Piers H. G. Stephens
- Published in print:
- 2015
- Published Online:
- January 2017
- ISBN:
- 9780262028059
- eISBN:
- 9780262325264
- Item type:
- chapter
- Publisher:
- The MIT Press
- DOI:
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262028059.003.0011
- Subject:
- Environmental Science, Environmental Studies
Piers H. G. Stephens discusses John Stuart Mill and, by distinguishing Mill’s brand of individualism from possessive individualism, concludes that liberal individualism is not necessarily opposed to ...
More
Piers H. G. Stephens discusses John Stuart Mill and, by distinguishing Mill’s brand of individualism from possessive individualism, concludes that liberal individualism is not necessarily opposed to environmentalism. Challenging a common criticism that Mill’s essay “Nature” sanctions human conquest of nature, Stephens argues that the essay actually critiques of the use of nature to support conservative, religiously based ethics. Stephens also highlights Mill’s embrace of a stationary-state economy, his willingness to accept regulation of the economy, and his support for small-scale agriculture and land preservation. More fundamentally, Mill, who had affinities with Romanticism, rejects the self-interested, economistic individualism espoused by Jeremy Bentham and others and instead posits an individualism, or individuality, that is relational, complex, and oriented toward natural spiritedness. Mill also connects appreciation of nonhuman nature to the development of character. Millian individualism thus suggests a strong affinity between freedom and diversity on the one hand and ecological consciousness on the other.Less
Piers H. G. Stephens discusses John Stuart Mill and, by distinguishing Mill’s brand of individualism from possessive individualism, concludes that liberal individualism is not necessarily opposed to environmentalism. Challenging a common criticism that Mill’s essay “Nature” sanctions human conquest of nature, Stephens argues that the essay actually critiques of the use of nature to support conservative, religiously based ethics. Stephens also highlights Mill’s embrace of a stationary-state economy, his willingness to accept regulation of the economy, and his support for small-scale agriculture and land preservation. More fundamentally, Mill, who had affinities with Romanticism, rejects the self-interested, economistic individualism espoused by Jeremy Bentham and others and instead posits an individualism, or individuality, that is relational, complex, and oriented toward natural spiritedness. Mill also connects appreciation of nonhuman nature to the development of character. Millian individualism thus suggests a strong affinity between freedom and diversity on the one hand and ecological consciousness on the other.
