This chapter outlines the five cornerstone of the book. First is the bringing of critical intent to the concept of resilience, the production of which is usually seen as regressively status-quo, by developing what is deemed a ‘critical resilience of the residuals’ whereby the relics of previously more equitable (Keynesian) arrangement are protected and defended. Second, a more ambivalent, if not supportive, version of the voluntary sector is presented. Third, a more complex interpretation of inner-city territory, one buffeted by multiple motivations that can breed resilience, rather than advancing a purely punitive representation, is advanced. Fourth and finally, the comparative approach will valorize overlooked, ordinary agents and practices (of care, sustenance, abeyance) within global-city regions, and propose novel approaches to comparing the voluntary sector and resilience comparatively. Further, the rich empirical material will be used to explore some empirical questions around the degree of similarity and difference across the Australian, UK and US welfare state and voluntary sector settlements.
University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.
If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.
To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .