Daniel Madigan
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- March 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780199769308
- eISBN:
- 9780190258283
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199769308.003.0015
- Subject:
- Religion, Religion and Society
This chapter analyzes the document published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) in 2000, Dominus Iesus (DI)—a document which caused more controversy within the Catholic Church ...
More
This chapter analyzes the document published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) in 2000, Dominus Iesus (DI)—a document which caused more controversy within the Catholic Church than any papal document since Pope Paul VI's 1968 encyclical, Humanae vitae, which condemned the use of artificial birth control. It begins by identifying some elements of the language, presuppositions, and methods of the document that together have created such a strong impression of arrogance. It then attempts to re-express some of DI's central concerns in a way that affirms their importance, but with less of what has seemed to some people its confident swagger. The reflection is informed particularly by the experience over the last few years of reading—together with Muslims, Jews, and Hindus—several ecclesial documents (including Dominus Iesus) that since the time of the Council have grappled with the question of dialogue and mission.Less
This chapter analyzes the document published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) in 2000, Dominus Iesus (DI)—a document which caused more controversy within the Catholic Church than any papal document since Pope Paul VI's 1968 encyclical, Humanae vitae, which condemned the use of artificial birth control. It begins by identifying some elements of the language, presuppositions, and methods of the document that together have created such a strong impression of arrogance. It then attempts to re-express some of DI's central concerns in a way that affirms their importance, but with less of what has seemed to some people its confident swagger. The reflection is informed particularly by the experience over the last few years of reading—together with Muslims, Jews, and Hindus—several ecclesial documents (including Dominus Iesus) that since the time of the Council have grappled with the question of dialogue and mission.
Robert McKim
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- May 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199774029
- eISBN:
- 9780199932610
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199774029.003.0005
- Subject:
- Religion, Philosophy of Religion
Various versions of inclusivism about salvation, or salvific inclusivism, are considered. All versions propose that religious outsiders, which is to say outsiders to one's religious tradition, may ...
More
Various versions of inclusivism about salvation, or salvific inclusivism, are considered. All versions propose that religious outsiders, which is to say outsiders to one's religious tradition, may achieve salvation but add that, in one way or another, outsiders are not as well situated with respect to salvation as insiders. Versions that involve a single salvific route are distinguished from versions that involve multiple salvific routes. The possibility that another tradition can make a contribution to the achievement of salvation, while not itself constituting a way to salvation, is considered. Proposals from Ibn al-‘Arabi, C. S. Lewis, Clark H. Pinnock, and from Dominus Iesus, a recent Catholic statement on the salvation of outsiders, are discussed.Less
Various versions of inclusivism about salvation, or salvific inclusivism, are considered. All versions propose that religious outsiders, which is to say outsiders to one's religious tradition, may achieve salvation but add that, in one way or another, outsiders are not as well situated with respect to salvation as insiders. Versions that involve a single salvific route are distinguished from versions that involve multiple salvific routes. The possibility that another tradition can make a contribution to the achievement of salvation, while not itself constituting a way to salvation, is considered. Proposals from Ibn al-‘Arabi, C. S. Lewis, Clark H. Pinnock, and from Dominus Iesus, a recent Catholic statement on the salvation of outsiders, are discussed.
