Kevin Dunion
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9781845861223
- eISBN:
- 9781474406178
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Edinburgh University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3366/edinburgh/9781845861223.003.0003
- Subject:
- Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This chapter provides an overview of freedom of information as it is practiced in Scotland, with particular emphasis on the approach which could properly be taken to the exemptions protecting the ...
More
This chapter provides an overview of freedom of information as it is practiced in Scotland, with particular emphasis on the approach which could properly be taken to the exemptions protecting the free and frank provision of advice and exchange of information at s 30(b)(i) and (ii) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA). At issue was whether contents-based exemptions could be claimed in respect of all advice given by officials, almost irrespective of content. The Scottish Information Commissioner took the view that a quasi-class-based approach to a contents-based exemption was contrary to statute. The key decision which brought this issue to a head was Mr William Alexander and the Scottish Executive. This chapter analyses the case-by-case approach to the ‘harm’ test used to determine whether the harm claimed by authorities regarding contents-based vs class-based exemptions stands up to scrutiny.Less
This chapter provides an overview of freedom of information as it is practiced in Scotland, with particular emphasis on the approach which could properly be taken to the exemptions protecting the free and frank provision of advice and exchange of information at s 30(b)(i) and (ii) of the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA). At issue was whether contents-based exemptions could be claimed in respect of all advice given by officials, almost irrespective of content. The Scottish Information Commissioner took the view that a quasi-class-based approach to a contents-based exemption was contrary to statute. The key decision which brought this issue to a head was Mr William Alexander and the Scottish Executive. This chapter analyses the case-by-case approach to the ‘harm’ test used to determine whether the harm claimed by authorities regarding contents-based vs class-based exemptions stands up to scrutiny.
Kevin Dunion
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9781845861223
- eISBN:
- 9781474406178
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Edinburgh University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3366/edinburgh/9781845861223.003.0004
- Subject:
- Law, Constitutional and Administrative Law
This chapter provides an overview of freedom of information as it is practiced in Scotland, with particular emphasis on the application of contents-based exemptions and exceptions. Many of the ...
More
This chapter provides an overview of freedom of information as it is practiced in Scotland, with particular emphasis on the application of contents-based exemptions and exceptions. Many of the provisions in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) and the Environmental Information Regulations (EIRs) which allow information to be withheld require authorities to demonstrate not only that the consequences of information being released into the public domain would be harmful, but that the nature and extent of the harm would be substantial. The question ‘Where is the harm in disclosure?’ has been at the core of many decisions. This chapter considers contents-based FOISA exemptions that apply only where disclosure ‘would or would be likely to prejudice substantially’. It also discusses the ‘harm’ test and the degree of harm that must be weighed against the likelihood of its occurrence, along with harm-based exemption in relation to ‘prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs’.Less
This chapter provides an overview of freedom of information as it is practiced in Scotland, with particular emphasis on the application of contents-based exemptions and exceptions. Many of the provisions in the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 (FOISA) and the Environmental Information Regulations (EIRs) which allow information to be withheld require authorities to demonstrate not only that the consequences of information being released into the public domain would be harmful, but that the nature and extent of the harm would be substantial. The question ‘Where is the harm in disclosure?’ has been at the core of many decisions. This chapter considers contents-based FOISA exemptions that apply only where disclosure ‘would or would be likely to prejudice substantially’. It also discusses the ‘harm’ test and the degree of harm that must be weighed against the likelihood of its occurrence, along with harm-based exemption in relation to ‘prejudice to the effective conduct of public affairs’.
