Rod Morgan
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199565955
- eISBN:
- 9780191701948
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565955.003.0004
- Subject:
- Law, Criminal Law and Criminology
This chapter extends the analysis in which David Downes and the author engaged in their joint essay on ‘law and order’ politics over three editions of the Oxford Handbook of Criminology. In doing so, ...
More
This chapter extends the analysis in which David Downes and the author engaged in their joint essay on ‘law and order’ politics over three editions of the Oxford Handbook of Criminology. In doing so, it reflects on developments since the new millennium. It also suggests as the starting point Prime Minister Blair's pronouncement that the excesses to be laid at the door of the liberal 1960s are now to be tackled head on. This represents, it argues, the latest effort by New Labour finally to expel the Old Labour ‘skeletons in the cupboard’, as David and the author termed it, thereby preventing the Tories from recovering their traditional stronghold to the ‘law and order’ right of Labour. It is stated that the rules of the game have indeed changed, and are radically changing. The autumn 2005 ‘rules’ debate has of course been placed on a much more bitter argument about whether the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq was and is justified, and whether those events have made the world and Britain a more dangerous place.Less
This chapter extends the analysis in which David Downes and the author engaged in their joint essay on ‘law and order’ politics over three editions of the Oxford Handbook of Criminology. In doing so, it reflects on developments since the new millennium. It also suggests as the starting point Prime Minister Blair's pronouncement that the excesses to be laid at the door of the liberal 1960s are now to be tackled head on. This represents, it argues, the latest effort by New Labour finally to expel the Old Labour ‘skeletons in the cupboard’, as David and the author termed it, thereby preventing the Tories from recovering their traditional stronghold to the ‘law and order’ right of Labour. It is stated that the rules of the game have indeed changed, and are radically changing. The autumn 2005 ‘rules’ debate has of course been placed on a much more bitter argument about whether the 2003 invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq was and is justified, and whether those events have made the world and Britain a more dangerous place.
Patrisia Macías-Rojas
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- May 2017
- ISBN:
- 9781479804665
- eISBN:
- 9781479858422
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- NYU Press
- DOI:
- 10.18574/nyu/9781479804665.003.0002
- Subject:
- Sociology, Law, Crime and Deviance
Arizona has played a historic role in national “law and order” policymaking and immigration politics. Today it has some of the highest levels of criminal arrest, prosecution, and sentencing for ...
More
Arizona has played a historic role in national “law and order” policymaking and immigration politics. Today it has some of the highest levels of criminal arrest, prosecution, and sentencing for immigration offenses. Yet it is also home to one of the most dynamic border- and immigrant-rights movements in the country. This chapter explores linkages among civil rights, mass incarceration, and immigration enforcement to better explain the local political and economic context in which the Department of Homeland Security has diffused federal criminal enforcement priorities and institutionalized “prosecutorial” approaches to migration that aggressively punish while safeguarding “victims’ rights.”Less
Arizona has played a historic role in national “law and order” policymaking and immigration politics. Today it has some of the highest levels of criminal arrest, prosecution, and sentencing for immigration offenses. Yet it is also home to one of the most dynamic border- and immigrant-rights movements in the country. This chapter explores linkages among civil rights, mass incarceration, and immigration enforcement to better explain the local political and economic context in which the Department of Homeland Security has diffused federal criminal enforcement priorities and institutionalized “prosecutorial” approaches to migration that aggressively punish while safeguarding “victims’ rights.”
