Deepak Kumar
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- October 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780195687149
- eISBN:
- 9780199081684
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195687149.001.0001
- Subject:
- History, Indian History
This book focuses on the development of colonial science in British India, together with its social and economic implications. It analyses the nature and working of the relationship between ...
More
This book focuses on the development of colonial science in British India, together with its social and economic implications. It analyses the nature and working of the relationship between techno-scientific imperatives and colonial requirements by looking at the close link between science and the Raj. The term ‘colonial science’ expresses the entire gamut of the relationship between science and colonization, and aptly sums up the state of science as well as its limitations, triumphs, and failures in a colony. In some ways, colonial science represented an advance over pre-colonial science. This book reviews the views of several scholars about pre-colonial science and technology, the imperatives determining colonial science, and explores science education in colonial India. It also considers early exploratory activities, scientific research works, problems in science administration, and how India responded to these issues. The term ‘science’ in this book refers more to the physical and biological sciences, also known collectively as ‘natural history’. In addition, it is used in relation to individuals, groups, institutions (both official and non-official), application, etc.Less
This book focuses on the development of colonial science in British India, together with its social and economic implications. It analyses the nature and working of the relationship between techno-scientific imperatives and colonial requirements by looking at the close link between science and the Raj. The term ‘colonial science’ expresses the entire gamut of the relationship between science and colonization, and aptly sums up the state of science as well as its limitations, triumphs, and failures in a colony. In some ways, colonial science represented an advance over pre-colonial science. This book reviews the views of several scholars about pre-colonial science and technology, the imperatives determining colonial science, and explores science education in colonial India. It also considers early exploratory activities, scientific research works, problems in science administration, and how India responded to these issues. The term ‘science’ in this book refers more to the physical and biological sciences, also known collectively as ‘natural history’. In addition, it is used in relation to individuals, groups, institutions (both official and non-official), application, etc.
S. Ravi Rajan
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- January 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199277964
- eISBN:
- 9780191707827
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199277964.001.0001
- Subject:
- History, Social History
This book contributes to the debate regarding the origins, institutionalization, and politics of the sciences and systems of knowledge underlying colonial frameworks of environmental management. It ...
More
This book contributes to the debate regarding the origins, institutionalization, and politics of the sciences and systems of knowledge underlying colonial frameworks of environmental management. It departs from the widely prevalent scholarly perspective that colonial science can be understood predominantly as a handmaiden of imperialism. Instead, it argues that the myriad colonial sciences had ideological and interventionist traditions distinct from each other and from the colonial bureaucracy, and that these tensions better explain environmental politics and policy dilemmas in the post-colonial era. The author argues that tropical forestry in the 19th century consisted of at least two distinct approaches towards nature, resource, and people; and what won out in the end was the Continental European forestry paradigm. He also shows that science and scientists were relatively marginal until the First World War. It was the acute scientific and resource crisis felt during the War, along with the rise of experts and expertise in Britain during that period and the lobby-politics of an organized empire-wide scientific community, that resulted in resource management regimes such as forestry beginning to get serious state backing. Over time, considerable differences in approach and outlook towards policy emerged between different colonial scientific communities, such as foresters and agriculturists. These different colonial sciences represented different situated knowledges, with different visions of nature, people, and empire, and in different configurations of power. Finally, in a panoramic overview of post-colonial developments, the author argues that the hegemony of these state-scientific regimes of resource management during the period 1950-1990 engendered not just social revolt, as recent historical work has shown, but also intellectual protest. Consequently, the discipline of forestry became systematically re-conceptualized, with new approaches to sylviculture, economics, law, and crucially, new visions of modernity. This disciplinary change constitutes nothing short of a cognitive revolution, one that has been brought about by a clearly articulated political perspective on the orientation of the discipline of forestry by its practitioners.Less
This book contributes to the debate regarding the origins, institutionalization, and politics of the sciences and systems of knowledge underlying colonial frameworks of environmental management. It departs from the widely prevalent scholarly perspective that colonial science can be understood predominantly as a handmaiden of imperialism. Instead, it argues that the myriad colonial sciences had ideological and interventionist traditions distinct from each other and from the colonial bureaucracy, and that these tensions better explain environmental politics and policy dilemmas in the post-colonial era. The author argues that tropical forestry in the 19th century consisted of at least two distinct approaches towards nature, resource, and people; and what won out in the end was the Continental European forestry paradigm. He also shows that science and scientists were relatively marginal until the First World War. It was the acute scientific and resource crisis felt during the War, along with the rise of experts and expertise in Britain during that period and the lobby-politics of an organized empire-wide scientific community, that resulted in resource management regimes such as forestry beginning to get serious state backing. Over time, considerable differences in approach and outlook towards policy emerged between different colonial scientific communities, such as foresters and agriculturists. These different colonial sciences represented different situated knowledges, with different visions of nature, people, and empire, and in different configurations of power. Finally, in a panoramic overview of post-colonial developments, the author argues that the hegemony of these state-scientific regimes of resource management during the period 1950-1990 engendered not just social revolt, as recent historical work has shown, but also intellectual protest. Consequently, the discipline of forestry became systematically re-conceptualized, with new approaches to sylviculture, economics, law, and crucially, new visions of modernity. This disciplinary change constitutes nothing short of a cognitive revolution, one that has been brought about by a clearly articulated political perspective on the orientation of the discipline of forestry by its practitioners.
Deepak Kumar
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- October 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780195687149
- eISBN:
- 9780199081684
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195687149.003.0001
- Subject:
- History, Indian History
As an extremely important historical process, colonization had wide-ranging effects on the polity, society, economy, etc. of a colony. Colonial science has often been considered as a dependent ...
More
As an extremely important historical process, colonization had wide-ranging effects on the polity, society, economy, etc. of a colony. Colonial science has often been considered as a dependent science in which the curiosity-oriented research in pure science is heavily superseded by a more result-oriented research in applied science. However, this definition is grossly insufficient. Colonial science is inextricably linked with the whole fabric of colonialism. This chapter discusses the concept and contours of colonial science, focusing on models of colonial science, the metropolis, and imperialism and imperial science. It also examines the role and place of the ‘tools’ or technology and ‘pure’ science in the history of imperialism, and considers pre-colonial science in India.Less
As an extremely important historical process, colonization had wide-ranging effects on the polity, society, economy, etc. of a colony. Colonial science has often been considered as a dependent science in which the curiosity-oriented research in pure science is heavily superseded by a more result-oriented research in applied science. However, this definition is grossly insufficient. Colonial science is inextricably linked with the whole fabric of colonialism. This chapter discusses the concept and contours of colonial science, focusing on models of colonial science, the metropolis, and imperialism and imperial science. It also examines the role and place of the ‘tools’ or technology and ‘pure’ science in the history of imperialism, and considers pre-colonial science in India.
Upamanyu Pablo Mukherjee
- Published in print:
- 2020
- Published Online:
- September 2020
- ISBN:
- 9781789620283
- eISBN:
- 9781789629699
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3828/liverpool/9781789620283.003.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, World Literature
The introduction surveys the central role accorded to certain ideas of techno-scientific development in Indian nationalist imagination. It then examines the recent trend of a ‘post-colonial turn’ in ...
More
The introduction surveys the central role accorded to certain ideas of techno-scientific development in Indian nationalist imagination. It then examines the recent trend of a ‘post-colonial turn’ in both science studies and science-fiction scholarship and argues that this misses the opportunity to examine both science and science fiction in relation to global capitalism, colonialism and international opposition to these. By looking at the case of Indian science fiction written during the first decades of Indian independence, when the country took a leading role in the non-aligned movement, it suggests that such inter-related literary and political forms tried to chart alternative routes to dominant practices of modernization in the 20th-century.Less
The introduction surveys the central role accorded to certain ideas of techno-scientific development in Indian nationalist imagination. It then examines the recent trend of a ‘post-colonial turn’ in both science studies and science-fiction scholarship and argues that this misses the opportunity to examine both science and science fiction in relation to global capitalism, colonialism and international opposition to these. By looking at the case of Indian science fiction written during the first decades of Indian independence, when the country took a leading role in the non-aligned movement, it suggests that such inter-related literary and political forms tried to chart alternative routes to dominant practices of modernization in the 20th-century.
Deepak Kumar
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- October 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780195687149
- eISBN:
- 9780199081684
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195687149.003.0008
- Subject:
- History, Indian History
Britain exploited science as an instrument of colonization and control in India, a concept that they closely tied to the needs of the empire. In order to legitimize their own rule, however, the ...
More
Britain exploited science as an instrument of colonization and control in India, a concept that they closely tied to the needs of the empire. In order to legitimize their own rule, however, the colonizers first had to delegitimize several pre-colonial structures and texts. Thus, they considered it necessary to condemn the immediate past: Indians were declared unscientific, superstitious and resistant to change. A paternalistic Raj that was caring yet dismissive gradually emerged. It laid claims to both superior musketry as well as superior knowledge based on the discourse of rationality and progress. This sense of superiority led the British to denounce whatever scientific knowledge the Indians possessed. Unlike Canada and Australia, Victorian India received what was clearly a low form of science education, administered under ‘controlled’ conditions. The colonizers discouraged fundamental research work. This has had long term consequences: technology has overtaken contemporary India, its educational institutions have been on a decline, and research for cutting-edge knowledge remains wanting.Less
Britain exploited science as an instrument of colonization and control in India, a concept that they closely tied to the needs of the empire. In order to legitimize their own rule, however, the colonizers first had to delegitimize several pre-colonial structures and texts. Thus, they considered it necessary to condemn the immediate past: Indians were declared unscientific, superstitious and resistant to change. A paternalistic Raj that was caring yet dismissive gradually emerged. It laid claims to both superior musketry as well as superior knowledge based on the discourse of rationality and progress. This sense of superiority led the British to denounce whatever scientific knowledge the Indians possessed. Unlike Canada and Australia, Victorian India received what was clearly a low form of science education, administered under ‘controlled’ conditions. The colonizers discouraged fundamental research work. This has had long term consequences: technology has overtaken contemporary India, its educational institutions have been on a decline, and research for cutting-edge knowledge remains wanting.
Laurent Dubreuil
David Fieni (ed.)
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780801450563
- eISBN:
- 9780801467516
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Cornell University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7591/cornell/9780801450563.003.0010
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
This chapter looks at how colonial science proposes a horizontal organization while respecting the prerogatives of each discipline: nothing that is colonial is foreign to it. While awaiting its ...
More
This chapter looks at how colonial science proposes a horizontal organization while respecting the prerogatives of each discipline: nothing that is colonial is foreign to it. While awaiting its potential failure, a field of study that is defined as “the description of so-called primitive peoples” may at least participate in the global intelligibility of the colony. Anthropology provides useful information about the governed individuals, in particular those who are “less civilized.” To this mass of empirical knowledge are added the more practical observations about the behavior of the colonized, as well as the facts brought back from expeditions (concerning geography, flora and fauna), and the history of conquests, among other things. Colonial science situates itself in this region.Less
This chapter looks at how colonial science proposes a horizontal organization while respecting the prerogatives of each discipline: nothing that is colonial is foreign to it. While awaiting its potential failure, a field of study that is defined as “the description of so-called primitive peoples” may at least participate in the global intelligibility of the colony. Anthropology provides useful information about the governed individuals, in particular those who are “less civilized.” To this mass of empirical knowledge are added the more practical observations about the behavior of the colonized, as well as the facts brought back from expeditions (concerning geography, flora and fauna), and the history of conquests, among other things. Colonial science situates itself in this region.
Deepak Kumar
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- October 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780195687149
- eISBN:
- 9780199081684
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195687149.003.0002
- Subject:
- History, Indian History
The late eighteenth century was an exciting time for the colonizers, who wanted to gather the maximum possible information about India as well as its people and resources. A number of travelogues and ...
More
The late eighteenth century was an exciting time for the colonizers, who wanted to gather the maximum possible information about India as well as its people and resources. A number of travelogues and tracts appeared, including those of John Capper, F. Buchanan, Hugh Murray, G. R. Wallace, M. Martin, R. Heber, J.M. Honigberger, and M. Jacquemont. These writers faithfully reported not only what was best in India's natural resources and technological traditions, but also what could be the most advantageous to their employers. This chapter examines how colonial science began in India, and how it gradually matured with the help of surveys, educational bodies, scientific societies, and interlocutors (both indigenous and foreign). The Scots and the Danes formed a substantial body of the early botanists and zoologists, followed by a second group of ‘scientists’ that included the early meteorologists, geologists, and astronomers. The surveyors were the forerunners of scientific exploration.Less
The late eighteenth century was an exciting time for the colonizers, who wanted to gather the maximum possible information about India as well as its people and resources. A number of travelogues and tracts appeared, including those of John Capper, F. Buchanan, Hugh Murray, G. R. Wallace, M. Martin, R. Heber, J.M. Honigberger, and M. Jacquemont. These writers faithfully reported not only what was best in India's natural resources and technological traditions, but also what could be the most advantageous to their employers. This chapter examines how colonial science began in India, and how it gradually matured with the help of surveys, educational bodies, scientific societies, and interlocutors (both indigenous and foreign). The Scots and the Danes formed a substantial body of the early botanists and zoologists, followed by a second group of ‘scientists’ that included the early meteorologists, geologists, and astronomers. The surveyors were the forerunners of scientific exploration.
Sven Speek
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- January 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780719091803
- eISBN:
- 9781781706824
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Manchester University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7228/manchester/9780719091803.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, Imperialism and Colonialism
The focus of the chapter is plant ecological and agro-ecological research in colonial Zambia (Northern Rhodesia), from the Great Depression to the beginning of the so called “Second Colonial ...
More
The focus of the chapter is plant ecological and agro-ecological research in colonial Zambia (Northern Rhodesia), from the Great Depression to the beginning of the so called “Second Colonial Occupation”. Colonial ecological research contributed to and was structured by the narrative of an impending social and ecological breakdown of “native” subsistence communities triggered by the impact of colonialism: the unintended consequences of Pax Britannica, the introduction of a capitalist economy, the creation of reserves. Ecology held the promise of not only helping to come to grips with these complexities, but of serving as a science of planning, opening up the possibility of successfully steering a course between the Scylla of social and ecological breakdown and the Charybdis of stagnation and low productivity. Northern Rhodesia – then still a backwater to the Empire – consequently became one of the hot spots for the testing out of ecological research methods.Less
The focus of the chapter is plant ecological and agro-ecological research in colonial Zambia (Northern Rhodesia), from the Great Depression to the beginning of the so called “Second Colonial Occupation”. Colonial ecological research contributed to and was structured by the narrative of an impending social and ecological breakdown of “native” subsistence communities triggered by the impact of colonialism: the unintended consequences of Pax Britannica, the introduction of a capitalist economy, the creation of reserves. Ecology held the promise of not only helping to come to grips with these complexities, but of serving as a science of planning, opening up the possibility of successfully steering a course between the Scylla of social and ecological breakdown and the Charybdis of stagnation and low productivity. Northern Rhodesia – then still a backwater to the Empire – consequently became one of the hot spots for the testing out of ecological research methods.
Cláudia Castelo
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- January 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780719091803
- eISBN:
- 9781781706824
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Manchester University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7228/manchester/9780719091803.003.0003
- Subject:
- History, Imperialism and Colonialism
The chapter focuses on development discourses of the Estado Novo (1933-74) raised around Angola and Mozambique. In addition to being, politically and economically, the two most significant parts of ...
More
The chapter focuses on development discourses of the Estado Novo (1933-74) raised around Angola and Mozambique. In addition to being, politically and economically, the two most significant parts of the Portuguese Empire, they also became white settlement colonies. This last characteristic held strong sway in the development model that the regime devised for those colonies. Although the chapter gives priority to the perspectives and strategies of the Portuguese state, it also presents the views of experts and scholars. It is based on political documents, such as governmental statements (namely of ministers of Colonies/ministers of Overseas Provinces and colonial officials), colonial legislation and Planos de Fomento (Development Plans); and on scientific surveys and reports, especially of the Junta de Investigações do Ultramar (Overseas Research Council).Less
The chapter focuses on development discourses of the Estado Novo (1933-74) raised around Angola and Mozambique. In addition to being, politically and economically, the two most significant parts of the Portuguese Empire, they also became white settlement colonies. This last characteristic held strong sway in the development model that the regime devised for those colonies. Although the chapter gives priority to the perspectives and strategies of the Portuguese state, it also presents the views of experts and scholars. It is based on political documents, such as governmental statements (namely of ministers of Colonies/ministers of Overseas Provinces and colonial officials), colonial legislation and Planos de Fomento (Development Plans); and on scientific surveys and reports, especially of the Junta de Investigações do Ultramar (Overseas Research Council).
Tiffany Willoughby-Herard
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780520280861
- eISBN:
- 9780520959972
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of California Press
- DOI:
- 10.1525/california/9780520280861.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, African-American History
“Origin Stories about Segregationist Philanthropy” examines how the race for eugenics has been conflated with national scientific achievement in the study of South Africa as a modern nation. Thereby ...
More
“Origin Stories about Segregationist Philanthropy” examines how the race for eugenics has been conflated with national scientific achievement in the study of South Africa as a modern nation. Thereby abetting the manufacture of white citizenship and transforming settlers into white people—as prophylaxis against travel writer Anthony Trollope’s 1877 prediction that South Africa would always be a “black man’s country.” While such South African exceptionalism is offered as a way of telling a particular domestic history, this erases South Africa’s imbrication in colonial science. A more thoroughgoing history of how foundations have marked blackness as the living standard of poverty in the process of industrialization is necessary. Thus, the chapter explains more about slavery and why African women’s production and reproduction must be spatially removed from what we understand as industrialization and, finally, why impoverished white people must come to stand in for the only opponents of class exploitation.Less
“Origin Stories about Segregationist Philanthropy” examines how the race for eugenics has been conflated with national scientific achievement in the study of South Africa as a modern nation. Thereby abetting the manufacture of white citizenship and transforming settlers into white people—as prophylaxis against travel writer Anthony Trollope’s 1877 prediction that South Africa would always be a “black man’s country.” While such South African exceptionalism is offered as a way of telling a particular domestic history, this erases South Africa’s imbrication in colonial science. A more thoroughgoing history of how foundations have marked blackness as the living standard of poverty in the process of industrialization is necessary. Thus, the chapter explains more about slavery and why African women’s production and reproduction must be spatially removed from what we understand as industrialization and, finally, why impoverished white people must come to stand in for the only opponents of class exploitation.
Gowan Dawson
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- September 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780226332734
- eISBN:
- 9780226332871
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226332871.003.0010
- Subject:
- History, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine
This chapter explores how, in the wake of Darwin’s Origin of Species and the fossil remains of so-called “missing links” like the Archaeopteryx that soon after came to light, Cuvierian correlation ...
More
This chapter explores how, in the wake of Darwin’s Origin of Species and the fossil remains of so-called “missing links” like the Archaeopteryx that soon after came to light, Cuvierian correlation faced a profound crisis. Rather than simply being eclipsed by evolution, however, it was often modified and adapted to the new scientific priorities of the post-Origin era. Darwin himself appropriated key elements of Cuvier’s law in his own law of correlated variability, denuding the original of its erstwhile anti-evolutionary potential. Owen too publicly disputed Cuvier’s views on the fixity of species, explaining functional adaptations as the result of a preordained law of evolution. Owen nevertheless still endeavoured to impose the Cuvier’s paleontological methods on obdurate colonial naturalists in Australia.Less
This chapter explores how, in the wake of Darwin’s Origin of Species and the fossil remains of so-called “missing links” like the Archaeopteryx that soon after came to light, Cuvierian correlation faced a profound crisis. Rather than simply being eclipsed by evolution, however, it was often modified and adapted to the new scientific priorities of the post-Origin era. Darwin himself appropriated key elements of Cuvier’s law in his own law of correlated variability, denuding the original of its erstwhile anti-evolutionary potential. Owen too publicly disputed Cuvier’s views on the fixity of species, explaining functional adaptations as the result of a preordained law of evolution. Owen nevertheless still endeavoured to impose the Cuvier’s paleontological methods on obdurate colonial naturalists in Australia.
Chul Kim
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- November 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780824852801
- eISBN:
- 9780824868666
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Hawai'i Press
- DOI:
- 10.21313/hawaii/9780824852801.003.0005
- Subject:
- Society and Culture, Asian Studies
Imperial arts and sciences primitivized colonized subjects, making their abject bodies public and visible through the gaze, probing, and dissection of cameras, measuring devices, and surgical ...
More
Imperial arts and sciences primitivized colonized subjects, making their abject bodies public and visible through the gaze, probing, and dissection of cameras, measuring devices, and surgical instruments. As loyal attendants of modern bio-power, Korean naturalist and realist literature came into existence simultaneously with imperial physical anthropology’s production of depraved bodies. This is why colonial Korean literature is fraught with representations of the underclass, criminals, the disabled, and the insane. South Korean literary historiography has tended to aestheticize these bodies for the purpose of shoring up anti-colonial nationalism in the post-Liberation era. How, then, might we recuperate the resistance of colonized bodies in reading colonial literature? How do these silent bodies respond to the camera, to the scientists' scalpels? How do they return the gaze of those who measure and probe? How do they emerge as subjects of resistance, transforming from the seen to the observer?Less
Imperial arts and sciences primitivized colonized subjects, making their abject bodies public and visible through the gaze, probing, and dissection of cameras, measuring devices, and surgical instruments. As loyal attendants of modern bio-power, Korean naturalist and realist literature came into existence simultaneously with imperial physical anthropology’s production of depraved bodies. This is why colonial Korean literature is fraught with representations of the underclass, criminals, the disabled, and the insane. South Korean literary historiography has tended to aestheticize these bodies for the purpose of shoring up anti-colonial nationalism in the post-Liberation era. How, then, might we recuperate the resistance of colonized bodies in reading colonial literature? How do these silent bodies respond to the camera, to the scientists' scalpels? How do they return the gaze of those who measure and probe? How do they emerge as subjects of resistance, transforming from the seen to the observer?
Julian Baker
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- November 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780199467228
- eISBN:
- 9780199087570
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199467228.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, Indian History, Environmental History
Examining the role of elephants in the colonial fieldwork of geologist Valentine Ball and botanist Joseph Hooker in British India, this chapter asks us to consider elephants in histories of ...
More
Examining the role of elephants in the colonial fieldwork of geologist Valentine Ball and botanist Joseph Hooker in British India, this chapter asks us to consider elephants in histories of scientific discovery not just as facilitating devices but also as contributing participants. The author demonstrates that elephants were not only vehicles of access, instruments of observation, and expedient symbols of authority, but also particular sentient beings treated as non-human staff. Concerns with trace and erasure in the historical record are raised as a challenge for writing ‘trans-species history’, but investigative persistence reveals that Ball and Hooker’s elephants may be understood as non-human subaltern actors with individuality and intentionality who played an integral role in scientific fieldwork.Less
Examining the role of elephants in the colonial fieldwork of geologist Valentine Ball and botanist Joseph Hooker in British India, this chapter asks us to consider elephants in histories of scientific discovery not just as facilitating devices but also as contributing participants. The author demonstrates that elephants were not only vehicles of access, instruments of observation, and expedient symbols of authority, but also particular sentient beings treated as non-human staff. Concerns with trace and erasure in the historical record are raised as a challenge for writing ‘trans-species history’, but investigative persistence reveals that Ball and Hooker’s elephants may be understood as non-human subaltern actors with individuality and intentionality who played an integral role in scientific fieldwork.