S. D. Ganichev and W. Prettl
- Published in print:
- 2005
- Published Online:
- September 2007
- ISBN:
- 9780198528302
- eISBN:
- 9780191713637
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528302.003.0005
- Subject:
- Physics, Condensed Matter Physics / Materials
This chapter discusses terahertz radiation-induced saturation of absorption, including incoherent and coherent saturation effects. Saturation due to slow relaxation and Rabi oscillations in various ...
More
This chapter discusses terahertz radiation-induced saturation of absorption, including incoherent and coherent saturation effects. Saturation due to slow relaxation and Rabi oscillations in various bulk and low-dimension semiconductors is discussed from theoretical and experimental perspectives. It is shown that THz saturation experiments provide a powerful method for studying the kinetics and the details of the relaxation processes in bulk and low dimensional materials. In particular, spin relaxation times in low dimensional systems at monopolar spin orientation become experimentally accessible, which are of interest for the current topic of spintronics.Less
This chapter discusses terahertz radiation-induced saturation of absorption, including incoherent and coherent saturation effects. Saturation due to slow relaxation and Rabi oscillations in various bulk and low-dimension semiconductors is discussed from theoretical and experimental perspectives. It is shown that THz saturation experiments provide a powerful method for studying the kinetics and the details of the relaxation processes in bulk and low dimensional materials. In particular, spin relaxation times in low dimensional systems at monopolar spin orientation become experimentally accessible, which are of interest for the current topic of spintronics.
Maria T. Acosta
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- November 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780195342680
- eISBN:
- 9780197562598
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780195342680.003.0045
- Subject:
- Clinical Medicine and Allied Health, Psychiatry
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (Nf1) is a neurocutaneous disorder with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 2,500–3,500 individuals (Ferner et al. 2007). The physical manifestations of Nf1, such as café au ...
More
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (Nf1) is a neurocutaneous disorder with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 2,500–3,500 individuals (Ferner et al. 2007). The physical manifestations of Nf1, such as café au lait spots, axillary freckling, iris hamartomas (Lisch nodules), osseous lesions (sphenoid wing dysplasia, pseudoarthrosis), and benign as well as malignant neural tumors (neurofibromas, optic gliomas), are well recognized (Castle et al. 2003; Ferner et al. 2007). National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria are currently used for clinical diagnosis (1988) (Table 31.1). The clinical severity of this disorder is quite variable, and approximately 20% of children with Nf1 will later have considerable physical complications (Castle et al. 2003; Ferner et al. 2007; Williams et al. 2009). Other clinical manifestations are abnormalities of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and endocrine systems, facial and body disfigurement, cognitive deficit, and malignancies of the peripheral nerve sheath and central nervous system. The tumors that occur in Nf1 are dermal and plexiform neurofibromas, optic gliomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), pheochromocytomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas (Castle et al. 2003). Children with Nf1 have an increased risk of developing myeloid disease, particularly juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia. Some 30%–40% of Nf1 patients develop plexiform neurofibromas (Szudek, Evans, and Friedman 2003). Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are present in 5%–10% of cases (Evans et al. 2002), often in preexisting plexiform neurofibromas (Castle et al. 2003). Although many see the predisposition to cancer as the major concern regarding Nf1, some of the more prevalent features are not directly related to tumors (Acosta, Gioia, and Silva 2006). Cognitive dysfunction, academic difficulties, and school failure, occur in 40%–80% (Hyman, Arthur, and North 2006; Krab et al. 2008; North et al. 1997). These complications affect the day-to-day life of these children, and are the largest cause of lifetime morbidity in the pediatric Nf1 population (Acosta et al. 2006). These deficits impact on long-term adaptation to society (Acosta et al. 2006; Barton and North 2007; Krab et al. 2008; Krab et al. 2009).
Less
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (Nf1) is a neurocutaneous disorder with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 2,500–3,500 individuals (Ferner et al. 2007). The physical manifestations of Nf1, such as café au lait spots, axillary freckling, iris hamartomas (Lisch nodules), osseous lesions (sphenoid wing dysplasia, pseudoarthrosis), and benign as well as malignant neural tumors (neurofibromas, optic gliomas), are well recognized (Castle et al. 2003; Ferner et al. 2007). National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria are currently used for clinical diagnosis (1988) (Table 31.1). The clinical severity of this disorder is quite variable, and approximately 20% of children with Nf1 will later have considerable physical complications (Castle et al. 2003; Ferner et al. 2007; Williams et al. 2009). Other clinical manifestations are abnormalities of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, and endocrine systems, facial and body disfigurement, cognitive deficit, and malignancies of the peripheral nerve sheath and central nervous system. The tumors that occur in Nf1 are dermal and plexiform neurofibromas, optic gliomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), pheochromocytomas, and rhabdomyosarcomas (Castle et al. 2003). Children with Nf1 have an increased risk of developing myeloid disease, particularly juvenile chronic myeloid leukemia. Some 30%–40% of Nf1 patients develop plexiform neurofibromas (Szudek, Evans, and Friedman 2003). Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are present in 5%–10% of cases (Evans et al. 2002), often in preexisting plexiform neurofibromas (Castle et al. 2003). Although many see the predisposition to cancer as the major concern regarding Nf1, some of the more prevalent features are not directly related to tumors (Acosta, Gioia, and Silva 2006). Cognitive dysfunction, academic difficulties, and school failure, occur in 40%–80% (Hyman, Arthur, and North 2006; Krab et al. 2008; North et al. 1997). These complications affect the day-to-day life of these children, and are the largest cause of lifetime morbidity in the pediatric Nf1 population (Acosta et al. 2006). These deficits impact on long-term adaptation to society (Acosta et al. 2006; Barton and North 2007; Krab et al. 2008; Krab et al. 2009).
Miriam Solomon
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- June 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780198732617
- eISBN:
- 9780191796838
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732617.003.0007
- Subject:
- Philosophy, Metaphysics/Epistemology, Philosophy of Science
Translational medicine emerged in the early 2000s. Its main focus (T1) is “bench to bedside and back” research. This chapter argues that the focus on evidence-based medicine in the 1990s obscured the ...
More
Translational medicine emerged in the early 2000s. Its main focus (T1) is “bench to bedside and back” research. This chapter argues that the focus on evidence-based medicine in the 1990s obscured the need for different methods in the context of discovery. Translational medicine recommends trial-and-error methods, along with mechanistic (pathophysiological) reasoning, to develop interventions which can then be tested in evidence-based medicine. Translational medicine also recommends changes in the social structure of research. Although Martin Wehling argues that we need more methodological rigor in translational medicine, this chapter is skeptical about whether such rigor is possible. With the metaphor of translation, translational medicine also offers hope that early failures in genetic technology and stem cell research can be surmounted. A subsidiary focus of translational medicine is T2, consisting of dissemination of research from “bedside to community.” T2 continues the work of medical consensus conferences.Less
Translational medicine emerged in the early 2000s. Its main focus (T1) is “bench to bedside and back” research. This chapter argues that the focus on evidence-based medicine in the 1990s obscured the need for different methods in the context of discovery. Translational medicine recommends trial-and-error methods, along with mechanistic (pathophysiological) reasoning, to develop interventions which can then be tested in evidence-based medicine. Translational medicine also recommends changes in the social structure of research. Although Martin Wehling argues that we need more methodological rigor in translational medicine, this chapter is skeptical about whether such rigor is possible. With the metaphor of translation, translational medicine also offers hope that early failures in genetic technology and stem cell research can be surmounted. A subsidiary focus of translational medicine is T2, consisting of dissemination of research from “bedside to community.” T2 continues the work of medical consensus conferences.