Blair Worden
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199230822
- eISBN:
- 9780191696480
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230822.003.0005
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature, Milton Studies
If the occasions that prompted Andrew Marvell's two political poems of 1650 had happened in the reverse order—if Tom May had died before Oliver Cromwell's return from Ireland—the opposition between ...
More
If the occasions that prompted Andrew Marvell's two political poems of 1650 had happened in the reverse order—if Tom May had died before Oliver Cromwell's return from Ireland—the opposition between ‘An Horatian Ode’ and ‘Tom May's Death’ could be given a simple explanation. The May poem would be the last of Marvell's royalist poems, and the ode to the first of his Cromwellian ones. One could read the ode as a testament to a conversion from one position to an exactly contrary one. That change was duly followed, by the poem, in 1651, in support of the republic's embassy, led by Cromwell's cousin and intimate ally Oliver St John, who went to The Hague in March of that year with the purpose of undermining the Stuart cause. Instead, the May poem comes between the occasions that produced the ode and the poem on the embassy.Less
If the occasions that prompted Andrew Marvell's two political poems of 1650 had happened in the reverse order—if Tom May had died before Oliver Cromwell's return from Ireland—the opposition between ‘An Horatian Ode’ and ‘Tom May's Death’ could be given a simple explanation. The May poem would be the last of Marvell's royalist poems, and the ode to the first of his Cromwellian ones. One could read the ode as a testament to a conversion from one position to an exactly contrary one. That change was duly followed, by the poem, in 1651, in support of the republic's embassy, led by Cromwell's cousin and intimate ally Oliver St John, who went to The Hague in March of that year with the purpose of undermining the Stuart cause. Instead, the May poem comes between the occasions that produced the ode and the poem on the embassy.
Edward Holberton
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- September 2008
- ISBN:
- 9780199544585
- eISBN:
- 9780191719981
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544585.001.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature
This book shows that the Protectorate's instabilities helped to generate lively and innovative poetry. Protectorate verse explores the fault-lines of a culture which ceaselessly contested the ...
More
This book shows that the Protectorate's instabilities helped to generate lively and innovative poetry. Protectorate verse explores the fault-lines of a culture which ceaselessly contested the authority of its own institutions, including the office of Protector itself. This study reads poems by Andrew Marvell, Edmund Waller, John Dryden, and a number of writers who will be less familiar, in a cross-section of institutional contexts, including an embassy to Sweden, Oxford University, parliamentary crises, and a state funeral. It finds that their poetry often proves difficult to align with established ideas of the political and cultural contests of the age, because it becomes entangled with cultural institutions which were transforming rapidly. The readings of this book challenge previous representations of Protectorate culture as a phase of conservative backsliding, or pragmatic compromise, under a quasi-monarchical order. Protectorate verse emerges as nuanced and vital writing, which looks beyond the personality of Oliver Cromwell to the tensions that are shaping his power. Poetry and the Cromwellian Protectectorate argues that it is precisely through being contingent and compromised that these poems achieve their vitality, and become so revealing.Less
This book shows that the Protectorate's instabilities helped to generate lively and innovative poetry. Protectorate verse explores the fault-lines of a culture which ceaselessly contested the authority of its own institutions, including the office of Protector itself. This study reads poems by Andrew Marvell, Edmund Waller, John Dryden, and a number of writers who will be less familiar, in a cross-section of institutional contexts, including an embassy to Sweden, Oxford University, parliamentary crises, and a state funeral. It finds that their poetry often proves difficult to align with established ideas of the political and cultural contests of the age, because it becomes entangled with cultural institutions which were transforming rapidly. The readings of this book challenge previous representations of Protectorate culture as a phase of conservative backsliding, or pragmatic compromise, under a quasi-monarchical order. Protectorate verse emerges as nuanced and vital writing, which looks beyond the personality of Oliver Cromwell to the tensions that are shaping his power. Poetry and the Cromwellian Protectectorate argues that it is precisely through being contingent and compromised that these poems achieve their vitality, and become so revealing.
Rachel Willie
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- May 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780719087639
- eISBN:
- 9781526104052
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Manchester University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7228/manchester/9780719087639.003.0003
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
Chapter two explores a selection of play pamphlets and how the paper stage was used to present images of Charles I and Oliver Cromwell. While the regicide silenced some of the criticism levied ...
More
Chapter two explores a selection of play pamphlets and how the paper stage was used to present images of Charles I and Oliver Cromwell. While the regicide silenced some of the criticism levied against Charles, Cromwell was increasingly portrayed as a Machiavellian: the saint and martyred king met his polar opposite in the portrayal of a demonic lord protector. Parliamentarians and royalists used drama as a way of reflecting upon and responding to politics. Through examining play pamphlets that use the place of the fair or the afterlife as a way to respond to the protectorate, this chapter shows that these play pamphlets are not uniform in their depictions of Charles or Cromwell, but share and modify modes of attack and defence on the page.Less
Chapter two explores a selection of play pamphlets and how the paper stage was used to present images of Charles I and Oliver Cromwell. While the regicide silenced some of the criticism levied against Charles, Cromwell was increasingly portrayed as a Machiavellian: the saint and martyred king met his polar opposite in the portrayal of a demonic lord protector. Parliamentarians and royalists used drama as a way of reflecting upon and responding to politics. Through examining play pamphlets that use the place of the fair or the afterlife as a way to respond to the protectorate, this chapter shows that these play pamphlets are not uniform in their depictions of Charles or Cromwell, but share and modify modes of attack and defence on the page.
Blair Worden
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199230822
- eISBN:
- 9780191696480
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230822.003.0014
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature, Milton Studies
John Milton welcomed both the coups of 1653. Defensio Secunda supports the attacks of Oliver Cromwell and the army officers on the character of the Rump, endorses its expulsion, and approves its ...
More
John Milton welcomed both the coups of 1653. Defensio Secunda supports the attacks of Oliver Cromwell and the army officers on the character of the Rump, endorses its expulsion, and approves its replacement by an assembly chosen by Cromwell and the army officers. Those sentiments were not coloured by retrospect. The passage of Defensio Secunda that reveals the most about Milton's attitude to the Rump was written shortly after its dissolution, with the intention of vindicating Cromwell's action. At that time Milton aimed to please Cromwell. He first proposed, and then approved, the appointment of civilian advisers whom Cromwell chose. The men he named would form the core of the Cromwellian party in Barebone's, and would then sit on the ruling council of the protectorate.Less
John Milton welcomed both the coups of 1653. Defensio Secunda supports the attacks of Oliver Cromwell and the army officers on the character of the Rump, endorses its expulsion, and approves its replacement by an assembly chosen by Cromwell and the army officers. Those sentiments were not coloured by retrospect. The passage of Defensio Secunda that reveals the most about Milton's attitude to the Rump was written shortly after its dissolution, with the intention of vindicating Cromwell's action. At that time Milton aimed to please Cromwell. He first proposed, and then approved, the appointment of civilian advisers whom Cromwell chose. The men he named would form the core of the Cromwellian party in Barebone's, and would then sit on the ruling council of the protectorate.
Kevin Sharpe
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- October 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780300162004
- eISBN:
- 9780300164909
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Yale University Press
- DOI:
- 10.12987/yale/9780300162004.003.0018
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
This chapter describes the different aspects of the visual imaging of Oliver Cromwell in England. One of the things best known about Oliver Cromwell's visual image is known through his supposed ...
More
This chapter describes the different aspects of the visual imaging of Oliver Cromwell in England. One of the things best known about Oliver Cromwell's visual image is known through his supposed instruction to the artist Peter Lely. The warts-and-all Cromwell has passed into history as the plain man, the plain speaker, and plain captain who only reluctantly took the reins of government. During the 1640s, and in the particular case of the medal to commemorate the victory at Dunbar in 1650, Cromwell had resisted a prominent image of him and had advised collective representations of parliament and the army. The visual representations of the Protector in portraits and engravings, as on seals, medals, and coins, were devised to sustain and enhance his authority in shifting historical circumstances no less than the earlier images of kings from which they borrowed.Less
This chapter describes the different aspects of the visual imaging of Oliver Cromwell in England. One of the things best known about Oliver Cromwell's visual image is known through his supposed instruction to the artist Peter Lely. The warts-and-all Cromwell has passed into history as the plain man, the plain speaker, and plain captain who only reluctantly took the reins of government. During the 1640s, and in the particular case of the medal to commemorate the victory at Dunbar in 1650, Cromwell had resisted a prominent image of him and had advised collective representations of parliament and the army. The visual representations of the Protector in portraits and engravings, as on seals, medals, and coins, were devised to sustain and enhance his authority in shifting historical circumstances no less than the earlier images of kings from which they borrowed.
S. J. Connolly
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- September 2008
- ISBN:
- 9780199543472
- eISBN:
- 9780191716553
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543472.003.0003
- Subject:
- History, European Early Modern History
This chapter traces the prolonged military conflict of 1641-53. It examines the elaborate system of government, with headquarters at Kilkenny, established by the Confederate Catholics, as well as the ...
More
This chapter traces the prolonged military conflict of 1641-53. It examines the elaborate system of government, with headquarters at Kilkenny, established by the Confederate Catholics, as well as the importation into Ireland of the tactics of the European military revolution. It examines the divisions between Royalist and Parliamentarian among Irish Protestants, the former commanded by the earl of Ormond, as well as the shifting allegiances of the Scottish army established in the north east. The arrival in 1649 of a parliamentary army under Oliver Cromwell, and the controversial massacres at Drogheda and Wexford, initiated the last phase of the war. The victorious parliamentary regime initiated a massive scheme of social engineering, transplanting Catholic proprietors to a small western region while redistributing other lands among English settlers.Less
This chapter traces the prolonged military conflict of 1641-53. It examines the elaborate system of government, with headquarters at Kilkenny, established by the Confederate Catholics, as well as the importation into Ireland of the tactics of the European military revolution. It examines the divisions between Royalist and Parliamentarian among Irish Protestants, the former commanded by the earl of Ormond, as well as the shifting allegiances of the Scottish army established in the north east. The arrival in 1649 of a parliamentary army under Oliver Cromwell, and the controversial massacres at Drogheda and Wexford, initiated the last phase of the war. The victorious parliamentary regime initiated a massive scheme of social engineering, transplanting Catholic proprietors to a small western region while redistributing other lands among English settlers.
Blair Worden
- Published in print:
- 1997
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199510146
- eISBN:
- 9780191700958
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199510146.003.0016
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
By 1652, when the five years of the parliamentary visitation ended, the resourceful and bitter resistance of Oxford University's royalism had been worn down. Few more significant challenges, ...
More
By 1652, when the five years of the parliamentary visitation ended, the resourceful and bitter resistance of Oxford University's royalism had been worn down. Few more significant challenges, political or military, had faced the victors of the civil wars. The strategic importance of Oxford survived the city's surrender to parliament — and would persist through the Interregnum. Oxford's new puritan rulers experienced a sense of insecurity and isolation which was heightened by the second civil war of 1648, when the university's defiance provoked a more extensive purge than had apparently been intended. Further expulsions followed the coup of 1648–9 which produced the regicide and the rule of the Rump, and which in Oxford as elsewhere diminished such support as the puritans could muster. The stability of puritan rule in Oxford was always proportionate to the stability of puritan rule in England; and the most stabilizing event during the parliamentary visitation was not a local but a national one, the final defeat of the royalists by Oliver Cromwell at Worcester in September 1651.Less
By 1652, when the five years of the parliamentary visitation ended, the resourceful and bitter resistance of Oxford University's royalism had been worn down. Few more significant challenges, political or military, had faced the victors of the civil wars. The strategic importance of Oxford survived the city's surrender to parliament — and would persist through the Interregnum. Oxford's new puritan rulers experienced a sense of insecurity and isolation which was heightened by the second civil war of 1648, when the university's defiance provoked a more extensive purge than had apparently been intended. Further expulsions followed the coup of 1648–9 which produced the regicide and the rule of the Rump, and which in Oxford as elsewhere diminished such support as the puritans could muster. The stability of puritan rule in Oxford was always proportionate to the stability of puritan rule in England; and the most stabilizing event during the parliamentary visitation was not a local but a national one, the final defeat of the royalists by Oliver Cromwell at Worcester in September 1651.
David S. Katz
- Published in print:
- 1996
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198206675
- eISBN:
- 9780191677267
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206675.003.0004
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History, British and Irish Modern History
This chapter explores the readmission of the Jews into England under Oliver Cromwell's rule. Why Jews would want to settle in London is obvious; the ...
More
This chapter explores the readmission of the Jews into England under Oliver Cromwell's rule. Why Jews would want to settle in London is obvious; the question is why the English actively solicited their return. When viewed from the perspective of Cromwell and his supporters, the chapter can see that economic matters initially played a very small part, despite the claims of most previous historians, who have made incomplete use of English non-Jewish sources. The initiative for the return of the Jews to England came instead from the English themselves and not from the Sephardi Jews who made up the tiny Marrano community in London. Locating the origins of this unusual initiative is therefore crucial for understanding the establishment of the community, but here too nestle a number of difficulties.Less
This chapter explores the readmission of the Jews into England under Oliver Cromwell's rule. Why Jews would want to settle in London is obvious; the question is why the English actively solicited their return. When viewed from the perspective of Cromwell and his supporters, the chapter can see that economic matters initially played a very small part, despite the claims of most previous historians, who have made incomplete use of English non-Jewish sources. The initiative for the return of the Jews to England came instead from the English themselves and not from the Sephardi Jews who made up the tiny Marrano community in London. Locating the origins of this unusual initiative is therefore crucial for understanding the establishment of the community, but here too nestle a number of difficulties.
Kevin Sharpe
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- October 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780300162004
- eISBN:
- 9780300164909
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Yale University Press
- DOI:
- 10.12987/yale/9780300162004.003.0019
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
This chapter focuses on the protectoral performances of Oliver Cromwell in England. Within the walls of the refurbished palaces, at Whitehall and Hampton Court, Cromwell re-established a household ...
More
This chapter focuses on the protectoral performances of Oliver Cromwell in England. Within the walls of the refurbished palaces, at Whitehall and Hampton Court, Cromwell re-established a household and court that at least imitated those of royal the predecessors. The Protectoral court as re-established did not appoint a Lord Steward but the household below stairs was run along similar lines to that of the Stuarts, with a privy kitchen and cellar, spicery and wine cellar, slaughterhouse and scullery. Unlike monarchs who had been expected to live of their own, Cromwell was granted an annual sum to finance household expenses, in recognition, perhaps, that the court of a Protector was public as well as private and as important to the image and dignity of the government as Cromwell himself.Less
This chapter focuses on the protectoral performances of Oliver Cromwell in England. Within the walls of the refurbished palaces, at Whitehall and Hampton Court, Cromwell re-established a household and court that at least imitated those of royal the predecessors. The Protectoral court as re-established did not appoint a Lord Steward but the household below stairs was run along similar lines to that of the Stuarts, with a privy kitchen and cellar, spicery and wine cellar, slaughterhouse and scullery. Unlike monarchs who had been expected to live of their own, Cromwell was granted an annual sum to finance household expenses, in recognition, perhaps, that the court of a Protector was public as well as private and as important to the image and dignity of the government as Cromwell himself.
Kevin Sharpe
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- October 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780300162004
- eISBN:
- 9780300164909
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Yale University Press
- DOI:
- 10.12987/yale/9780300162004.003.0020
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
This chapter discusses the contestation and commemoration of Oliver Cromwell in England. From the creation of the Protectorate, Cromwell and the government were the targets not only of satires but of ...
More
This chapter discusses the contestation and commemoration of Oliver Cromwell in England. From the creation of the Protectorate, Cromwell and the government were the targets not only of satires but of opposition writings of various genres that contested official representations. Although an apologist for the Instrument sought to disparage the opinionators who protested against the new regime, far from fading with time, the attacks on Cromwell personally and the regime generally increased in number and intensity. His new title was a great stumbling block to obeying the government. The collapse of the Protector's first parliament only added fuel to the opposition. The Declaration of the MPs lately dissolved directly accused Cromwell, mighty Conqueror, of tyranny, and published that they had been purged because they had sought to restrain his avarice and ambition.Less
This chapter discusses the contestation and commemoration of Oliver Cromwell in England. From the creation of the Protectorate, Cromwell and the government were the targets not only of satires but of opposition writings of various genres that contested official representations. Although an apologist for the Instrument sought to disparage the opinionators who protested against the new regime, far from fading with time, the attacks on Cromwell personally and the regime generally increased in number and intensity. His new title was a great stumbling block to obeying the government. The collapse of the Protector's first parliament only added fuel to the opposition. The Declaration of the MPs lately dissolved directly accused Cromwell, mighty Conqueror, of tyranny, and published that they had been purged because they had sought to restrain his avarice and ambition.
Blair Worden
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199230822
- eISBN:
- 9780191696480
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230822.003.0015
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature, Milton Studies
John Milton's explanation was needed, since his proposed solution, the perpetuation of what remained of the Long Parliament, ran contrary to a fundamental premiss of the commonwealthmen, those ...
More
John Milton's explanation was needed, since his proposed solution, the perpetuation of what remained of the Long Parliament, ran contrary to a fundamental premiss of the commonwealthmen, those spokesmen for the ‘good old cause’, and of none of them more than Marchamont Nedham when he took their part. In another respect, however, Milton was now wholly with the commonwealthmen. His hopes of single rulers, however ‘supremely excellent’, had been destroyed by the rule of Oliver Cromwell. The ruler who had seemed to him a bulwark against the Stuarts now appeared of a kind with them. Milton may not have wanted a newly elected parliament in 1659–60, but he did want one with undivided and unlimited power. Nedham, as he worked his way back from the protectorate to the Rump, had to overcome venomous resistance to his own re-employment from among the commonwealthmen, who particularly resented his orchestration and publication of addresses in the Cromwellian interest.Less
John Milton's explanation was needed, since his proposed solution, the perpetuation of what remained of the Long Parliament, ran contrary to a fundamental premiss of the commonwealthmen, those spokesmen for the ‘good old cause’, and of none of them more than Marchamont Nedham when he took their part. In another respect, however, Milton was now wholly with the commonwealthmen. His hopes of single rulers, however ‘supremely excellent’, had been destroyed by the rule of Oliver Cromwell. The ruler who had seemed to him a bulwark against the Stuarts now appeared of a kind with them. Milton may not have wanted a newly elected parliament in 1659–60, but he did want one with undivided and unlimited power. Nedham, as he worked his way back from the protectorate to the Rump, had to overcome venomous resistance to his own re-employment from among the commonwealthmen, who particularly resented his orchestration and publication of addresses in the Cromwellian interest.
T.C. Barnard
- Published in print:
- 2000
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198208570
- eISBN:
- 9780191678066
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208570.003.0010
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
There were three important elements in English policy towards Ireland in the Interregnum: the policy formulated in England, and then the policies decided in Ireland, by Oliver Cromwell, Henry Ireton, ...
More
There were three important elements in English policy towards Ireland in the Interregnum: the policy formulated in England, and then the policies decided in Ireland, by Oliver Cromwell, Henry Ireton, and Charles Fleetwood between 1649 and 1655, and thereafter by Henry Cromwell. This chapter also reviews the verdicts of earlier historians on these three policies. In contrast with the voluminous treatment of the civil war in Ireland and the history of the Confederate Catholics, the 1650s have received short shrift. The reasons are not hard to find. To Irish historians, the 1650s are obviously a less attractive subject than the 1640s, offering no record of incipient nationalism or heroic and successful defiance of England, but only butchery, flight, or monotonous martyrdom.Less
There were three important elements in English policy towards Ireland in the Interregnum: the policy formulated in England, and then the policies decided in Ireland, by Oliver Cromwell, Henry Ireton, and Charles Fleetwood between 1649 and 1655, and thereafter by Henry Cromwell. This chapter also reviews the verdicts of earlier historians on these three policies. In contrast with the voluminous treatment of the civil war in Ireland and the history of the Confederate Catholics, the 1650s have received short shrift. The reasons are not hard to find. To Irish historians, the 1650s are obviously a less attractive subject than the 1640s, offering no record of incipient nationalism or heroic and successful defiance of England, but only butchery, flight, or monotonous martyrdom.
Ted McCormick
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199547890
- eISBN:
- 9780191720529
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547890.003.0004
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History, Economic History
This chapter traces Petty's career in Cromwellian Ireland, from his arrival as Physician‐General in 1652 through the collapse of the Protectorate. It focuses on the origins, design, execution, and ...
More
This chapter traces Petty's career in Cromwellian Ireland, from his arrival as Physician‐General in 1652 through the collapse of the Protectorate. It focuses on the origins, design, execution, and significance of Petty's ‘Down Survey’ — long celebrated as the first ‘scientific’ mapping of Ireland. Setting the survey both in the context of political disputes over the Cromwellian land settlement and against the background of Baconian scientific ‘reformation’ described in Chapter 2, this chapter argues that Petty's project was both a key instrument in the English colonization of Ireland and an organic outgrowth of his work with the Hartlib Circle, as well as the basis of his personal fortune. An empirical and collaborative scientific project geared towards the plantation and improvement of Ireland, the ‘Down Survey’ was both a model of Baconian natural philosophy and Petty's introduction to English and Irish religious politics.Less
This chapter traces Petty's career in Cromwellian Ireland, from his arrival as Physician‐General in 1652 through the collapse of the Protectorate. It focuses on the origins, design, execution, and significance of Petty's ‘Down Survey’ — long celebrated as the first ‘scientific’ mapping of Ireland. Setting the survey both in the context of political disputes over the Cromwellian land settlement and against the background of Baconian scientific ‘reformation’ described in Chapter 2, this chapter argues that Petty's project was both a key instrument in the English colonization of Ireland and an organic outgrowth of his work with the Hartlib Circle, as well as the basis of his personal fortune. An empirical and collaborative scientific project geared towards the plantation and improvement of Ireland, the ‘Down Survey’ was both a model of Baconian natural philosophy and Petty's introduction to English and Irish religious politics.
Ronald Hutton
- Published in print:
- 1993
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198203926
- eISBN:
- 9780191676048
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198203926.003.0003
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History, History of Religion
Oliver Cromwell died in the afternoon of 3 September. By evening it was accepted that he had named Richard as his successor. Richard had inherited his father's temper and sense of a call from God. ...
More
Oliver Cromwell died in the afternoon of 3 September. By evening it was accepted that he had named Richard as his successor. Richard had inherited his father's temper and sense of a call from God. Having taken power he grew to enjoy it, and fought for it ferociously at the end. It is a truism to say that he fell because he lost control of the army, and that this was ultimately because he had never been a soldier, but this so-called truism requires some qualification. He never really ‘had’ control of the army, which accepted him only with Fleetwood as an informal, and then as a formal, intermediary. When he believed that he was winning a section of it, he was merely detaching a few officers from their men. In essence, he could only view the army from outside, with no sympathy. In the autumn he had relied on appeals to the army. In the spring, when tension was greater and he was growing less patient, he began to mix these with coercion, and fatally overestimated his own power. His father had always seen the soldiers as the centre of the whole great movement which had swept him to office, embodying ideals which held good for all. Richard could only see them as rather irritating servants of society. There the second half of the truism remains. The man who destroyed the Protectorate was Oliver Cromwell, who pushed it into near-bankruptcy, divided its supporters, and elevated as a potential successor a son who had no understanding of the men upon whom he most depended.Less
Oliver Cromwell died in the afternoon of 3 September. By evening it was accepted that he had named Richard as his successor. Richard had inherited his father's temper and sense of a call from God. Having taken power he grew to enjoy it, and fought for it ferociously at the end. It is a truism to say that he fell because he lost control of the army, and that this was ultimately because he had never been a soldier, but this so-called truism requires some qualification. He never really ‘had’ control of the army, which accepted him only with Fleetwood as an informal, and then as a formal, intermediary. When he believed that he was winning a section of it, he was merely detaching a few officers from their men. In essence, he could only view the army from outside, with no sympathy. In the autumn he had relied on appeals to the army. In the spring, when tension was greater and he was growing less patient, he began to mix these with coercion, and fatally overestimated his own power. His father had always seen the soldiers as the centre of the whole great movement which had swept him to office, embodying ideals which held good for all. Richard could only see them as rather irritating servants of society. There the second half of the truism remains. The man who destroyed the Protectorate was Oliver Cromwell, who pushed it into near-bankruptcy, divided its supporters, and elevated as a potential successor a son who had no understanding of the men upon whom he most depended.
Patrick J. Corish
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199562527
- eISBN:
- 9780191701849
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562527.003.0013
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
This chapter describes the reconquest of Ireland by Oliver Cromwell. The final defeat of Charles I and the replacement of the monarchy in 1649 by a puritan commonwealth was maintained by an army in ...
More
This chapter describes the reconquest of Ireland by Oliver Cromwell. The final defeat of Charles I and the replacement of the monarchy in 1649 by a puritan commonwealth was maintained by an army in which Oliver Cromwell was the ruling power. His first major task was the reconquest of Ireland. This was achieved by his unprecedented offensive of 1649–50, which, as followed up by his successors in Ireland during the next two years, put an end to nearly ten years of anarchy and reduced all the warring elements to submission. The conquest had been made easier by the divisions among the royalist forces: divisions between English and Irish, between Catholic and Protestant and internal divisions between Catholics. O’Neill's agreement with Ormond had been based on the understanding that a new petition be sent to the pope to grant absolution from Rinuccini's censures, thereby reviving an issue which had seriously divided the Catholic hierarchy. No general terms of surrender had been negotiated, and with few exceptions nothing had been guaranteed in the surrenders except freedom from immediate pillage. Cromwell's reply to the bishops' declaration at Clonmacnoise had made it clear that a vast confiscation of property was to be part of any final settlement.Less
This chapter describes the reconquest of Ireland by Oliver Cromwell. The final defeat of Charles I and the replacement of the monarchy in 1649 by a puritan commonwealth was maintained by an army in which Oliver Cromwell was the ruling power. His first major task was the reconquest of Ireland. This was achieved by his unprecedented offensive of 1649–50, which, as followed up by his successors in Ireland during the next two years, put an end to nearly ten years of anarchy and reduced all the warring elements to submission. The conquest had been made easier by the divisions among the royalist forces: divisions between English and Irish, between Catholic and Protestant and internal divisions between Catholics. O’Neill's agreement with Ormond had been based on the understanding that a new petition be sent to the pope to grant absolution from Rinuccini's censures, thereby reviving an issue which had seriously divided the Catholic hierarchy. No general terms of surrender had been negotiated, and with few exceptions nothing had been guaranteed in the surrenders except freedom from immediate pillage. Cromwell's reply to the bishops' declaration at Clonmacnoise had made it clear that a vast confiscation of property was to be part of any final settlement.
T.C. Barnard
- Published in print:
- 2000
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198208570
- eISBN:
- 9780191678066
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208570.003.0002
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
Authority for Ireland's government rested with England after 1649: first with the Rump of the Long Parliament; and then, between 1653 and 1659, with the protector, his councils of state, and the ...
More
Authority for Ireland's government rested with England after 1649: first with the Rump of the Long Parliament; and then, between 1653 and 1659, with the protector, his councils of state, and the intermittent parliaments. Ultimate decisions about the future settlement of Ireland, the confiscation and redistribution of land, and the policies to be adopted by the governors in Dublin, rested with the Westminster government. Changes in the governors at Dublin reflected the shifts of power in England, first from the Rump to the army and Oliver Cromwell, then to Cromwell as protector, and finally in 1659 back in turn to the Rump, the army, and the survivors of the Long Parliament. This chapter catalogues the changes in government in Ireland resulting from the events that greatly influenced Irish policy.Less
Authority for Ireland's government rested with England after 1649: first with the Rump of the Long Parliament; and then, between 1653 and 1659, with the protector, his councils of state, and the intermittent parliaments. Ultimate decisions about the future settlement of Ireland, the confiscation and redistribution of land, and the policies to be adopted by the governors in Dublin, rested with the Westminster government. Changes in the governors at Dublin reflected the shifts of power in England, first from the Rump to the army and Oliver Cromwell, then to Cromwell as protector, and finally in 1659 back in turn to the Rump, the army, and the survivors of the Long Parliament. This chapter catalogues the changes in government in Ireland resulting from the events that greatly influenced Irish policy.
Ronald Hutton
- Published in print:
- 1993
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198203926
- eISBN:
- 9780191676048
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198203926.003.0002
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History, History of Religion
In early September 1658 a letter crossed the North Sea. Its destination was Hochstrade, a town on the northern frontier of the Spanish Netherlands, with some fine houses plundered bare by the king of ...
More
In early September 1658 a letter crossed the North Sea. Its destination was Hochstrade, a town on the northern frontier of the Spanish Netherlands, with some fine houses plundered bare by the king of Spain's cavalry. Lodged in one of these was the recipient, Sir Edward Hyde, whose main duty was to gather information for and present advice to his master, Charles II, England's uncrowned and exiled King. This particular letter carried one of the most significant pieces of information Hyde had ever received. Oliver Cromwell, the effective ruler of his country and mortal enemy of his cause, was dead. This chapter discusses life, religion, and politics in England under Cromwell's regime.Less
In early September 1658 a letter crossed the North Sea. Its destination was Hochstrade, a town on the northern frontier of the Spanish Netherlands, with some fine houses plundered bare by the king of Spain's cavalry. Lodged in one of these was the recipient, Sir Edward Hyde, whose main duty was to gather information for and present advice to his master, Charles II, England's uncrowned and exiled King. This particular letter carried one of the most significant pieces of information Hyde had ever received. Oliver Cromwell, the effective ruler of his country and mortal enemy of his cause, was dead. This chapter discusses life, religion, and politics in England under Cromwell's regime.
Jeffrey R. Collins
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- January 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199237647
- eISBN:
- 9780191708442
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199237647.001.0001
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes offers a revisionist interpretation of Thomas Hobbes's evolving response to the English Civil War and Revolution. Conventionally, Hobbes is portrayed as a ...
More
The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes offers a revisionist interpretation of Thomas Hobbes's evolving response to the English Civil War and Revolution. Conventionally, Hobbes is portrayed as a consistent, if intellectually maverick, royalist partisan. This book challenges that view, and vindicates the widespread contemporary belief that Hobbes had betrayed the royalist cause and accommodated himself to England's revolutionary regimes. In sustaining these conclusions, Professor Collins emphasizes the central importance of religion to both Hobbes's political thought and to the broader course of the English Revolution itself. Hobbes and the Revolution are both placed within the tumultuous historical process that saw the emerging English state securing political authority over public religion and the national church. This cause animated the radicals who propelled the English Revolution, including, Collins argues, Oliver Cromwell and his supporters. It also animated the evolution of Hobbes's political theory, which was centrally concerned with vindicating this aspect of the revolution's political program. Seen in this light, Thomas Hobbes emerges as a theorist who moved with, rather than against, the revolutionary currents of his age.Less
The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes offers a revisionist interpretation of Thomas Hobbes's evolving response to the English Civil War and Revolution. Conventionally, Hobbes is portrayed as a consistent, if intellectually maverick, royalist partisan. This book challenges that view, and vindicates the widespread contemporary belief that Hobbes had betrayed the royalist cause and accommodated himself to England's revolutionary regimes. In sustaining these conclusions, Professor Collins emphasizes the central importance of religion to both Hobbes's political thought and to the broader course of the English Revolution itself. Hobbes and the Revolution are both placed within the tumultuous historical process that saw the emerging English state securing political authority over public religion and the national church. This cause animated the radicals who propelled the English Revolution, including, Collins argues, Oliver Cromwell and his supporters. It also animated the evolution of Hobbes's political theory, which was centrally concerned with vindicating this aspect of the revolution's political program. Seen in this light, Thomas Hobbes emerges as a theorist who moved with, rather than against, the revolutionary currents of his age.
Roger B. Manning
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- September 2007
- ISBN:
- 9780199261499
- eISBN:
- 9780191718625
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199261499.003.0009
- Subject:
- History, British and Irish Early Modern History
Professional officers who kept abreast of military innovations understood the need to discipline their soldiers and keep them focused on achieving military goals. Armies which foraged and plundered ...
More
Professional officers who kept abreast of military innovations understood the need to discipline their soldiers and keep them focused on achieving military goals. Armies which foraged and plundered often became involved in secondary wars with local communities, and forfeited the goodwill of those who might offer intelligence and assistance. Regular payment of troops and developed systems of supply obviated the need for plunder, while improved discipline reduced the incidence of mutiny. The articles of war of various British and Irish armies — which were based upon mainland European models — attempted to regulate crimes and depredations by soldiers, generally secured the more humane treatment of prisoners of war, and restrained plundering and atrocities committed against civilian populations. Ireland was an exception to this trend to improve discipline and limit the destructiveness of war. Here, the parliamentary forces, which became captives of their own anti-Catholic propaganda and the determination of Cromwell to achieve total victory, pursued a policy of ‘fire and sword’ and committed atrocities which made the war in Ireland more bitter.Less
Professional officers who kept abreast of military innovations understood the need to discipline their soldiers and keep them focused on achieving military goals. Armies which foraged and plundered often became involved in secondary wars with local communities, and forfeited the goodwill of those who might offer intelligence and assistance. Regular payment of troops and developed systems of supply obviated the need for plunder, while improved discipline reduced the incidence of mutiny. The articles of war of various British and Irish armies — which were based upon mainland European models — attempted to regulate crimes and depredations by soldiers, generally secured the more humane treatment of prisoners of war, and restrained plundering and atrocities committed against civilian populations. Ireland was an exception to this trend to improve discipline and limit the destructiveness of war. Here, the parliamentary forces, which became captives of their own anti-Catholic propaganda and the determination of Cromwell to achieve total victory, pursued a policy of ‘fire and sword’ and committed atrocities which made the war in Ireland more bitter.
Blair Worden
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199230822
- eISBN:
- 9780191696480
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230822.003.0012
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature, Milton Studies
The civil wars, which ended persecution by the bishops, raised, in John Milton's perspective, ‘new forcers of conscience’: ‘new presbyter’, which is ‘but old priest writ large’. At Pride's Purge the ...
More
The civil wars, which ended persecution by the bishops, raised, in John Milton's perspective, ‘new forcers of conscience’: ‘new presbyter’, which is ‘but old priest writ large’. At Pride's Purge the programme for a uniform and compulsory Presbyterian Church was seen off, at least for the time being. However, the Rump did not repeal the post-war legislation which had paved the way for the Presbyterian system; indeed it came within one vote of giving it its official blessing. Presbyterian influence in high places persisted. In 1652 what Milton now called ‘new foes’ to liberty of conscience rose again, when parliament considered a scheme for the ‘propagation of the gospel’. It was submitted to parliament in February, published in March, and debated through the spring. The terms were given to the bodies appointed by Oliver Cromwell to vet candidates for church livings and to remove unsatisfactory ministers from the parishes.Less
The civil wars, which ended persecution by the bishops, raised, in John Milton's perspective, ‘new forcers of conscience’: ‘new presbyter’, which is ‘but old priest writ large’. At Pride's Purge the programme for a uniform and compulsory Presbyterian Church was seen off, at least for the time being. However, the Rump did not repeal the post-war legislation which had paved the way for the Presbyterian system; indeed it came within one vote of giving it its official blessing. Presbyterian influence in high places persisted. In 1652 what Milton now called ‘new foes’ to liberty of conscience rose again, when parliament considered a scheme for the ‘propagation of the gospel’. It was submitted to parliament in February, published in March, and debated through the spring. The terms were given to the bodies appointed by Oliver Cromwell to vet candidates for church livings and to remove unsatisfactory ministers from the parishes.
