Brice Dickson
- Published in print:
- 2010
- Published Online:
- May 2010
- ISBN:
- 9780199571383
- eISBN:
- 9780191721854
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571383.003.0011
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
The law relating to the freedoms protected by Articles 9 to 11 of the European Convention — freedom of speech, belief, assembly, and association — has in Northern Ireland always been similar to that ...
More
The law relating to the freedoms protected by Articles 9 to 11 of the European Convention — freedom of speech, belief, assembly, and association — has in Northern Ireland always been similar to that applying in England and Wales. During the years of conflict it has been a key element in a number of important controversies. This chapter looks in turn at broadcasting bans, freedom of expression during electoral and parliamentary processes, freedom of belief claims such as those put forward by people seeking to join the police, and the freedom to march, together with a miscellany of other relatively minor issues. Until 2000, of course, the European Convention was not part of the domestic law of any part of the United Kingdom (nor of Ireland until 2004), so persons or organizations with grievances about their right to freedom of speech, belief, and assembly had to take their complaints to Strasbourg if they wanted Convention standards to be directly applied. This happened rarely, and when it did, applicants tended to discover that this was yet another field in which the enforcement organs of the Convention system were quite content to confer a wide margin of appreciation on States.Less
The law relating to the freedoms protected by Articles 9 to 11 of the European Convention — freedom of speech, belief, assembly, and association — has in Northern Ireland always been similar to that applying in England and Wales. During the years of conflict it has been a key element in a number of important controversies. This chapter looks in turn at broadcasting bans, freedom of expression during electoral and parliamentary processes, freedom of belief claims such as those put forward by people seeking to join the police, and the freedom to march, together with a miscellany of other relatively minor issues. Until 2000, of course, the European Convention was not part of the domestic law of any part of the United Kingdom (nor of Ireland until 2004), so persons or organizations with grievances about their right to freedom of speech, belief, and assembly had to take their complaints to Strasbourg if they wanted Convention standards to be directly applied. This happened rarely, and when it did, applicants tended to discover that this was yet another field in which the enforcement organs of the Convention system were quite content to confer a wide margin of appreciation on States.
Ray A. Moore and Donald L. Robinson
- Published in print:
- 2002
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780195151169
- eISBN:
- 9780199833917
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/019515116X.003.0022
- Subject:
- Political Science, Democratization
On August 31, a “special committee,” consisting of 45 members of the House of Peers, began a series of secret meetings that would last until October 3. Attention focused again on the emperor's role ...
More
On August 31, a “special committee,” consisting of 45 members of the House of Peers, began a series of secret meetings that would last until October 3. Attention focused again on the emperor's role (kokutai), popular sovereignty, and the proposed electoral review of judges. Peers also criticized the American‐sounding rhetoric of the preamble and the notion in Chapter X of the constitution as “supreme law.” Notable during these debates were exchanges between Takayanagi Kenzō and Sasaki Sōichi. In the end, after making a few minor amendments, the House of Peers added its approval of the revision.Less
On August 31, a “special committee,” consisting of 45 members of the House of Peers, began a series of secret meetings that would last until October 3. Attention focused again on the emperor's role (kokutai), popular sovereignty, and the proposed electoral review of judges. Peers also criticized the American‐sounding rhetoric of the preamble and the notion in Chapter X of the constitution as “supreme law.” Notable during these debates were exchanges between Takayanagi Kenzō and Sasaki Sōichi. In the end, after making a few minor amendments, the House of Peers added its approval of the revision.
Ray A. Moore and Donald L. Robinson
- Published in print:
- 2002
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780195151169
- eISBN:
- 9780199833917
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/019515116X.003.0016
- Subject:
- Political Science, Democratization
Recounts the intense debate in the revision committee over Article 9, renouncing war and armed forces, and the contents of the bill of rights (Chapter III). The chapter reveals sharp quarrels between ...
More
Recounts the intense debate in the revision committee over Article 9, renouncing war and armed forces, and the contents of the bill of rights (Chapter III). The chapter reveals sharp quarrels between Chairman Ashida Hitoshi and representatives of the left about viewing the Weimar Constitution as a model for Japan's new democracy. It sets forth the debate over human rights: what would be the status of religion under the new constitutional structure? Would Japan's traditional family structure survive in the new emphasis on the rights of individuals? A notable speech by a newly elected female member, Katō Shizue, and rejoinders by Kimura Tokutarō and Tanaka Kōtarō, ministers of justice and education, respectively, explored these questions.Less
Recounts the intense debate in the revision committee over Article 9, renouncing war and armed forces, and the contents of the bill of rights (Chapter III). The chapter reveals sharp quarrels between Chairman Ashida Hitoshi and representatives of the left about viewing the Weimar Constitution as a model for Japan's new democracy. It sets forth the debate over human rights: what would be the status of religion under the new constitutional structure? Would Japan's traditional family structure survive in the new emphasis on the rights of individuals? A notable speech by a newly elected female member, Katō Shizue, and rejoinders by Kimura Tokutarō and Tanaka Kōtarō, ministers of justice and education, respectively, explored these questions.
Ray A. Moore and Donald L. Robinson
- Published in print:
- 2002
- Published Online:
- November 2003
- ISBN:
- 9780195151169
- eISBN:
- 9780199833917
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/019515116X.003.0021
- Subject:
- Political Science, Democratization
Having passed the lower house, the proposed revision came next before the House of Peers. The aristocratic upper house would exist no longer under the new constitution, yet its approval was critical ...
More
Having passed the lower house, the proposed revision came next before the House of Peers. The aristocratic upper house would exist no longer under the new constitution, yet its approval was critical to the project's legitimacy. Ch. 19 tells how the proposed revision came under severe attack by peers, but was also stoutly defended. The principal defenders, besides Kanamori, were a highly respected lawyer, Takayanagi Kenzō, and Nanbara Shigeru, president of the University of Tokyo; the scholarly Sasaki Sōichi and a fierce and eloquent peer, Sawada Ushimaro, led the critics. Again the role of the emperor under the new charter (kokutai) was an object of earnest interest, as was Article 9 and the bill of rights.Less
Having passed the lower house, the proposed revision came next before the House of Peers. The aristocratic upper house would exist no longer under the new constitution, yet its approval was critical to the project's legitimacy. Ch. 19 tells how the proposed revision came under severe attack by peers, but was also stoutly defended. The principal defenders, besides Kanamori, were a highly respected lawyer, Takayanagi Kenzō, and Nanbara Shigeru, president of the University of Tokyo; the scholarly Sasaki Sōichi and a fierce and eloquent peer, Sawada Ushimaro, led the critics. Again the role of the emperor under the new charter (kokutai) was an object of earnest interest, as was Article 9 and the bill of rights.
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
This chapter examines State implementation of Article 9(2) to balance out competing interests between individual freedom to manifest a religion or belief and the legitimate interests of the State in ...
More
This chapter examines State implementation of Article 9(2) to balance out competing interests between individual freedom to manifest a religion or belief and the legitimate interests of the State in ensuring that such manifestations are restricted from unduly interfering in public health and order, morality, and the rights and freedoms of others. The Court and Commission give wide leeway for State activity in justifying whether restrictions on the manifestation of religion or belief are necessary. Although the Court and Commission are tasked to secure State action on manifesting religion or belief, not many cases are passed on to Article 9(2) because they paid little attention to issues concerning Article9(1), either bypassing the article with little explanation for breach or completely ignoring the issues. Limited scope is given to Article 9(1).Less
This chapter examines State implementation of Article 9(2) to balance out competing interests between individual freedom to manifest a religion or belief and the legitimate interests of the State in ensuring that such manifestations are restricted from unduly interfering in public health and order, morality, and the rights and freedoms of others. The Court and Commission give wide leeway for State activity in justifying whether restrictions on the manifestation of religion or belief are necessary. Although the Court and Commission are tasked to secure State action on manifesting religion or belief, not many cases are passed on to Article 9(2) because they paid little attention to issues concerning Article9(1), either bypassing the article with little explanation for breach or completely ignoring the issues. Limited scope is given to Article 9(1).
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.003.0008
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
This chapter discusses the issue of breaching the compromise between legislation and certain religious groups through enforcing certain laws conflicting with certain religious cultures, which appears ...
More
This chapter discusses the issue of breaching the compromise between legislation and certain religious groups through enforcing certain laws conflicting with certain religious cultures, which appears to pass on certain religious issues or to discriminate against certain religious groups. Some of the laws are genuinely neutral regarding religion and general in application, but for some religions or religious groups, complying with these laws would require behaving contrary to their religion or belief. This is potentially divisive to increasingly pluralistic European societies. Thus, there have been suggestions of exemptions from these laws. The Court and Commission present three basic responses: as long as the law is genuinely neutral and general, it does not breach Article 9; restricting religious freedom under these laws could breach Article 9(1), but can be justified in Article 9(2); and lastly, these issues are dealt with in specific reference to another article of the Convention.Less
This chapter discusses the issue of breaching the compromise between legislation and certain religious groups through enforcing certain laws conflicting with certain religious cultures, which appears to pass on certain religious issues or to discriminate against certain religious groups. Some of the laws are genuinely neutral regarding religion and general in application, but for some religions or religious groups, complying with these laws would require behaving contrary to their religion or belief. This is potentially divisive to increasingly pluralistic European societies. Thus, there have been suggestions of exemptions from these laws. The Court and Commission present three basic responses: as long as the law is genuinely neutral and general, it does not breach Article 9; restricting religious freedom under these laws could breach Article 9(1), but can be justified in Article 9(2); and lastly, these issues are dealt with in specific reference to another article of the Convention.
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.003.0006
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
This chapter concentrates on the application of the right to manifest freedom of religion or belief — an essential protection for freedom of religion or belief stipulated in Article 9(1) under the ...
More
This chapter concentrates on the application of the right to manifest freedom of religion or belief — an essential protection for freedom of religion or belief stipulated in Article 9(1) under the Convention. It describes the difficulty of demonstration of the right caused by restrictions, not only from State interference, relatively narrow definition of terms, and numerous possible interpretations of the manifestation, but also from Court and Commission management. The approach of the Court and Commission to manifestation of religious rights offers limited scope and protection, especially to minorities and individual believers, since their performance is supported by insufficient reference to what is necessary to religion or belief, and since their approach is analogous to the tradition of Christian beliefs, a dominantly recognized religion.Less
This chapter concentrates on the application of the right to manifest freedom of religion or belief — an essential protection for freedom of religion or belief stipulated in Article 9(1) under the Convention. It describes the difficulty of demonstration of the right caused by restrictions, not only from State interference, relatively narrow definition of terms, and numerous possible interpretations of the manifestation, but also from Court and Commission management. The approach of the Court and Commission to manifestation of religious rights offers limited scope and protection, especially to minorities and individual believers, since their performance is supported by insufficient reference to what is necessary to religion or belief, and since their approach is analogous to the tradition of Christian beliefs, a dominantly recognized religion.
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.003.0009
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
This chapter sums up the issues regarding the fundamental human right of freedom of religion or belief and the analysis regarding the drafting, implementation, interpretation, and other aspects of ...
More
This chapter sums up the issues regarding the fundamental human right of freedom of religion or belief and the analysis regarding the drafting, implementation, interpretation, and other aspects of the laws that are meant to protect the right to manifest religion or belief. Investigation of Article 9 and its cases reveals a confusing establishment of the principle law that restricts the movement of both governing parties and society. The lack of knowledge and understanding about the intended definition of religion and belief limits the overall legal implementation and effectiveness of Article 9 as perceived through the article's inconsistencies, gaps in evidence and objectivity, and lack of clarity; whereas the narrow scope of applicable religions, along with greater sympathy for the States, makes it difficult for applicants acting outside the traditional, European model of religious practice to make successful Article 9 claims.Less
This chapter sums up the issues regarding the fundamental human right of freedom of religion or belief and the analysis regarding the drafting, implementation, interpretation, and other aspects of the laws that are meant to protect the right to manifest religion or belief. Investigation of Article 9 and its cases reveals a confusing establishment of the principle law that restricts the movement of both governing parties and society. The lack of knowledge and understanding about the intended definition of religion and belief limits the overall legal implementation and effectiveness of Article 9 as perceived through the article's inconsistencies, gaps in evidence and objectivity, and lack of clarity; whereas the narrow scope of applicable religions, along with greater sympathy for the States, makes it difficult for applicants acting outside the traditional, European model of religious practice to make successful Article 9 claims.
Norman Doe
- Published in print:
- 2011
- Published Online:
- September 2011
- ISBN:
- 9780199604005
- eISBN:
- 9780191729331
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604005.003.0003
- Subject:
- Law, EU Law, Comparative Law
This chapter explores religious freedom, particularly from the perspective of individuals. It covers religious freedom in the constitutions of European States, as well as concessions and exemptions ...
More
This chapter explores religious freedom, particularly from the perspective of individuals. It covers religious freedom in the constitutions of European States, as well as concessions and exemptions enjoyed by individuals from laws of general applicability at the sub-constitutional level (that is, at the level of laws created by States under the authority of national constitutions). It evaluates the impact of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the national level (including Strasbourg jurisprudence), and proposes that key elements of Article 9 are already to be found in pre-existing national laws on religion in terms of both the right to religious freedom and the limits which States may place on its exercise.Less
This chapter explores religious freedom, particularly from the perspective of individuals. It covers religious freedom in the constitutions of European States, as well as concessions and exemptions enjoyed by individuals from laws of general applicability at the sub-constitutional level (that is, at the level of laws created by States under the authority of national constitutions). It evaluates the impact of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights at the national level (including Strasbourg jurisprudence), and proposes that key elements of Article 9 are already to be found in pre-existing national laws on religion in terms of both the right to religious freedom and the limits which States may place on its exercise.
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.003.0003
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
This chapter explains the history and development of the Convention through the drafting of the history of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to explain the intended interpretation of Article ...
More
This chapter explains the history and development of the Convention through the drafting of the history of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to explain the intended interpretation of Article 9. The intention of the Convention, based upon the work of the United Nations, is described as ‘securing the universal and effective recognition and observance of the rights’, but certain aspects, such as the protection of religious freedom, were controversial at the time and were particularly debated within the establishment, more so in the Universal Declaration. The travaux préparatories may be limited in discussing and understanding what the drafters intended to protect in Article 9, and also in Article 2 of the First Protocol, but several significant points are made regarding the right to freedom of religion.Less
This chapter explains the history and development of the Convention through the drafting of the history of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to explain the intended interpretation of Article 9. The intention of the Convention, based upon the work of the United Nations, is described as ‘securing the universal and effective recognition and observance of the rights’, but certain aspects, such as the protection of religious freedom, were controversial at the time and were particularly debated within the establishment, more so in the Universal Declaration. The travaux préparatories may be limited in discussing and understanding what the drafters intended to protect in Article 9, and also in Article 2 of the First Protocol, but several significant points are made regarding the right to freedom of religion.
Katharine Fortin
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- September 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780198808381
- eISBN:
- 9780191846106
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198808381.003.0009
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration, Public International Law
Chapter 9 considers the relevance of control of territory to the acquisition of legal obligations by armed groups. Employing the principle of ‘effectiveness’ as its starting point, the chapter ...
More
Chapter 9 considers the relevance of control of territory to the acquisition of legal obligations by armed groups. Employing the principle of ‘effectiveness’ as its starting point, the chapter conducts a detailed analysis of the rules on State responsibility, focusing in particular on Article 9. It also charts jurisprudence from the US Supreme Court, the US-Mexico General Claims Commission, and the Franco-Italian Conciliation Commission. Finding support for the idea that States may be held responsible for the impersonal acts of armed groups, the chapter explains how this case law may give rise to an argument that armed groups are bound by the international obligations of the State in instances where they control territory. It concludes by explaining how the obligations of armed groups may also originate in the continued rights of the population in the territory under their control.Less
Chapter 9 considers the relevance of control of territory to the acquisition of legal obligations by armed groups. Employing the principle of ‘effectiveness’ as its starting point, the chapter conducts a detailed analysis of the rules on State responsibility, focusing in particular on Article 9. It also charts jurisprudence from the US Supreme Court, the US-Mexico General Claims Commission, and the Franco-Italian Conciliation Commission. Finding support for the idea that States may be held responsible for the impersonal acts of armed groups, the chapter explains how this case law may give rise to an argument that armed groups are bound by the international obligations of the State in instances where they control territory. It concludes by explaining how the obligations of armed groups may also originate in the continued rights of the population in the territory under their control.
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- book
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.001.0001
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
Freedom of religion and belief is one of the central rights set out in international human rights treaties and yet it has also been one of the most controversial. While it is generally agreed that ...
More
Freedom of religion and belief is one of the central rights set out in international human rights treaties and yet it has also been one of the most controversial. While it is generally agreed that religious freedom is a fundamental right, there is little consensus about its content or scope. This book provides a detailed analysis of the law of freedom of religion or belief as developed under the European Convention on Human Rights. It takes a critical view of the restrictive manner in which the European Court and Commission of Human Rights have interpreted the Convention provisions relating to freedom of religion or belief and the high level of deference that they have given to State interests. The first part of the book sets the context, historical and theoretical, in which the interpretation of religious freedom in the Convention takes place. The second looks at the meaning of the Article 9(1) provisions for the protection of freedom of religion and belief, and the third part explores the limitations that a State may place on that freedom. Some of the issues raised include the role of religious education in State schools, permissible limitations on proselytism, the rights of conscientious objectors, and the scope of religious freedom for prisoners.Less
Freedom of religion and belief is one of the central rights set out in international human rights treaties and yet it has also been one of the most controversial. While it is generally agreed that religious freedom is a fundamental right, there is little consensus about its content or scope. This book provides a detailed analysis of the law of freedom of religion or belief as developed under the European Convention on Human Rights. It takes a critical view of the restrictive manner in which the European Court and Commission of Human Rights have interpreted the Convention provisions relating to freedom of religion or belief and the high level of deference that they have given to State interests. The first part of the book sets the context, historical and theoretical, in which the interpretation of religious freedom in the Convention takes place. The second looks at the meaning of the Article 9(1) provisions for the protection of freedom of religion and belief, and the third part explores the limitations that a State may place on that freedom. Some of the issues raised include the role of religious education in State schools, permissible limitations on proselytism, the rights of conscientious objectors, and the scope of religious freedom for prisoners.
Katharine Fortin
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- September 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780198808381
- eISBN:
- 9780191846106
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198808381.003.0010
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration, Public International Law
The chapter considers the relevance of the law on crimes against humanity to explanations of how armed groups are bound by international human rights law. Exploring the two-tiered nature of crimes ...
More
The chapter considers the relevance of the law on crimes against humanity to explanations of how armed groups are bound by international human rights law. Exploring the two-tiered nature of crimes against humanity, it shows that responsibility for crimes against humanity exists at two levels: the level of the individual perpetrator (individual criminal responsibility) and the level of the entity behind the perpetrator (a civil responsibility). From this starting point, the chapter analyses what the case law on crimes against humanity can tell us about whether and when armed groups can commit crimes against humanity. The chapter ends by exploring the connection between crimes against humanity and human rights law in a normative sense, examining what a conclusion that armed groups can commit crimes against humanity demonstrates about their obligations under human rights law.Less
The chapter considers the relevance of the law on crimes against humanity to explanations of how armed groups are bound by international human rights law. Exploring the two-tiered nature of crimes against humanity, it shows that responsibility for crimes against humanity exists at two levels: the level of the individual perpetrator (individual criminal responsibility) and the level of the entity behind the perpetrator (a civil responsibility). From this starting point, the chapter analyses what the case law on crimes against humanity can tell us about whether and when armed groups can commit crimes against humanity. The chapter ends by exploring the connection between crimes against humanity and human rights law in a normative sense, examining what a conclusion that armed groups can commit crimes against humanity demonstrates about their obligations under human rights law.
Carolyn Evans
- Published in print:
- 2001
- Published Online:
- March 2012
- ISBN:
- 9780199243648
- eISBN:
- 9780191697272
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243648.003.0002
- Subject:
- Law, Human Rights and Immigration
This chapter explores the theoretical rationale for religious freedom in modern European States, in various present cultures. As explained through Dworkin's concept, the conception of freedom of ...
More
This chapter explores the theoretical rationale for religious freedom in modern European States, in various present cultures. As explained through Dworkin's concept, the conception of freedom of religion or belief is divergent among people, and it is adapted differently into practice, creating identities and a wide scope for justification and interpretation. There are different interpretations and applications of articles in various States, especially Article 9, which protects the freedom of religion and belief, since the Convention gives little guidance as to the explanation and reasoning behind its principle, resulting in inconsistencies, inequality, and unfairness in order to justify the right outcome for a particular factual situation. It would seem that the best approach for the Court to this complexity that emphasizes dignity and freedom in decision-making, in parallel to the ideals of the Convention, is through an argument from autonomy.Less
This chapter explores the theoretical rationale for religious freedom in modern European States, in various present cultures. As explained through Dworkin's concept, the conception of freedom of religion or belief is divergent among people, and it is adapted differently into practice, creating identities and a wide scope for justification and interpretation. There are different interpretations and applications of articles in various States, especially Article 9, which protects the freedom of religion and belief, since the Convention gives little guidance as to the explanation and reasoning behind its principle, resulting in inconsistencies, inequality, and unfairness in order to justify the right outcome for a particular factual situation. It would seem that the best approach for the Court to this complexity that emphasizes dignity and freedom in decision-making, in parallel to the ideals of the Convention, is through an argument from autonomy.
Stephen Weatherill
- Published in print:
- 2016
- Published Online:
- August 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780199557264
- eISBN:
- 9780191828768
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557264.003.0007
- Subject:
- Law, EU Law
This chapter illustrates that each national of a Member State shall be a Citizen of the Union (Articles 9 TEU and 20(1) TFEU). Citizenship of a modern European State comes with a range of ...
More
This chapter illustrates that each national of a Member State shall be a Citizen of the Union (Articles 9 TEU and 20(1) TFEU). Citizenship of a modern European State comes with a range of well-recognized rights and duties. All States have different detailed frameworks, but the idea of the individual citizen’s intimate connection with, and expected allegiance to, his or her State is missing at the EU level. Articles 9 TEU and 20(1) TFEU also provide that Union citizenship ‘shall be additional to and not replace national citizenship’. It is but a supplement; though on a more positive note, EU citizenship strengthens State citizenship with a set of entitlements and protection that extend beyond that which can be provided at the national level. The chapter aims to provide an understanding of the scope of protection granted by EU law, as well as its relationship with national law.Less
This chapter illustrates that each national of a Member State shall be a Citizen of the Union (Articles 9 TEU and 20(1) TFEU). Citizenship of a modern European State comes with a range of well-recognized rights and duties. All States have different detailed frameworks, but the idea of the individual citizen’s intimate connection with, and expected allegiance to, his or her State is missing at the EU level. Articles 9 TEU and 20(1) TFEU also provide that Union citizenship ‘shall be additional to and not replace national citizenship’. It is but a supplement; though on a more positive note, EU citizenship strengthens State citizenship with a set of entitlements and protection that extend beyond that which can be provided at the national level. The chapter aims to provide an understanding of the scope of protection granted by EU law, as well as its relationship with national law.
Garren Mulloy
- Published in print:
- 2021
- Published Online:
- January 2022
- ISBN:
- 9780197606155
- eISBN:
- 9780197632932
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780197606155.003.0003
- Subject:
- History, Military History
From the foundation of the Japan Self-Defense Forces in 1954, they gradually became the primary defenders of Japan’s external security, together with her US guarantor. This chapter examines the ...
More
From the foundation of the Japan Self-Defense Forces in 1954, they gradually became the primary defenders of Japan’s external security, together with her US guarantor. This chapter examines the foundation of the three Forces, and the development of each in turn, from their origins, culture, and ethos, through growth and technical development, to how their respective and combined Cold War security roles changed. It also highlights their uneven capabilities and US engagement throughout the period, with naval cooperation prominently to the fore through the Maritime Self-Defense Force. While the Air Self-Defense Force gained technical prowess, it also demonstrated notable and embarrassing capability flaws, while the Ground Self-Defense Force struggled for public acceptance despite being the largest Force and the primary disaster relief provider, partly due to lingering imperial-era associations. Despite developing into sophisticated armed forces they struggled to shed the existential dilemma of being established seemingly in breach of Article 9 of the constitution and thereby struggled to gain social acceptance and legitimacy.Less
From the foundation of the Japan Self-Defense Forces in 1954, they gradually became the primary defenders of Japan’s external security, together with her US guarantor. This chapter examines the foundation of the three Forces, and the development of each in turn, from their origins, culture, and ethos, through growth and technical development, to how their respective and combined Cold War security roles changed. It also highlights their uneven capabilities and US engagement throughout the period, with naval cooperation prominently to the fore through the Maritime Self-Defense Force. While the Air Self-Defense Force gained technical prowess, it also demonstrated notable and embarrassing capability flaws, while the Ground Self-Defense Force struggled for public acceptance despite being the largest Force and the primary disaster relief provider, partly due to lingering imperial-era associations. Despite developing into sophisticated armed forces they struggled to shed the existential dilemma of being established seemingly in breach of Article 9 of the constitution and thereby struggled to gain social acceptance and legitimacy.
Andrew L. Oros
- Published in print:
- 2017
- Published Online:
- January 2019
- ISBN:
- 9780231172615
- eISBN:
- 9780231542593
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Columbia University Press
- DOI:
- 10.7312/columbia/9780231172615.003.0005
- Subject:
- Political Science, Security Studies
This chapter examines the return of Shinzo Abe to Prime Minister of Japan from 2012-2015, paying special attention to new security legislation and military capabilities developed in this period.
This chapter examines the return of Shinzo Abe to Prime Minister of Japan from 2012-2015, paying special attention to new security legislation and military capabilities developed in this period.
Kate Purcell
- Published in print:
- 2019
- Published Online:
- March 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780198743644
- eISBN:
- 9780191803796
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198743644.003.0003
- Subject:
- Law, Public International Law, Environmental and Energy Law
This chapter introduces David Caron’s influential argument that Articles 7(2) and 76(9) of UNCLOS ‘negatively imply’ that baselines and the zonal limits measured from them are, as a general rule, ...
More
This chapter introduces David Caron’s influential argument that Articles 7(2) and 76(9) of UNCLOS ‘negatively imply’ that baselines and the zonal limits measured from them are, as a general rule, ambulatory. It points to two important differences between these provisions neglected by Caron’s analysis. It explains why it is necessary to revisit Articles 7(2) and 76(9) with a view to determining the ordinary meaning of their terms in context and in light of the treaty’s object and purpose—the project of the following two chapters. Caron’s argument is premised on a problematic interpretation of the relevant provisions and UNCLOS more broadly.Less
This chapter introduces David Caron’s influential argument that Articles 7(2) and 76(9) of UNCLOS ‘negatively imply’ that baselines and the zonal limits measured from them are, as a general rule, ambulatory. It points to two important differences between these provisions neglected by Caron’s analysis. It explains why it is necessary to revisit Articles 7(2) and 76(9) with a view to determining the ordinary meaning of their terms in context and in light of the treaty’s object and purpose—the project of the following two chapters. Caron’s argument is premised on a problematic interpretation of the relevant provisions and UNCLOS more broadly.
Sarah Paterson
- Published in print:
- 2020
- Published Online:
- December 2020
- ISBN:
- 9780198860365
- eISBN:
- 9780191892547
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
- DOI:
- 10.1093/oso/9780198860365.003.0005
- Subject:
- Law, Company and Commercial Law
This chapter explores the way in which the shifts in the fields of finance and non-financial corporates discussed in Chapters 3 and 4 have led to changes in US secured transactions law. It examines ...
More
This chapter explores the way in which the shifts in the fields of finance and non-financial corporates discussed in Chapters 3 and 4 have led to changes in US secured transactions law. It examines the way in which these changes have, in turn, shifted bargaining power towards secured creditors when a debtor attempts to reorganize its debt and equity finance. However, the argument is made that this gives rise to different issues from the traditional concern for secured creditor liquidation bias when it is set in the wider organizational and institutional environment which the book has begun to examine. Turning to England, the chapter explores how the English courts have generally supported the allocation of control rights in distress to senior financial creditors. It reveals why this has, once again, made English corporate reorganization law particularly well adapted to the demands of the past decade.Less
This chapter explores the way in which the shifts in the fields of finance and non-financial corporates discussed in Chapters 3 and 4 have led to changes in US secured transactions law. It examines the way in which these changes have, in turn, shifted bargaining power towards secured creditors when a debtor attempts to reorganize its debt and equity finance. However, the argument is made that this gives rise to different issues from the traditional concern for secured creditor liquidation bias when it is set in the wider organizational and institutional environment which the book has begun to examine. Turning to England, the chapter explores how the English courts have generally supported the allocation of control rights in distress to senior financial creditors. It reveals why this has, once again, made English corporate reorganization law particularly well adapted to the demands of the past decade.
Jessamyn R. Abel
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- November 2016
- ISBN:
- 9780824841072
- eISBN:
- 9780824868086
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- University of Hawai'i Press
- DOI:
- 10.21313/hawaii/9780824841072.003.0003
- Subject:
- History, Asian History
The wartime persistence of internationalist thinking contributed to the quick acceptance in the immediate postwar years of the new United Nations, which in terms of its principles and ideals ...
More
The wartime persistence of internationalist thinking contributed to the quick acceptance in the immediate postwar years of the new United Nations, which in terms of its principles and ideals represented not a sharp turn, but in many ways a continuation of ideas that educators and foreign policy experts and practitioners, even at the highest levels of government, had promoted throughout the war. Over the decade between the establishment of the UN and Japan’s accession, changes in domestic Japanese politics and views of the organization led to a division within the broad Japanese support for the organization between pro-American conservatives who favored remilitarization and close alliance with the United States within the context of UN membership and pacifists opposed to remilitarization and insisting on a posture of neutrality and independence from the U.S. But both sides aimed at world peace through cooperation with the international organization.Less
The wartime persistence of internationalist thinking contributed to the quick acceptance in the immediate postwar years of the new United Nations, which in terms of its principles and ideals represented not a sharp turn, but in many ways a continuation of ideas that educators and foreign policy experts and practitioners, even at the highest levels of government, had promoted throughout the war. Over the decade between the establishment of the UN and Japan’s accession, changes in domestic Japanese politics and views of the organization led to a division within the broad Japanese support for the organization between pro-American conservatives who favored remilitarization and close alliance with the United States within the context of UN membership and pacifists opposed to remilitarization and insisting on a posture of neutrality and independence from the U.S. But both sides aimed at world peace through cooperation with the international organization.