RIZWAAN JAMEEL MOKAL
- Published in print:
- 2005
- Published Online:
- January 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199264872
- eISBN:
- 9780191718397
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199264872.003.0006
- Subject:
- Law, Company and Commercial Law
This chapter considers the twin institutions of the floating charge and administrative receivership. It explains the distinctive role played by the floating charge by examining the empirical context ...
More
This chapter considers the twin institutions of the floating charge and administrative receivership. It explains the distinctive role played by the floating charge by examining the empirical context in which it operates and by comparing the recoveries made by different classes of creditor in corporate liquidation. The analysis suggests that whereas the fixed charge in included in debentures so as to provide its holder with priority, the floating charge is a residual management displacement device. Its dominant role is to ensure the integrity of the debtor's estate when the latter becomes distressed and its management is displaced in favour of a specialist distress-oriented manager. This is where administrative receivership (‘receivership’) comes in. Traditionally, the replacement of the distressed company's management has been brought about by the appointment of a receiver (formerly, a receiver and manager). However, the chapter harnesses theory and evidence in favour of the argument that receivership is significantly destructive of social value, and that it is unfair and oppressive. Its virtual abolition by the Enterprise Act 2002 is therefore welcomed. However, the substitution of receivership with administration also, it is argued, signals the end of the usefulness of the floating charge. The chapter concludes by sketching out a case for the abolition of this type of charge.Less
This chapter considers the twin institutions of the floating charge and administrative receivership. It explains the distinctive role played by the floating charge by examining the empirical context in which it operates and by comparing the recoveries made by different classes of creditor in corporate liquidation. The analysis suggests that whereas the fixed charge in included in debentures so as to provide its holder with priority, the floating charge is a residual management displacement device. Its dominant role is to ensure the integrity of the debtor's estate when the latter becomes distressed and its management is displaced in favour of a specialist distress-oriented manager. This is where administrative receivership (‘receivership’) comes in. Traditionally, the replacement of the distressed company's management has been brought about by the appointment of a receiver (formerly, a receiver and manager). However, the chapter harnesses theory and evidence in favour of the argument that receivership is significantly destructive of social value, and that it is unfair and oppressive. Its virtual abolition by the Enterprise Act 2002 is therefore welcomed. However, the substitution of receivership with administration also, it is argued, signals the end of the usefulness of the floating charge. The chapter concludes by sketching out a case for the abolition of this type of charge.
Rebecca Parry and Sharif Shivji
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- March 2021
- ISBN:
- 9780198793403
- eISBN:
- 9780191927836
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198793403.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, Company and Commercial Law
Preference laws have long played a part in maintaining creditor entitlements in the period leading up to the commencement of formal insolvency proceedings. The general rationale of the preference ...
More
Preference laws have long played a part in maintaining creditor entitlements in the period leading up to the commencement of formal insolvency proceedings. The general rationale of the preference provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986 is that if in the period leading up to insolvency proceedings the debtor.
Less
Preference laws have long played a part in maintaining creditor entitlements in the period leading up to the commencement of formal insolvency proceedings. The general rationale of the preference provisions of the Insolvency Act 1986 is that if in the period leading up to insolvency proceedings the debtor.
