Lisa Siraganian
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- May 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199796557
- eISBN:
- 9780199932542
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796557.003.0003
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century and Contemporary Literature
This chapter explores the polarity between spectator or readerly irrelevance on the one hand and bodily incorporation of the reader’s body on the other, to investigate writers and artists who ...
More
This chapter explores the polarity between spectator or readerly irrelevance on the one hand and bodily incorporation of the reader’s body on the other, to investigate writers and artists who articulate positions negotiating between these two poles. In particular, this chapter examines the paradoxical figure of William Carlos Williams, who understands collage as a way to productively complicate the notion of readerly irrelevance. The autonomous art object of Stein and Lewis finds its most serious early challenge in the Dada aesthetics of Marcel Duchamp and Mina Loy, who contest both the frame’s integrity and art’s removal from politics by insisting on the inseparability of art and life. Responding to Duchamp’s and Loy’s notions of framing, Williams’s Spring and All (1923) negotiates a shifting compromise between art that rejects the incorporation of the spectator’s world and art that insists upon it, while his less-known work, The Great American Novel (1923), implies that this new theory of framing facilitates specific forms of social progress that he hopes could preempt the state’s progressive goals.Less
This chapter explores the polarity between spectator or readerly irrelevance on the one hand and bodily incorporation of the reader’s body on the other, to investigate writers and artists who articulate positions negotiating between these two poles. In particular, this chapter examines the paradoxical figure of William Carlos Williams, who understands collage as a way to productively complicate the notion of readerly irrelevance. The autonomous art object of Stein and Lewis finds its most serious early challenge in the Dada aesthetics of Marcel Duchamp and Mina Loy, who contest both the frame’s integrity and art’s removal from politics by insisting on the inseparability of art and life. Responding to Duchamp’s and Loy’s notions of framing, Williams’s Spring and All (1923) negotiates a shifting compromise between art that rejects the incorporation of the spectator’s world and art that insists upon it, while his less-known work, The Great American Novel (1923), implies that this new theory of framing facilitates specific forms of social progress that he hopes could preempt the state’s progressive goals.
Joel Nickels
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- August 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780816676088
- eISBN:
- 9781452947716
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Minnesota Press
- DOI:
- 10.5749/minnesota/9780816676088.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
This chapter focuses on William Carlos Williams’s poetic method and concept of self-valorization. Self-valorization refers to a process of value creation that eludes monetary measure and whose object ...
More
This chapter focuses on William Carlos Williams’s poetic method and concept of self-valorization. Self-valorization refers to a process of value creation that eludes monetary measure and whose object is not the production of commodities but rather the reproduction of the multitude’s own capacities. Williams presents the multitude’s self-valorization as no more than an aspect of capital valorization. He suggests that the talents, capacities, and organizational skill of the multitude cannot be dynamized and fulfilled through monetary compensation, since even a maximum of buying power will not restore the multitude to the decision-making processes, organizational initiatives, and technological infrastructures that shape their existence as producers of wealth. He asks whether the self-valorization of the multitude could be imagined as a large-scale force of social regulation.Less
This chapter focuses on William Carlos Williams’s poetic method and concept of self-valorization. Self-valorization refers to a process of value creation that eludes monetary measure and whose object is not the production of commodities but rather the reproduction of the multitude’s own capacities. Williams presents the multitude’s self-valorization as no more than an aspect of capital valorization. He suggests that the talents, capacities, and organizational skill of the multitude cannot be dynamized and fulfilled through monetary compensation, since even a maximum of buying power will not restore the multitude to the decision-making processes, organizational initiatives, and technological infrastructures that shape their existence as producers of wealth. He asks whether the self-valorization of the multitude could be imagined as a large-scale force of social regulation.
Paul Cappucci
- Published in print:
- 2021
- Published Online:
- May 2022
- ISBN:
- 9781949979930
- eISBN:
- 9781800852235
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3828/liverpool/9781949979930.003.0004
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century Literature and Modernism
This chapter examines William Carlos Williams’s influence on several of the younger American poets included in the “Beat” issue of the Black Mountain Review. It focuses specific attention on ...
More
This chapter examines William Carlos Williams’s influence on several of the younger American poets included in the “Beat” issue of the Black Mountain Review. It focuses specific attention on Williams’s personal connections to Allen Ginsberg, Robert Creeley, Gary Snyder, and Denise Levertov. By examining their correspondence, this chapter documents the significant ways that Williams encouraged and influenced their different poetic pursuits. It also considers the ways that Creeley’s selections for this final BMR issue reflect Williams’s vital role in a “revival,” as Ginsberg called it, occurring on the West Coast during the 1950s. Less
This chapter examines William Carlos Williams’s influence on several of the younger American poets included in the “Beat” issue of the Black Mountain Review. It focuses specific attention on Williams’s personal connections to Allen Ginsberg, Robert Creeley, Gary Snyder, and Denise Levertov. By examining their correspondence, this chapter documents the significant ways that Williams encouraged and influenced their different poetic pursuits. It also considers the ways that Creeley’s selections for this final BMR issue reflect Williams’s vital role in a “revival,” as Ginsberg called it, occurring on the West Coast during the 1950s.
Lisa Siraganian
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- May 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199796557
- eISBN:
- 9780199932542
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796557.003.0000
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century and Contemporary Literature
This introduction defines key terms—air, framing, incorporation—to contextualize the debates about meaning, autonomy, and politics that structure the book, while also setting out a map of its ...
More
This introduction defines key terms—air, framing, incorporation—to contextualize the debates about meaning, autonomy, and politics that structure the book, while also setting out a map of its chapters, complete with brief summaries. The chapter recounts how painterly discussions of collage enabled writers to think about the text’s frame as either excluding or including particulars of the reader’s world. Through pointed discussions of Wallace Stevens, Marcel Duchamp, William Carlos Williams, Gertrude Stein, and Michael Fried, we examine this new conception of aesthetic autonomy. The reader’s or viewer’s relation to the art object became a way to envision the political subject’s ideal relation to liberalism and the discourse of individual rights. In addition, this chapter incorporates discussions of theoretical texts by T. S. Eliot, Theodor Adorno, Peter Bürger, and others to distinguish the book’s account of modernism from canonical accounts that focus on post-structuralism and ideology critique.Less
This introduction defines key terms—air, framing, incorporation—to contextualize the debates about meaning, autonomy, and politics that structure the book, while also setting out a map of its chapters, complete with brief summaries. The chapter recounts how painterly discussions of collage enabled writers to think about the text’s frame as either excluding or including particulars of the reader’s world. Through pointed discussions of Wallace Stevens, Marcel Duchamp, William Carlos Williams, Gertrude Stein, and Michael Fried, we examine this new conception of aesthetic autonomy. The reader’s or viewer’s relation to the art object became a way to envision the political subject’s ideal relation to liberalism and the discourse of individual rights. In addition, this chapter incorporates discussions of theoretical texts by T. S. Eliot, Theodor Adorno, Peter Bürger, and others to distinguish the book’s account of modernism from canonical accounts that focus on post-structuralism and ideology critique.
Mike Chasar
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- November 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780231158657
- eISBN:
- 9780231530774
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Columbia University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7312/columbia/9780231158657.003.0004
- Subject:
- Literature, Poetry
This chapter delves further into the idea that popular culture provides materials, resources, opportunities, and strategies for poets trying to conceptualize and write “modern” poetry by bringing ...
More
This chapter delves further into the idea that popular culture provides materials, resources, opportunities, and strategies for poets trying to conceptualize and write “modern” poetry by bringing together two discussions. One focuses on the relationships between popular literacy, technology, and the commercial landscape of twentieth-century America; the other seeks to understand poet William Carlos Williams' literary goal of capturing the commercial language of U.S. culture in his poetry. Williams' work leans towards the so-called “restless viewing;” he was pushed toward such viewpoint by the hours he spent driving, reading, and writing in his car while making house calls as a doctor. Engrossed in a landscape of competing billboards and other forms of outdoor advertising, Williams recognized the potential for linguistic interference at the heart of that “billboard discourse,” providing more evidence that modernism was rooted in popular culture.Less
This chapter delves further into the idea that popular culture provides materials, resources, opportunities, and strategies for poets trying to conceptualize and write “modern” poetry by bringing together two discussions. One focuses on the relationships between popular literacy, technology, and the commercial landscape of twentieth-century America; the other seeks to understand poet William Carlos Williams' literary goal of capturing the commercial language of U.S. culture in his poetry. Williams' work leans towards the so-called “restless viewing;” he was pushed toward such viewpoint by the hours he spent driving, reading, and writing in his car while making house calls as a doctor. Engrossed in a landscape of competing billboards and other forms of outdoor advertising, Williams recognized the potential for linguistic interference at the heart of that “billboard discourse,” providing more evidence that modernism was rooted in popular culture.
Karen Guendel
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- September 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780813056289
- eISBN:
- 9780813058078
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University Press of Florida
- DOI:
- 10.5744/florida/9780813056289.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century Literature and Modernism
Karen Guendel locates in William Carlos Williams’s poetry a slippage between body and text, catalyzed by the poem’s aesthetic preference for stone over flesh. Such poetry, Guendel’s essay suggests, ...
More
Karen Guendel locates in William Carlos Williams’s poetry a slippage between body and text, catalyzed by the poem’s aesthetic preference for stone over flesh. Such poetry, Guendel’s essay suggests, is bound up in textual erotics wherein the text and reader perform a bodily encounter that gives life to one and pleasure to the other. Such material poetics foreground an embodiment of human life in environmental terms, through its material residues—in the reader’s lips, the book itself, and the stone memorial objects that clutter museum halls.Less
Karen Guendel locates in William Carlos Williams’s poetry a slippage between body and text, catalyzed by the poem’s aesthetic preference for stone over flesh. Such poetry, Guendel’s essay suggests, is bound up in textual erotics wherein the text and reader perform a bodily encounter that gives life to one and pleasure to the other. Such material poetics foreground an embodiment of human life in environmental terms, through its material residues—in the reader’s lips, the book itself, and the stone memorial objects that clutter museum halls.
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9781846311154
- eISBN:
- 9781846313790
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5949/UPO9781846313790.003
- Subject:
- Literature, Poetry
This chapter examines American poet William Carlos Williams' engagement with surrealism. It explains that Williams is an important figure for many language writers but their reception of his work has ...
More
This chapter examines American poet William Carlos Williams' engagement with surrealism. It explains that Williams is an important figure for many language writers but their reception of his work has often been at odds with the canonical representations of it. It compares Williams' The Great American Novel with André Breton's Soluble Fish, which is an example of a surrealist ‘false novel’. This chapter also suggests that the contributions of Williams, Charles Henri Ford and Parker Tyler to the Blues magazine indicates that there is no clear boundary between the orthodox American followers of surrealism and its renegade dissidents.Less
This chapter examines American poet William Carlos Williams' engagement with surrealism. It explains that Williams is an important figure for many language writers but their reception of his work has often been at odds with the canonical representations of it. It compares Williams' The Great American Novel with André Breton's Soluble Fish, which is an example of a surrealist ‘false novel’. This chapter also suggests that the contributions of Williams, Charles Henri Ford and Parker Tyler to the Blues magazine indicates that there is no clear boundary between the orthodox American followers of surrealism and its renegade dissidents.
Eric White
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- March 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780199545810
- eISBN:
- 9780191803475
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199545810.003.0014
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century and Contemporary Literature
This chapter discusses the histories of Contact and Pagany: A Native Quarterly. Contact was launched by William Carlos Williams in 1920 with the help of the Midwestern writer Robert McAlmon. Williams ...
More
This chapter discusses the histories of Contact and Pagany: A Native Quarterly. Contact was launched by William Carlos Williams in 1920 with the help of the Midwestern writer Robert McAlmon. Williams sought to develop an avant-garde group within the United States that could express a distinctively ‘American’ aesthetic that was neither hostile to experiments conducted in other nations nor blinkered by crass literary nationalisms. He craved a textual place in which to debate this project, where he could cultivate intellectual and creative contact with other writers, in America and overseas. Despite the magazine's relatively short publishing life (spanning December 1920 to September 1921), it impact on American modernism endured into the following decade, largely due to its specialized field of influence and its editors' innovative policies. In Richard Johns's ‘Native Quarterly’ Pagany, which, inspired by Williams's example, began publishing in 1930, and the re-launched version of Contact (which appeared in 1932), the localist debate that Williams and McAlmon inaugurated in the first incarnation of Contact was reignited by a new generation.Less
This chapter discusses the histories of Contact and Pagany: A Native Quarterly. Contact was launched by William Carlos Williams in 1920 with the help of the Midwestern writer Robert McAlmon. Williams sought to develop an avant-garde group within the United States that could express a distinctively ‘American’ aesthetic that was neither hostile to experiments conducted in other nations nor blinkered by crass literary nationalisms. He craved a textual place in which to debate this project, where he could cultivate intellectual and creative contact with other writers, in America and overseas. Despite the magazine's relatively short publishing life (spanning December 1920 to September 1921), it impact on American modernism endured into the following decade, largely due to its specialized field of influence and its editors' innovative policies. In Richard Johns's ‘Native Quarterly’ Pagany, which, inspired by Williams's example, began publishing in 1930, and the re-launched version of Contact (which appeared in 1932), the localist debate that Williams and McAlmon inaugurated in the first incarnation of Contact was reignited by a new generation.
Joel Nickels
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- August 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780816676088
- eISBN:
- 9781452947716
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- University of Minnesota Press
- DOI:
- 10.5749/minnesota/9780816676088.001.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
This book challenges the conventional image of modernism as a socially phobic formation, arguing that modernism’s abstractions and difficulties are ways of imagining unrealized powers of collective ...
More
This book challenges the conventional image of modernism as a socially phobic formation, arguing that modernism’s abstractions and difficulties are ways of imagining unrealized powers of collective self-organization. Establishing a conceptual continuum between modernism and contemporary theorists such as Paulo Virno, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Alain Badiou, this book rediscovers modernism’s attempts to document the creative potenza of the multitude. By examining scenes of collective life in works by William Carlos Williams, Wyndham Lewis, Laura Riding, and Wallace Stevens, this book resurrects modernism’s obsession with constituent power: the raw, indeterminate capacity for reciprocal counsel that continually constitutes and reconstitutes established political regimes. In doing so, it reminds us that our own attempts to imagine leaderless networks of collective initiative are not so much breaks with modernist forms of knowledge as restagings of some of modernism’s most radical moments of political speculation.Less
This book challenges the conventional image of modernism as a socially phobic formation, arguing that modernism’s abstractions and difficulties are ways of imagining unrealized powers of collective self-organization. Establishing a conceptual continuum between modernism and contemporary theorists such as Paulo Virno, Michael Hardt, Antonio Negri, and Alain Badiou, this book rediscovers modernism’s attempts to document the creative potenza of the multitude. By examining scenes of collective life in works by William Carlos Williams, Wyndham Lewis, Laura Riding, and Wallace Stevens, this book resurrects modernism’s obsession with constituent power: the raw, indeterminate capacity for reciprocal counsel that continually constitutes and reconstitutes established political regimes. In doing so, it reminds us that our own attempts to imagine leaderless networks of collective initiative are not so much breaks with modernist forms of knowledge as restagings of some of modernism’s most radical moments of political speculation.
Harris Feinsod
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- October 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780190682002
- eISBN:
- 9780190682033
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780190682002.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, American, 20th Century Literature
This chapter introduces the unlikely roles poets played at the center of hemispheric cultural diplomacy initiatives in 1938–1945, the years when Good Neighbor diplomacy was motivated by a broad ...
More
This chapter introduces the unlikely roles poets played at the center of hemispheric cultural diplomacy initiatives in 1938–1945, the years when Good Neighbor diplomacy was motivated by a broad antifascist coalition. The chapter discusses major diplomat-poets like William Carlos Williams, Pablo Neruda, Archibald MacLeish, and Langston Hughes, and compares these writers to Puerto Rican poet Julia de Burgos, Ecuadorian Consul General Jorge Carrera Andrade, soldier-poet Lysander Kemp, and others who coalesced around the anthologies, translations, and congresses of Good Neighbor initiatives. Borrowing metaphors of bridging and broadcasting from new infrastructures of hemispheric modernization, and invoking strategies of apostrophic address to an impossibly large hemispheric public, Good Neighbor poetry promoted Popular Front antifascism, but also enabled advocates of decolonial politics, racial democracy, and international feminism.Less
This chapter introduces the unlikely roles poets played at the center of hemispheric cultural diplomacy initiatives in 1938–1945, the years when Good Neighbor diplomacy was motivated by a broad antifascist coalition. The chapter discusses major diplomat-poets like William Carlos Williams, Pablo Neruda, Archibald MacLeish, and Langston Hughes, and compares these writers to Puerto Rican poet Julia de Burgos, Ecuadorian Consul General Jorge Carrera Andrade, soldier-poet Lysander Kemp, and others who coalesced around the anthologies, translations, and congresses of Good Neighbor initiatives. Borrowing metaphors of bridging and broadcasting from new infrastructures of hemispheric modernization, and invoking strategies of apostrophic address to an impossibly large hemispheric public, Good Neighbor poetry promoted Popular Front antifascism, but also enabled advocates of decolonial politics, racial democracy, and international feminism.
Jahan Ramazani
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- May 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780226083735
- eISBN:
- 9780226083421
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226083421.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, Poetry
Among poetry’s most powerful interlocutors in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has been journalism. As the pressure of news has become increasingly pervasive, from the world wars to JFK’s ...
More
Among poetry’s most powerful interlocutors in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has been journalism. As the pressure of news has become increasingly pervasive, from the world wars to JFK’s assassination, the Irish Troubles, and the September 11 attacks, poets such as W. B. Yeats, William Carlos Williams, W. H. Auden, Louise Bennett, Louis MacNeice, Frank O’Hara, Robert Duncan, Seamus Heaney, Michael Longley, Carolyn Forché, and Jorie Graham have refashioned poetry to absorb news stories, newspaper headlines, and news vocabulary. But poetry has defined itself against the news at the same time that it has ingested it. “It is difficult / to get the news from poems,” Williams famously wrote, implicitly characterizing poetry as an antigenre to the news: “yet men die miserably every day / for lack / of what is found there.” Even as poets have drawn on the news, they have explored the differences between poetry and what Walter Benjamin saw as the commodified, transparent, and instantaneous discourse of journalism, foregrounding poetry’s long temporal horizons and deep memory, its obliquity and metaphoric density.Less
Among poetry’s most powerful interlocutors in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries has been journalism. As the pressure of news has become increasingly pervasive, from the world wars to JFK’s assassination, the Irish Troubles, and the September 11 attacks, poets such as W. B. Yeats, William Carlos Williams, W. H. Auden, Louise Bennett, Louis MacNeice, Frank O’Hara, Robert Duncan, Seamus Heaney, Michael Longley, Carolyn Forché, and Jorie Graham have refashioned poetry to absorb news stories, newspaper headlines, and news vocabulary. But poetry has defined itself against the news at the same time that it has ingested it. “It is difficult / to get the news from poems,” Williams famously wrote, implicitly characterizing poetry as an antigenre to the news: “yet men die miserably every day / for lack / of what is found there.” Even as poets have drawn on the news, they have explored the differences between poetry and what Walter Benjamin saw as the commodified, transparent, and instantaneous discourse of journalism, foregrounding poetry’s long temporal horizons and deep memory, its obliquity and metaphoric density.
David Leeming
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780195142884
- eISBN:
- 9780199834402
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/0195142888.003.0004
- Subject:
- Religion, Religion and Society
Heroes are those humans who, in the mythological traditions, are in varying degrees infused with divine or superhuman qualities. Heroes reflect our priorities as individuals and as cultures. As ...
More
Heroes are those humans who, in the mythological traditions, are in varying degrees infused with divine or superhuman qualities. Heroes reflect our priorities as individuals and as cultures. As analyzed archetypally in Joseph Campbell's “monomyth,” the hero reflects our priorities as a species, priorities involving the body's, the psyche's, and the soul's search for union. Warlike cultures create warlike heroes who seek the union of hegemony; heroes such as Jesus and the Buddha reflect the search for spiritual union; the hero pattern as a whole reflects our life's psychological journey toward wholeness. Modern thinkers have recognized new mythologies that reflect new understandings of reality based on, e.g., psychology, mysticism, ecology, and physics. New hero values have emerged from this modernist process, values perhaps reflected in William Carlos Williams's little poem, “The Red Wheelbarrow.”Less
Heroes are those humans who, in the mythological traditions, are in varying degrees infused with divine or superhuman qualities. Heroes reflect our priorities as individuals and as cultures. As analyzed archetypally in Joseph Campbell's “monomyth,” the hero reflects our priorities as a species, priorities involving the body's, the psyche's, and the soul's search for union. Warlike cultures create warlike heroes who seek the union of hegemony; heroes such as Jesus and the Buddha reflect the search for spiritual union; the hero pattern as a whole reflects our life's psychological journey toward wholeness. Modern thinkers have recognized new mythologies that reflect new understandings of reality based on, e.g., psychology, mysticism, ecology, and physics. New hero values have emerged from this modernist process, values perhaps reflected in William Carlos Williams's little poem, “The Red Wheelbarrow.”
Lee M. Jenkins
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- September 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780813060507
- eISBN:
- 9780813050676
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University Press of Florida
- DOI:
- 10.5744/florida/9780813060507.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century Literature and Modernism
This chapter discusses Lawrence’s involvements with and influence on American modernism and the avant-garde. The chapter opens with an assessment of Lawrence’s importance for the Stieglitz circle and ...
More
This chapter discusses Lawrence’s involvements with and influence on American modernism and the avant-garde. The chapter opens with an assessment of Lawrence’s importance for the Stieglitz circle and the localizing American aesthetic promoted in the poetry and cultural criticism of William Carlos Williams and Marsden Hartley, and it goes on to analyse Lawrence’s close connection to the place-based modernism of northern New Mexico in the 1920s. The chapter assesses the relationship of Lawrence’s collections Look! We Have Come Through!(1917) and Birds, Beasts and Flowers (1923) to American poetry from Whitman to Williams, comparing the use of the Persephone-myth in Lawrence’s poems and those of his American contemporaries. The chapter also discusses Lawrence’s connections to transatlantic Imagism, via Amy Lowell, H.D., Harriet Monroe, Alice Corbin Henderson, and Mary Austin, and his articulation, in the New Mexico poems of Birds, Beasts and Flowers, of a local poetics of space and place.Less
This chapter discusses Lawrence’s involvements with and influence on American modernism and the avant-garde. The chapter opens with an assessment of Lawrence’s importance for the Stieglitz circle and the localizing American aesthetic promoted in the poetry and cultural criticism of William Carlos Williams and Marsden Hartley, and it goes on to analyse Lawrence’s close connection to the place-based modernism of northern New Mexico in the 1920s. The chapter assesses the relationship of Lawrence’s collections Look! We Have Come Through!(1917) and Birds, Beasts and Flowers (1923) to American poetry from Whitman to Williams, comparing the use of the Persephone-myth in Lawrence’s poems and those of his American contemporaries. The chapter also discusses Lawrence’s connections to transatlantic Imagism, via Amy Lowell, H.D., Harriet Monroe, Alice Corbin Henderson, and Mary Austin, and his articulation, in the New Mexico poems of Birds, Beasts and Flowers, of a local poetics of space and place.
Michael O'Neill
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- September 2007
- ISBN:
- 9780199299287
- eISBN:
- 9780191715099
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299287.003.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, 19th-century Literature and Romanticism
This introductory chapter is divided into two parts. The first draws upon an array of 20th-century poetry in support of the argument that Romantic poetry is a persistent presence in subsequent ...
More
This introductory chapter is divided into two parts. The first draws upon an array of 20th-century poetry in support of the argument that Romantic poetry is a persistent presence in subsequent literature. This is the case even when later poets appear to differ greatly in their attitudes from Romantic poets. A case in point in Ted Hughes's ‘Skylarks’, which invites the reader to reconsider Shelley's ‘To a Skylark’ as both Neoplatonic and surprisingly realistic. It is argued that Hughes' poem enters its own poetic territory, yet it does so by virtue of its Romantic inheritance. More generally, it is suggested that post-Romantic responses to Romantic poetry allow us to understand how fraught and conflicted Romanticism is. Readings of poems by, among others, Donald Davie, Sidney Keyes, Denise Levertov, and Anthony Hecht conclude the first part of the introduction. The second part sets out in a more explicit way the book's purpose and method, including its stress on ‘aesthetic achievement’, its sense of the value of division, its sympathy with Albert Gelpi's reading of Modernism as post- rather than anti-Romantic, and its views of the work of previous critics who have written on legacies of Romanticism such as Harold Bloom. A brief chapter-by-chapter summary follows. Poems by such authors as Eliot, Yeats, Williams, Fisher, and Lowell are also mentioned.Less
This introductory chapter is divided into two parts. The first draws upon an array of 20th-century poetry in support of the argument that Romantic poetry is a persistent presence in subsequent literature. This is the case even when later poets appear to differ greatly in their attitudes from Romantic poets. A case in point in Ted Hughes's ‘Skylarks’, which invites the reader to reconsider Shelley's ‘To a Skylark’ as both Neoplatonic and surprisingly realistic. It is argued that Hughes' poem enters its own poetic territory, yet it does so by virtue of its Romantic inheritance. More generally, it is suggested that post-Romantic responses to Romantic poetry allow us to understand how fraught and conflicted Romanticism is. Readings of poems by, among others, Donald Davie, Sidney Keyes, Denise Levertov, and Anthony Hecht conclude the first part of the introduction. The second part sets out in a more explicit way the book's purpose and method, including its stress on ‘aesthetic achievement’, its sense of the value of division, its sympathy with Albert Gelpi's reading of Modernism as post- rather than anti-Romantic, and its views of the work of previous critics who have written on legacies of Romanticism such as Harold Bloom. A brief chapter-by-chapter summary follows. Poems by such authors as Eliot, Yeats, Williams, Fisher, and Lowell are also mentioned.
Adam Lifshey
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- September 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780823232383
- eISBN:
- 9780823241187
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Fordham University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5422/fordham/9780823232383.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, American Colonial Literature
Since the nineteenth century the diary has been the most widely read and referenced account of the events of the 1492–93 crossing. It has been canonized despite the issues of unreliability that ...
More
Since the nineteenth century the diary has been the most widely read and referenced account of the events of the 1492–93 crossing. It has been canonized despite the issues of unreliability that result in part from the changes introduced by its editor from early colonial times, the Dominican priest Bartolomé de las Casas. The version by de las Casas, produced some four decades or more after Columbus wrote the original diary, is the basis of all modern editions. The manuscript by Columbus and a contemporary copy did not survive into posterity. The de las Casas document itself was lost until the end of the eighteenth century and remained unpublished until 1825. It alternates between Columbus's first-person narrative in allegedly verbatim citations and de las Casas's third- person paraphrasings of the explorer's entries.Less
Since the nineteenth century the diary has been the most widely read and referenced account of the events of the 1492–93 crossing. It has been canonized despite the issues of unreliability that result in part from the changes introduced by its editor from early colonial times, the Dominican priest Bartolomé de las Casas. The version by de las Casas, produced some four decades or more after Columbus wrote the original diary, is the basis of all modern editions. The manuscript by Columbus and a contemporary copy did not survive into posterity. The de las Casas document itself was lost until the end of the eighteenth century and remained unpublished until 1825. It alternates between Columbus's first-person narrative in allegedly verbatim citations and de las Casas's third- person paraphrasings of the explorer's entries.
Jeffrey Bilbro
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- September 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780813176406
- eISBN:
- 9780813176437
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University Press of Kentucky
- DOI:
- 10.5810/kentucky/9780813176406.003.0005
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
Climate change discourse trades in complex statistical models that, in general, offer gloomy prognostications of inevitable disaster. The problems appear so complicated that our only hope seems to ...
More
Climate change discourse trades in complex statistical models that, in general, offer gloomy prognostications of inevitable disaster. The problems appear so complicated that our only hope seems to lie in massive engineering solutions that might alter global weather patterns or extract tons of garbage from our oceans. This discourse of statistics and big data either makes it seem as though individuals cannot do anything to affect the problems and hence leads to pessimism, or it optimistically implies that we don’t need to do anything because technocrats can fix the problems for us. Berry’s essays, however, sharply distinguish between optimism—which is an industrial trait founded on the belief that technological progress will continue to make our lives better—and hope—which is a virtue founded on specific examples of good work and good lives. He offers particular examples of locally adapted good work that can support authentic hope: the artist Harlan Hubbard, the poet William Carlos Williams, the farming communities of the Amish. While individual examples may seem inadequate to the scale of global problems, Michel de Certeau argues that the everyday practices these people and communities model have the power to subvert unjust systems.Less
Climate change discourse trades in complex statistical models that, in general, offer gloomy prognostications of inevitable disaster. The problems appear so complicated that our only hope seems to lie in massive engineering solutions that might alter global weather patterns or extract tons of garbage from our oceans. This discourse of statistics and big data either makes it seem as though individuals cannot do anything to affect the problems and hence leads to pessimism, or it optimistically implies that we don’t need to do anything because technocrats can fix the problems for us. Berry’s essays, however, sharply distinguish between optimism—which is an industrial trait founded on the belief that technological progress will continue to make our lives better—and hope—which is a virtue founded on specific examples of good work and good lives. He offers particular examples of locally adapted good work that can support authentic hope: the artist Harlan Hubbard, the poet William Carlos Williams, the farming communities of the Amish. While individual examples may seem inadequate to the scale of global problems, Michel de Certeau argues that the everyday practices these people and communities model have the power to subvert unjust systems.
Peter Campion
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- May 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780226663234
- eISBN:
- 9780226663401
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226663401.003.0003
- Subject:
- Literature, American, 20th Century Literature
This chapter considers four Modernist poets (Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams, Lorine Niedecker, and George Oppen), with particular attention paid to their adaptation and combination of lyric and ...
More
This chapter considers four Modernist poets (Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams, Lorine Niedecker, and George Oppen), with particular attention paid to their adaptation and combination of lyric and epic, and in light of Hannah Arendt's writing on poetry and history.Less
This chapter considers four Modernist poets (Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams, Lorine Niedecker, and George Oppen), with particular attention paid to their adaptation and combination of lyric and epic, and in light of Hannah Arendt's writing on poetry and history.
Jack Ryan
- Published in print:
- 2021
- Published Online:
- September 2021
- ISBN:
- 9781496832603
- eISBN:
- 9781496832641
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University Press of Mississippi
- DOI:
- 10.14325/mississippi/9781496832603.003.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, Film, Media, and Cultural Studies
Jarmusch's film is not a strict adaptation of the 1946 William Carlos Williams epic poem by the same name. One might more appropriately bill it as a cinematic homage to observational poetry, as essay ...
More
Jarmusch's film is not a strict adaptation of the 1946 William Carlos Williams epic poem by the same name. One might more appropriately bill it as a cinematic homage to observational poetry, as essay contributor Jack Ryan does. Jarmusch does, after all, shape his films around the tenets of such poetry. Jarmusch structures the film around what is taken to be a typical work week of its hero, Paterson (Adam Driver). That hero builds a deep sense of place into the poems he writes. The chapter offers that these qualities form the center of Jarmusch’s adaptation, which finds a way to allow a daily routine to protect the creative consciousness from the crush of modernity. The film ultimately favors the process of poetry over the content of any singular poem, a point the chapter claims that Jarmusch returns to each time Paterson meets another poet.Less
Jarmusch's film is not a strict adaptation of the 1946 William Carlos Williams epic poem by the same name. One might more appropriately bill it as a cinematic homage to observational poetry, as essay contributor Jack Ryan does. Jarmusch does, after all, shape his films around the tenets of such poetry. Jarmusch structures the film around what is taken to be a typical work week of its hero, Paterson (Adam Driver). That hero builds a deep sense of place into the poems he writes. The chapter offers that these qualities form the center of Jarmusch’s adaptation, which finds a way to allow a daily routine to protect the creative consciousness from the crush of modernity. The film ultimately favors the process of poetry over the content of any singular poem, a point the chapter claims that Jarmusch returns to each time Paterson meets another poet.
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- June 2013
- ISBN:
- 9781846312120
- eISBN:
- 9781846315190
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5949/UPO9781846315190.003
- Subject:
- Literature, American, 20th Century Literature
The simultaneous emergence of modernism and the cinema may explain why writers found in the new medium possibilities of representing and recording experience. Recent studies of modernism have all ...
More
The simultaneous emergence of modernism and the cinema may explain why writers found in the new medium possibilities of representing and recording experience. Recent studies of modernism have all linked literary experimentation with the new technology of visual representation. This chapter focuses on three American writers – Gertrude Stein, E. E. Cummings, and William Carlos Williams – who responded directly to the cinema as part of their broader experiments across visual and verbal media.Less
The simultaneous emergence of modernism and the cinema may explain why writers found in the new medium possibilities of representing and recording experience. Recent studies of modernism have all linked literary experimentation with the new technology of visual representation. This chapter focuses on three American writers – Gertrude Stein, E. E. Cummings, and William Carlos Williams – who responded directly to the cinema as part of their broader experiments across visual and verbal media.
Peter Middleton
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- May 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780226290003
- eISBN:
- 9780226290140
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226290140.003.0002
- Subject:
- Literature, American, 20th Century Literature
Postwar New American poets and their successors, the Language Writers, insisted that their poetry was capable of intellectual inquiry. After giving examples of their claims for poetry, the chapter ...
More
Postwar New American poets and their successors, the Language Writers, insisted that their poetry was capable of intellectual inquiry. After giving examples of their claims for poetry, the chapter sets out the book’s methodological assumptions. Literary theory has struggled to represent adequately the interrelations between science and poetry because it has not engaged with the epistemological claims of the sciences. Yet science is part of the DNA of modern literary theory. One major theme of the book is how poets attempted to develop new poetic epistemologies. Science envy has been attributed to the early-twentieth-century modernist poets, but the book argues that the picture is more complex in the postwar era. Many disciplines employed methods and concepts from physics, seeing this not as physics envy but as intellectual opportunity. The book then maps out schematically the different kinds of responses made by postwar American poets of all kinds to the sciences. It goes on to show how some of these responses had antecedents among modernist predecessors. Archibald MacLeish’s poem “Einstein” is discussed in detail because of its representative character. The importance of William Carlos Williams and Ezra Pound for later poets is discussed.Less
Postwar New American poets and their successors, the Language Writers, insisted that their poetry was capable of intellectual inquiry. After giving examples of their claims for poetry, the chapter sets out the book’s methodological assumptions. Literary theory has struggled to represent adequately the interrelations between science and poetry because it has not engaged with the epistemological claims of the sciences. Yet science is part of the DNA of modern literary theory. One major theme of the book is how poets attempted to develop new poetic epistemologies. Science envy has been attributed to the early-twentieth-century modernist poets, but the book argues that the picture is more complex in the postwar era. Many disciplines employed methods and concepts from physics, seeing this not as physics envy but as intellectual opportunity. The book then maps out schematically the different kinds of responses made by postwar American poets of all kinds to the sciences. It goes on to show how some of these responses had antecedents among modernist predecessors. Archibald MacLeish’s poem “Einstein” is discussed in detail because of its representative character. The importance of William Carlos Williams and Ezra Pound for later poets is discussed.