Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Securing respectBehavioural expectations and anti-social behaviour in the UK$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Andrew Millie

Print publication date: 2009

Print ISBN-13: 9781847420947

Published to University Press Scholarship Online: March 2012

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781847420947.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 22 August 2017

Tolerance, respect and civility amid changing cities

Tolerance, respect and civility amid changing cities

Chapter:
(p.171) seven Tolerance, respect and civility amid changing cities
Source:
Securing respect
Author(s):

Jon Bannister

Ade Kearns

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781847420947.003.0008

Britain has a reputation for toleration. In the first half of the twentieth century, tolerance was regarded as one of several British virtues, as seen from experience by foreigners. Inevitably, the culture of tolerance became one of Britain's hallmarks and identities. This culture has also seeped into government policies. Reputation and rhetoric, therefore, supported the notion that Britain is a tolerant place to live in. This chapter presents an image of Britain as a non-tolerant place as suggested by the realities of public opinion and public policy. It defines tolerance and specifies its relationship to civility and respect. Although it is argued that active engagement with others is an important foundation of tolerance, the chapter illustrates, however, that engagement and tolerance are less likely to arise as a result of the purified public realm, and that tolerance is very context specific. The chapter also discusses how a combination of global forces, which increased the need for tolerance and a public policy that highlighted ‘otherness’ and that seeks to support preference for privatism through an increasing regulation of ‘inappropriate behaviours’, one that serves to create a ‘cycle of intolerance’. The chapter concludes that the pursuance of a form of a cohesion that stresses conformity and consensus is counterproductive, as it serves to emphasise social inequality and to frame those inequality as undesirable and unacceptable, rather than to encourage tolerance.

Keywords:   toleration, tolerance, culture of tolerance, public opinion, public policy, civility, respect, engagement, cycle of intolerance

University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .