Richard Scholar
- Published in print:
- 2005
- Published Online:
- September 2008
- ISBN:
- 9780199274406
- eISBN:
- 9780191706448
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274406.003.0003
- Subject:
- Literature, European Literature
It is commonly said that elusive forces draw individual human beings into passionate relations with one another. This chapter identifies three tendencies towards the je-ne-sais-quoi in the realm of ...
More
It is commonly said that elusive forces draw individual human beings into passionate relations with one another. This chapter identifies three tendencies towards the je-ne-sais-quoi in the realm of the passions, and argues that these three tendencies correspond loosely to the term's history. The first part deals with Descartes and other philosophers who attempt to draw the je-ne-sais-quoi into, or to exclude it from, a systematic theory. The second part of the chapter is devoted to those early modern writers (Corneille, Pascal, La Rochefoucauld, Molière, Racine, and others) who describe a strange sympathy that springs not from any rational choice but from an inexplicable mutual passion. This falls upon the subject at one stroke and, or so the poets say at the term's moment of lexical currency, as a certain je-ne-sais-quoi. The third part of the chapter looks at those writers (Regnard among others) who come to exploit the term as a fashionable instrument of persuasion.Less
It is commonly said that elusive forces draw individual human beings into passionate relations with one another. This chapter identifies three tendencies towards the je-ne-sais-quoi in the realm of the passions, and argues that these three tendencies correspond loosely to the term's history. The first part deals with Descartes and other philosophers who attempt to draw the je-ne-sais-quoi into, or to exclude it from, a systematic theory. The second part of the chapter is devoted to those early modern writers (Corneille, Pascal, La Rochefoucauld, Molière, Racine, and others) who describe a strange sympathy that springs not from any rational choice but from an inexplicable mutual passion. This falls upon the subject at one stroke and, or so the poets say at the term's moment of lexical currency, as a certain je-ne-sais-quoi. The third part of the chapter looks at those writers (Regnard among others) who come to exploit the term as a fashionable instrument of persuasion.
Michael Moriarty
- Published in print:
- 2006
- Published Online:
- September 2007
- ISBN:
- 9780199291038
- eISBN:
- 9780191710599
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199291038.003.0008
- Subject:
- Literature, World Literature
Interest in problems of self-knowledge and self-deception is not confined to philosophers and theologians. It is exploited by dramatists for comic effect (Corneille and Molière). But confusion as to ...
More
Interest in problems of self-knowledge and self-deception is not confined to philosophers and theologians. It is exploited by dramatists for comic effect (Corneille and Molière). But confusion as to one’s motives is also found in characters in tragedy (Corneille and Racine) and in serious fiction (Lafayette’s La Princesse de Clèves). Different forms of this confusion are analysed.Less
Interest in problems of self-knowledge and self-deception is not confined to philosophers and theologians. It is exploited by dramatists for comic effect (Corneille and Molière). But confusion as to one’s motives is also found in characters in tragedy (Corneille and Racine) and in serious fiction (Lafayette’s La Princesse de Clèves). Different forms of this confusion are analysed.
Hugh Gaston Hall
- Published in print:
- 1990
- Published Online:
- October 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780198151579
- eISBN:
- 9780191672743
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198151579.003.0009
- Subject:
- Literature, European Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature
Prompted perhaps by Pierre Corneille's success with Le Cid, Jean Desmarets abandoned comedy for tragicomedy. Desmarets was elected on June 16 with Chapelain and the Abbé de Bourzeis, by the ...
More
Prompted perhaps by Pierre Corneille's success with Le Cid, Jean Desmarets abandoned comedy for tragicomedy. Desmarets was elected on June 16 with Chapelain and the Abbé de Bourzeis, by the Académie-Française to the committee of three entrusted with general appreciation of Le Cid. Not surprisingly, in view of the success of Le Cid, Desmarets turned to tragicomedy and to an episode in the career of another virtuous conqueror of Spain, Scipio Africanus. Scipion, the first of Desmarets's two historical tragicomedies dedicated to Cardinal Richelieu, shares with Ariane and Le Cid a conquering hero of noble origins and royal aspirations. Scipion also shares with Le Cid the specific themes of self-mastery and of marriage for reasons of State. Desmarets's second tragicomedy, Roxane, was first performed on an unknown date in 1639.Less
Prompted perhaps by Pierre Corneille's success with Le Cid, Jean Desmarets abandoned comedy for tragicomedy. Desmarets was elected on June 16 with Chapelain and the Abbé de Bourzeis, by the Académie-Française to the committee of three entrusted with general appreciation of Le Cid. Not surprisingly, in view of the success of Le Cid, Desmarets turned to tragicomedy and to an episode in the career of another virtuous conqueror of Spain, Scipio Africanus. Scipion, the first of Desmarets's two historical tragicomedies dedicated to Cardinal Richelieu, shares with Ariane and Le Cid a conquering hero of noble origins and royal aspirations. Scipion also shares with Le Cid the specific themes of self-mastery and of marriage for reasons of State. Desmarets's second tragicomedy, Roxane, was first performed on an unknown date in 1639.
Christopher Brooke
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- October 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780691152080
- eISBN:
- 9781400842414
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Princeton University Press
- DOI:
- 10.23943/princeton/9780691152080.003.0005
- Subject:
- Philosophy, Political Philosophy
This chapter details the contemporary assault on Stoic moral psychology from the pens of the French Augustinians. The influence of the Stoic revival of the sixteenth century continued to be felt in a ...
More
This chapter details the contemporary assault on Stoic moral psychology from the pens of the French Augustinians. The influence of the Stoic revival of the sixteenth century continued to be felt in a variety of spheres in seventeenth-century France, and gave rise to a variegated landscape which brought about several orientations toward the Stoics. The chapter considers one such orientation in particular — the nascent anti-Stoicism of the 1640s. This took on its distinctive form in the pages of Corneille Jansen's Augustinus (1640), but, as the chapter demonstrates, such an orientation was not by any means confined to narrow Jansenist circles.Less
This chapter details the contemporary assault on Stoic moral psychology from the pens of the French Augustinians. The influence of the Stoic revival of the sixteenth century continued to be felt in a variety of spheres in seventeenth-century France, and gave rise to a variegated landscape which brought about several orientations toward the Stoics. The chapter considers one such orientation in particular — the nascent anti-Stoicism of the 1640s. This took on its distinctive form in the pages of Corneille Jansen's Augustinus (1640), but, as the chapter demonstrates, such an orientation was not by any means confined to narrow Jansenist circles.
Wes Williams
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- September 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199577026
- eISBN:
- 9780191728662
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577026.003.0005
- Subject:
- Literature, 16th-century and Renaissance Literature, European Literature
This chapter initiates discussion of the conjoined processes of medicalization and theatricalization that monsters undergo in the seventeenth century. The changing reception of Heliodorus's ...
More
This chapter initiates discussion of the conjoined processes of medicalization and theatricalization that monsters undergo in the seventeenth century. The changing reception of Heliodorus's Aethiopica (onstage, in painting, and in vernacular verse and prose translation) introduces its central themes. There follows detailed analysis of (hitherto largely unknown) accounts of conjoined twins born mid-century. The survival of sixteenth-century civil-war rhetoric in these ‘medical’ discussions suggests that politics underscores the history of medicine in matters monstrous. The final section is devoted to a close reading of Corneille's enormously successful ‘machine-play’, Andromède, performed at a time of renewed civil war (1650). It focuses on Corneille's revisiting of the themes of sedition, seduction, witness/autopsy, and the force of the imagination; its argument is that the playwright's resistance to spectacular politics is evident both in his recasting of Perseus's ‘rescue’ as mere show, and of the monster as the embodiment of Andromeda's true desire.Less
This chapter initiates discussion of the conjoined processes of medicalization and theatricalization that monsters undergo in the seventeenth century. The changing reception of Heliodorus's Aethiopica (onstage, in painting, and in vernacular verse and prose translation) introduces its central themes. There follows detailed analysis of (hitherto largely unknown) accounts of conjoined twins born mid-century. The survival of sixteenth-century civil-war rhetoric in these ‘medical’ discussions suggests that politics underscores the history of medicine in matters monstrous. The final section is devoted to a close reading of Corneille's enormously successful ‘machine-play’, Andromède, performed at a time of renewed civil war (1650). It focuses on Corneille's revisiting of the themes of sedition, seduction, witness/autopsy, and the force of the imagination; its argument is that the playwright's resistance to spectacular politics is evident both in his recasting of Perseus's ‘rescue’ as mere show, and of the monster as the embodiment of Andromeda's true desire.
Emma Gilby
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- April 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780198831891
- eISBN:
- 9780191869723
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198831891.001.0001
- Subject:
- Literature, European Literature, 16th-century and Renaissance Literature
Descartes’s Fictions traces common movements in early modern philosophy and literary method. This volume reassesses the significance of Descartes’s writing by bringing his philosophical output into ...
More
Descartes’s Fictions traces common movements in early modern philosophy and literary method. This volume reassesses the significance of Descartes’s writing by bringing his philosophical output into contact with the literary treatises, exempla, and debates of his age. Arguing that humanist theorizing about the art of poetry represents a vital intellectual context for Descartes’s work, the volume offers readings of the controversies to which this poetic theory gives rise, with particular reference to the genre of tragicomedy, the question of verisimilitude, and the figures of Guez de Balzac and Pierre Corneille. Drawing on what Descartes says about, and to, his many contemporaries and correspondents embedded in the early modern republic of letters, this volume shows that poetics provides a repository of themes and images to which he returns repeatedly: fortune, method, error, providence, passion, and imagination, amongst others. Like the poets and theorists of the early modern period, Descartes is also drawn to the forms of attention that people may bring to his work. This interest finds expression in the mature Cartesian metaphysics of the Meditations, as well as, later, in the moral philosophy of his correspondence with Elisabeth of Bohemia or the Passions of the Soul. Some of the tropes of modern secondary criticism—a comparison of Descartes and Corneille, or the portrayal of Descartes as a ‘tragic’ figure—are also re-evaluated. This volume thus bridges the gap between Cartesian criticism and late-humanist literary culture in France.Less
Descartes’s Fictions traces common movements in early modern philosophy and literary method. This volume reassesses the significance of Descartes’s writing by bringing his philosophical output into contact with the literary treatises, exempla, and debates of his age. Arguing that humanist theorizing about the art of poetry represents a vital intellectual context for Descartes’s work, the volume offers readings of the controversies to which this poetic theory gives rise, with particular reference to the genre of tragicomedy, the question of verisimilitude, and the figures of Guez de Balzac and Pierre Corneille. Drawing on what Descartes says about, and to, his many contemporaries and correspondents embedded in the early modern republic of letters, this volume shows that poetics provides a repository of themes and images to which he returns repeatedly: fortune, method, error, providence, passion, and imagination, amongst others. Like the poets and theorists of the early modern period, Descartes is also drawn to the forms of attention that people may bring to his work. This interest finds expression in the mature Cartesian metaphysics of the Meditations, as well as, later, in the moral philosophy of his correspondence with Elisabeth of Bohemia or the Passions of the Soul. Some of the tropes of modern secondary criticism—a comparison of Descartes and Corneille, or the portrayal of Descartes as a ‘tragic’ figure—are also re-evaluated. This volume thus bridges the gap between Cartesian criticism and late-humanist literary culture in France.
Richard Parish
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- January 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780197265666
- eISBN:
- 9780191771927
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- British Academy
- DOI:
- 10.5871/bacad/9780197265666.003.0009
- Subject:
- History, World Modern History
The most important verse paraphrase of the Imitation of Christ in 17th-century France was written by the dramatist Pierre Corneille. In his paratexts he discusses the difficulties he has encountered ...
More
The most important verse paraphrase of the Imitation of Christ in 17th-century France was written by the dramatist Pierre Corneille. In his paratexts he discusses the difficulties he has encountered in the project, which expands on the original by including engravings, many of which illustrate episodes from the lives of saints. One such is Theodora, who is the subject of his closely contemporary martyr tragedy, Théodore. But here too he encountered difficulties, in the context of bienséance, from objections expressed to the prostitution with which the eponym is threatened. In a different idiom, the Jesuit priest Jean-Joseph Surin, seeing his role as exorcist as another kind of imitation of Christ, records his ordeal in two autobiographical works, one of which moves progressively into stylistic incoherence. Finally, Bossuet engages in the polemic surrounding a further possible implication of the term, in the form of the Catholic doctrine of the Real Presence.Less
The most important verse paraphrase of the Imitation of Christ in 17th-century France was written by the dramatist Pierre Corneille. In his paratexts he discusses the difficulties he has encountered in the project, which expands on the original by including engravings, many of which illustrate episodes from the lives of saints. One such is Theodora, who is the subject of his closely contemporary martyr tragedy, Théodore. But here too he encountered difficulties, in the context of bienséance, from objections expressed to the prostitution with which the eponym is threatened. In a different idiom, the Jesuit priest Jean-Joseph Surin, seeing his role as exorcist as another kind of imitation of Christ, records his ordeal in two autobiographical works, one of which moves progressively into stylistic incoherence. Finally, Bossuet engages in the polemic surrounding a further possible implication of the term, in the form of the Catholic doctrine of the Real Presence.
Ronald Schechter
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- May 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780226499574
- eISBN:
- 9780226499604
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226499604.003.0005
- Subject:
- History, European Early Modern History
The positive emotional connotations of the word “terror” were enhanced by eighteenth-century theater criticism, which used the standard of terror when judging tragedies. Drawing (often loosely) on ...
More
The positive emotional connotations of the word “terror” were enhanced by eighteenth-century theater criticism, which used the standard of terror when judging tragedies. Drawing (often loosely) on Aristotle, writers praised tragedies for instilling terror and pity in spectators and discounted tragedies that failed to stimulate these feelings. Often, however, and particularly in the later decades of the century, theater critics neglected to mention pity in their assessments of tragedy and focused exclusively on terror. There were ethical implications to such judgments, because critics believed that viewing a terror-inspiring tragedy was morally improving. As a term used to praise exemplary works of drama, “terror” had a dignified, elevating feel to it, and it was a compliment to call a playwright “terrible.” Among the playwrights to benefit from the reputation of having instilled terror were the Greek tragedians Sophocles, Euripides and Aeschylus, the seventeenth-century dramatist Jean Racine, and the eighteenth-century playwright Claude Prosper Jolyot de Crébillon.Less
The positive emotional connotations of the word “terror” were enhanced by eighteenth-century theater criticism, which used the standard of terror when judging tragedies. Drawing (often loosely) on Aristotle, writers praised tragedies for instilling terror and pity in spectators and discounted tragedies that failed to stimulate these feelings. Often, however, and particularly in the later decades of the century, theater critics neglected to mention pity in their assessments of tragedy and focused exclusively on terror. There were ethical implications to such judgments, because critics believed that viewing a terror-inspiring tragedy was morally improving. As a term used to praise exemplary works of drama, “terror” had a dignified, elevating feel to it, and it was a compliment to call a playwright “terrible.” Among the playwrights to benefit from the reputation of having instilled terror were the Greek tragedians Sophocles, Euripides and Aeschylus, the seventeenth-century dramatist Jean Racine, and the eighteenth-century playwright Claude Prosper Jolyot de Crébillon.
R. Darren Gobert
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- January 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780804786386
- eISBN:
- 9780804788267
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804786386.003.0003
- Subject:
- Philosophy, Philosophy of Mind
This chapter concerns playwriting and dramatic theory after Descartes. It demonstrates how the much-discussed problem of dramatic catharsis originates in an incommensurability produced by ...
More
This chapter concerns playwriting and dramatic theory after Descartes. It demonstrates how the much-discussed problem of dramatic catharsis originates in an incommensurability produced by Cartesianism, since the universal experience of pity and fear theorized by Aristotle cannot be reconciled with an audience of individualized subjects. Pierre Corneille responded to this incommensurability in Nicomède, whose script is analyzed alongside two of its performances: at the Hôtel de Bourgogne in 1651, and at the Louvre in 1658. Corneille reconfigured tragedy in order to foreground wonder, the precise emotion that Descartes located at the center of his emotional physics and moral philosophy. These Cartesian innovations, theorized in Corneille's copious theoretical writings, were in turn mimicked in English theater and dramatic theory of the period, especially that of John Dryden, whose essays "Of Dramatick Poesy" and "Conquest of Granada" are discussed.Less
This chapter concerns playwriting and dramatic theory after Descartes. It demonstrates how the much-discussed problem of dramatic catharsis originates in an incommensurability produced by Cartesianism, since the universal experience of pity and fear theorized by Aristotle cannot be reconciled with an audience of individualized subjects. Pierre Corneille responded to this incommensurability in Nicomède, whose script is analyzed alongside two of its performances: at the Hôtel de Bourgogne in 1651, and at the Louvre in 1658. Corneille reconfigured tragedy in order to foreground wonder, the precise emotion that Descartes located at the center of his emotional physics and moral philosophy. These Cartesian innovations, theorized in Corneille's copious theoretical writings, were in turn mimicked in English theater and dramatic theory of the period, especially that of John Dryden, whose essays "Of Dramatick Poesy" and "Conquest of Granada" are discussed.
Jotham Parsons
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780801451591
- eISBN:
- 9780801454981
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Cornell University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7591/cornell/9780801451591.003.0007
- Subject:
- History, European Early Modern History
This chapter argues that French literature down to the 1630s frequently thematized the social danger of money, particularly with regards to social mobility. Writers from the age of Henri II through ...
More
This chapter argues that French literature down to the 1630s frequently thematized the social danger of money, particularly with regards to social mobility. Writers from the age of Henri II through the first years of the seventeenth century stressed the role of money and precious metals as both expressions and synecdoches of royal or even divine majesty. But in the half century that followed the death of Henri IV, monetary themes became the province of comic and libertine writers such as Pierre Corneille, Tristan l'Hermite, and Charles Sorel, who flourished in the reign of Louis XIII (1610–1643), and their successors, such as Molière and Antoine Furetière, under Louis XIV.Less
This chapter argues that French literature down to the 1630s frequently thematized the social danger of money, particularly with regards to social mobility. Writers from the age of Henri II through the first years of the seventeenth century stressed the role of money and precious metals as both expressions and synecdoches of royal or even divine majesty. But in the half century that followed the death of Henri IV, monetary themes became the province of comic and libertine writers such as Pierre Corneille, Tristan l'Hermite, and Charles Sorel, who flourished in the reign of Louis XIII (1610–1643), and their successors, such as Molière and Antoine Furetière, under Louis XIV.
John Watkins
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- January 2018
- ISBN:
- 9781501707575
- eISBN:
- 9781501708527
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Cornell University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7591/cornell/9781501707575.003.0007
- Subject:
- Literature, Early and Medieval Literature
This chapter examines how war affected interdynastic marriage in seventeenth-century France. By late seventeenth century, the hope for European peace had lost its foundations in a shared ...
More
This chapter examines how war affected interdynastic marriage in seventeenth-century France. By late seventeenth century, the hope for European peace had lost its foundations in a shared sacramentology and confidence in women's intercessions. When discrete national historiographies celebrating nation-states rather than dynasties appeared, their writers cast the women whose marriages bound Europe in a single family as tragic victims of their fathers' ambitions and husbands' infidelities. This chapter analyzes how French drama registered the personal and cultural impact of marriage diplomacy's declining prestige by focusing on Pierre Corneille's Horace and Tite et Bérénice, as well as Jean Racine's Andromaque and Bérénice. It also discusses two treaties, the 1659 Treaty of the Pyrenees and the 1670 Treaty of Dover.Less
This chapter examines how war affected interdynastic marriage in seventeenth-century France. By late seventeenth century, the hope for European peace had lost its foundations in a shared sacramentology and confidence in women's intercessions. When discrete national historiographies celebrating nation-states rather than dynasties appeared, their writers cast the women whose marriages bound Europe in a single family as tragic victims of their fathers' ambitions and husbands' infidelities. This chapter analyzes how French drama registered the personal and cultural impact of marriage diplomacy's declining prestige by focusing on Pierre Corneille's Horace and Tite et Bérénice, as well as Jean Racine's Andromaque and Bérénice. It also discusses two treaties, the 1659 Treaty of the Pyrenees and the 1670 Treaty of Dover.
Andrea Frisch
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- September 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780748694396
- eISBN:
- 9781474412322
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Edinburgh University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694396.003.0005
- Subject:
- Literature, Criticism/Theory
Examines the consolidation in French tragedy of the early seventeenth century of what Thomas Pavel has described as an “art of distancing” (“art de l'éloignement”) characteristic of French ...
More
Examines the consolidation in French tragedy of the early seventeenth century of what Thomas Pavel has described as an “art of distancing” (“art de l'éloignement”) characteristic of French neo-classicism. The conciliatory posture encouraged by the exhortation to extinguish memories of the wars provoked a reorientation of French emotions about the national past, away from a Renaissance Humanist tendency to exploit pathos in the service of political action, and towards a neoclassical aesthetics and an absolutist politics for which emotion frequently functioned as an alternative to political action. By seeking to unify the French around a set of shared emotions, the imperative to forget the violently divisive differences of the period of the Wars of Religion paved the way for the thoroughgoing forgetting of difference that grounded the ideology of absolutism.Less
Examines the consolidation in French tragedy of the early seventeenth century of what Thomas Pavel has described as an “art of distancing” (“art de l'éloignement”) characteristic of French neo-classicism. The conciliatory posture encouraged by the exhortation to extinguish memories of the wars provoked a reorientation of French emotions about the national past, away from a Renaissance Humanist tendency to exploit pathos in the service of political action, and towards a neoclassical aesthetics and an absolutist politics for which emotion frequently functioned as an alternative to political action. By seeking to unify the French around a set of shared emotions, the imperative to forget the violently divisive differences of the period of the Wars of Religion paved the way for the thoroughgoing forgetting of difference that grounded the ideology of absolutism.
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- March 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780226886015
- eISBN:
- 9780226886039
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226886039.003.0006
- Subject:
- Philosophy, General
This chapter discusses concepts of the drama of time through the works of Aristotle, Pierre Corneille, Shakespeare, Lessing, and Proust.
This chapter discusses concepts of the drama of time through the works of Aristotle, Pierre Corneille, Shakespeare, Lessing, and Proust.
Michael Moriarty
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- December 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780198840688
- eISBN:
- 9780191882654
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198840688.003.0006
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy
The chapter contains an exposition of Descartes’s ethics, the keystone of which is the concept of générosité. This incorporates both a cognitive state (the knowledge that nothing belongs to us but ...
More
The chapter contains an exposition of Descartes’s ethics, the keystone of which is the concept of générosité. This incorporates both a cognitive state (the knowledge that nothing belongs to us but the use of our free will, and that nothing but the good or bad use of our free will is worthy of praise or blame) and a disposition of will, a determination always to act in accordance with our judgement of what is best. The concept is discussed in relation both to Aristotle’s conception of magnanimity and to the Stoic ethics of Epictetus, but also in relation to the use of the term in literary texts of the time, the plays of Pierre Corneille, and the stories of Jean-Pierre Camus.Less
The chapter contains an exposition of Descartes’s ethics, the keystone of which is the concept of générosité. This incorporates both a cognitive state (the knowledge that nothing belongs to us but the use of our free will, and that nothing but the good or bad use of our free will is worthy of praise or blame) and a disposition of will, a determination always to act in accordance with our judgement of what is best. The concept is discussed in relation both to Aristotle’s conception of magnanimity and to the Stoic ethics of Epictetus, but also in relation to the use of the term in literary texts of the time, the plays of Pierre Corneille, and the stories of Jean-Pierre Camus.
Joseph Harris
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- May 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780198701613
- eISBN:
- 9780191771453
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701613.003.0004
- Subject:
- Literature, European Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature
The writings of the dramatist Corneille inject a salutary dose of practical experience into a debate so far conducted largely between theoreticians. Steering away from illusionistic models, the more ...
More
The writings of the dramatist Corneille inject a salutary dose of practical experience into a debate so far conducted largely between theoreticians. Steering away from illusionistic models, the more pragmatic Corneille holds that dramatists can win spectators’ belief by engaging their interest in the plot or its characters, distracting them from technical flaws and inconsistencies, and manipulating their (often patchy) grasp of history. Corneille is one of the first thinkers to consider the spectator’s emotional relationship to dramatic characters rather than to the whole dramatic fiction. Most famously, he is drawn to the ideal of a dramatic hero able—often through great virtue—to produce wonder in spectators alongside, or even instead of, Aristotle’s traditional pity and fear. Despite often being drafted in to justify Corneille’s own innovations, the spectator emerges in Corneille’s theories as a recognizably human, three-dimensional being: intelligent, equitable, imaginative, but also pleasure-seeking, complex, and fascinatingly unpredictable.Less
The writings of the dramatist Corneille inject a salutary dose of practical experience into a debate so far conducted largely between theoreticians. Steering away from illusionistic models, the more pragmatic Corneille holds that dramatists can win spectators’ belief by engaging their interest in the plot or its characters, distracting them from technical flaws and inconsistencies, and manipulating their (often patchy) grasp of history. Corneille is one of the first thinkers to consider the spectator’s emotional relationship to dramatic characters rather than to the whole dramatic fiction. Most famously, he is drawn to the ideal of a dramatic hero able—often through great virtue—to produce wonder in spectators alongside, or even instead of, Aristotle’s traditional pity and fear. Despite often being drafted in to justify Corneille’s own innovations, the spectator emerges in Corneille’s theories as a recognizably human, three-dimensional being: intelligent, equitable, imaginative, but also pleasure-seeking, complex, and fascinatingly unpredictable.
Blair Hoxby
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- October 2015
- ISBN:
- 9780198749165
- eISBN:
- 9780191813283
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749165.003.0005
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature, 16th-century and Renaissance Literature
Twentieth-century critics claim that drama cannot be both Christian and tragic at once, and when they do make an exception it is for the Calvinist or Jansenist tragedy of damnation. As staunch ...
More
Twentieth-century critics claim that drama cannot be both Christian and tragic at once, and when they do make an exception it is for the Calvinist or Jansenist tragedy of damnation. As staunch opponents of both of these strains of Augustinian piety, the Jesuits, who may have produced 100,000 tragedies before 1773, find no place in such accounts. Focusing on Bernardino Stefonio’s Crispus (1597), Calderón’s The Constant Prince (1629), and Corneille’s Polyeucte (1644), this chapter reconstructs the theory and dramaturgy of rounter-reformation martyr tragedies. It argues that Molinism supports a dramaturgy that frets over the competing claims of God’s providence and man’s free will while doing so in terms that are distinct from the implicitly Lutheran account of necessity and free will offered by German idealists such as Schelling and Hölderlin.Less
Twentieth-century critics claim that drama cannot be both Christian and tragic at once, and when they do make an exception it is for the Calvinist or Jansenist tragedy of damnation. As staunch opponents of both of these strains of Augustinian piety, the Jesuits, who may have produced 100,000 tragedies before 1773, find no place in such accounts. Focusing on Bernardino Stefonio’s Crispus (1597), Calderón’s The Constant Prince (1629), and Corneille’s Polyeucte (1644), this chapter reconstructs the theory and dramaturgy of rounter-reformation martyr tragedies. It argues that Molinism supports a dramaturgy that frets over the competing claims of God’s providence and man’s free will while doing so in terms that are distinct from the implicitly Lutheran account of necessity and free will offered by German idealists such as Schelling and Hölderlin.
Tiphaine Karsenti
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- December 2018
- ISBN:
- 9780198804215
- eISBN:
- 9780191842412
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198804215.003.0022
- Subject:
- Classical Studies, Plays and Playwrights: Classical, Early, and Medieval
This chapter examines how French playwrights in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries appropriated the epic figure of Achilles. Inheriting both antique and medieval traditions, they made him into a ...
More
This chapter examines how French playwrights in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries appropriated the epic figure of Achilles. Inheriting both antique and medieval traditions, they made him into a flexible tragic hero, alternately noble, brutal, and romantic. Following the evolution of taste and aesthetics, love and passions progressively took a major part in their treatment of the hero. But the uses of this epic figure also reflect the social, political, and ethical concerns of a France facing profound transformation. From the civil wars opposing Catholics and Protestants in the sixteenth century to the establishment of absolute monarchy under Louis XIV, the definition of the state, the relations between nobles and political power, the vision of man and history were profoundly shaken. The ambivalent characterizations of Achilles, virtuous yet excessive, supportive yet a threat to the king, authorized manifold dramatizations of these contemporary issues.Less
This chapter examines how French playwrights in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries appropriated the epic figure of Achilles. Inheriting both antique and medieval traditions, they made him into a flexible tragic hero, alternately noble, brutal, and romantic. Following the evolution of taste and aesthetics, love and passions progressively took a major part in their treatment of the hero. But the uses of this epic figure also reflect the social, political, and ethical concerns of a France facing profound transformation. From the civil wars opposing Catholics and Protestants in the sixteenth century to the establishment of absolute monarchy under Louis XIV, the definition of the state, the relations between nobles and political power, the vision of man and history were profoundly shaken. The ambivalent characterizations of Achilles, virtuous yet excessive, supportive yet a threat to the king, authorized manifold dramatizations of these contemporary issues.
Cedric C. Brown
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- December 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780198790792
- eISBN:
- 9780191833434
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198790792.003.0010
- Subject:
- Literature, 17th-century and Restoration Literature, Milton Studies
One conclusion is repeated: the spectrum of friendship is indivisible, instrumentality not occluding principled affection. On the question of why many of the champions of friendship in this book are ...
More
One conclusion is repeated: the spectrum of friendship is indivisible, instrumentality not occluding principled affection. On the question of why many of the champions of friendship in this book are not socio-typical, the possible answer—friendship discourse could be to do with need—is related to the historical observation, that from the ancient world onwards writings about friendship often appeared in times of disintegration. Another general observation concerns the pervasive exclusivity of friendship criteria, despite the pressure of caritas. Foreign language competence is often used as a surrogate marker. Finally, the book demonstrates the indivisibility of the friendship spectrum by reconfiguring the case of the woman writer most associated with friendship, Katherine Philips. The changes of address at the Restoration did not radically rewrite earlier practice: some early poems also approached those in higher social positions. The Poliarchus letters, Corneille translations, and posthumous collections are considered.Less
One conclusion is repeated: the spectrum of friendship is indivisible, instrumentality not occluding principled affection. On the question of why many of the champions of friendship in this book are not socio-typical, the possible answer—friendship discourse could be to do with need—is related to the historical observation, that from the ancient world onwards writings about friendship often appeared in times of disintegration. Another general observation concerns the pervasive exclusivity of friendship criteria, despite the pressure of caritas. Foreign language competence is often used as a surrogate marker. Finally, the book demonstrates the indivisibility of the friendship spectrum by reconfiguring the case of the woman writer most associated with friendship, Katherine Philips. The changes of address at the Restoration did not radically rewrite earlier practice: some early poems also approached those in higher social positions. The Poliarchus letters, Corneille translations, and posthumous collections are considered.
Helen Slaney
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780198736769
- eISBN:
- 9780191800412
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736769.003.0004
- Subject:
- Classical Studies, Literary Studies: Classical, Early, and Medieval
French tragedy of the same period (sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries) was likewise experiencing rapid change, transformed within a generation from an academic pastime into a fully-fledged ...
More
French tragedy of the same period (sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries) was likewise experiencing rapid change, transformed within a generation from an academic pastime into a fully-fledged profession. Initially performed within the collège (university) communities, Seneca entered the repertoire of touring companies and was translated for outdoor performance on temporary stages by playwrights such as Robert Garnier and Jean de La Taille. With the establishment of the first permanent venues in Paris, the Hôtel de Bourgogne and the Théâtre du Marais, companies began to take advantage of the scenography and special effects now available to fuse Senecan tragedy with baroque spectacle. Whereas English playwrights tended to apply senecan features to different plots, Senecan plays in their entirety were performed much more frequently in France.Less
French tragedy of the same period (sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries) was likewise experiencing rapid change, transformed within a generation from an academic pastime into a fully-fledged profession. Initially performed within the collège (university) communities, Seneca entered the repertoire of touring companies and was translated for outdoor performance on temporary stages by playwrights such as Robert Garnier and Jean de La Taille. With the establishment of the first permanent venues in Paris, the Hôtel de Bourgogne and the Théâtre du Marais, companies began to take advantage of the scenography and special effects now available to fuse Senecan tragedy with baroque spectacle. Whereas English playwrights tended to apply senecan features to different plots, Senecan plays in their entirety were performed much more frequently in France.
Helen Slaney
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780198736769
- eISBN:
- 9780191800412
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198736769.003.0005
- Subject:
- Classical Studies, Literary Studies: Classical, Early, and Medieval
Following precepts derived from Aristotle’s Poetics, French neoclassical tragedy from the 1630s onwards was required to comply with the so-called Règles—the ‘Rules’—of dramatic composition. One of ...
More
Following precepts derived from Aristotle’s Poetics, French neoclassical tragedy from the 1630s onwards was required to comply with the so-called Règles—the ‘Rules’—of dramatic composition. One of the most important of these was ‘unity of place’, which was not in fact prescribed by Aristotle but became essential in French theatre practice. Racine’s Phèdre is a brilliant example of how Senecan tragedy could be adapted to neoclassical regulation. Although claiming Euripides’ Hippolytus as its source, Phèdre actually has more structural and thematic similarities to the Senecan version. One such theme is the idea of repression and containment, expressed not only through the spoken text of Phèdre but also in its staging.Less
Following precepts derived from Aristotle’s Poetics, French neoclassical tragedy from the 1630s onwards was required to comply with the so-called Règles—the ‘Rules’—of dramatic composition. One of the most important of these was ‘unity of place’, which was not in fact prescribed by Aristotle but became essential in French theatre practice. Racine’s Phèdre is a brilliant example of how Senecan tragedy could be adapted to neoclassical regulation. Although claiming Euripides’ Hippolytus as its source, Phèdre actually has more structural and thematic similarities to the Senecan version. One such theme is the idea of repression and containment, expressed not only through the spoken text of Phèdre but also in its staging.