Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
The ethics of welfareHuman rights, dependency and responsibility$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Hartley Dean

Print publication date: 2004

Print ISBN-13: 9781861345622

Published to University Press Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781861345622.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 21 August 2017

Popular discourses of dependency, responsibility and rights

Popular discourses of dependency, responsibility and rights

Chapter:
(p.68) (p.69) Four Popular discourses of dependency, responsibility and rights
Source:
The ethics of welfare
Author(s):

Hartley Dean

Ruth Rogers

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781861345622.003.0005

This chapter recounts the principal findings from the ESRC-funded (Economic and Social Research Council) study. It gives particular attention to what might be defined as ‘popular discourses’, based on in-depth interviews that were conducted with a sample of forty-nine working-age adults drawn from Dover, London, Sheffield and Luton. The sample was evenly distributed between men and women and, although it somewhat focused on older participants, the sample included representatives of the full working-age range. The youngest participant was nineteen years of age and the oldest was sixty-five years of age during the time of interview. Six members of the sample were from non-white minority ethnic groups. Two thirds of the samples were living with partners and nearly half had dependent children. Eleven respondents were disabled and five reported that a member of their family was disabled. The sample presented in this chapter was deliberately selected to four income bands: the poorest with income bands below £9,000 per annum, two intermediate income groups with incomes from £9,000 per annum to £ 18,000 per annum and £18,001 per annum to £27,000 per annum, and the richest with incomes above £27,000 per annum. Nine of the participants were professional or in managerial occupations, thirteen were in skilled occupations, ten were in part or unskilled occupations and seventeen were unemployed. The interviews held with these participants aimed to explore the participants' understandings of dependency, responsibility, and rights and to locate these understandings in relation to their attitudes to the welfare state.

Keywords:   ESRC, popular discourses, dependency, responsibility, rights, welfare state

University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .