Andrea Frisch
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- September 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780748694396
- eISBN:
- 9781474412322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Edinburgh University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694396.003.0003
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
Considers historiographical texts in both verse and prose that incorporate the civil “troubles” into their representation of the French past, paying special attention to the relationship between ...
More
Considers historiographical texts in both verse and prose that incorporate the civil “troubles” into their representation of the French past, paying special attention to the relationship between memory and history that they posit, as well as to the rhetorical techniques for representing the past that they either endorse or employ. On the whole, these techniques are designed to create distance between readers and their own recent past, making of them spectators to rather than participants in history. To this end, conciliatory historians of the immediate post-war period, appropriating the stance of the critical historiographer, explicitly disavow “passion.” At the same time, however, they employ a wide range of affective terms associated with tragedy and the tragic in their representations of the French civil wars, and ultimately solicit an emotional response to their account of the troubles.Less
Considers historiographical texts in both verse and prose that incorporate the civil “troubles” into their representation of the French past, paying special attention to the relationship between memory and history that they posit, as well as to the rhetorical techniques for representing the past that they either endorse or employ. On the whole, these techniques are designed to create distance between readers and their own recent past, making of them spectators to rather than participants in history. To this end, conciliatory historians of the immediate post-war period, appropriating the stance of the critical historiographer, explicitly disavow “passion.” At the same time, however, they employ a wide range of affective terms associated with tragedy and the tragic in their representations of the French civil wars, and ultimately solicit an emotional response to their account of the troubles.
Andrea Frisch
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- September 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780748694396
- eISBN:
- 9781474412322
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Edinburgh University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694396.001.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
This study argues that the political and legislative process of forgetting internal differences undertaken in France after the civil wars of the sixteenth century leads to subtle yet fundamental ...
More
This study argues that the political and legislative process of forgetting internal differences undertaken in France after the civil wars of the sixteenth century leads to subtle yet fundamental shifts in the broader conception of the relationship between readers or spectators on the one hand, and history, on the other. These shifts, occasioned by the desire for communal reconciliation, will ultimately serve the ideologies of cultural and political absolutism. By juxtaposing representations of the French civil war past as they appear (and frequently overlap) in historiography and tragedy from 1550-1630, Forgetting Differences tracks changes in the ways in which history and tragedy sought to “move” readers throughout the period of the wars and in their wake. The shift from a politically (and martially) active reading of the past to a primarily affective one follows the imperative, so clear and urgent at the turn of the seventeenth century, to put an end to violent conflict. Subsequently, however, this orientation to both history and tragedy would be appropriated for other ends, utlimately helping to further absolutist ideologies of culture and politics that privileged affective over active readings of the past.Less
This study argues that the political and legislative process of forgetting internal differences undertaken in France after the civil wars of the sixteenth century leads to subtle yet fundamental shifts in the broader conception of the relationship between readers or spectators on the one hand, and history, on the other. These shifts, occasioned by the desire for communal reconciliation, will ultimately serve the ideologies of cultural and political absolutism. By juxtaposing representations of the French civil war past as they appear (and frequently overlap) in historiography and tragedy from 1550-1630, Forgetting Differences tracks changes in the ways in which history and tragedy sought to “move” readers throughout the period of the wars and in their wake. The shift from a politically (and martially) active reading of the past to a primarily affective one follows the imperative, so clear and urgent at the turn of the seventeenth century, to put an end to violent conflict. Subsequently, however, this orientation to both history and tragedy would be appropriated for other ends, utlimately helping to further absolutist ideologies of culture and politics that privileged affective over active readings of the past.
