Antony Black
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- May 2008
- ISBN:
- 9780199533206
- eISBN:
- 9780191714498
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199533206.003.0003
- Subject:
- Political Science, Political Theory
In Europe, separate states acquired legitimacy; in Islam the universal caliphate and 'umma retained the fullest respect. Muslim philosophers, not unlike Augustine and Hobbes, derived the need for the ...
More
In Europe, separate states acquired legitimacy; in Islam the universal caliphate and 'umma retained the fullest respect. Muslim philosophers, not unlike Augustine and Hobbes, derived the need for the Shari'a and caliph from the strife-prone nature of humans. Some Western thinkers adopted the view of Cicero (and later of Locke) that human society and the state develop by consensus. Marsilius of Padua's theory of the state in some ways resembled the Muslim theory of the caliphate; he was probably influenced by Ibn Rushd, but Marsilius was without influence. Muslims, drawing on Iranian monarchical theory, saw the ruler's responsibilities as extending to the social and economic infrastructure. Europeans saw the state, Muslims the caliphate, as impersonal offices.Less
In Europe, separate states acquired legitimacy; in Islam the universal caliphate and 'umma retained the fullest respect. Muslim philosophers, not unlike Augustine and Hobbes, derived the need for the Shari'a and caliph from the strife-prone nature of humans. Some Western thinkers adopted the view of Cicero (and later of Locke) that human society and the state develop by consensus. Marsilius of Padua's theory of the state in some ways resembled the Muslim theory of the caliphate; he was probably influenced by Ibn Rushd, but Marsilius was without influence. Muslims, drawing on Iranian monarchical theory, saw the ruler's responsibilities as extending to the social and economic infrastructure. Europeans saw the state, Muslims the caliphate, as impersonal offices.
Robert Pasnau
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- January 2014
- ISBN:
- 9780197265499
- eISBN:
- 9780191760310
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- British Academy
- DOI:
- 10.5871/bacad/9780197265499.003.0006
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy
Who can know? Who can merely believe on faith? Who should be kept in the dark entirely? This chapter considers various episodes from the history of philosophy—Locke, Aquinas, Averroes, Maimonides, ...
More
Who can know? Who can merely believe on faith? Who should be kept in the dark entirely? This chapter considers various episodes from the history of philosophy—Locke, Aquinas, Averroes, Maimonides, al-Ghazali—where one or another such division of epistemic labour has been affirmed. It ends by considering the case that can be made for keeping secret some philosophical doctrines.Less
Who can know? Who can merely believe on faith? Who should be kept in the dark entirely? This chapter considers various episodes from the history of philosophy—Locke, Aquinas, Averroes, Maimonides, al-Ghazali—where one or another such division of epistemic labour has been affirmed. It ends by considering the case that can be made for keeping secret some philosophical doctrines.
Zygmunt G. Baranński
- Published in print:
- 2007
- Published Online:
- January 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780197264133
- eISBN:
- 9780191734649
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- British Academy
- DOI:
- 10.5871/bacad/9780197264133.003.0004
- Subject:
- Literature, 16th-century and Renaissance Literature
This chapter examines the structure of Petrarch's De Sui Ipsius et Multorum Ignorantia and his opinion on philosophers Epicurus and Averroës' views on the immortality of the soul. It discusses ...
More
This chapter examines the structure of Petrarch's De Sui Ipsius et Multorum Ignorantia and his opinion on philosophers Epicurus and Averroës' views on the immortality of the soul. It discusses Petrarch's views on Epicurus and Averroës in the invective on ignorance in order to reach an overall perspective on his mature views of the intellectual life. It analyses De Ignorantia and suggests that it is appropriate to be run through with elements taken from both academic and popular Christianity given its concern with salvation and with the relationship between God and humanity.Less
This chapter examines the structure of Petrarch's De Sui Ipsius et Multorum Ignorantia and his opinion on philosophers Epicurus and Averroës' views on the immortality of the soul. It discusses Petrarch's views on Epicurus and Averroës in the invective on ignorance in order to reach an overall perspective on his mature views of the intellectual life. It analyses De Ignorantia and suggests that it is appropriate to be run through with elements taken from both academic and popular Christianity given its concern with salvation and with the relationship between God and humanity.
Frank Griffel
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780195331622
- eISBN:
- 9780199867998
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331622.003.0001
- Subject:
- Religion, Theology, Islam
Earlier Western researchers have often assumed that the history of Arabic-Islamic philosophy ended with Averroes at the turn to the 13th century and that al-Ghazali’s critique of philosophy in his ...
More
Earlier Western researchers have often assumed that the history of Arabic-Islamic philosophy ended with Averroes at the turn to the 13th century and that al-Ghazali’s critique of philosophy in his Incoherence of the Philosophers (Tahafut al-falasifa) was responsible for its rapid decline. In reality, however, al-Ghazali did not destroy the tradition of Aristotelian philosophy in Islam, rather he integrated it into the Muslim theological discourse and was thus an active part of the “naturalization” of the Greek science in Islam.Less
Earlier Western researchers have often assumed that the history of Arabic-Islamic philosophy ended with Averroes at the turn to the 13th century and that al-Ghazali’s critique of philosophy in his Incoherence of the Philosophers (Tahafut al-falasifa) was responsible for its rapid decline. In reality, however, al-Ghazali did not destroy the tradition of Aristotelian philosophy in Islam, rather he integrated it into the Muslim theological discourse and was thus an active part of the “naturalization” of the Greek science in Islam.
Ruth Glasner
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199567737
- eISBN:
- 9780191721472
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567737.001.0001
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Ancient Philosophy
For the first time Averroes' physics is studied on the basis of all available texts and versions of his three commentaries on Aristotle's Physics, including texts that are extant only in Hebrew ...
More
For the first time Averroes' physics is studied on the basis of all available texts and versions of his three commentaries on Aristotle's Physics, including texts that are extant only in Hebrew manuscripts and have not been hitherto studied. A comparison of these sources shows that a diachronic study is absolutely essential. Averroes changed his interpretation of the basic notions of physics—the structure of corporeal reality and the definition of motion—more than once. He has repeatedly rewritten and edited several key chapters in all three commentaries. After many hesitations he offers a bold new interpretation of physics to which this book refers as ‘Aristotelian atomism’. Ideas that are usually ascribed to scholastic scholars and others that were traced back to Averroes but only in a very general form, not only originated with him, but were fully developed by him into a comprehensive and systematic physical system. Unlike earlier Greek or Muslim atomistic systems, Averroes' Aristotelian atomism endeavours to be fully scientific, by Aristotelian standards, and still to provide a basis for an indeterministic natural philosophy. Commonly known as ‘the commentator’ and usually considered to be a faithful follower of Aristotle, Averroes is revealed in his commentaries on the Physics to be an original and sophisticated philosopher.Less
For the first time Averroes' physics is studied on the basis of all available texts and versions of his three commentaries on Aristotle's Physics, including texts that are extant only in Hebrew manuscripts and have not been hitherto studied. A comparison of these sources shows that a diachronic study is absolutely essential. Averroes changed his interpretation of the basic notions of physics—the structure of corporeal reality and the definition of motion—more than once. He has repeatedly rewritten and edited several key chapters in all three commentaries. After many hesitations he offers a bold new interpretation of physics to which this book refers as ‘Aristotelian atomism’. Ideas that are usually ascribed to scholastic scholars and others that were traced back to Averroes but only in a very general form, not only originated with him, but were fully developed by him into a comprehensive and systematic physical system. Unlike earlier Greek or Muslim atomistic systems, Averroes' Aristotelian atomism endeavours to be fully scientific, by Aristotelian standards, and still to provide a basis for an indeterministic natural philosophy. Commonly known as ‘the commentator’ and usually considered to be a faithful follower of Aristotle, Averroes is revealed in his commentaries on the Physics to be an original and sophisticated philosopher.
Ruth Glasner
- Published in print:
- 2009
- Published Online:
- September 2009
- ISBN:
- 9780199567737
- eISBN:
- 9780191721472
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567737.003.0001
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Ancient Philosophy
The Introduction discusses who Averroes was, what he did, and his reputation for being Aristotle's most faithful interpreter. Averroes' three commentaries on Aristotle's treatises are introduced. The ...
More
The Introduction discusses who Averroes was, what he did, and his reputation for being Aristotle's most faithful interpreter. Averroes' three commentaries on Aristotle's treatises are introduced. The aims and ideas of the book are briefly summarized.Less
The Introduction discusses who Averroes was, what he did, and his reputation for being Aristotle's most faithful interpreter. Averroes' three commentaries on Aristotle's treatises are introduced. The aims and ideas of the book are briefly summarized.
Emanuele Coccia
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- September 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780823267415
- eISBN:
- 9780823272358
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Fordham University Press
- DOI:
- 10.5422/fordham/9780823267415.003.0009
- Subject:
- Philosophy, Aesthetics
This chapter discusses the micro-ontology of the image. It explains why the science of the sensible is a form of regional ontology, capable of positing another kind of being, the being of the images ...
More
This chapter discusses the micro-ontology of the image. It explains why the science of the sensible is a form of regional ontology, capable of positing another kind of being, the being of the images beyond the being of things, of mind and of consciousness. Scholasticism has long wondered about the principles of this “special ontology.” According to medieval theologians such as Roger Bacon and Avicenna, images had a minor being, inferior to the thing of which they are the image. To speak of images therefore means to engage in micro-ontology; that is, to speak about the weaker and more fragile form of being which exists in the universe. Placing the real being in opposition to the weak, minor being of images is not a way of dealing with what modernity has come to call the imaginary. This chapter concludes by citing Averroes's claim that the being of images is something in between the being of things and the being of souls, between bodies and spirit.Less
This chapter discusses the micro-ontology of the image. It explains why the science of the sensible is a form of regional ontology, capable of positing another kind of being, the being of the images beyond the being of things, of mind and of consciousness. Scholasticism has long wondered about the principles of this “special ontology.” According to medieval theologians such as Roger Bacon and Avicenna, images had a minor being, inferior to the thing of which they are the image. To speak of images therefore means to engage in micro-ontology; that is, to speak about the weaker and more fragile form of being which exists in the universe. Placing the real being in opposition to the weak, minor being of images is not a way of dealing with what modernity has come to call the imaginary. This chapter concludes by citing Averroes's claim that the being of images is something in between the being of things and the being of souls, between bodies and spirit.
G. Scott Davis
- Published in print:
- 2012
- Published Online:
- September 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199755042
- eISBN:
- 9780199950508
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755042.003.0006
- Subject:
- Religion, Religion and Society
This chapter surveys the impact of Muslim culture on conceptions of just war and the righteous warrior in the literature and laws of medieval Christian Spain. The first part contrasts the image of ...
More
This chapter surveys the impact of Muslim culture on conceptions of just war and the righteous warrior in the literature and laws of medieval Christian Spain. The first part contrasts the image of Islam in The Song of Roland and in The Poem of the Cid. These two works highlight the contrast between the parochialism of French chivalry and the pluralism of Spain. The second section is an analysis of Las Siete Partidas, a legal code dating from the reign of Alfonso X of Castile (1252–84). The possibility of a link between Spanish “pluralism” and the Malikite inclination to interpret shari‘a with an eye to the public good seems to underlie the more accommodating tendencies of Averroes. The final section focuses on the work of Vitoria, Soto, and the Second Scholastic as an attempt to reinvigorate pluralism against the imperial claims of both the papacy and the Habsburgs. The rise of Grotius marks a defeat in which the lawyers of an emerging Europe of nation-states triumph over the Aristotelian moral theology of Aquinas and the Second Scholastic.Less
This chapter surveys the impact of Muslim culture on conceptions of just war and the righteous warrior in the literature and laws of medieval Christian Spain. The first part contrasts the image of Islam in The Song of Roland and in The Poem of the Cid. These two works highlight the contrast between the parochialism of French chivalry and the pluralism of Spain. The second section is an analysis of Las Siete Partidas, a legal code dating from the reign of Alfonso X of Castile (1252–84). The possibility of a link between Spanish “pluralism” and the Malikite inclination to interpret shari‘a with an eye to the public good seems to underlie the more accommodating tendencies of Averroes. The final section focuses on the work of Vitoria, Soto, and the Second Scholastic as an attempt to reinvigorate pluralism against the imperial claims of both the papacy and the Habsburgs. The rise of Grotius marks a defeat in which the lawyers of an emerging Europe of nation-states triumph over the Aristotelian moral theology of Aquinas and the Second Scholastic.
Robert Pasnau
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- May 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199567911
- eISBN:
- 9780191725449
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567911.003.0004
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Metaphysics/Epistemology
This chapter considers the relationship between matter and extension. Scholastic authors held a wide range of views in this domain, with some divorcing matter and extension entirely, and others ...
More
This chapter considers the relationship between matter and extension. Scholastic authors held a wide range of views in this domain, with some divorcing matter and extension entirely, and others treating matter as intrinsically extended.Less
This chapter considers the relationship between matter and extension. Scholastic authors held a wide range of views in this domain, with some divorcing matter and extension entirely, and others treating matter as intrinsically extended.
Anna Corrias
- Published in print:
- 2022
- Published Online:
- May 2022
- ISBN:
- 9780197267295
- eISBN:
- 9780191965128
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- British Academy
- DOI:
- 10.5871/bacad/9780197267295.003.0003
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy
This essay analyses Marsilio Ficino’s interpretation of Theophrastus’s view of the Aristotelian concept of ‘potential intellect’, as found in the fragments preserved in Priscian of Lydia’s ...
More
This essay analyses Marsilio Ficino’s interpretation of Theophrastus’s view of the Aristotelian concept of ‘potential intellect’, as found in the fragments preserved in Priscian of Lydia’s Metaphrasis of Theophrastus’s Physics, which Ficino translated and commented on at the end of his life (publication year 1497). Theophrastus’s view, as interpreted by Priscian, was that ‘potential’ does not mean ‘potential to knowledge’, but ‘potential to knowledge in act’. Ficino was thrilled by this finding, for it proved, contra Averroes, that the human mind could not be described as ‘pure potentiality’ and, as such, compared to matter. On the contrary, the mind was an independent substance which did not need external agency in order to initiate and perform thinking.Less
This essay analyses Marsilio Ficino’s interpretation of Theophrastus’s view of the Aristotelian concept of ‘potential intellect’, as found in the fragments preserved in Priscian of Lydia’s Metaphrasis of Theophrastus’s Physics, which Ficino translated and commented on at the end of his life (publication year 1497). Theophrastus’s view, as interpreted by Priscian, was that ‘potential’ does not mean ‘potential to knowledge’, but ‘potential to knowledge in act’. Ficino was thrilled by this finding, for it proved, contra Averroes, that the human mind could not be described as ‘pure potentiality’ and, as such, compared to matter. On the contrary, the mind was an independent substance which did not need external agency in order to initiate and perform thinking.
Sarah Stroumsa
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- May 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780691176437
- eISBN:
- 9780691195452
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Princeton University Press
- DOI:
- 10.23943/princeton/9780691176437.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, European Medieval History
This chapter explores the remarkable phenomenon of twelfth-century rigorous Andalusian Aristotelianism. In the early twelfth century, the philosophical map of al-Andalus was dramatically redrawn. ...
More
This chapter explores the remarkable phenomenon of twelfth-century rigorous Andalusian Aristotelianism. In the early twelfth century, the philosophical map of al-Andalus was dramatically redrawn. Along with what can only be described as the blossoming of Islamic philosophy after its constrained state in the previous century, one notices a significant shift to an orthodox version of Aristotelian philosophy. The thought of the Eastern Aristotelians was sprinkled with un-Aristotelian elements. Largely in response to Platonizing authors, especially Avicenna, Andalusian falāsifa explicitly identified with the Peripatetic tradition, and strove to strengthen the authority of Aristotle and his commentators. This stricter version of Aristotelianism, which makes its debut with Ibn Bājja under the Almoravids, was further crystalized under the Almohads by philosophers such as Averroes and Maimonides. The chapter also considers “the Andalusian revolt against Ptolemaic astronomy.” The term “Andalusian Revolt” was first coined in 1984 by Abdelhamid Sabra in his discussion of astronomical theories that attempted to dethrone Ptolemy's astronomy from its almost unquestioned authority.Less
This chapter explores the remarkable phenomenon of twelfth-century rigorous Andalusian Aristotelianism. In the early twelfth century, the philosophical map of al-Andalus was dramatically redrawn. Along with what can only be described as the blossoming of Islamic philosophy after its constrained state in the previous century, one notices a significant shift to an orthodox version of Aristotelian philosophy. The thought of the Eastern Aristotelians was sprinkled with un-Aristotelian elements. Largely in response to Platonizing authors, especially Avicenna, Andalusian falāsifa explicitly identified with the Peripatetic tradition, and strove to strengthen the authority of Aristotle and his commentators. This stricter version of Aristotelianism, which makes its debut with Ibn Bājja under the Almoravids, was further crystalized under the Almohads by philosophers such as Averroes and Maimonides. The chapter also considers “the Andalusian revolt against Ptolemaic astronomy.” The term “Andalusian Revolt” was first coined in 1984 by Abdelhamid Sabra in his discussion of astronomical theories that attempted to dethrone Ptolemy's astronomy from its almost unquestioned authority.
Antonia Fitzpatrick
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- November 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780198790853
- eISBN:
- 9780191833304
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198790853.001.0001
- Subject:
- History, History of Ideas
This is a study of the union of matter and the soul in human beings in the thought of the Dominican Thomas Aquinas. At first glance, this issue might appear arcane, but it was at the centre of ...
More
This is a study of the union of matter and the soul in human beings in the thought of the Dominican Thomas Aquinas. At first glance, this issue might appear arcane, but it was at the centre of Catholic polemic with heresy in the thirteenth century and of the development of medieval thought. The book argues that theological issues, especially the need for an identical body to be resurrected at the end of time, were vital to Aquinas’s account of how human beings are constituted. The book explores how theological questions shaped Aquinas’s thought on individuality and bodily identity over time, his embryology and understanding of heredity, his work on nutrition and bodily growth, and his fundamental conception of matter. It demonstrates how Aquinas used his peripatetic sources, Aristotle and Averroes, to further his own thinking. The book indicates how Aquinas’s thought on bodily identity became pivotal to university debates and relations between rival mendicant orders in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries, and that quarrels surrounding these issues persisted into the fifteenth century. Not only is this a study of the interface between theology, biology, and physics in Aquinas’s thought; it also fundamentally revises the generally accepted view of Aquinas. Aquinas is famous for holding that the only substantial form in a human being is the soul; most scholars have therefore thought he located the identity of the individual in their soul. This book restores the body through a thorough examination of the range of Aquinas’s works.Less
This is a study of the union of matter and the soul in human beings in the thought of the Dominican Thomas Aquinas. At first glance, this issue might appear arcane, but it was at the centre of Catholic polemic with heresy in the thirteenth century and of the development of medieval thought. The book argues that theological issues, especially the need for an identical body to be resurrected at the end of time, were vital to Aquinas’s account of how human beings are constituted. The book explores how theological questions shaped Aquinas’s thought on individuality and bodily identity over time, his embryology and understanding of heredity, his work on nutrition and bodily growth, and his fundamental conception of matter. It demonstrates how Aquinas used his peripatetic sources, Aristotle and Averroes, to further his own thinking. The book indicates how Aquinas’s thought on bodily identity became pivotal to university debates and relations between rival mendicant orders in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries, and that quarrels surrounding these issues persisted into the fifteenth century. Not only is this a study of the interface between theology, biology, and physics in Aquinas’s thought; it also fundamentally revises the generally accepted view of Aquinas. Aquinas is famous for holding that the only substantial form in a human being is the soul; most scholars have therefore thought he located the identity of the individual in their soul. This book restores the body through a thorough examination of the range of Aquinas’s works.
Stephen R. Ogden
- Published in print:
- 2022
- Published Online:
- March 2022
- ISBN:
- 9780192896117
- eISBN:
- 9780191918575
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780192896117.001.0001
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy, Philosophy of Mind
This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis—the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human ...
More
This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis—the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes’ arguments, both from the text of Aristotle’s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotle’s DA III.4–5 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a “commentator” but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes’ two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes’ own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna’s and Aquinas’s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes’ most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics.Less
This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis—the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes’ arguments, both from the text of Aristotle’s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotle’s DA III.4–5 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a “commentator” but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes’ two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes’ own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna’s and Aquinas’s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes’ most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics.
Robert Pasnau (ed.)
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- December 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780198786368
- eISBN:
- 9780191831331
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198786368.001.0001
- Subject:
- Philosophy, History of Philosophy
This series annually collects the best current work in the field of medieval philosophy. Each book features original chapters that contribute to an understanding of a wide range of themes and ...
More
This series annually collects the best current work in the field of medieval philosophy. Each book features original chapters that contribute to an understanding of a wide range of themes and problems in all aspects of the field, from late antiquity into the Renaissance, and extending over the Jewish, Islamic, and Christian traditions. Material published includes analyses, extended book reviews, translations, commentaries, and editions of texts. This volume contains the following chapters: Cary Nederman on the medieval roots of modern toleration; Stephen Ogden on how Averroes does not argue for a single separate intellect; John Hawthorne on Scotus’s theory of universals; Jeff Steele on the irrelevance of aesthetic considerations to Scotus’s theory of natural law; David Sanson and Ahmed Alwishah on Al-Taftāzānī’s treatment of the liar paradox; Jacob Tuttle on Suarez’s theory of efficient causation; Brian Embry on a late-scholastic theory of truthmakers; Thomas Ward’s critical review of Jeffrey Brower’s recent book on Aquinas; and a response by Turner Nevitt to a recent paper by Adam Wood on Aquinas’s account of “gappy” existence.Less
This series annually collects the best current work in the field of medieval philosophy. Each book features original chapters that contribute to an understanding of a wide range of themes and problems in all aspects of the field, from late antiquity into the Renaissance, and extending over the Jewish, Islamic, and Christian traditions. Material published includes analyses, extended book reviews, translations, commentaries, and editions of texts. This volume contains the following chapters: Cary Nederman on the medieval roots of modern toleration; Stephen Ogden on how Averroes does not argue for a single separate intellect; John Hawthorne on Scotus’s theory of universals; Jeff Steele on the irrelevance of aesthetic considerations to Scotus’s theory of natural law; David Sanson and Ahmed Alwishah on Al-Taftāzānī’s treatment of the liar paradox; Jacob Tuttle on Suarez’s theory of efficient causation; Brian Embry on a late-scholastic theory of truthmakers; Thomas Ward’s critical review of Jeffrey Brower’s recent book on Aquinas; and a response by Turner Nevitt to a recent paper by Adam Wood on Aquinas’s account of “gappy” existence.
Mark Byron
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- May 2019
- ISBN:
- 9781942954408
- eISBN:
- 9781786944337
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Liverpool University Press
- DOI:
- 10.3828/liverpool/9781942954408.003.0023
- Subject:
- Literature, 20th-century Literature and Modernism
Canto 36 functions as a kind of still point amidst the political and historical material imbuing Eleven New Cantos: the Continental Congress of 1774-89 and Siena under the rule of Leopold, Grand Duke ...
More
Canto 36 functions as a kind of still point amidst the political and historical material imbuing Eleven New Cantos: the Continental Congress of 1774-89 and Siena under the rule of Leopold, Grand Duke of Tuscany and Holy Roman Emperor. The greater part of the poem comprises Pound’s final authoritative translation of Guido Cavalcanti’s canzone ‘Donna mi prega,’ followed by two verse paragraphs dealing with the intellectual and poetic provenance of Guido’s ideas. The nature of these ideas is broadly well known: for Pound, Guido’s philosophical vocabulary transmits certain aspects of Neoplatonism as well as the psychology implied in Aristotle’s De anima. As Pound explains in his essay ‘Cavalcanti’ in Make It New (1934), Guido received these ideas directly or otherwise from a variety of sources, notably John Scottus Eriugena and Robert Grosseteste on one hand, and the great medieval Islamic tradition of Avicenna and Averroes on the other. This essay explores this terrain in more detail, providing greater context for Pound’s claims of intellectual provenance in a close reading of the poem. The Islamic inheritance in particular is far more complex than has been acknowledged, and certainly well beyond Pound’s explicit understanding of the matter. However he was right to place great emphasis on Cavalcanti’s vocabulary: attention to the ways in which Avicenna and Averroes understood the concepts of the diafan, the agent and possible intellects, and the mechanism by which the individual soul makes contact with divine intelligence, all clarify the argument as set out in Cavalcanti’s poem and represented in Pound’s translation. This clarification also makes more explicit the links with the lines following Pound’s translation concerning Eriugena and the Italian Troubadour Sordello da Goito.Less
Canto 36 functions as a kind of still point amidst the political and historical material imbuing Eleven New Cantos: the Continental Congress of 1774-89 and Siena under the rule of Leopold, Grand Duke of Tuscany and Holy Roman Emperor. The greater part of the poem comprises Pound’s final authoritative translation of Guido Cavalcanti’s canzone ‘Donna mi prega,’ followed by two verse paragraphs dealing with the intellectual and poetic provenance of Guido’s ideas. The nature of these ideas is broadly well known: for Pound, Guido’s philosophical vocabulary transmits certain aspects of Neoplatonism as well as the psychology implied in Aristotle’s De anima. As Pound explains in his essay ‘Cavalcanti’ in Make It New (1934), Guido received these ideas directly or otherwise from a variety of sources, notably John Scottus Eriugena and Robert Grosseteste on one hand, and the great medieval Islamic tradition of Avicenna and Averroes on the other. This essay explores this terrain in more detail, providing greater context for Pound’s claims of intellectual provenance in a close reading of the poem. The Islamic inheritance in particular is far more complex than has been acknowledged, and certainly well beyond Pound’s explicit understanding of the matter. However he was right to place great emphasis on Cavalcanti’s vocabulary: attention to the ways in which Avicenna and Averroes understood the concepts of the diafan, the agent and possible intellects, and the mechanism by which the individual soul makes contact with divine intelligence, all clarify the argument as set out in Cavalcanti’s poem and represented in Pound’s translation. This clarification also makes more explicit the links with the lines following Pound’s translation concerning Eriugena and the Italian Troubadour Sordello da Goito.
Rolf G. Kuehni and Andreas Schwarz
- Published in print:
- 2008
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780195189681
- eISBN:
- 9780199847747
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189681.003.0006
- Subject:
- Psychology, Cognitive Psychology
The Greek atomist philosophers claimed that material images (eidola) distinguish themselves from objects and infiltrate the eyes to cause vision. Aristotle rejected the material nature of eidola and ...
More
The Greek atomist philosophers claimed that material images (eidola) distinguish themselves from objects and infiltrate the eyes to cause vision. Aristotle rejected the material nature of eidola and looked for a medium between object and eye. Colors on the surface of objects can set the transparent in motion and thereby transmit their quality to the eye. Aristotle's theory was defended in the late Middle Ages by Mid-eastern philosophers Avicenna and Averroës, and, mainly via southern Spain, this theory established itself in European thought. People with color vision take for granted an immediate connection between color stimulus and perceptual result. Thus, this developed the idea to define color experiences by quantitative description of the stimuli.Less
The Greek atomist philosophers claimed that material images (eidola) distinguish themselves from objects and infiltrate the eyes to cause vision. Aristotle rejected the material nature of eidola and looked for a medium between object and eye. Colors on the surface of objects can set the transparent in motion and thereby transmit their quality to the eye. Aristotle's theory was defended in the late Middle Ages by Mid-eastern philosophers Avicenna and Averroës, and, mainly via southern Spain, this theory established itself in European thought. People with color vision take for granted an immediate connection between color stimulus and perceptual result. Thus, this developed the idea to define color experiences by quantitative description of the stimuli.
John Willinsky
- Published in print:
- 2018
- Published Online:
- May 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780226487922
- eISBN:
- 9780226488080
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Chicago Press
- DOI:
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226488080.003.0006
- Subject:
- History, History of Ideas
The initial Arabic translation movement took place with the expansion of the Islamic empire during the eighth and ninth centuries (in the Western calendar) during the ʿAbbasid caliphate, which ...
More
The initial Arabic translation movement took place with the expansion of the Islamic empire during the eighth and ninth centuries (in the Western calendar) during the ʿAbbasid caliphate, which introduced Greek, Hindi, and Persian works into Islamic learning. Where the work of Plato, Aristotle, Euclid and Galen, as well as Hindi mathematics was largely absent from the medieval West, it inspired much learning among Muslim scholars and gave rise to great libraries, with the translation process adding its own emphasis to how the intellectual properties of a text were to be conveyed and engaged across cultures and languages. In particular, the work of al-Kindī, Avicenna, and Averroës on Aristotle’s On the Soul, wrestled with the collective and individual nature of the soul in ways that further the concept of intellectual properties. The Arabic-Latin translation movement of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, through centers such as Toledo, Salerno, Sicily, and Antioch, brought together Muslim, Jew, and Christian (particularly in the Iberian Peninsula) to render much of Islamic learning into Latin, capturing both the ancient texts from Greek and the Islamic commentaries, which proved especially valuable in the teaching of Aristotle and company for centuries to come in Europe.Less
The initial Arabic translation movement took place with the expansion of the Islamic empire during the eighth and ninth centuries (in the Western calendar) during the ʿAbbasid caliphate, which introduced Greek, Hindi, and Persian works into Islamic learning. Where the work of Plato, Aristotle, Euclid and Galen, as well as Hindi mathematics was largely absent from the medieval West, it inspired much learning among Muslim scholars and gave rise to great libraries, with the translation process adding its own emphasis to how the intellectual properties of a text were to be conveyed and engaged across cultures and languages. In particular, the work of al-Kindī, Avicenna, and Averroës on Aristotle’s On the Soul, wrestled with the collective and individual nature of the soul in ways that further the concept of intellectual properties. The Arabic-Latin translation movement of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, through centers such as Toledo, Salerno, Sicily, and Antioch, brought together Muslim, Jew, and Christian (particularly in the Iberian Peninsula) to render much of Islamic learning into Latin, capturing both the ancient texts from Greek and the Islamic commentaries, which proved especially valuable in the teaching of Aristotle and company for centuries to come in Europe.
Michael Farquhar
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- May 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780804798358
- eISBN:
- 9781503600270
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Stanford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.11126/stanford/9780804798358.003.0007
- Subject:
- Religion, Islam
This chapter considers the content of teaching at the Islamic University of Medina, from the time of its founding and over the decades that followed. While IUM syllabuses were from the start strongly ...
More
This chapter considers the content of teaching at the Islamic University of Medina, from the time of its founding and over the decades that followed. While IUM syllabuses were from the start strongly influenced by Wahhabi norms, the bodies of knowledge that were to be transmitted to its students underwent certain subtle shifts over time. These shifts in many ways map onto, and no doubt in part reflect, the broader evolution of the Wahhabi tradition in the second half of the twentieth century. However, the chapter highlights evidence that they also related to the university’s status as a node within a transnational religious economy and its engagement in far-reaching struggles to steer the course of the Islamic tradition.Less
This chapter considers the content of teaching at the Islamic University of Medina, from the time of its founding and over the decades that followed. While IUM syllabuses were from the start strongly influenced by Wahhabi norms, the bodies of knowledge that were to be transmitted to its students underwent certain subtle shifts over time. These shifts in many ways map onto, and no doubt in part reflect, the broader evolution of the Wahhabi tradition in the second half of the twentieth century. However, the chapter highlights evidence that they also related to the university’s status as a node within a transnational religious economy and its engagement in far-reaching struggles to steer the course of the Islamic tradition.
Rita Copeland
- Published in print:
- 2021
- Published Online:
- December 2021
- ISBN:
- 9780192845122
- eISBN:
- 9780191937446
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780192845122.003.0005
- Subject:
- Literature, Early and Medieval Literature
Chapter 4 turns from following the long and varied tradition of stylistic teaching and practice to dedicated theory: now the reception of Aristotle’s Rhetoric and especially its analytic of the ...
More
Chapter 4 turns from following the long and varied tradition of stylistic teaching and practice to dedicated theory: now the reception of Aristotle’s Rhetoric and especially its analytic of the emotions from antiquity to the late thirteenth century. This chapter treats pathos and enthymeme in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. It contrasts other ancient philosophical traditions of the passions with Aristotle’s phenomenological treatment of emotion in the Rhetoric. It traces the post-classical reception of the Rhetoric through medieval Arabic commentators on the emotions, Moerbeke’s authoritative Latin translation, Giles of Rome’s important commentary on the Rhetoric, c.1272, and other scholastic commentators on the relevant sections of Aristotle’s text. It also contrasts other medieval philosophies of the passions with what readers would have found in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. In his first engagement with the Rhetoric, Giles did not grasp the political significance of Aristotle’s treatment of emotions because his thinking was still embedded in contemporary medieval theories of the passions.Less
Chapter 4 turns from following the long and varied tradition of stylistic teaching and practice to dedicated theory: now the reception of Aristotle’s Rhetoric and especially its analytic of the emotions from antiquity to the late thirteenth century. This chapter treats pathos and enthymeme in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. It contrasts other ancient philosophical traditions of the passions with Aristotle’s phenomenological treatment of emotion in the Rhetoric. It traces the post-classical reception of the Rhetoric through medieval Arabic commentators on the emotions, Moerbeke’s authoritative Latin translation, Giles of Rome’s important commentary on the Rhetoric, c.1272, and other scholastic commentators on the relevant sections of Aristotle’s text. It also contrasts other medieval philosophies of the passions with what readers would have found in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. In his first engagement with the Rhetoric, Giles did not grasp the political significance of Aristotle’s treatment of emotions because his thinking was still embedded in contemporary medieval theories of the passions.
Eliyahu Stern
- Published in print:
- 2013
- Published Online:
- October 2013
- ISBN:
- 9780300179309
- eISBN:
- 9780300183221
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Yale University Press
- DOI:
- 10.12987/yale/9780300179309.003.0001
- Subject:
- Society and Culture, Jewish Studies
This chapter seeks to examine the life of Elijah ben Solomon, and his contribution to modern Jewish history. Widely known as the “Genius,” he lived most of his life in the Lithuanian city of Vilna. ...
More
This chapter seeks to examine the life of Elijah ben Solomon, and his contribution to modern Jewish history. Widely known as the “Genius,” he lived most of his life in the Lithuanian city of Vilna. It is in Vilna where he would make significant contributions on Jewish literature. He mastered the Jewish canon to the extent that there is hardly or no major rabbinic or kabbalistic text untouched by his masterful commentary. The chapter argues that his originality, command of sources, and clarity of thought place him among religious luminaries such as Aquinas and Averroes.Less
This chapter seeks to examine the life of Elijah ben Solomon, and his contribution to modern Jewish history. Widely known as the “Genius,” he lived most of his life in the Lithuanian city of Vilna. It is in Vilna where he would make significant contributions on Jewish literature. He mastered the Jewish canon to the extent that there is hardly or no major rabbinic or kabbalistic text untouched by his masterful commentary. The chapter argues that his originality, command of sources, and clarity of thought place him among religious luminaries such as Aquinas and Averroes.