Linn Posey-Maddox
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780226120188
- eISBN:
- 9780226120355
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226120355.003.0007
- Subject:
- Education, Educational Policy and Politics
This final chapter highlights the need for critical and nuanced studies of urban school transformation, as well as evaluations of “progress” and “reform” in urban education that extend beyond ...
More
This final chapter highlights the need for critical and nuanced studies of urban school transformation, as well as evaluations of “progress” and “reform” in urban education that extend beyond commonly used markers such as rising test scores, the presence of the middle-class, and greater material resources. It offers a new way to think about and address the role of middle-class parents in school integration efforts, based on the goal of producing equitable development in public education. The chapter concludes with a focus on education policy and practice, providing several recommendations for policy makers, district and school staff, and parents based on the findings of the study.Less
This final chapter highlights the need for critical and nuanced studies of urban school transformation, as well as evaluations of “progress” and “reform” in urban education that extend beyond commonly used markers such as rising test scores, the presence of the middle-class, and greater material resources. It offers a new way to think about and address the role of middle-class parents in school integration efforts, based on the goal of producing equitable development in public education. The chapter concludes with a focus on education policy and practice, providing several recommendations for policy makers, district and school staff, and parents based on the findings of the study.
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780804770835
- eISBN:
- 9780804781794
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804770835.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
This introductory discusses the theme of this book, which is about equitable development in Southeast Asia. The book proposes to answer the general theoretical question of variation in patterns of ...
More
This introductory discusses the theme of this book, which is about equitable development in Southeast Asia. The book proposes to answer the general theoretical question of variation in patterns of inequality through a comparative historical analysis in which political institutions play a central role in shaping outcomes of development. It provides a structured comparison of Malaysia and Thailand, two relatively similar countries, and compares them to the case of the Philippines and Vietnam. The central thesis of this study is that institutional power and capacity, along with pragmatic ideology, are crucial to the pursuit of equitable development.Less
This introductory discusses the theme of this book, which is about equitable development in Southeast Asia. The book proposes to answer the general theoretical question of variation in patterns of inequality through a comparative historical analysis in which political institutions play a central role in shaping outcomes of development. It provides a structured comparison of Malaysia and Thailand, two relatively similar countries, and compares them to the case of the Philippines and Vietnam. The central thesis of this study is that institutional power and capacity, along with pragmatic ideology, are crucial to the pursuit of equitable development.
Linn Posey-Maddox
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780226120188
- eISBN:
- 9780226120355
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226120355.003.0001
- Subject:
- Education, Educational Policy and Politics
This chapter outlines the scope and main arguments of the book, as well as the key concepts that frame the research. It presents an overview of social class and education, drawing from the work of ...
More
This chapter outlines the scope and main arguments of the book, as well as the key concepts that frame the research. It presents an overview of social class and education, drawing from the work of Bourdieu. It then discusses the intersection of race and class in family-school relationships, and the persistence of racial inequality in urban education. It also outlines the concept of school gentrification, and distinguishes it from economic integration. The chapter then proposes the concept of equitable development as a goal for urban school transformation efforts, and discusses its main tenets. The chapter concludes by outlining the remaining chapters in the book.Less
This chapter outlines the scope and main arguments of the book, as well as the key concepts that frame the research. It presents an overview of social class and education, drawing from the work of Bourdieu. It then discusses the intersection of race and class in family-school relationships, and the persistence of racial inequality in urban education. It also outlines the concept of school gentrification, and distinguishes it from economic integration. The chapter then proposes the concept of equitable development as a goal for urban school transformation efforts, and discusses its main tenets. The chapter concludes by outlining the remaining chapters in the book.
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780804770835
- eISBN:
- 9780804781794
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804770835.003.0002
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
This chapter examines alternative explanations for variation in equitable development. It considers democracy, class, and ethnicity as alternative arguments and suggests that institutions provide a ...
More
This chapter examines alternative explanations for variation in equitable development. It considers democracy, class, and ethnicity as alternative arguments and suggests that institutions provide a more compelling theoretical lens for explaining variation in equitable development. The chapter highlights the importance of party institutionalization, state intervention, and close state–party ties and moderate policies in explaining variation in equitable development. It explains that institutions provide the weak with a collective material structure which allows them to unify and articulate their interests.Less
This chapter examines alternative explanations for variation in equitable development. It considers democracy, class, and ethnicity as alternative arguments and suggests that institutions provide a more compelling theoretical lens for explaining variation in equitable development. The chapter highlights the importance of party institutionalization, state intervention, and close state–party ties and moderate policies in explaining variation in equitable development. It explains that institutions provide the weak with a collective material structure which allows them to unify and articulate their interests.
Erik Kuhonta
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780804770835
- eISBN:
- 9780804781794
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804770835.001.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
Why do some countries in the developing world achieve growth with equity, while others do not? If democracy is the supposed panacea for the developing world, why have Southeast Asian democracies had ...
More
Why do some countries in the developing world achieve growth with equity, while others do not? If democracy is the supposed panacea for the developing world, why have Southeast Asian democracies had such uneven results? In exploring these questions, the author of this book argues that the realization of equitable development hinges heavily on strong institutions, particularly institutionalized political parties and cohesive interventionist states, and on moderate policy and ideology. The book is framed as a structured and focused comparative-historical analysis of the politics of inequality in Malaysia and Thailand, but also includes comparisons with the Philippines and Vietnam. It shows how Malaysia and Vietnam have had the requisite institutional capacity and power to advance equitable development, while Thailand and the Philippines, because of weaker institutions, have not achieved the same levels of success. At its core, the book makes a claim for the need for institutional power and institutional capacity to alleviate structural inequalities.Less
Why do some countries in the developing world achieve growth with equity, while others do not? If democracy is the supposed panacea for the developing world, why have Southeast Asian democracies had such uneven results? In exploring these questions, the author of this book argues that the realization of equitable development hinges heavily on strong institutions, particularly institutionalized political parties and cohesive interventionist states, and on moderate policy and ideology. The book is framed as a structured and focused comparative-historical analysis of the politics of inequality in Malaysia and Thailand, but also includes comparisons with the Philippines and Vietnam. It shows how Malaysia and Vietnam have had the requisite institutional capacity and power to advance equitable development, while Thailand and the Philippines, because of weaker institutions, have not achieved the same levels of success. At its core, the book makes a claim for the need for institutional power and institutional capacity to alleviate structural inequalities.
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780804770835
- eISBN:
- 9780804781794
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804770835.003.0006
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
This chapter, which examines the impact of the turmoil of the mid-1970s on social and institutional reforms in Thailand, suggests that the democratic period of the mid-1970s provided the first ...
More
This chapter, which examines the impact of the turmoil of the mid-1970s on social and institutional reforms in Thailand, suggests that the democratic period of the mid-1970s provided the first concrete opportunity for social reforms where there was active movement in the grass roots, which pushed for more equitable policies. It discusses the role of political parties in the reform process and the negative impact of weak institutions on the prospects for reform. The chapter also considers policies related to rural debt, dams, and health care during the term of Thaksin Shinawatra, which affected equitable development.Less
This chapter, which examines the impact of the turmoil of the mid-1970s on social and institutional reforms in Thailand, suggests that the democratic period of the mid-1970s provided the first concrete opportunity for social reforms where there was active movement in the grass roots, which pushed for more equitable policies. It discusses the role of political parties in the reform process and the negative impact of weak institutions on the prospects for reform. The chapter also considers policies related to rural debt, dams, and health care during the term of Thaksin Shinawatra, which affected equitable development.
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780804770835
- eISBN:
- 9780804781794
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804770835.003.0007
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
This chapter, which compares equitable development in the Philippines and Vietnam, examines how the Philippines has historically been plagued by weak institutions that have denied it the potential ...
More
This chapter, which compares equitable development in the Philippines and Vietnam, examines how the Philippines has historically been plagued by weak institutions that have denied it the potential for growth and equity. It describes how a highly institutionalized political party in Vietnam has successfully implemented social reforms that have created a relatively equitable society and stimulated economic growth without excessively exacerbating the distribution of income. The chapter suggests that the experiences of these two countries validate the role of institutional power and capacity in equitable development.Less
This chapter, which compares equitable development in the Philippines and Vietnam, examines how the Philippines has historically been plagued by weak institutions that have denied it the potential for growth and equity. It describes how a highly institutionalized political party in Vietnam has successfully implemented social reforms that have created a relatively equitable society and stimulated economic growth without excessively exacerbating the distribution of income. The chapter suggests that the experiences of these two countries validate the role of institutional power and capacity in equitable development.
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780804770835
- eISBN:
- 9780804781794
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804770835.003.0008
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
This chapter sums up the key findings of this study on equitable development in Southeast Asia, and highlights the similarities and differences in the experiences of Malaysia, Thailand, the ...
More
This chapter sums up the key findings of this study on equitable development in Southeast Asia, and highlights the similarities and differences in the experiences of Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. It suggests that the two positive cases of Malaysia and Vietnam had relatively similar institutional features, which has enabled them to achieve equitable development. The chapter explains that opposition to a colonial regime or to a colonial project stimulated the formation of strong parties in both Malaysia and Vietnam. It also contends that the advent of democratic elections in the Philippines weakened the potential for institutional development and that the absence of colonialism in Thailand limited the impulse for a nationalist party.Less
This chapter sums up the key findings of this study on equitable development in Southeast Asia, and highlights the similarities and differences in the experiences of Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines, and Vietnam. It suggests that the two positive cases of Malaysia and Vietnam had relatively similar institutional features, which has enabled them to achieve equitable development. The chapter explains that opposition to a colonial regime or to a colonial project stimulated the formation of strong parties in both Malaysia and Vietnam. It also contends that the advent of democratic elections in the Philippines weakened the potential for institutional development and that the absence of colonialism in Thailand limited the impulse for a nationalist party.