Laurent Dubreuil
David Fieni (ed.)
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780801450563
- eISBN:
- 9780801467516
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Cornell University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7591/cornell/9780801450563.003.0009
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
This chapter explains that anthropology, at least during the first part of its disciplinary history, spoke the colonial language all too often. For Marcel Mauss, Michel Leiris, and Claude ...
More
This chapter explains that anthropology, at least during the first part of its disciplinary history, spoke the colonial language all too often. For Marcel Mauss, Michel Leiris, and Claude Lévi-Strauss, colonization is both what allows ethnology to take place and what, once brought to term, will prohibit it (in the dissolution of ancestral cultures). Hence the colony as condition of possibility does not enter the field of study but instead remains outside the frame. Yet, after the epistemological crisis linked to decolonization, anthropology has sometimes closed itself off into what can be called its standard state—this supposedly reverential attitude is of the same order as the former ensauvagement, except that this time it abandons the comparison of differences.Less
This chapter explains that anthropology, at least during the first part of its disciplinary history, spoke the colonial language all too often. For Marcel Mauss, Michel Leiris, and Claude Lévi-Strauss, colonization is both what allows ethnology to take place and what, once brought to term, will prohibit it (in the dissolution of ancestral cultures). Hence the colony as condition of possibility does not enter the field of study but instead remains outside the frame. Yet, after the epistemological crisis linked to decolonization, anthropology has sometimes closed itself off into what can be called its standard state—this supposedly reverential attitude is of the same order as the former ensauvagement, except that this time it abandons the comparison of differences.