David Griffiths, Nando Sigona, and Roger Zetter
- Published in print:
- 2005
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9781861346346
- eISBN:
- 9781447303152
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Policy Press
- DOI:
- 10.1332/policypress/9781861346346.003.0002
- Subject:
- Sociology, Migration Studies (including Refugee Studies)
This chapter reviews the theoretical questions that inform the analysis of refugee community organisations. The areas it covers include the literature on migrant organisations, the relevant research ...
More
This chapter reviews the theoretical questions that inform the analysis of refugee community organisations. The areas it covers include the literature on migrant organisations, the relevant research on social networks and social capital, and the integrative role of RCOs. A critique of the literature and a proposal of alternative perspectives and questions that relate to the role of RCOs are also included.Less
This chapter reviews the theoretical questions that inform the analysis of refugee community organisations. The areas it covers include the literature on migrant organisations, the relevant research on social networks and social capital, and the integrative role of RCOs. A critique of the literature and a proposal of alternative perspectives and questions that relate to the role of RCOs are also included.
Jennifer Church
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- September 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780199678440
- eISBN:
- 9780191757945
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199678440.003.0002
- Subject:
- Philosophy, Metaphysics/Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind
Several different understandings of perceptual immediacy are criticized. A vivid example of immediate knowledge is then introduced to highlight the need for self-evident objectivity, and the ...
More
Several different understandings of perceptual immediacy are criticized. A vivid example of immediate knowledge is then introduced to highlight the need for self-evident objectivity, and the importance of entertaining alternate perspectives. Arguments are presented to show why sensory content is not as relevant as usually supposed.Less
Several different understandings of perceptual immediacy are criticized. A vivid example of immediate knowledge is then introduced to highlight the need for self-evident objectivity, and the importance of entertaining alternate perspectives. Arguments are presented to show why sensory content is not as relevant as usually supposed.
Yaroslav Komarovski
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- June 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780190244958
- eISBN:
- 9780190245009
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190244958.003.0005
- Subject:
- Religion, Buddhism, World Religions
Focusing on Tibetan sectarian polemics, this chapter outlines two positions that seem to be advocating contradictory forms of mediation preceding the direct realization of ultimate reality as well as ...
More
Focusing on Tibetan sectarian polemics, this chapter outlines two positions that seem to be advocating contradictory forms of mediation preceding the direct realization of ultimate reality as well as different views on the nature of that realization. Exploring the positions of the major Geluk thinker, Tsongkhapa, and his major Sakya critic, Gorampa, it demonstrates that although both thinkers agree that the process of contemplation of reality is deconstructive, they interpret very differently what is negated, how it is negated, and how one should proceed in the process. It argues that the differences between the processes proposed by the two thinkers pertain mostly to the conflicting descriptions, as well as minor variations in the processes, while on the practical level those processes are equally effective in terms of leading to the same mystical experience of ultimate reality, which is not mediated by any words or concepts when it actually occurs.Less
Focusing on Tibetan sectarian polemics, this chapter outlines two positions that seem to be advocating contradictory forms of mediation preceding the direct realization of ultimate reality as well as different views on the nature of that realization. Exploring the positions of the major Geluk thinker, Tsongkhapa, and his major Sakya critic, Gorampa, it demonstrates that although both thinkers agree that the process of contemplation of reality is deconstructive, they interpret very differently what is negated, how it is negated, and how one should proceed in the process. It argues that the differences between the processes proposed by the two thinkers pertain mostly to the conflicting descriptions, as well as minor variations in the processes, while on the practical level those processes are equally effective in terms of leading to the same mystical experience of ultimate reality, which is not mediated by any words or concepts when it actually occurs.
