Jennifer Mitzen
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- January 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780226060088
- eISBN:
- 9780226060255
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226060255.001.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, International Relations and Politics
How states cooperate in the absence of a sovereign power is a perennial question in international relations. This book argues that global governance is more than just the cooperation of states under ...
More
How states cooperate in the absence of a sovereign power is a perennial question in international relations. This book argues that global governance is more than just the cooperation of states under anarchy: it is the formation and maintenance of collective intentions, or joint commitments among states to address problems together. The key mechanism through which these intentions are sustained is face-to-face diplomacy, which keeps states' obligations to one another salient and helps them solve problems on a day-to-day basis. The book argues that the origins of this practice lie in the Concert of Europe, an informal agreement among five European states in the wake of the Napoleonic wars to reduce the possibility of recurrence, which first institutionalized the practice of jointly managing the balance of power. Through the Concert's many successes, the book shows that the words and actions of state leaders in public forums contributed to collective self-restraint and a commitment to problem solving—and at a time when communication was considerably more difficult than it is today. Despite the Concert's eventual breakdown, the practice it introduced—of face-to-face diplomacy as a mode of joint problem solving—survived, and is the basis of global governance today.Less
How states cooperate in the absence of a sovereign power is a perennial question in international relations. This book argues that global governance is more than just the cooperation of states under anarchy: it is the formation and maintenance of collective intentions, or joint commitments among states to address problems together. The key mechanism through which these intentions are sustained is face-to-face diplomacy, which keeps states' obligations to one another salient and helps them solve problems on a day-to-day basis. The book argues that the origins of this practice lie in the Concert of Europe, an informal agreement among five European states in the wake of the Napoleonic wars to reduce the possibility of recurrence, which first institutionalized the practice of jointly managing the balance of power. Through the Concert's many successes, the book shows that the words and actions of state leaders in public forums contributed to collective self-restraint and a commitment to problem solving—and at a time when communication was considerably more difficult than it is today. Despite the Concert's eventual breakdown, the practice it introduced—of face-to-face diplomacy as a mode of joint problem solving—survived, and is the basis of global governance today.
Winfried Tilmann and Plassmann Clemens
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- March 2021
- ISBN:
- 9780198755463
- eISBN:
- 9780191927706
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0014
- Subject:
- Law, Intellectual Property, IT, and Media Law
The European Union would not consent to the creation of a competent international patent court when the rules of operation of that court are at least ambiguous with regard to its obligation to take ...
More
The European Union would not consent to the creation of a competent international patent court when the rules of operation of that court are at least ambiguous with regard to its obligation to take into account all Union law. In particular, the Union would not elude its obligation to observe the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European legal system by participating in a standardized judicial system in which the application of such rights does not appear to be guaranteed.
Less
The European Union would not consent to the creation of a competent international patent court when the rules of operation of that court are at least ambiguous with regard to its obligation to take into account all Union law. In particular, the Union would not elude its obligation to observe the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European legal system by participating in a standardized judicial system in which the application of such rights does not appear to be guaranteed.
Matthew Dallek
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780199743124
- eISBN:
- 9780190469559
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199743124.003.0005
- Subject:
- History, American History: 20th Century
President Roosevelt and Mayor La Guardia were forced to grapple more directly with the problem of home defense during 1940, an election year. Several forces came together to force the issue onto the ...
More
President Roosevelt and Mayor La Guardia were forced to grapple more directly with the problem of home defense during 1940, an election year. Several forces came together to force the issue onto the national agenda. Hitler’s victories across much of Western Europe prompted some liberal internationalists to warn that the United States would become extremely vulnerable if Britain were to fall. FDR’s Division of State and Local Cooperation had little authority to impose home defense policies on states and cities. Numerous mayors complained that the states were bypassing their home defense needs and lobbied the Roosevelt administration to establish a federal, nationwide home defense program. As fears of attack on the United States soared in some quarters, a slow consensus began to form among many liberals that home defense of some sort was going to become an important program in the age of total war.Less
President Roosevelt and Mayor La Guardia were forced to grapple more directly with the problem of home defense during 1940, an election year. Several forces came together to force the issue onto the national agenda. Hitler’s victories across much of Western Europe prompted some liberal internationalists to warn that the United States would become extremely vulnerable if Britain were to fall. FDR’s Division of State and Local Cooperation had little authority to impose home defense policies on states and cities. Numerous mayors complained that the states were bypassing their home defense needs and lobbied the Roosevelt administration to establish a federal, nationwide home defense program. As fears of attack on the United States soared in some quarters, a slow consensus began to form among many liberals that home defense of some sort was going to become an important program in the age of total war.
Winfried Tilmann
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- March 2021
- ISBN:
- 9780198755463
- eISBN:
- 9780191927706
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0060
- Subject:
- Law, Intellectual Property, IT, and Media Law
The European Union would not consent to the creation of a competent international patent court when the rules of operation of that court are at least ambiguous with regard to its obligation to take ...
More
The European Union would not consent to the creation of a competent international patent court when the rules of operation of that court are at least ambiguous with regard to its obligation to take into account all Union law. In particular, the Union would not elude its obligation to observe the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European legal system by participating in a standardized judicial system in which the application of such rights does not appear to be guaranteed.
Less
The European Union would not consent to the creation of a competent international patent court when the rules of operation of that court are at least ambiguous with regard to its obligation to take into account all Union law. In particular, the Union would not elude its obligation to observe the fundamental rights guaranteed by the European legal system by participating in a standardized judicial system in which the application of such rights does not appear to be guaranteed.
