Farah Godrej
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- January 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199782062
- eISBN:
- 9780199919123
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199782062.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory, Comparative Politics
In recent years, two movements have emerged which should interest to political theorists. First, “cosmopolitanism” has become the focus of much normative interest within political theory. ...
More
In recent years, two movements have emerged which should interest to political theorists. First, “cosmopolitanism” has become the focus of much normative interest within political theory. Simultaneously, political theory has seen the emergence of a sub-field calling itself “comparative political theory,” seeking to introduce non-Western perspectives into familiar debates about human problems. This chapter suggests that each of the above movements, while generally welcome, is characterized by important gaps that deserve sustained attention: in one case, the lack of any reflection on what the recent development of cosmopolitan discourse mean for political theory and for the activity of political theorizing in particular, and in the other case, the relative scarcity of self-conscious methodological reflection within the emerging field calling itself comparative political theory. This chapter identifies the central aporiae in each of these literatures, and argues that they are not unrelated. Political theory itself can evolve toward cosmopolitanism only when explorations of “comparative” political thought occur at the center, rather than at the margins of, the discipline. The chapter articulates the necessity of this cosmopolitan intervention into the modes of political theorizing. It summarizes the various methodological claims and reflections that constitute this intervention, and follow throughout the book.Less
In recent years, two movements have emerged which should interest to political theorists. First, “cosmopolitanism” has become the focus of much normative interest within political theory. Simultaneously, political theory has seen the emergence of a sub-field calling itself “comparative political theory,” seeking to introduce non-Western perspectives into familiar debates about human problems. This chapter suggests that each of the above movements, while generally welcome, is characterized by important gaps that deserve sustained attention: in one case, the lack of any reflection on what the recent development of cosmopolitan discourse mean for political theory and for the activity of political theorizing in particular, and in the other case, the relative scarcity of self-conscious methodological reflection within the emerging field calling itself comparative political theory. This chapter identifies the central aporiae in each of these literatures, and argues that they are not unrelated. Political theory itself can evolve toward cosmopolitanism only when explorations of “comparative” political thought occur at the center, rather than at the margins of, the discipline. The chapter articulates the necessity of this cosmopolitan intervention into the modes of political theorizing. It summarizes the various methodological claims and reflections that constitute this intervention, and follow throughout the book.
Andrew F. March
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195330960
- eISBN:
- 9780199868278
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195330960.003.0002
- Subject:
- Religion, Islam
This chapter explains further the idea of an overlapping consensus and the interest in arguing for one across multiple ethical traditions, showing that this interest is primarily derived from the ...
More
This chapter explains further the idea of an overlapping consensus and the interest in arguing for one across multiple ethical traditions, showing that this interest is primarily derived from the desire for social stability and solidarity, rather than first-order philosophical moral justification. The chapter surveys the justificatory theories of John Rawls’s political liberalism and Jürgen Habermas’s discourse ethics, as well as the relativist critiques of Rorty and Fish, arguing that there is a basic agreement that the justification of liberal norms from within a particular religious tradition is of primarily political interest, rather than philosophical. It closes with a defense of justificatory comparative political theory primarily aimed at refuting the charge of cultural hegemony and clarifying the nature of the “liberal bias” involved. The central argument is that this inquiry is ultimately deeply respectful of Islam as an autonomous source of ethical thought and motivation, which is compatible with criticism of specific doctrines or practices.Less
This chapter explains further the idea of an overlapping consensus and the interest in arguing for one across multiple ethical traditions, showing that this interest is primarily derived from the desire for social stability and solidarity, rather than first-order philosophical moral justification. The chapter surveys the justificatory theories of John Rawls’s political liberalism and Jürgen Habermas’s discourse ethics, as well as the relativist critiques of Rorty and Fish, arguing that there is a basic agreement that the justification of liberal norms from within a particular religious tradition is of primarily political interest, rather than philosophical. It closes with a defense of justificatory comparative political theory primarily aimed at refuting the charge of cultural hegemony and clarifying the nature of the “liberal bias” involved. The central argument is that this inquiry is ultimately deeply respectful of Islam as an autonomous source of ethical thought and motivation, which is compatible with criticism of specific doctrines or practices.
Nader Hashemi
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- May 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195321241
- eISBN:
- 9780199869831
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195321241.003.0001
- Subject:
- Religion, Islam
This chapter maps out the key arguments, theoretical approaches, analytical assumptions, and methodology that shape this study. The emerging sub-discipline of comparative political theory is ...
More
This chapter maps out the key arguments, theoretical approaches, analytical assumptions, and methodology that shape this study. The emerging sub-discipline of comparative political theory is discussed and an argument is advanced as to why this book should be viewed as a contribution to this new discipline of political science. Furthermore, the intellectual context that has informed the academic and intellectual debate both on the relationship between religion and democracy in general and Islam and liberal democracy in particular is discussed with special attention to the post-Cold War and post-September 11, 2001 context. A definition of terms such as religion and liberal democracy is provided along a discussion of the theoretical tensions between the two. A detailed chapter overview and summary appears along with a concluding discussion about the salience of this inquiry for our world today.Less
This chapter maps out the key arguments, theoretical approaches, analytical assumptions, and methodology that shape this study. The emerging sub-discipline of comparative political theory is discussed and an argument is advanced as to why this book should be viewed as a contribution to this new discipline of political science. Furthermore, the intellectual context that has informed the academic and intellectual debate both on the relationship between religion and democracy in general and Islam and liberal democracy in particular is discussed with special attention to the post-Cold War and post-September 11, 2001 context. A definition of terms such as religion and liberal democracy is provided along a discussion of the theoretical tensions between the two. A detailed chapter overview and summary appears along with a concluding discussion about the salience of this inquiry for our world today.
Susan Mcwilliams
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- April 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780199329687
- eISBN:
- 9780199381524
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199329687.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory, Comparative Politics
In this interconnected age, political theorists have joined other scholars in reconsidering whether their discipline speaks to contemporary problems—whether the discipline of political theory is ...
More
In this interconnected age, political theorists have joined other scholars in reconsidering whether their discipline speaks to contemporary problems—whether the discipline of political theory is appropriately global in scope. While some scholars have championed new schools of thinking—comparative, contemporary cosmopolitan, and postcolonial—substantial resources exist in the history of Western political thought for the cultivation of a global political theory. Those resources are to be found in a travel-story tradition that has long been neglected by political theorists but which is foundational to the development of Western political theory. This tradition dates back to the ancient Greek practice of theoria, which established a mode of engaging with the world that directly speaks to the present, when politics are inescapably global, hybrid, and multicultural in scope. Traveling back in the travel-story tradition gives us one of the strongest foundations for moving forward to a truly global political theory.Less
In this interconnected age, political theorists have joined other scholars in reconsidering whether their discipline speaks to contemporary problems—whether the discipline of political theory is appropriately global in scope. While some scholars have championed new schools of thinking—comparative, contemporary cosmopolitan, and postcolonial—substantial resources exist in the history of Western political thought for the cultivation of a global political theory. Those resources are to be found in a travel-story tradition that has long been neglected by political theorists but which is foundational to the development of Western political theory. This tradition dates back to the ancient Greek practice of theoria, which established a mode of engaging with the world that directly speaks to the present, when politics are inescapably global, hybrid, and multicultural in scope. Traveling back in the travel-story tradition gives us one of the strongest foundations for moving forward to a truly global political theory.
Jane Anna Gordon
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780823254811
- eISBN:
- 9780823260881
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Fordham University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5422/fordham/9780823254811.003.0007
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
This conclusion explains how creolizing political theory is different from the comparative political theory of Fred Dallmayr, Roxanne Euben, Michaelle Browers, Leigh Jenco, Farah Godrej, and Andrew ...
More
This conclusion explains how creolizing political theory is different from the comparative political theory of Fred Dallmayr, Roxanne Euben, Michaelle Browers, Leigh Jenco, Farah Godrej, and Andrew March, on the one hand, and work on processes of disavowal by Sibylle Fischer and on moments of universal history by Susan Buck-Morss, on the other. While creating professional space to study political thought beyond the U.S. and Western Europe, focus in comparative political theory has been monopolized by East Asia, East India, and Muslim worlds to the exclusion of African, Caribbean, Latin and Native American ones. Work on disavowal and universal history has illuminated the larger historical patterns of such exclusions but often with some skepticism about the possibility of forging more viable, inclusive political collectivities. Creolization then draws on both academic developments while being far less reluctant about how we can forge new creolizing alternatives. Finally, creolized approaches are compared with problem-driven research within political science.Less
This conclusion explains how creolizing political theory is different from the comparative political theory of Fred Dallmayr, Roxanne Euben, Michaelle Browers, Leigh Jenco, Farah Godrej, and Andrew March, on the one hand, and work on processes of disavowal by Sibylle Fischer and on moments of universal history by Susan Buck-Morss, on the other. While creating professional space to study political thought beyond the U.S. and Western Europe, focus in comparative political theory has been monopolized by East Asia, East India, and Muslim worlds to the exclusion of African, Caribbean, Latin and Native American ones. Work on disavowal and universal history has illuminated the larger historical patterns of such exclusions but often with some skepticism about the possibility of forging more viable, inclusive political collectivities. Creolization then draws on both academic developments while being far less reluctant about how we can forge new creolizing alternatives. Finally, creolized approaches are compared with problem-driven research within political science.
Joel Jay Kassiola
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780262028059
- eISBN:
- 9780262325264
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028059.003.0016
- Subject:
- Environmental Science, Environmental Studies
Focusing on the writings of Confucius and the Confucian tradition, Joel Jay Kassiola argues that looking beyond the Western political thought makes obvious sense in an era of globalization and ...
More
Focusing on the writings of Confucius and the Confucian tradition, Joel Jay Kassiola argues that looking beyond the Western political thought makes obvious sense in an era of globalization and planetary environmental crisis; moreover, such a move enables us to escape the narrow perspectives that have contributed to our ecological predicament. Confucius and Confucianism provide a particularly valuable understanding of our times: Confucius wrote in response to a society that, like our own, was confused and bewildered by a transformative moment in history and widespread sense of perceived crisis; Confucius valued past teachings and thus offered an intergenerational perspective; and the later Confucian tradition advanced a cosmology attuned to an ecological perspective. While Western religious cosmology envisions a discrete moment of creation by a divine creator, a view that fosters a dualism of humanity and nature, Neo-Confucian thought sees nature as always existing in an endless, ongoing process of creation. Furthermore, the Confucian tradition is non-anthropocentric, as it posits a fundamental continuity and unity among humanity, Heaven, and Earth, a view that, in turn, entails respect and care for nonhuman nature.Less
Focusing on the writings of Confucius and the Confucian tradition, Joel Jay Kassiola argues that looking beyond the Western political thought makes obvious sense in an era of globalization and planetary environmental crisis; moreover, such a move enables us to escape the narrow perspectives that have contributed to our ecological predicament. Confucius and Confucianism provide a particularly valuable understanding of our times: Confucius wrote in response to a society that, like our own, was confused and bewildered by a transformative moment in history and widespread sense of perceived crisis; Confucius valued past teachings and thus offered an intergenerational perspective; and the later Confucian tradition advanced a cosmology attuned to an ecological perspective. While Western religious cosmology envisions a discrete moment of creation by a divine creator, a view that fosters a dualism of humanity and nature, Neo-Confucian thought sees nature as always existing in an endless, ongoing process of creation. Furthermore, the Confucian tradition is non-anthropocentric, as it posits a fundamental continuity and unity among humanity, Heaven, and Earth, a view that, in turn, entails respect and care for nonhuman nature.
Jane Anna Gordon
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- September 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780823254811
- eISBN:
- 9780823260881
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Fordham University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5422/fordham/9780823254811.001.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
Asking whether one can develop an approach to studying political life that reflects its heterogeneity, Jane Anna Gordon offers the creolization of political theory as a viable response. Creolization, ...
More
Asking whether one can develop an approach to studying political life that reflects its heterogeneity, Jane Anna Gordon offers the creolization of political theory as a viable response. Creolization, she argues, describes mixtures that were not supposed to have emerged in the plantation societies of the Caribbean but did through their capacity to exemplify living culture, thought, and political practice. In so doing, they provide a useful way of understanding similar processes that continue today, namely of one potential outcome when people who were previously strangers find themselves as unequal co-occupants of new political locations they seek to call “home.” In demonstrating a path that is different from the one usually associated with multiculturalism, in which different cultures are thought to co-exist relatively separately and the aim is for each to tolerate the other by letting it remain in relative isolation, creolization describes how people reinterpret themselves through interaction with one another to create forms of belonging that are familiar but also distinctive and new. These are useful models for reconsidering how contemporary political solidarities could be constructed and how relationships may be forged among what have become radically separate fields for studying a shared world. Gordon demonstrates the generative capacity of creolizing methodologies through bringing together the ideas of the 18th century revolutionary Swiss thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the 20th century Martinican-born Algerian liberationist Frantz Fanon. Fanon, she argues, outlined a vision of how to bring into being the decolonial methodologies and democratically legitimate alternatives that Rousseau mainly imagined.Less
Asking whether one can develop an approach to studying political life that reflects its heterogeneity, Jane Anna Gordon offers the creolization of political theory as a viable response. Creolization, she argues, describes mixtures that were not supposed to have emerged in the plantation societies of the Caribbean but did through their capacity to exemplify living culture, thought, and political practice. In so doing, they provide a useful way of understanding similar processes that continue today, namely of one potential outcome when people who were previously strangers find themselves as unequal co-occupants of new political locations they seek to call “home.” In demonstrating a path that is different from the one usually associated with multiculturalism, in which different cultures are thought to co-exist relatively separately and the aim is for each to tolerate the other by letting it remain in relative isolation, creolization describes how people reinterpret themselves through interaction with one another to create forms of belonging that are familiar but also distinctive and new. These are useful models for reconsidering how contemporary political solidarities could be constructed and how relationships may be forged among what have become radically separate fields for studying a shared world. Gordon demonstrates the generative capacity of creolizing methodologies through bringing together the ideas of the 18th century revolutionary Swiss thinker Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the 20th century Martinican-born Algerian liberationist Frantz Fanon. Fanon, she argues, outlined a vision of how to bring into being the decolonial methodologies and democratically legitimate alternatives that Rousseau mainly imagined.
Stuart Gray
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- March 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190636319
- eISBN:
- 9780190636333
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190636319.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Theory
The Introduction lays out the book’s historical-comparative approach, explaining how combining the history of political ideas and comparative political theory (CPT) enhances the rigor of both areas ...
More
The Introduction lays out the book’s historical-comparative approach, explaining how combining the history of political ideas and comparative political theory (CPT) enhances the rigor of both areas of study. It outlines the major analytic challenges facing this approach, including cultural reductionism, authorial intention, and chronological precision. To address these challenges, it then explains how one must locate inter-cultural categories and concepts as well as specific intra-cultural concepts and terminology to reconstruct and compare differences and similarities of meaning across cultural boundaries. Subsequently, the chapter explains how such historical-comparative analysis builds upon existing positions in comparative and environmental political theory by attending to premodern traditions, including a concept (rule) that has been generally neglected. Finally, it explains how poetry and kingship supply important hinges for comparing Greek and Indian thought, further addressing conceptual and terminological issues that follow from this analytic pairing.Less
The Introduction lays out the book’s historical-comparative approach, explaining how combining the history of political ideas and comparative political theory (CPT) enhances the rigor of both areas of study. It outlines the major analytic challenges facing this approach, including cultural reductionism, authorial intention, and chronological precision. To address these challenges, it then explains how one must locate inter-cultural categories and concepts as well as specific intra-cultural concepts and terminology to reconstruct and compare differences and similarities of meaning across cultural boundaries. Subsequently, the chapter explains how such historical-comparative analysis builds upon existing positions in comparative and environmental political theory by attending to premodern traditions, including a concept (rule) that has been generally neglected. Finally, it explains how poetry and kingship supply important hinges for comparing Greek and Indian thought, further addressing conceptual and terminological issues that follow from this analytic pairing.
Peter F. Cannavò and Joseph H. Lane
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780262028059
- eISBN:
- 9780262325264
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028059.003.0001
- Subject:
- Environmental Science, Environmental Studies
This is an introduction to the volume as a whole. The editors, Peter F. Cannavò and Joseph H. Lane Jr., summarize the origins and history of environmental political theory and discuss the need for a ...
More
This is an introduction to the volume as a whole. The editors, Peter F. Cannavò and Joseph H. Lane Jr., summarize the origins and history of environmental political theory and discuss the need for a volume like Engaging Nature and how this book goes beyond past studies of environmental perspectives in the political theory canon. The editors present their scholarly approach in choosing the particular theorists to profile, discuss the intended audience for the book, and summarize the individual essays. They also highlight the need for academics to go beyond the Western political theory tradition and develop more scholarship in comparative environmental political theory.Less
This is an introduction to the volume as a whole. The editors, Peter F. Cannavò and Joseph H. Lane Jr., summarize the origins and history of environmental political theory and discuss the need for a volume like Engaging Nature and how this book goes beyond past studies of environmental perspectives in the political theory canon. The editors present their scholarly approach in choosing the particular theorists to profile, discuss the intended audience for the book, and summarize the individual essays. They also highlight the need for academics to go beyond the Western political theory tradition and develop more scholarship in comparative environmental political theory.
Juliet Hooker
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- April 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190633691
- eISBN:
- 9780190633714
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190633691.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Theory
The introduction explains the hemispheric geographic and conceptual frame developed in the book in order to map the intellectual connections and political genealogies of two subaltern traditions of ...
More
The introduction explains the hemispheric geographic and conceptual frame developed in the book in order to map the intellectual connections and political genealogies of two subaltern traditions of racial thought: Latin American and US African American political thought. It lays out the book’s methodological approach, which is one of juxtaposition, in order to avoid some of the pitfalls of comparison. It also traces the common discursive field within which Frederick Douglass, Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, W. E. B. Du Bois, and José Vasconcelos were operating, which was the scientific racism that dominated US and European intellectual circles from the second half of the nineteenth through the first half of the twentieth century.Less
The introduction explains the hemispheric geographic and conceptual frame developed in the book in order to map the intellectual connections and political genealogies of two subaltern traditions of racial thought: Latin American and US African American political thought. It lays out the book’s methodological approach, which is one of juxtaposition, in order to avoid some of the pitfalls of comparison. It also traces the common discursive field within which Frederick Douglass, Domingo Faustino Sarmiento, W. E. B. Du Bois, and José Vasconcelos were operating, which was the scientific racism that dominated US and European intellectual circles from the second half of the nineteenth through the first half of the twentieth century.
Peter F. Cannavò and Joseph H. Lane Jr. (eds)
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780262028059
- eISBN:
- 9780262325264
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028059.001.0001
- Subject:
- Environmental Science, Environmental Studies
Engaging Nature is an edited collection that explores how past political theorists conceptualized the natural world and humanity’s relationship with it. The theorists profiled are largely from the ...
More
Engaging Nature is an edited collection that explores how past political theorists conceptualized the natural world and humanity’s relationship with it. The theorists profiled are largely from the Western canon, but other influential theorists have been included in order to bring in insights related to race, gender, and non-Western perspectives. The theorists covered in the book are: Plato, Aristotle, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Edmund Burke, Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, W. E. B. Du Bois, Martin Heidegger, Hannah Arendt, and Confucius. The essays also draw insights from these theorists into how we might address our contemporary environmental crisis. In many cases, the authors present unorthodox readings of particular theorists who have been pigeonholed as ‘anti-environmentalist’ or not recognized for their insights into nature and environmental issues. The essays also highlight the complexity of Western political thought in its approach to nature, as many individual theorists present perspectives that transcend anthropocentrism. In pursuing a chronological review of Western thinkers but then ending with Confucius, the editors also wish to highlight the importance of expanding the discussion beyond the Western canon. This book is intended for a fairly broad audience, from advanced undergraduates to mature scholars in both political theory and environmental studies.Less
Engaging Nature is an edited collection that explores how past political theorists conceptualized the natural world and humanity’s relationship with it. The theorists profiled are largely from the Western canon, but other influential theorists have been included in order to bring in insights related to race, gender, and non-Western perspectives. The theorists covered in the book are: Plato, Aristotle, Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Edmund Burke, Mary Wollstonecraft, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx, W. E. B. Du Bois, Martin Heidegger, Hannah Arendt, and Confucius. The essays also draw insights from these theorists into how we might address our contemporary environmental crisis. In many cases, the authors present unorthodox readings of particular theorists who have been pigeonholed as ‘anti-environmentalist’ or not recognized for their insights into nature and environmental issues. The essays also highlight the complexity of Western political thought in its approach to nature, as many individual theorists present perspectives that transcend anthropocentrism. In pursuing a chronological review of Western thinkers but then ending with Confucius, the editors also wish to highlight the importance of expanding the discussion beyond the Western canon. This book is intended for a fairly broad audience, from advanced undergraduates to mature scholars in both political theory and environmental studies.
Leigh Jenco
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- October 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780190263812
- eISBN:
- 9780190263843
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190263812.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Theory
Both Chinese thinkers of a century ago and contemporary scholars struggle with the realization that their received modes of viewing the world derive not from universally accessible and transparent ...
More
Both Chinese thinkers of a century ago and contemporary scholars struggle with the realization that their received modes of viewing the world derive not from universally accessible and transparent foundations but from local, historically situated traditions of thought. These parallels suggest that the Western Learning conversations examined in this book can be read as more than simply the instrumental rhetoric of self-colonization or the mark of the inevitable demise of “Confucian China” in the face of Western modernity. Rather, these conversations offer more general methodological lessons about how individuals and societies might confront their own ethnocentrism by learning from cultural others in radically self-transformative ways, contributing to debates in comparative political theory and postcolonial studies.Less
Both Chinese thinkers of a century ago and contemporary scholars struggle with the realization that their received modes of viewing the world derive not from universally accessible and transparent foundations but from local, historically situated traditions of thought. These parallels suggest that the Western Learning conversations examined in this book can be read as more than simply the instrumental rhetoric of self-colonization or the mark of the inevitable demise of “Confucian China” in the face of Western modernity. Rather, these conversations offer more general methodological lessons about how individuals and societies might confront their own ethnocentrism by learning from cultural others in radically self-transformative ways, contributing to debates in comparative political theory and postcolonial studies.
Matthew J. Moore
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- June 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780190465513
- eISBN:
- 9780190465537
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465513.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory
The introduction argues that Western political theory has overlooked the political philosophy of Buddhism, and that it would benefit from engaging with Buddhism as a political theory. The Buddhist ...
More
The introduction argues that Western political theory has overlooked the political philosophy of Buddhism, and that it would benefit from engaging with Buddhism as a political theory. The Buddhist political philosophy rests on three ideas, which are both similar to and different from the concerns of Western scholars: that human beings are not selves; that politics is necessary but not very important; and that moral norms are advice for wise living rather than categorical obligations. The introduction summarizes the author’s understandings of political theory and Buddhism generally, and argues that Western political theorists stand to benefit from learning more about Buddhism.Less
The introduction argues that Western political theory has overlooked the political philosophy of Buddhism, and that it would benefit from engaging with Buddhism as a political theory. The Buddhist political philosophy rests on three ideas, which are both similar to and different from the concerns of Western scholars: that human beings are not selves; that politics is necessary but not very important; and that moral norms are advice for wise living rather than categorical obligations. The introduction summarizes the author’s understandings of political theory and Buddhism generally, and argues that Western political theorists stand to benefit from learning more about Buddhism.
Matthew J. Moore
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- June 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780190465513
- eISBN:
- 9780190465537
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190465513.003.0002
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory
This chapter examines the political theory found in the primary texts of early Buddhism and related contemporary scholarship. It argues that the early texts contain both a theory of government, which ...
More
This chapter examines the political theory found in the primary texts of early Buddhism and related contemporary scholarship. It argues that the early texts contain both a theory of government, which endorses enlightened monarchy based on a primitive social contract, and a political theory, which rests on the ideas that human beings are not selves, that politics is necessary but not very important, and that moral norms are advice rather than absolute duties. This reading directly contradicts the long Western tradition of seeing Buddhism as anti-political. It also argues that modern readings of the Buddhist political tradition as republican are mistaken.Less
This chapter examines the political theory found in the primary texts of early Buddhism and related contemporary scholarship. It argues that the early texts contain both a theory of government, which endorses enlightened monarchy based on a primitive social contract, and a political theory, which rests on the ideas that human beings are not selves, that politics is necessary but not very important, and that moral norms are advice rather than absolute duties. This reading directly contradicts the long Western tradition of seeing Buddhism as anti-political. It also argues that modern readings of the Buddhist political tradition as republican are mistaken.
Juliet Hooker
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- April 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190633691
- eISBN:
- 9780190633714
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190633691.003.0006
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Theory
The conclusion develops the implications of hemispheric juxtaposition for comparative political theory, and for African American studies, Latin American studies, and Latino studies. It explains how a ...
More
The conclusion develops the implications of hemispheric juxtaposition for comparative political theory, and for African American studies, Latin American studies, and Latino studies. It explains how a hemispheric intellectual genealogy of racial thought in the Americas transforms our understanding of each of these thinkers: Frederick Douglass, Domingo F. Sarmiento, W. E. B. Du Bois, and José Vasconcelos. It also highlights two key theoretical concepts constitutive of racial thought in the Americas that emerge from the hemispheric analysis in this book: an expanded notion of democratic fugitivity informed by black fugitivity, and the concept of mestizo futurism.Less
The conclusion develops the implications of hemispheric juxtaposition for comparative political theory, and for African American studies, Latin American studies, and Latino studies. It explains how a hemispheric intellectual genealogy of racial thought in the Americas transforms our understanding of each of these thinkers: Frederick Douglass, Domingo F. Sarmiento, W. E. B. Du Bois, and José Vasconcelos. It also highlights two key theoretical concepts constitutive of racial thought in the Americas that emerge from the hemispheric analysis in this book: an expanded notion of democratic fugitivity informed by black fugitivity, and the concept of mestizo futurism.
William J. Long
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- January 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780190843397
- eISBN:
- 9780190843427
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780190843397.003.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
This study asks, “How does democratic governance and economic development differ when founded on Eastern, Buddhist principles, rather than dominant Western, liberal, and Enlightenment values and ...
More
This study asks, “How does democratic governance and economic development differ when founded on Eastern, Buddhist principles, rather than dominant Western, liberal, and Enlightenment values and beliefs?” The small, remote country of Bhutan, the only democratic, market-based state in the world rooted constitutionally and culturally in Mahayana Buddhist principles and ethics, provides a heuristic case study for comparing two distinct approaches to democracy and development. Because the two approaches—Eastern and Western—are based on distinctive philosophical traditions that differ on important, first-order principles, comparison can bring to light new questions, frames of inquiry, and alternative approaches to contemporary democratic theory and practice and broaden our conceptualization of, and policies directed toward, human development.Less
This study asks, “How does democratic governance and economic development differ when founded on Eastern, Buddhist principles, rather than dominant Western, liberal, and Enlightenment values and beliefs?” The small, remote country of Bhutan, the only democratic, market-based state in the world rooted constitutionally and culturally in Mahayana Buddhist principles and ethics, provides a heuristic case study for comparing two distinct approaches to democracy and development. Because the two approaches—Eastern and Western—are based on distinctive philosophical traditions that differ on important, first-order principles, comparison can bring to light new questions, frames of inquiry, and alternative approaches to contemporary democratic theory and practice and broaden our conceptualization of, and policies directed toward, human development.
Stuart Gray
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- March 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190636319
- eISBN:
- 9780190636333
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190636319.001.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Theory
This book establishes a new analytic approach to understanding fundamental political ideas of other cultures and time periods, applying the approach to a study of ancient Greek and Indian conceptions ...
More
This book establishes a new analytic approach to understanding fundamental political ideas of other cultures and time periods, applying the approach to a study of ancient Greek and Indian conceptions of rule. This cross-cultural study provides a defense for the importance of rule in contemporary political life, arguing that anthropocentric and instrumentalist conceptions of rule have led to destructive consequences for the welfare of both human and nonhuman life. Therefore, this book seeks to rethink the meaning of rule by critically retrieving and examining premodern ideas in both the West and South Asia. Conflicting cosmological and anthropocentric origins for rule in the history of Western political thought can be located in ancient Greece, particularly in the influential works of Homer and Hesiod. In contrast to a more human-centered and strongly individualistic conception of rule as “distinction” in Greece is an alternative understanding of rule as “stewardship” that appears in early Indian thought. A critical assessment of these two traditions not only provides a novel interpretation of each but also supplies a new framework for theorizing the meaning of rule that better accounts for relations between humans and nonhuman nature. The book thus outlines a new conception of rule as “panocracy,” which expands the ethical horizon for understanding humans’ political effect and responsibilities in an increasingly interconnected, fragile world. This culturally hybrid vision of ruling entails duties of stewardship toward nonhuman nature and involvement in processes of world-building on a global scale.Less
This book establishes a new analytic approach to understanding fundamental political ideas of other cultures and time periods, applying the approach to a study of ancient Greek and Indian conceptions of rule. This cross-cultural study provides a defense for the importance of rule in contemporary political life, arguing that anthropocentric and instrumentalist conceptions of rule have led to destructive consequences for the welfare of both human and nonhuman life. Therefore, this book seeks to rethink the meaning of rule by critically retrieving and examining premodern ideas in both the West and South Asia. Conflicting cosmological and anthropocentric origins for rule in the history of Western political thought can be located in ancient Greece, particularly in the influential works of Homer and Hesiod. In contrast to a more human-centered and strongly individualistic conception of rule as “distinction” in Greece is an alternative understanding of rule as “stewardship” that appears in early Indian thought. A critical assessment of these two traditions not only provides a novel interpretation of each but also supplies a new framework for theorizing the meaning of rule that better accounts for relations between humans and nonhuman nature. The book thus outlines a new conception of rule as “panocracy,” which expands the ethical horizon for understanding humans’ political effect and responsibilities in an increasingly interconnected, fragile world. This culturally hybrid vision of ruling entails duties of stewardship toward nonhuman nature and involvement in processes of world-building on a global scale.
William J. Long
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- January 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780190843397
- eISBN:
- 9780190843427
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780190843397.003.0003
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics
Because Buddhists view political and economic systems as an instrument to a higher end not an end in themselves, Buddhist teachings do not offer a systematic prescription for social organization that ...
More
Because Buddhists view political and economic systems as an instrument to a higher end not an end in themselves, Buddhist teachings do not offer a systematic prescription for social organization that one might expect from a Western treatise. Instead, Buddhist social theory can be distilled from a collection of axioms, instructions, and observations that guide possible forms of political and economic organization and practice that can provide conditions conducive to the transcendence of suffering—the uniquely Buddhist dimension of “happiness.” Buddhist political and economic thinking parallels Western thought in many ways, but differs in its emphasis on virtuous government, the duty of care owed to others (not just individual freedoms), and its environmental sustainability ethos. This chapter identifies the points of congruence and departure between Western and Buddhist notions of the good polity and economy.Less
Because Buddhists view political and economic systems as an instrument to a higher end not an end in themselves, Buddhist teachings do not offer a systematic prescription for social organization that one might expect from a Western treatise. Instead, Buddhist social theory can be distilled from a collection of axioms, instructions, and observations that guide possible forms of political and economic organization and practice that can provide conditions conducive to the transcendence of suffering—the uniquely Buddhist dimension of “happiness.” Buddhist political and economic thinking parallels Western thought in many ways, but differs in its emphasis on virtuous government, the duty of care owed to others (not just individual freedoms), and its environmental sustainability ethos. This chapter identifies the points of congruence and departure between Western and Buddhist notions of the good polity and economy.
Jakob De Roover
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- April 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780199460977
- eISBN:
- 9780199086313
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199460977.003.0001
- Subject:
- Religion, Religion and Society
This chapter introduces the theme and intellectual challenges the book sets out to address. It first explains the basic concepts and principles of the liberal model of secularism and toleration. ...
More
This chapter introduces the theme and intellectual challenges the book sets out to address. It first explains the basic concepts and principles of the liberal model of secularism and toleration. Next, it briefly characterizes three problems: (a) Even though the liberal model succeeded in bringing European societies from an era of religious conflict to one of relatively peaceful diversity, it failed to reproduce this success in non-Western societies like India. (b) In Europe also, the modus vivendi that came into being in the framework of liberal secularism is beginning to show cracks, after the arrival of new religions and traditions. (c) The liberal model suffers from the conceptual obscurity of the religious–secular distinction. Finally, the introduction characterizes the cultural asymmetry that prevents us from taking the forms of co-existence in Asian societies seriously as resources for a comparative political theory.Less
This chapter introduces the theme and intellectual challenges the book sets out to address. It first explains the basic concepts and principles of the liberal model of secularism and toleration. Next, it briefly characterizes three problems: (a) Even though the liberal model succeeded in bringing European societies from an era of religious conflict to one of relatively peaceful diversity, it failed to reproduce this success in non-Western societies like India. (b) In Europe also, the modus vivendi that came into being in the framework of liberal secularism is beginning to show cracks, after the arrival of new religions and traditions. (c) The liberal model suffers from the conceptual obscurity of the religious–secular distinction. Finally, the introduction characterizes the cultural asymmetry that prevents us from taking the forms of co-existence in Asian societies seriously as resources for a comparative political theory.
Juliet Hooker
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- April 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190633691
- eISBN:
- 9780190633714
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190633691.001.0001
- Subject:
- Political Science, Comparative Politics, Political Theory
Theorizing Race in the Americas analyzes the accounts of race formulated by four key thinkers from the Americas: the former slave, abolitionist leader, and thinker, Frederick Douglass; the ...
More
Theorizing Race in the Americas analyzes the accounts of race formulated by four key thinkers from the Americas: the former slave, abolitionist leader, and thinker, Frederick Douglass; the Argentinean statesman and pensador Domingo F. Sarmiento; the towering black intellectual W. E. B. Du Bois; and the Mexican philosopher José Vasconcelos. Latin American thinkers are generally viewed as having formulated more flexible and complex notions of racial identity than those that emerged in the United States. This has led to the claim that, because of their growing demographic presence, Latinos are dismantling or challenging US ideas about race, particularly the tendency to think in binary terms (black-white) and overlook the existence of mixture. At the same time, African American thinkers such as Douglass and Du Bois are viewed as having been solely preoccupied with domestic problems of racial equality for African Americans in the United States. This book disproves both of these claims by showing how US and Latin American thinkers, in both the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, looked to political models in the "other" America to advance racial projects in their own countries. I argue that we should move beyond easy narratives about one region's superior approach to race to see that hemispheric comparison has been central to the formulation of both Latin American and US ideas about race.Less
Theorizing Race in the Americas analyzes the accounts of race formulated by four key thinkers from the Americas: the former slave, abolitionist leader, and thinker, Frederick Douglass; the Argentinean statesman and pensador Domingo F. Sarmiento; the towering black intellectual W. E. B. Du Bois; and the Mexican philosopher José Vasconcelos. Latin American thinkers are generally viewed as having formulated more flexible and complex notions of racial identity than those that emerged in the United States. This has led to the claim that, because of their growing demographic presence, Latinos are dismantling or challenging US ideas about race, particularly the tendency to think in binary terms (black-white) and overlook the existence of mixture. At the same time, African American thinkers such as Douglass and Du Bois are viewed as having been solely preoccupied with domestic problems of racial equality for African Americans in the United States. This book disproves both of these claims by showing how US and Latin American thinkers, in both the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, looked to political models in the "other" America to advance racial projects in their own countries. I argue that we should move beyond easy narratives about one region's superior approach to race to see that hemispheric comparison has been central to the formulation of both Latin American and US ideas about race.
