‘peoples’ with a right to self-government through (indigenous) law. The chapter proceeds as follows. It first provides an overview of the adoption of the UN Declaration and its status in international law, before examining the provisions on shared government and self-government. The Declaration reflects a condition of legal pluralism, and the chapter examines the meaning of the idea before considering its relevance beyond the state. It concludes on the need for a distinction to be made between normative pluralism and legal pluralism, and in doing so, develops a concept of law that applies to state law, international law, and the laws of indigenous peoples. The chapter then returns to the question of the conflict of law norms in conditions of global legal pluralism, complexity, uncertainty, and reasonable disagreement. It argues that legal orders should approach the question of the conflicts of laws from the perspective of democratic legitimacy. It questions whether it is appropriate to apply this ‘meta-perspective’ to the position of indigenous peoples, and concludes with a number of observations on the right of political participation for persons belonging to indigenous peoples in the fragmented system of global governance.Less
This chapter focuses on the complexities that emerge in the system of global governance following the acceptance that indigenous peoples are ‘peoples’ with a right to self-government through (indigenous) law. The chapter proceeds as follows. It first provides an overview of the adoption of the UN Declaration and its status in international law, before examining the provisions on shared government and self-government. The Declaration reflects a condition of legal pluralism, and the chapter examines the meaning of the idea before considering its relevance beyond the state. It concludes on the need for a distinction to be made between normative pluralism and legal pluralism, and in doing so, develops a concept of law that applies to state law, international law, and the laws of indigenous peoples. The chapter then returns to the question of the conflict of law norms in conditions of global legal pluralism, complexity, uncertainty, and reasonable disagreement. It argues that legal orders should approach the question of the conflicts of laws from the perspective of democratic legitimacy. It questions whether it is appropriate to apply this ‘meta-perspective’ to the position of indigenous peoples, and concludes with a number of observations on the right of political participation for persons belonging to indigenous peoples in the fragmented system of global governance.
Nick Barber
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- January 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199585014
- eISBN:
- 9780191595318
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585014.001.0001
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This book provides an original analytical account of the state and its associated constitutional phenomena. It presents the state as a form of social group, consisting of people, territory, and ...
More
This book provides an original analytical account of the state and its associated constitutional phenomena. It presents the state as a form of social group, consisting of people, territory, and institutions bound together by rules. The institutions of the state make a distinctive and characteristic claim over the people of the state, who, in turn, have a distinctive and characteristic relationship with these institutions. This account reveals the importance of at least two forms of pluralism — legal and constitutional. It also casts light on some of the more difficult questions faced by writers on constitutions — such as the possibility of states undertaking actions and forming intentions, the moral significance of these actions for the people of the state, and the capacity of the state to carry responsibility for acts between generations.Less
This book provides an original analytical account of the state and its associated constitutional phenomena. It presents the state as a form of social group, consisting of people, territory, and institutions bound together by rules. The institutions of the state make a distinctive and characteristic claim over the people of the state, who, in turn, have a distinctive and characteristic relationship with these institutions. This account reveals the importance of at least two forms of pluralism — legal and constitutional. It also casts light on some of the more difficult questions faced by writers on constitutions — such as the possibility of states undertaking actions and forming intentions, the moral significance of these actions for the people of the state, and the capacity of the state to carry responsibility for acts between generations.
Samia Bano
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- February 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199580910
- eISBN:
- 9780191723025
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0016
- Subject:
- Law, Comparative Law
This chapter draws upon debates about the concepts of ‘interlegality’ and ‘multicultural interlegality’, to analyze the ways in which Muslim legal pluralism in matters of family law are negotiated ...
More
This chapter draws upon debates about the concepts of ‘interlegality’ and ‘multicultural interlegality’, to analyze the ways in which Muslim legal pluralism in matters of family law are negotiated and renegotiated between and within the limits of state and community laws. It begins with a brief discussion on the limits of traditional legal pluralist scholarship and considers why the concept of interlegality may be useful to better understand the multiplicity in matters of Muslim family law. It then analyzes the emergence of Muslim legal pluralism in Britain and asks whether Shariah Councils and the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal constitute new socio-legal formations and ‘multicultural interlegality’.Less
This chapter draws upon debates about the concepts of ‘interlegality’ and ‘multicultural interlegality’, to analyze the ways in which Muslim legal pluralism in matters of family law are negotiated and renegotiated between and within the limits of state and community laws. It begins with a brief discussion on the limits of traditional legal pluralist scholarship and considers why the concept of interlegality may be useful to better understand the multiplicity in matters of Muslim family law. It then analyzes the emergence of Muslim legal pluralism in Britain and asks whether Shariah Councils and the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal constitute new socio-legal formations and ‘multicultural interlegality’.
N. W. Barber
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- January 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199585014
- eISBN:
- 9780191595318
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585014.003.0009
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This chapter advances a modest account of legal pluralism and its significance for states. It argues that a legal order can contain multiple rules of recognition that lead to the order containing ...
More
This chapter advances a modest account of legal pluralism and its significance for states. It argues that a legal order can contain multiple rules of recognition that lead to the order containing multiple, unranked, legal sources. These rules of recognition are inconsistent, and there is the possibility that they will, in turn, identify inconsistent rules addressed to individuals. In addition, pluralist orders lack a legal mechanism able to resolve the inconsistency; there is no higher constitutional body that can resolve this dispute through adjudication or legislation. Consequently, pluralist legal orders contain a risk, which need not be realized, of constitutional crisis; of officials being compelled to choose between their loyalties to different public institutions.Less
This chapter advances a modest account of legal pluralism and its significance for states. It argues that a legal order can contain multiple rules of recognition that lead to the order containing multiple, unranked, legal sources. These rules of recognition are inconsistent, and there is the possibility that they will, in turn, identify inconsistent rules addressed to individuals. In addition, pluralist orders lack a legal mechanism able to resolve the inconsistency; there is no higher constitutional body that can resolve this dispute through adjudication or legislation. Consequently, pluralist legal orders contain a risk, which need not be realized, of constitutional crisis; of officials being compelled to choose between their loyalties to different public institutions.
Anne Griffiths
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- February 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199580910
- eISBN:
- 9780191723025
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580910.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, Comparative Law
This chapter presents case studies that illuminate how different actors make and maintain law in various settings that represent very diverse constellations of power. They explore the ways in which ...
More
This chapter presents case studies that illuminate how different actors make and maintain law in various settings that represent very diverse constellations of power. They explore the ways in which law constitutes and legitimates power by analyzing different activities through which it is exercised, including its decisional, regulatory, and discursive properties. For law plays an important part in creating, producing, and enforcing meanings of concepts such as ‘justice’, ‘authority’, and ‘rights’; and in instantiating notions of ‘legality’ that may be invoked by different social actors in their construction of hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourses.Less
This chapter presents case studies that illuminate how different actors make and maintain law in various settings that represent very diverse constellations of power. They explore the ways in which law constitutes and legitimates power by analyzing different activities through which it is exercised, including its decisional, regulatory, and discursive properties. For law plays an important part in creating, producing, and enforcing meanings of concepts such as ‘justice’, ‘authority’, and ‘rights’; and in instantiating notions of ‘legality’ that may be invoked by different social actors in their construction of hegemonic and counter-hegemonic discourses.
Lucinda Miller
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- January 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199606627
- eISBN:
- 9780191731716
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606627.001.0001
- Subject:
- Law, EU Law
The emergence of a European contract law is one of the more significant legal developments in Europe today. The complexities that lie at its heart also make it one of the more fascinating areas of ...
More
The emergence of a European contract law is one of the more significant legal developments in Europe today. The complexities that lie at its heart also make it one of the more fascinating areas of legal study. European Contract Law: Exploring Europeanization examines the origins of the discipline and its subsequent evolution. It brings the discussion up-to-date with full analysis of the debate on the Common Frame of Reference and the future that this ambiguous instrument may have in the contemporary European legal framework. One of the central themes of the book is exploration of the multi-level, open architecture of the EU legal order and the implications of such governance arrangements for the EU’s private law programme. The book demonstrates that the key to understanding European contract law in the 21st century lies in adopting a perspective and mechanisms suitable for a legal order populated by multiple sources of private law. Legal pluralism is offered as a theoretical construct in relation to which the future of European private law might be shaped. Legal pluralism forces consideration of diversity’s normative appeal and readjusts the analytical spotlight beyond the traditional, centralised, legislative, ‘command and control’ means of regulation. In so doing, softer mechanisms are introduced for the governance of contract law; mechanisms that enable coordination between the different sites at which contract law operates. This reorientation in thinking about European contract law, indeed about Europeanization itself, enables the inevitable diversity and pluralism that is a feature of multi-level Europe to be captured within a framework that maximises the opportunities for mutual transformations and learning.Less
The emergence of a European contract law is one of the more significant legal developments in Europe today. The complexities that lie at its heart also make it one of the more fascinating areas of legal study. European Contract Law: Exploring Europeanization examines the origins of the discipline and its subsequent evolution. It brings the discussion up-to-date with full analysis of the debate on the Common Frame of Reference and the future that this ambiguous instrument may have in the contemporary European legal framework. One of the central themes of the book is exploration of the multi-level, open architecture of the EU legal order and the implications of such governance arrangements for the EU’s private law programme. The book demonstrates that the key to understanding European contract law in the 21st century lies in adopting a perspective and mechanisms suitable for a legal order populated by multiple sources of private law. Legal pluralism is offered as a theoretical construct in relation to which the future of European private law might be shaped. Legal pluralism forces consideration of diversity’s normative appeal and readjusts the analytical spotlight beyond the traditional, centralised, legislative, ‘command and control’ means of regulation. In so doing, softer mechanisms are introduced for the governance of contract law; mechanisms that enable coordination between the different sites at which contract law operates. This reorientation in thinking about European contract law, indeed about Europeanization itself, enables the inevitable diversity and pluralism that is a feature of multi-level Europe to be captured within a framework that maximises the opportunities for mutual transformations and learning.
KEITH CULVER and MICHAEL GIUDICE
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- May 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780195370751
- eISBN:
- 9780199775903
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195370751.003.005
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law
Separation of legality from the state is what enables our view to better explain without distortion the various forms of non-state prima facie legality whose emergence is too pervasive to leave ...
More
Separation of legality from the state is what enables our view to better explain without distortion the various forms of non-state prima facie legality whose emergence is too pervasive to leave outside the scope of a balanced general jurisprudence. This chapter returns to the prima facie legalities identified in Chapter 1, and shows fully how freedom from the ideas of legal official, legal system, and hierarchy (and so in general the idea of “chains of validity”) is crucial to responsive descriptive-explanation of legality broadly.Less
Separation of legality from the state is what enables our view to better explain without distortion the various forms of non-state prima facie legality whose emergence is too pervasive to leave outside the scope of a balanced general jurisprudence. This chapter returns to the prima facie legalities identified in Chapter 1, and shows fully how freedom from the ideas of legal official, legal system, and hierarchy (and so in general the idea of “chains of validity”) is crucial to responsive descriptive-explanation of legality broadly.
Brian Z. Tamanaha
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- January 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199244676
- eISBN:
- 9780191715044
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244676.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law
This chapter builds upon the conventionalist approach to law to develop a non-essentialist version of legal pluralism. The analysis proceeds largely in relation to sociological dimensions of legal ...
More
This chapter builds upon the conventionalist approach to law to develop a non-essentialist version of legal pluralism. The analysis proceeds largely in relation to sociological dimensions of legal pluralism, thereby complementing the predominantly legal theory discussed earlier. This and the previous chapter together present a new way of understanding the kinds of legal phenomena operative in society today, and of how they should be studied, in ways that depart from but are also continuous with legal positivism as well as sociological approaches to law.Less
This chapter builds upon the conventionalist approach to law to develop a non-essentialist version of legal pluralism. The analysis proceeds largely in relation to sociological dimensions of legal pluralism, thereby complementing the predominantly legal theory discussed earlier. This and the previous chapter together present a new way of understanding the kinds of legal phenomena operative in society today, and of how they should be studied, in ways that depart from but are also continuous with legal positivism as well as sociological approaches to law.
Lucinda Miller
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- January 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199606627
- eISBN:
- 9780191731716
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606627.003.0006
- Subject:
- Law, EU Law
This chapter contends that diversity should be welcomed rather than disdained within the contract law frame, not simply because it is politically expedient to do so but because diversity is seen to ...
More
This chapter contends that diversity should be welcomed rather than disdained within the contract law frame, not simply because it is politically expedient to do so but because diversity is seen to offer a number of important advantages. Moreover, diversity is not antagonistic to the notion of Europeanization and may even provide a new paradigm for legal integration. Legal pluralism is offered as a useful theoretical construct from which the normative appeal of diversity can be evaluated. Drawing on the literature on global and constitutional legal pluralism, the chapter demonstrates that pluralism can create opportunity for experimentation, innovation and mutual learning. However, for its benefits to be maximised and its disadvantages minimised, pluralism should be managed within a framework of coordination. With this aim, the chapter advances a number of soft law governance mechanisms and institutions for coordinating the various sites at which contract law operates.Less
This chapter contends that diversity should be welcomed rather than disdained within the contract law frame, not simply because it is politically expedient to do so but because diversity is seen to offer a number of important advantages. Moreover, diversity is not antagonistic to the notion of Europeanization and may even provide a new paradigm for legal integration. Legal pluralism is offered as a useful theoretical construct from which the normative appeal of diversity can be evaluated. Drawing on the literature on global and constitutional legal pluralism, the chapter demonstrates that pluralism can create opportunity for experimentation, innovation and mutual learning. However, for its benefits to be maximised and its disadvantages minimised, pluralism should be managed within a framework of coordination. With this aim, the chapter advances a number of soft law governance mechanisms and institutions for coordinating the various sites at which contract law operates.
Jacob T. Levy
- Published in print:
- 2000
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780198297123
- eISBN:
- 9780191599767
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/0198297122.003.0007
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory
Indigenous, and also religious, legal codes can be and have been incorporated into the legal systems of states in a number of ways. These include common‐law incorporation, which recognizes culturally ...
More
Indigenous, and also religious, legal codes can be and have been incorporated into the legal systems of states in a number of ways. These include common‐law incorporation, which recognizes culturally distinct ways of establishing rights that are known to the general law, such as marriage and property rights; customary incorporation, which directly applies and enforces the customary rights, privileges, and duties associated with the relevant legal tradition; and self‐government, which grants legal status to the group to make, and revise, its laws on a territorial basis. Hybrid forms have often represented hypocrisy on the states’ part, according to indigenous peoples, the burdens of all these and the benefits of none. The inalienability of indigenous land against a generally common‐law background is such a hypocrisy.Less
Indigenous, and also religious, legal codes can be and have been incorporated into the legal systems of states in a number of ways. These include common‐law incorporation, which recognizes culturally distinct ways of establishing rights that are known to the general law, such as marriage and property rights; customary incorporation, which directly applies and enforces the customary rights, privileges, and duties associated with the relevant legal tradition; and self‐government, which grants legal status to the group to make, and revise, its laws on a territorial basis. Hybrid forms have often represented hypocrisy on the states’ part, according to indigenous peoples, the burdens of all these and the benefits of none. The inalienability of indigenous land against a generally common‐law background is such a hypocrisy.
N. W. Barber
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- January 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199585014
- eISBN:
- 9780191595318
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585014.003.0010
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
The previous chapter argued that it was possible for a form of legal pluralism to arise within a legal order and, furthermore, that this was, or may become, a characteristic of a number of the legal ...
More
The previous chapter argued that it was possible for a form of legal pluralism to arise within a legal order and, furthermore, that this was, or may become, a characteristic of a number of the legal orders that are connected to the European Union. This chapter reflects on a second type of pluralism, constitutional pluralism. It contends that this is distinguishable from legal pluralism, and that, additionally, constitutional pluralism also casts some light upon the nature of the European Union. This requires us to address a question which has often been raised in European scholarship: that is, whether the European Union is, or may become, a state, and what the implications would be for its citizens and Member States if the Union were to gain statehood. The chapter starts by considering two forms of constitutional ordering — the federation and the confederation — and compares those with the model of the state provided in earlier chapters. It then turns to the European Union, and contrasts that polity against these orderings, concluding that the Union stands somewhere between a federation and a confederation. It is the location of the Union in this conceptual borderland which generates a special, perhaps unique, form of constitutional pluralism.Less
The previous chapter argued that it was possible for a form of legal pluralism to arise within a legal order and, furthermore, that this was, or may become, a characteristic of a number of the legal orders that are connected to the European Union. This chapter reflects on a second type of pluralism, constitutional pluralism. It contends that this is distinguishable from legal pluralism, and that, additionally, constitutional pluralism also casts some light upon the nature of the European Union. This requires us to address a question which has often been raised in European scholarship: that is, whether the European Union is, or may become, a state, and what the implications would be for its citizens and Member States if the Union were to gain statehood. The chapter starts by considering two forms of constitutional ordering — the federation and the confederation — and compares those with the model of the state provided in earlier chapters. It then turns to the European Union, and contrasts that polity against these orderings, concluding that the Union stands somewhere between a federation and a confederation. It is the location of the Union in this conceptual borderland which generates a special, perhaps unique, form of constitutional pluralism.
Guillermo O'Donnell
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- September 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199587612
- eISBN:
- 9780191723384
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587612.003.0011
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Democratization
This chapter begins with a personal anecdote that has sustained the author's scepticism about narrowly individualistic or excessively culturalist conceptions of democracy, as well as of the view of a ...
More
This chapter begins with a personal anecdote that has sustained the author's scepticism about narrowly individualistic or excessively culturalist conceptions of democracy, as well as of the view of a uniquely better kind of democracy these conceptions lead to. In addition, it acknowledges that the conception of agency and its grounding of democracy generates complex issues in terms of both the extensive globalization of the present world and of the subsistence of legal pluralism. Although the chapter is unable to propose clear cut solutions to such issues (including the ones raised under the banner of the ‘war on terrorism’), it takes side, not without some important caveats, with authors who argue for the universalism of the rights entailed by human agency, including gender ones. As to globalization, after noting significant pros and cons, especially in relation to countries outside the Northwest, the argument is that, even though deeply transformed in several respects, the state continues to be of crucial importance. The chapter concludes with a statement of the minimal standards that despite their diversity, any democracy should be expected to meet.Less
This chapter begins with a personal anecdote that has sustained the author's scepticism about narrowly individualistic or excessively culturalist conceptions of democracy, as well as of the view of a uniquely better kind of democracy these conceptions lead to. In addition, it acknowledges that the conception of agency and its grounding of democracy generates complex issues in terms of both the extensive globalization of the present world and of the subsistence of legal pluralism. Although the chapter is unable to propose clear cut solutions to such issues (including the ones raised under the banner of the ‘war on terrorism’), it takes side, not without some important caveats, with authors who argue for the universalism of the rights entailed by human agency, including gender ones. As to globalization, after noting significant pros and cons, especially in relation to countries outside the Northwest, the argument is that, even though deeply transformed in several respects, the state continues to be of crucial importance. The chapter concludes with a statement of the minimal standards that despite their diversity, any democracy should be expected to meet.
D. J. GALLIGAN
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199291830
- eISBN:
- 9780191700675
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291830.003.0011
- Subject:
- Law, Philosophy of Law
Because there is a need to study further how legal orders are able to run simultaneously parallel, intersect, and compete with each other, the recognition of such aspects of legal pluralism and ...
More
Because there is a need to study further how legal orders are able to run simultaneously parallel, intersect, and compete with each other, the recognition of such aspects of legal pluralism and informal rules should be extended to economic and business organizations, non-government organizations, the family, sporting clubs and other collective bodies as potential legal orders. This chapter introduces the notion of extended legal pluralism to refer to rule-governed entities that could and should be classified as legal orders. However, a concept referred to as legal centralism asserts that the law should be a single set of laws that governs all people and is exclusive of other laws. This chapter also includes explanations of other such hindrances to extended legal pluralism to include such ideas as the relationships among other informal legal orders and how other legal orders are not given as much focus as they deserve.Less
Because there is a need to study further how legal orders are able to run simultaneously parallel, intersect, and compete with each other, the recognition of such aspects of legal pluralism and informal rules should be extended to economic and business organizations, non-government organizations, the family, sporting clubs and other collective bodies as potential legal orders. This chapter introduces the notion of extended legal pluralism to refer to rule-governed entities that could and should be classified as legal orders. However, a concept referred to as legal centralism asserts that the law should be a single set of laws that governs all people and is exclusive of other laws. This chapter also includes explanations of other such hindrances to extended legal pluralism to include such ideas as the relationships among other informal legal orders and how other legal orders are not given as much focus as they deserve.
Richard J. Ross
Lauren Benton (ed.)
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- March 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780814771167
- eISBN:
- 9780814708316
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- NYU Press
- DOI:
- 10.18574/nyu/9780814771167.001.0001
- Subject:
- History, Imperialism and Colonialism
This book advances our understanding of law and empire in the early modern world. It exposes new dimensions of legal pluralism in the British, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Ottoman empires. ...
More
This book advances our understanding of law and empire in the early modern world. It exposes new dimensions of legal pluralism in the British, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Ottoman empires. In-depth analyses probe such topics as the shifting legal privileges of corporations, the intertwining of religious and legal thought, and the effects of clashing legal authorities on sovereignty and subjecthood. Case studies show how a variety of individuals engage with the law and shape the contours of imperial rule. The book reaches from Peru to New Zealand to Europe to capture the varieties and continuities of legal pluralism and to probe the analytic power of the concept of legal pluralism in the comparative study of empires. For legal scholars, social scientists, and historians, the book maps new approaches to the study of empires and the global history of law.Less
This book advances our understanding of law and empire in the early modern world. It exposes new dimensions of legal pluralism in the British, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Ottoman empires. In-depth analyses probe such topics as the shifting legal privileges of corporations, the intertwining of religious and legal thought, and the effects of clashing legal authorities on sovereignty and subjecthood. Case studies show how a variety of individuals engage with the law and shape the contours of imperial rule. The book reaches from Peru to New Zealand to Europe to capture the varieties and continuities of legal pluralism and to probe the analytic power of the concept of legal pluralism in the comparative study of empires. For legal scholars, social scientists, and historians, the book maps new approaches to the study of empires and the global history of law.
Lauren Benton and Richard J. Ross
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- March 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780814771167
- eISBN:
- 9780814708316
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- NYU Press
- DOI:
- 10.18574/nyu/9780814771167.003.0001
- Subject:
- History, Imperialism and Colonialism
This book explores the changing structures and processes of legal pluralism as well as the many different ways of imagining and describing legal pluralism in empires. It considers the complex and ...
More
This book explores the changing structures and processes of legal pluralism as well as the many different ways of imagining and describing legal pluralism in empires. It considers the complex and contingent configuration of imperial law as a set of fluid institutional and cultural practices rather than a structure of command. It discusses imperial sovereignty as well as the legal strategies of conquered subjects, slaves, and religious minorities and examines the connection between legal pluralism and inter-imperial law and between legal pluralism and jurisdictional politics. It also investigates how political and religious thought were used to structure, justify, or undermine plural legal regimes and how jurisdictional conflicts and the strategic manipulation of ideas and information about legal pluralism have shaped the history of empires. This introductory chapter assesses some of the problems that have hampered the dominant approaches to the subject of legal pluralism and proposes an alternative perspective that defines legal pluralism as a formation of historically occurring patterns of jurisdictional complexity and conflict.Less
This book explores the changing structures and processes of legal pluralism as well as the many different ways of imagining and describing legal pluralism in empires. It considers the complex and contingent configuration of imperial law as a set of fluid institutional and cultural practices rather than a structure of command. It discusses imperial sovereignty as well as the legal strategies of conquered subjects, slaves, and religious minorities and examines the connection between legal pluralism and inter-imperial law and between legal pluralism and jurisdictional politics. It also investigates how political and religious thought were used to structure, justify, or undermine plural legal regimes and how jurisdictional conflicts and the strategic manipulation of ideas and information about legal pluralism have shaped the history of empires. This introductory chapter assesses some of the problems that have hampered the dominant approaches to the subject of legal pluralism and proposes an alternative perspective that defines legal pluralism as a formation of historically occurring patterns of jurisdictional complexity and conflict.
George Letsas
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- January 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199588770
- eISBN:
- 9780191741029
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588770.003.0004
- Subject:
- Law, EU Law, Philosophy of Law
This chapter contends that the problem of normative conflicts is not a genuine one and that this teaches us a great deal about European law, and fundamental rights in Europe. In particular, it ...
More
This chapter contends that the problem of normative conflicts is not a genuine one and that this teaches us a great deal about European law, and fundamental rights in Europe. In particular, it challenges an argument whose structure goes like this: legal pluralism is an empirical fact, which generates problems of normative conflicts that in turn can be solved through some process of judicial dialogue. It is argued that, as a matter of law, there are no normative conflicts of fundamental rights in Europe. The chapter does not aim to offer a solution to the problem of pluralism, say via some harmonization or dialogue theory, nor to make conflicts disappear by stipulation, but rather to debunk it. It provides an account of law and fundamental rights that both explains why such conflicts do not exist and offers some normative guidance to how European judges should decide cases. Legal philosophy should seek to contribute not only to the understanding of European law but also to its sound development.Less
This chapter contends that the problem of normative conflicts is not a genuine one and that this teaches us a great deal about European law, and fundamental rights in Europe. In particular, it challenges an argument whose structure goes like this: legal pluralism is an empirical fact, which generates problems of normative conflicts that in turn can be solved through some process of judicial dialogue. It is argued that, as a matter of law, there are no normative conflicts of fundamental rights in Europe. The chapter does not aim to offer a solution to the problem of pluralism, say via some harmonization or dialogue theory, nor to make conflicts disappear by stipulation, but rather to debunk it. It provides an account of law and fundamental rights that both explains why such conflicts do not exist and offers some normative guidance to how European judges should decide cases. Legal philosophy should seek to contribute not only to the understanding of European law but also to its sound development.
Andreas L Paulus
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199231942
- eISBN:
- 9780191716140
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231942.003.0010
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter explores the extent to which modern recognition of an ‘ international community’ influences the relationship between international and national law. It shows that domestic courts do not ...
More
This chapter explores the extent to which modern recognition of an ‘ international community’ influences the relationship between international and national law. It shows that domestic courts do not regard the ‘international community’ as a repository of moral values or laws superior to their own. International law, as the law of the international community, will be regarded as formal authority only in the instance domestic law renders it binding for the court in question. Domestic law, not international law continues to determine the breadth of the influence of international law in the domestic legal order. International community values may however inform the understanding of principles and values enshrined in domestic law. In this respect, the ‘international community’ is not regarded as a higher authority, but as one of several influences that weigh on the decision of an actual case, and often not the controlling one.Less
This chapter explores the extent to which modern recognition of an ‘ international community’ influences the relationship between international and national law. It shows that domestic courts do not regard the ‘international community’ as a repository of moral values or laws superior to their own. International law, as the law of the international community, will be regarded as formal authority only in the instance domestic law renders it binding for the court in question. Domestic law, not international law continues to determine the breadth of the influence of international law in the domestic legal order. International community values may however inform the understanding of principles and values enshrined in domestic law. In this respect, the ‘international community’ is not regarded as a higher authority, but as one of several influences that weigh on the decision of an actual case, and often not the controlling one.
Neil MacCormick
- Published in print:
- 1999
- Published Online:
- January 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780198268765
- eISBN:
- 9780191713118
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198268765.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, EU Law
The interlocking of legal systems in various countries, with mutual recognition of each other's validity, but with different grounds for that recognition, has profound and potentially dangerous ...
More
The interlocking of legal systems in various countries, with mutual recognition of each other's validity, but with different grounds for that recognition, has profound and potentially dangerous implications for the successful continuation of European integration. This chapter explores the problem of legal pluralism and solutions to the difficulties for practice implicit in the very idea of pluralism. The character and implications of the kind of legal pluralism that institutional theory admits are considered. The context is one in which ongoing challenges occur along the interface between the state-law systems of member states of the European Union (EU), and the EU legal order as interpreted by the European Court of Justice. The concepts of law, constitution, constitutionalism, and pluralism are discussed, along with EU jurisprudence on EU law, the dilemma of revolt or revolution against the constitution, state-law and the rule of law, and distinction between pluralism under international law and radical pluralism.Less
The interlocking of legal systems in various countries, with mutual recognition of each other's validity, but with different grounds for that recognition, has profound and potentially dangerous implications for the successful continuation of European integration. This chapter explores the problem of legal pluralism and solutions to the difficulties for practice implicit in the very idea of pluralism. The character and implications of the kind of legal pluralism that institutional theory admits are considered. The context is one in which ongoing challenges occur along the interface between the state-law systems of member states of the European Union (EU), and the EU legal order as interpreted by the European Court of Justice. The concepts of law, constitution, constitutionalism, and pluralism are discussed, along with EU jurisprudence on EU law, the dilemma of revolt or revolution against the constitution, state-law and the rule of law, and distinction between pluralism under international law and radical pluralism.
