Jeswald W. Salacuse and Nicholas P. Sullivan
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0005
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter assesses whether BITs have achieved their objectives. The first part of the chapter examines the historical movement to form BITs. The second part explores the goals motivating BITs, ...
More
This chapter assesses whether BITs have achieved their objectives. The first part of the chapter examines the historical movement to form BITs. The second part explores the goals motivating BITs, namely foreign investment protection, market liberalization, and foreign investment promotion. The next three parts assess the success of BITs in achieving each of these goals. The chapter concludes by considering the implications of the BIT movement for the further development of international investment law.Less
This chapter assesses whether BITs have achieved their objectives. The first part of the chapter examines the historical movement to form BITs. The second part explores the goals motivating BITs, namely foreign investment protection, market liberalization, and foreign investment promotion. The next three parts assess the success of BITs in achieving each of these goals. The chapter concludes by considering the implications of the BIT movement for the further development of international investment law.
Thomas W. Wälde
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199571345
- eISBN:
- 9780191705472
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0038
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law, Private International Law
This chapter focuses on particular challenges in the interpretation of investment treaties before international tribunals. Interpretation of authoritative texts (divine, legal, or scholarly) is ...
More
This chapter focuses on particular challenges in the interpretation of investment treaties before international tribunals. Interpretation of authoritative texts (divine, legal, or scholarly) is always difficult and apt to provoke engaged challenges. This is even more so if the community within which and for which application takes place does not share a widespread homogeneity of political, ideological, religious, or professional values. Investment arbitration by ad hoc tribunals is a novel and therefore unfamiliar form of international adjudication; as a result, it needs to make more effort to achieve political legitimacy — whatever the legal legitimacy founded on international treaties. The best approach is a resolutely technical and professional approach, that is, an approach that employs increasingly detailed drafting techniques in treaty-making, but also a predominantly textual approach linked to identifiable common elements of modern practice in interpretation.Less
This chapter focuses on particular challenges in the interpretation of investment treaties before international tribunals. Interpretation of authoritative texts (divine, legal, or scholarly) is always difficult and apt to provoke engaged challenges. This is even more so if the community within which and for which application takes place does not share a widespread homogeneity of political, ideological, religious, or professional values. Investment arbitration by ad hoc tribunals is a novel and therefore unfamiliar form of international adjudication; as a result, it needs to make more effort to achieve political legitimacy — whatever the legal legitimacy founded on international treaties. The best approach is a resolutely technical and professional approach, that is, an approach that employs increasingly detailed drafting techniques in treaty-making, but also a predominantly textual approach linked to identifiable common elements of modern practice in interpretation.
Kenneth J. Vandevelde
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0001
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter traces the history of international investment agreements. The history thus far comprises three separate eras. The first, the colonial era, began in the late 18th century and continued ...
More
This chapter traces the history of international investment agreements. The history thus far comprises three separate eras. The first, the colonial era, began in the late 18th century and continued until the end of the Second World War. The second, the postcolonial era, began with the end of the war and continued until approximately 1990, with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The third, the global era, began in approximately 1990 and continues to the present.Less
This chapter traces the history of international investment agreements. The history thus far comprises three separate eras. The first, the colonial era, began in the late 18th century and continued until the end of the Second World War. The second, the postcolonial era, began with the end of the war and continued until approximately 1990, with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The third, the global era, began in approximately 1990 and continues to the present.
Peter Muchlinski
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0002
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter presents an overview of the most common provisions found in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), focusing on bilateral investment treaties (BITs), as they represent the most ...
More
This chapter presents an overview of the most common provisions found in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), focusing on bilateral investment treaties (BITs), as they represent the most common type of IIA. These provisions include the preamble, provisions defining the scope of application of the treaty, standards of treatment, and dispute settlement clauses.Less
This chapter presents an overview of the most common provisions found in International Investment Agreements (IIAs), focusing on bilateral investment treaties (BITs), as they represent the most common type of IIA. These provisions include the preamble, provisions defining the scope of application of the treaty, standards of treatment, and dispute settlement clauses.
Gus Van Harten
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199552146
- eISBN:
- 9780191711558
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.001.0001
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
The recent explosion of investment treaty arbitration marks a major transformation of both international and public law, above all because of the manner in which states have delegated core powers of ...
More
The recent explosion of investment treaty arbitration marks a major transformation of both international and public law, above all because of the manner in which states have delegated core powers of the courts to private arbitrators. The book outlines investment treaty arbitration as a public law system and demonstrates how the system goes beyond all other forms of international adjudication in giving arbitrators a comprehensive jurisdiction to determine the legality of sovereign acts and to award public funds to businesses that sustain loss as a result of government regulation. The analysis also reveals some startling consequences of transplanting rules of commercial arbitration into the regulatory sphere. For instance, the system allows public law to be interpreted by arbitrators in private as a matter of course with limited scope for judicial review. Also, arbitrators are able to award compensation to investors in ways that go beyond domestic systems of state liability, and these awards may then be enforced in as many as 165 countries, making them more widely enforceable than other adjudicative decisions in public law. The system's mixture of private arbitration and public law undermines accountability and openness in judicial decision-making. But, most importantly, it poses a unique and fundamental challenge to the principle of judicial independence. To address this, the book argues that the system be replaced with an international investment court, properly constituted according to public law principles and made up of tenured judges.Less
The recent explosion of investment treaty arbitration marks a major transformation of both international and public law, above all because of the manner in which states have delegated core powers of the courts to private arbitrators. The book outlines investment treaty arbitration as a public law system and demonstrates how the system goes beyond all other forms of international adjudication in giving arbitrators a comprehensive jurisdiction to determine the legality of sovereign acts and to award public funds to businesses that sustain loss as a result of government regulation. The analysis also reveals some startling consequences of transplanting rules of commercial arbitration into the regulatory sphere. For instance, the system allows public law to be interpreted by arbitrators in private as a matter of course with limited scope for judicial review. Also, arbitrators are able to award compensation to investors in ways that go beyond domestic systems of state liability, and these awards may then be enforced in as many as 165 countries, making them more widely enforceable than other adjudicative decisions in public law. The system's mixture of private arbitration and public law undermines accountability and openness in judicial decision-making. But, most importantly, it poses a unique and fundamental challenge to the principle of judicial independence. To address this, the book argues that the system be replaced with an international investment court, properly constituted according to public law principles and made up of tenured judges.
Stephen M. Schwebel
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199571345
- eISBN:
- 9780191705472
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0027
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law, Private International Law
In 2004, the United States government adopted and published a Model Bilateral Investment Treaty that substantially revised the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty previously employed by it in ...
More
In 2004, the United States government adopted and published a Model Bilateral Investment Treaty that substantially revised the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty previously employed by it in negotiations with other governments over the conclusion of bilateral investment agreements. It has subsequently used the 2004 Model BIT in negotiating bilateral investment treaties, and investment chapters of free trade agreements, with other governments. This chapter focuses on a single provision stating that the ‘fair and equitable treatment includes the obligation not to deny justice’. The result of this specification is that the standard of fair and equitable treatment that is a paramount standard of bilateral investment treaties the world over is reduced in the US Model BIT to (i) ‘the customary international law minimum standard of treatment’ and (ii) ‘the obligation not to deny justice’.Less
In 2004, the United States government adopted and published a Model Bilateral Investment Treaty that substantially revised the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty previously employed by it in negotiations with other governments over the conclusion of bilateral investment agreements. It has subsequently used the 2004 Model BIT in negotiating bilateral investment treaties, and investment chapters of free trade agreements, with other governments. This chapter focuses on a single provision stating that the ‘fair and equitable treatment includes the obligation not to deny justice’. The result of this specification is that the standard of fair and equitable treatment that is a paramount standard of bilateral investment treaties the world over is reduced in the US Model BIT to (i) ‘the customary international law minimum standard of treatment’ and (ii) ‘the obligation not to deny justice’.
Alasdair Roberts
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- May 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780195374988
- eISBN:
- 9780199776849
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195374988.003.0006
- Subject:
- Political Science, American Politics
This chapter focuses on the creation of new independent regulatory agencies and signing of thousands of bilateral investment treaties during the era of liberalization. This was another massive ...
More
This chapter focuses on the creation of new independent regulatory agencies and signing of thousands of bilateral investment treaties during the era of liberalization. This was another massive experiment with the logic of discipline. But the experiment did not always produce the expected results. Governments sometimes escaped the constraints they had promised to honor. And where constraints continued to bind, troubling questions about the corrosion of democratic governance were raised.Less
This chapter focuses on the creation of new independent regulatory agencies and signing of thousands of bilateral investment treaties during the era of liberalization. This was another massive experiment with the logic of discipline. But the experiment did not always produce the expected results. Governments sometimes escaped the constraints they had promised to honor. And where constraints continued to bind, troubling questions about the corrosion of democratic governance were raised.
Gus Van Harten
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199552146
- eISBN:
- 9780191711558
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.003.0002
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter introduces investment law and arbitration by examining the historical conflict between capital-exporting and capital-importing countries over proposals for a multilateral investment ...
More
This chapter introduces investment law and arbitration by examining the historical conflict between capital-exporting and capital-importing countries over proposals for a multilateral investment treaty, and by arguing that this legal conflict is interwoven with the social and economic history of European expansion and colonialism, and the corresponding efforts of newly independent countries to achieve greater regulatory autonomy over foreign-owned assets within their territory. It provides an overview of the present system of investment treaty arbitration and the manner in which its use has expanded as multinational firms have capitalized on the opportunity to bring claims against middle-sized developing and former communist states. Finally, it offers an explanation for why capital-importing countries have agreed in bilateral and regional treaties to accept an intensity of adjudicative supervision and investor protection that they long opposed at the multilateral level.Less
This chapter introduces investment law and arbitration by examining the historical conflict between capital-exporting and capital-importing countries over proposals for a multilateral investment treaty, and by arguing that this legal conflict is interwoven with the social and economic history of European expansion and colonialism, and the corresponding efforts of newly independent countries to achieve greater regulatory autonomy over foreign-owned assets within their territory. It provides an overview of the present system of investment treaty arbitration and the manner in which its use has expanded as multinational firms have capitalized on the opportunity to bring claims against middle-sized developing and former communist states. Finally, it offers an explanation for why capital-importing countries have agreed in bilateral and regional treaties to accept an intensity of adjudicative supervision and investor protection that they long opposed at the multilateral level.
Tom Coupé, Irina Orlova, and Alexandre Skiba
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0024
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter empirically examines the effect of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and double taxation treaties (DTTs) on foreign direct investment. This chapter is structured as follows: firstly ...
More
This chapter empirically examines the effect of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and double taxation treaties (DTTs) on foreign direct investment. This chapter is structured as follows: firstly it describes bilateral investment and tax treaties, and reviews existing empirical studies on both BITs and DTTs. It then describes the methodology and data, and discusses the estimation technique and results, and conclusions. The chapter shows that transition countries that have BITs with developed countries receive more FDI inflows from these countries. It also provides evidence that BITs function to some extent as substitutes for institutional quality. There was no robust effect of tax treaties on FDI.Less
This chapter empirically examines the effect of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and double taxation treaties (DTTs) on foreign direct investment. This chapter is structured as follows: firstly it describes bilateral investment and tax treaties, and reviews existing empirical studies on both BITs and DTTs. It then describes the methodology and data, and discusses the estimation technique and results, and conclusions. The chapter shows that transition countries that have BITs with developed countries receive more FDI inflows from these countries. It also provides evidence that BITs function to some extent as substitutes for institutional quality. There was no robust effect of tax treaties on FDI.
Bruno Simma and Theodore Kill
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199571345
- eISBN:
- 9780191705472
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0036
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law, Private International Law
Under customary principles of treaty interpretation, tribunals routinely resort to rules of international law whose normative validity is grounded in a source outside of the treaty that is the ...
More
Under customary principles of treaty interpretation, tribunals routinely resort to rules of international law whose normative validity is grounded in a source outside of the treaty that is the subject of interpretation. Rules fitting this description are referred to as ‘external rules’ in relation to the treaty being interpreted. This chapter explores the possibility that investment tribunals may take international human rights law into account as such external rules when interpreting the treaties upon which investor claims are based. Section B discusses the practice of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in looking to external rules of international law as interpretative aids. Section C examines Article 31, paragraph 3, sub-paragraph c (Article 31(3)(c)) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Section D briefly sets out the ways in which international human rights law can inform the interpretation of BITs, based on our analysis of ICJ case law and Article 31(3)(c).Less
Under customary principles of treaty interpretation, tribunals routinely resort to rules of international law whose normative validity is grounded in a source outside of the treaty that is the subject of interpretation. Rules fitting this description are referred to as ‘external rules’ in relation to the treaty being interpreted. This chapter explores the possibility that investment tribunals may take international human rights law into account as such external rules when interpreting the treaties upon which investor claims are based. Section B discusses the practice of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in looking to external rules of international law as interpretative aids. Section C examines Article 31, paragraph 3, sub-paragraph c (Article 31(3)(c)) of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Section D briefly sets out the ways in which international human rights law can inform the interpretation of BITs, based on our analysis of ICJ case law and Article 31(3)(c).
Andrew T. Guzman
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0003
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter looks at why BITs have become the preferred method for governing the relationship between foreign investors and host governments in developing countries. It offers a novel explanation of ...
More
This chapter looks at why BITs have become the preferred method for governing the relationship between foreign investors and host governments in developing countries. It offers a novel explanation of why developing states fought aggressively against the former rule of “prompt, adequate, and effective” compensation for expropriation and in favor of a more lenient standard, and yet contemporaneously flocked to sign treaties that offer investors much greater protection than did the old rule of customary international law. It shows that although an individual country has a strong incentive to negotiate with and offer concessions to potential investors—thereby making itself a more attractive location relative to other potential hosts—developing countries as a group are likely to benefit from forcing investors to enter contracts with host countries that cannot be enforced in an international forum, thereby giving the host a much greater ability to extract value from the investment. The chapter offers a comprehensive explanation for the behavior of developing countries and assesses the desirability of BITs. It discusses the welfare implications of BITs as compared to the “appropriate compensation” standard that developing countries have advocated at the UN. It demonstrates that although BITs increase global efficiency, they likely reduce the overall welfare of developing countries. Finally, the chapter discusses the impact of BITs on customary international law.Less
This chapter looks at why BITs have become the preferred method for governing the relationship between foreign investors and host governments in developing countries. It offers a novel explanation of why developing states fought aggressively against the former rule of “prompt, adequate, and effective” compensation for expropriation and in favor of a more lenient standard, and yet contemporaneously flocked to sign treaties that offer investors much greater protection than did the old rule of customary international law. It shows that although an individual country has a strong incentive to negotiate with and offer concessions to potential investors—thereby making itself a more attractive location relative to other potential hosts—developing countries as a group are likely to benefit from forcing investors to enter contracts with host countries that cannot be enforced in an international forum, thereby giving the host a much greater ability to extract value from the investment. The chapter offers a comprehensive explanation for the behavior of developing countries and assesses the desirability of BITs. It discusses the welfare implications of BITs as compared to the “appropriate compensation” standard that developing countries have advocated at the UN. It demonstrates that although BITs increase global efficiency, they likely reduce the overall welfare of developing countries. Finally, the chapter discusses the impact of BITs on customary international law.
Deborah L. Swenson
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.003.0016
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter examines the correlation between previous foreign investment and the signing of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) to explore whether there is any evidence that the signing of BITs is ...
More
This chapter examines the correlation between previous foreign investment and the signing of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) to explore whether there is any evidence that the signing of BITs is investor-driven. It also looks at how BITs affect the flow of investments between countries when a wide range of controls for the economic environment, such as home and host GDP, wage rates, and risk measures are considered. The chapter identifies two factors that are likely to influence the observed benefits of country decisions to enter into BITs. First, although treaties are viewed as forward-looking tools that are signed to gain future investments, treaty signing also has a backward-looking element. In particular, countries that had already received larger stocks of foreign investment are more likely to sign BITs than countries that had been less successful in attracting foreign investment. This result suggests that the interest of exiting foreign investors drove the signing of BITs, at least in part. The second conclusion of this chapter is that controls for timing, intrinsic country attractiveness, and investor identity are all important. When these issues are addressed, BIT signing did help developing countries attract a larger volume of foreign investment.Less
This chapter examines the correlation between previous foreign investment and the signing of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) to explore whether there is any evidence that the signing of BITs is investor-driven. It also looks at how BITs affect the flow of investments between countries when a wide range of controls for the economic environment, such as home and host GDP, wage rates, and risk measures are considered. The chapter identifies two factors that are likely to influence the observed benefits of country decisions to enter into BITs. First, although treaties are viewed as forward-looking tools that are signed to gain future investments, treaty signing also has a backward-looking element. In particular, countries that had already received larger stocks of foreign investment are more likely to sign BITs than countries that had been less successful in attracting foreign investment. This result suggests that the interest of exiting foreign investors drove the signing of BITs, at least in part. The second conclusion of this chapter is that controls for timing, intrinsic country attractiveness, and investor identity are all important. When these issues are addressed, BIT signing did help developing countries attract a larger volume of foreign investment.
Karl P. Sauvant and Lisa E. Sachs
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195388534
- eISBN:
- 9780199855322
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388534.001.0001
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
In recent years, the treaties and strategies promoting global investment have changed dramatically. The widespread liberalization of economic policy has effectively spurred an increase in foreign ...
More
In recent years, the treaties and strategies promoting global investment have changed dramatically. The widespread liberalization of economic policy has effectively spurred an increase in foreign direct investment (FDI). By encouraging foreign investors to enter international markets, many countries are witnessing exponential growth within their economies and local industries. The surge of FDI not only brings capital for emerging or growing industries, but it is also capable of boosting the country's economy by creating greater access to financing, more job opportunities, and potential knowledge and technology spillovers. The basic purpose of concluding bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and double taxation treaties (DTTs) is to signal to investors that investments will be legally protected under international law in case of political turmoil and to mitigate the possibility of double taxation of foreign entities. But the actual effect of BITs and DTTs on the flows of foreign direct investment is debatable. This book assesses the performance of these treaties, and presents the most recent literature on BITs and DTTs and their impact on foreign investments.Less
In recent years, the treaties and strategies promoting global investment have changed dramatically. The widespread liberalization of economic policy has effectively spurred an increase in foreign direct investment (FDI). By encouraging foreign investors to enter international markets, many countries are witnessing exponential growth within their economies and local industries. The surge of FDI not only brings capital for emerging or growing industries, but it is also capable of boosting the country's economy by creating greater access to financing, more job opportunities, and potential knowledge and technology spillovers. The basic purpose of concluding bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and double taxation treaties (DTTs) is to signal to investors that investments will be legally protected under international law in case of political turmoil and to mitigate the possibility of double taxation of foreign entities. But the actual effect of BITs and DTTs on the flows of foreign direct investment is debatable. This book assesses the performance of these treaties, and presents the most recent literature on BITs and DTTs and their impact on foreign investments.
Chester Brown
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- January 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199589104
- eISBN:
- 9780191595455
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589104.003.0021
- Subject:
- Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Public International Law
This chapter deals with the applicable procedure in investment treaty arbitration. It notes that although investment treaty arbitration has a public law character, the applicable procedure typically ...
More
This chapter deals with the applicable procedure in investment treaty arbitration. It notes that although investment treaty arbitration has a public law character, the applicable procedure typically follows the model of international commercial arbitration. With this in mind, the chapter considers whether some features of the procedure that is applied in domestic public law litigation — in particular, in judicial review proceedings before domestic courts — might be relevant and applicable to investment treaty arbitration, so that it might better reflect its public law function. It then reviews the applicable procedure in such proceedings in the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States, Germany, and France, and suggests that the following aspects of procedure are worthy of consideration by investment treaty tribunals: the evidence-gathering powers of domestic tribunals, aspects of the inquisitorial process, the regime for access to the courts for non-disputing parties, and the diverse range of available remedies.Less
This chapter deals with the applicable procedure in investment treaty arbitration. It notes that although investment treaty arbitration has a public law character, the applicable procedure typically follows the model of international commercial arbitration. With this in mind, the chapter considers whether some features of the procedure that is applied in domestic public law litigation — in particular, in judicial review proceedings before domestic courts — might be relevant and applicable to investment treaty arbitration, so that it might better reflect its public law function. It then reviews the applicable procedure in such proceedings in the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States, Germany, and France, and suggests that the following aspects of procedure are worthy of consideration by investment treaty tribunals: the evidence-gathering powers of domestic tribunals, aspects of the inquisitorial process, the regime for access to the courts for non-disputing parties, and the diverse range of available remedies.
Anthony Sinclair
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199571345
- eISBN:
- 9780191705472
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0008
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law, Private International Law
This chapter begins by addressing the drafting approaches found in investment protection treaties that appear to provide a basis for investment-related State contract disputes to be submitted by an ...
More
This chapter begins by addressing the drafting approaches found in investment protection treaties that appear to provide a basis for investment-related State contract disputes to be submitted by an investor to a treaty-based arbitral tribunal for determination. It then addresses the competence of treaty-based arbitral tribunals to determine contractual claims per se. Finally, it reviews the publicly available arbitral practice on the prospect that contractual claims may be determined pursuant to generic investment treaty dispute settlement provisions.Less
This chapter begins by addressing the drafting approaches found in investment protection treaties that appear to provide a basis for investment-related State contract disputes to be submitted by an investor to a treaty-based arbitral tribunal for determination. It then addresses the competence of treaty-based arbitral tribunals to determine contractual claims per se. Finally, it reviews the publicly available arbitral practice on the prospect that contractual claims may be determined pursuant to generic investment treaty dispute settlement provisions.
Gus Van Harten
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199552146
- eISBN:
- 9780191711558
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.003.0006
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter examines how investment treaty arbitrators have exercised their power. Four broad approaches emerge from the jurisprudence to date. Two of them emphasize a reciprocal legal framework in ...
More
This chapter examines how investment treaty arbitrators have exercised their power. Four broad approaches emerge from the jurisprudence to date. Two of them emphasize a reciprocal legal framework in their conceptualization of investment treaty arbitration: the first by treating it as a form of commercial arbitration; the second as public international law. In contrast, the third and fourth approaches to the subject recognize the regulatory character of the underlying relationship between investors and state. The first does so by comparing investor protection to the protection of human rights; the second by applying a more prudential public law framework which moderates state liability in order to preserve governmental discretion. Each of these approaches is examined, informed by the view that the appropriate approach is to accept the regulatory context for investment disputes, and thus the relevance of public law, within the boundaries set by the inter-state bargain of an investment treaty.Less
This chapter examines how investment treaty arbitrators have exercised their power. Four broad approaches emerge from the jurisprudence to date. Two of them emphasize a reciprocal legal framework in their conceptualization of investment treaty arbitration: the first by treating it as a form of commercial arbitration; the second as public international law. In contrast, the third and fourth approaches to the subject recognize the regulatory character of the underlying relationship between investors and state. The first does so by comparing investor protection to the protection of human rights; the second by applying a more prudential public law framework which moderates state liability in order to preserve governmental discretion. Each of these approaches is examined, informed by the view that the appropriate approach is to accept the regulatory context for investment disputes, and thus the relevance of public law, within the boundaries set by the inter-state bargain of an investment treaty.
Gus Van Harten
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199552146
- eISBN:
- 9780191711558
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552146.003.0004
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter reviews the notion of ‘investment’ in contemporary treaties to demonstrate that the system affords to arbitrators a broad jurisdiction over a wide range of sovereign acts. It argues that ...
More
This chapter reviews the notion of ‘investment’ in contemporary treaties to demonstrate that the system affords to arbitrators a broad jurisdiction over a wide range of sovereign acts. It argues that the treaties typically apply broadly framed standards of review by looking at three key standards — national treatment, the minimum standard of treatment, and compensation for expropriation — which reveal the interpretive and governmental discretion that is delegated to arbitrators. The aim here is not to demarcate precisely the boundaries of arbitrator authority or the meaning of particular standards, but merely to show that within those boundaries a wide expanse of regulatory activity is subject to intensive review.Less
This chapter reviews the notion of ‘investment’ in contemporary treaties to demonstrate that the system affords to arbitrators a broad jurisdiction over a wide range of sovereign acts. It argues that the treaties typically apply broadly framed standards of review by looking at three key standards — national treatment, the minimum standard of treatment, and compensation for expropriation — which reveal the interpretive and governmental discretion that is delegated to arbitrators. The aim here is not to demarcate precisely the boundaries of arbitrator authority or the meaning of particular standards, but merely to show that within those boundaries a wide expanse of regulatory activity is subject to intensive review.
Stephen D. Cohen
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- May 2007
- ISBN:
- 9780195179354
- eISBN:
- 9780199783779
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179354.003.0012
- Subject:
- Economics and Finance, International
This chapter provides yet another eclectic analysis, this time of the still-irreconcilable controversy surrounding the “appropriate” kinds and extent of governmental regulation of MNCs as entities ...
More
This chapter provides yet another eclectic analysis, this time of the still-irreconcilable controversy surrounding the “appropriate” kinds and extent of governmental regulation of MNCs as entities and FDI as process. The initial section explains why so little progress has been made in establishing meaningful international rules covering these international business phenomena. Next is an abbreviated survey of the major bilateral agreements and voluntary codes of conduct that seek to regulate FDI-related activities to serve the common good. The conflicting attitudes towards the appropriate kinds and extent of multilateral regulations are explained in depth by examining two major loci of contention: the would-be Multilateral Agreement on Investment, and the existing Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The increasing significance of activist non-government organizations as unofficial regulators of MNC behavior is examined in the concluding section.Less
This chapter provides yet another eclectic analysis, this time of the still-irreconcilable controversy surrounding the “appropriate” kinds and extent of governmental regulation of MNCs as entities and FDI as process. The initial section explains why so little progress has been made in establishing meaningful international rules covering these international business phenomena. Next is an abbreviated survey of the major bilateral agreements and voluntary codes of conduct that seek to regulate FDI-related activities to serve the common good. The conflicting attitudes towards the appropriate kinds and extent of multilateral regulations are explained in depth by examining two major loci of contention: the would-be Multilateral Agreement on Investment, and the existing Chapter 11 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The increasing significance of activist non-government organizations as unofficial regulators of MNC behavior is examined in the concluding section.
Ioana Tudor
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- January 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199235063
- eISBN:
- 9780191715785
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199235063.003.0002
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law
This chapter presents the results of empirical research conducted on the basis of 365 bilateral investment treaties, and of the existing regional and multilateral treaties that contain a FET clause. ...
More
This chapter presents the results of empirical research conducted on the basis of 365 bilateral investment treaties, and of the existing regional and multilateral treaties that contain a FET clause. The conclusion of this research is that there are five main drafting variations of the FET clauses in the examined treaties, and that each of these variations may have an impact on the meaning of FET. The wording of each FET clause is therefore essential in establishing its application in each case. The research also concludes that not all investment treaties contain a FET clause. In the presence of so many variations, the question arises as to the common denominator that ensures the coherence among them and the existence of a single standard.Less
This chapter presents the results of empirical research conducted on the basis of 365 bilateral investment treaties, and of the existing regional and multilateral treaties that contain a FET clause. The conclusion of this research is that there are five main drafting variations of the FET clauses in the examined treaties, and that each of these variations may have an impact on the meaning of FET. The wording of each FET clause is therefore essential in establishing its application in each case. The research also concludes that not all investment treaties contain a FET clause. In the presence of so many variations, the question arises as to the common denominator that ensures the coherence among them and the existence of a single standard.
L. Yves Fortier
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199571345
- eISBN:
- 9780191705472
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.003.0028
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law, Private International Law
This chapter has two main objectives. The first is to provide an overview of the evolution of Canada's approach to investment protection, with particular focus on dispute settlement. The second ...
More
This chapter has two main objectives. The first is to provide an overview of the evolution of Canada's approach to investment protection, with particular focus on dispute settlement. The second objective is to identify the essential elements that now underpin Canada's approach to investment protection. It argues that principles central to the Canadian legal system, such as procedural fairness and due process, are now incorporated as quasi sine qua nons in Canada's approach to investment protection. These principles are consonant with the ICSID Convention's objectives to settle investment disputes in an orderly manner and to protect, to the same extent and with the same vigour, the investor and the host State in the general interest of development.Less
This chapter has two main objectives. The first is to provide an overview of the evolution of Canada's approach to investment protection, with particular focus on dispute settlement. The second objective is to identify the essential elements that now underpin Canada's approach to investment protection. It argues that principles central to the Canadian legal system, such as procedural fairness and due process, are now incorporated as quasi sine qua nons in Canada's approach to investment protection. These principles are consonant with the ICSID Convention's objectives to settle investment disputes in an orderly manner and to protect, to the same extent and with the same vigour, the investor and the host State in the general interest of development.
