Tirthankar Roy and Anand V. Swamy
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- May 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780226387642
- eISBN:
- 9780226387789
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226387789.003.0004
- Subject:
- Economics and Finance, Economic History
The institutional changes introduced under British rule in the 19th century made it easier to transfer land. Peasants could now borrow against land, and it could be seized when they failed to repay. ...
More
The institutional changes introduced under British rule in the 19th century made it easier to transfer land. Peasants could now borrow against land, and it could be seized when they failed to repay. It was inevitable that some peasants, faced with disasters such as crop failures or falling prices for their produce, would lose their land to lenders. This was not politically problematic when the lender was a local resident, probably a rich peasant. This was usually the case in relatively prosperous regions. But in poor and dry areas the lender was often an immigrant. Peasants who lost land to immigrants rioted in some areas. Fearing widespread political unrest, the Raj introduced legislation to reduce land transfer. In some instances land transfer was directly restricted, but more common measures involved regulating the moneylender-borrower relationship via usury laws, limits on interest accumulation, and debt-relief, which allowed the borrower to pay less than was owed. A slew of such legislation was passed after the Depression, when many peasants were hard-pressed to repay loans. Thus, whatever its commitment to laissez-faire, the Raj heavily regulated transactions in land and credit.Less
The institutional changes introduced under British rule in the 19th century made it easier to transfer land. Peasants could now borrow against land, and it could be seized when they failed to repay. It was inevitable that some peasants, faced with disasters such as crop failures or falling prices for their produce, would lose their land to lenders. This was not politically problematic when the lender was a local resident, probably a rich peasant. This was usually the case in relatively prosperous regions. But in poor and dry areas the lender was often an immigrant. Peasants who lost land to immigrants rioted in some areas. Fearing widespread political unrest, the Raj introduced legislation to reduce land transfer. In some instances land transfer was directly restricted, but more common measures involved regulating the moneylender-borrower relationship via usury laws, limits on interest accumulation, and debt-relief, which allowed the borrower to pay less than was owed. A slew of such legislation was passed after the Depression, when many peasants were hard-pressed to repay loans. Thus, whatever its commitment to laissez-faire, the Raj heavily regulated transactions in land and credit.
