Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
A more equal society?New Labour, poverty, inequality and exclusion$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

John Hills and Kitty Stewart

Print publication date: 2005

Print ISBN-13: 9781861345783

Published to University Press Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781861345783.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 23 August 2017

A tide turned but mountains yet to climb?

A tide turned but mountains yet to climb?

Chapter:
(p.325) Fifteen A tide turned but mountains yet to climb?
Source:
A more equal society?
Author(s):

John Hills

Kitty Stewart

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781861345783.003.0015

This chapter summarises the key points derived from the previous chapters. Some of the common points stand out from this analysis. First, the government since 1997 has undeniably taken tackling poverty and social exclusion very seriously, in a way not done before. In most of the areas discussed, there is proof of the recognition of the range of problems faced by Britain in the mid-1990s. Second, the issues have been acknowledged as multifaceted and interlinked. Although policy debates have focused on cash incomes and services today, they have also recognised the drivers of disadvantage and of life chances for children. Third, New Labour has become more prolific in its use of its targets. Poverty and social exclusion have become top priorities of the government. However in some cases there have been omissions, such as working-age poverty and overall inequality. Fourth, in the individual policy areas, there is a variation in the speed and scope of policy. Education, employment, child poverty, vulnerable groups, and neighbourhood regeneration were continuing priorities with substantial new resources. However, the scale of action in other areas and for other marginalised groups was less fast and less impressive. The inclusion agenda has, literally, had borders. Finally, there are recurring problems. In many areas, there is an unacknowledged conflict between government objectives of raising standards for all and of reducing differences between disadvantaged groups and others. There are a number of gaps and areas where people are still left behind and the default policy for most social security benefits and tax credits is linked to their values in prices and not to general standards of living. Overall, however, it can be said that the tide has turned, however, there is a long way to go to reach the unambiguous picture of success.

Keywords:   poverty, social exclusion, policy, cash incomes, disadvantage, inequality, education, employment, child poverty, vulnerable groups

University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .