Andreas Føllesdal
- Published in print:
- 2014
- Published Online:
- March 2016
- ISBN:
- 9781479868858
- eISBN:
- 9781479821303
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- NYU Press
- DOI:
- 10.18574/nyu/9781479868858.003.0007
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory
This chapter explores different conceptions of the principle of subsidiarity and their implications for constitutional and institutional design. It begins with a discussion of four alternative ...
More
This chapter explores different conceptions of the principle of subsidiarity and their implications for constitutional and institutional design. It begins with a discussion of four alternative theories of subsidiarity that draw on insights from Althusius, the American Confederalists, economic or fiscal federalism, and Catholic Personalism, respectively. It then considers some areas where the different conceptions of subsidiarity yield surprisingly different recommendations, with particular emphasis on two key issues: who should have the authority to apply the principle of subsidiarity, and which objectives guide the application of subsidiarity—Pareto improvements, human rights, or redistribution across member units. The chapter concludes by highlighting the dilemmas presented by competing traditions of subsidiarity for the European Court of Human Rights, American constitutional federalism, debates in Europe about the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, and international law.Less
This chapter explores different conceptions of the principle of subsidiarity and their implications for constitutional and institutional design. It begins with a discussion of four alternative theories of subsidiarity that draw on insights from Althusius, the American Confederalists, economic or fiscal federalism, and Catholic Personalism, respectively. It then considers some areas where the different conceptions of subsidiarity yield surprisingly different recommendations, with particular emphasis on two key issues: who should have the authority to apply the principle of subsidiarity, and which objectives guide the application of subsidiarity—Pareto improvements, human rights, or redistribution across member units. The chapter concludes by highlighting the dilemmas presented by competing traditions of subsidiarity for the European Court of Human Rights, American constitutional federalism, debates in Europe about the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, and international law.
