Matthew Dallek
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780199743124
- eISBN:
- 9780190469559
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199743124.003.0015
- Subject:
- History, American History: 20th Century
During World War II, the choices made by liberals had immediate consequences for liberalism and the country. Social defense was ultimately subordinated to the needs of national security. As home ...
More
During World War II, the choices made by liberals had immediate consequences for liberalism and the country. Social defense was ultimately subordinated to the needs of national security. As home defense evolved, what “defense” and “security” even meant narrowed in wartime society to connote military preparedness rather than “human security.” Eleanor Roosevelt became a principal architect of liberalism as “a fighting faith.” She insisted that social and economic problems had to remain at the center of the debate about democracy in wartime. She helped forge the liberal tradition of projecting America’s values to the world while also pushing Americans to live up to their founding principles. Fiorello La Guardia’s vision for home defense found arguably even more resonance in the culture of 1950s America than ER’s. His idea to prioritize militarism ahead of other national concerns gained traction among some liberals during the Cold War.Less
During World War II, the choices made by liberals had immediate consequences for liberalism and the country. Social defense was ultimately subordinated to the needs of national security. As home defense evolved, what “defense” and “security” even meant narrowed in wartime society to connote military preparedness rather than “human security.” Eleanor Roosevelt became a principal architect of liberalism as “a fighting faith.” She insisted that social and economic problems had to remain at the center of the debate about democracy in wartime. She helped forge the liberal tradition of projecting America’s values to the world while also pushing Americans to live up to their founding principles. Fiorello La Guardia’s vision for home defense found arguably even more resonance in the culture of 1950s America than ER’s. His idea to prioritize militarism ahead of other national concerns gained traction among some liberals during the Cold War.
Richard Crockatt
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- October 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780198785491
- eISBN:
- 9780191827402
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785491.003.0009
- Subject:
- History, History of Ideas, Political History
It is difficult to gauge precisely what influence Einstein and other intellectuals had on the course of events, not because ideas never influence events but because the mechanisms involved are rarely ...
More
It is difficult to gauge precisely what influence Einstein and other intellectuals had on the course of events, not because ideas never influence events but because the mechanisms involved are rarely direct or immediate. Einstein himself often despaired of the effort to influence policymakers but never gave up. His ethical approach was not simply a personal choice but reflected the times, in which it was still possible to believe ethical principles could guide practice. Karl Mannheim’s Ideology and Utopia, which charted the increasing dominance of ideological thinking under the pressure of ‘general democratization’, indicated the way the world was going, and it was away from the ethical approach. However, what is sometimes regarded as a weakness of Einstein’s political thinking—its remoteness from practice—was the basis of its power to hold practice to account. His was a fighting faith, demonstrating that in politics much more is involved than politics.Less
It is difficult to gauge precisely what influence Einstein and other intellectuals had on the course of events, not because ideas never influence events but because the mechanisms involved are rarely direct or immediate. Einstein himself often despaired of the effort to influence policymakers but never gave up. His ethical approach was not simply a personal choice but reflected the times, in which it was still possible to believe ethical principles could guide practice. Karl Mannheim’s Ideology and Utopia, which charted the increasing dominance of ideological thinking under the pressure of ‘general democratization’, indicated the way the world was going, and it was away from the ethical approach. However, what is sometimes regarded as a weakness of Einstein’s political thinking—its remoteness from practice—was the basis of its power to hold practice to account. His was a fighting faith, demonstrating that in politics much more is involved than politics.
