Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
"Young people, welfare and crime"Governing non-participation$
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.

Ross Fergusson

Print publication date: 2016

Print ISBN-13: 9781447307013

Published to University Press Scholarship Online: September 2016

DOI: 10.1332/policypress/9781447307013.001.0001

Show Summary Details
Page of
date: 23 August 2017

Theorising the non-participation-crime relationship

Theorising the non-participation-crime relationship

Chapter:
(p.169) Seven Theorising the non-participation-crime relationship
Source:
"Young people, welfare and crime"
Author(s):

Ross Fergusson

Publisher:
Policy Press
DOI:10.1332/policypress/9781447307013.003.0007

This chapter extends the exploration of Habermas’s and Tyler’s theorisations, and those of other theorists, for reinterpreting non-participation and its relationship to crime among young people. It begins by reflecting on how empirical work on the relationship explored in previous chapters has clustered around instrumental and expressive motivations for crime, and considers the additional insights Habermas’s and Tyler’s analyses bring. Other theorists’ work on the ways in which problematised populations can be ‘governed through unemployment’ then leads to a critical assessment of Habermas’s and Tyler’s engagement with concept of governance, which highlights problematically weak distinctions between the concepts of governmentalisation and social control. The congruence between Habermas’s theories of welfare conditionalisation and juridification, and Jonathan Simon’s notions of ‘governing through crime’ suggest alternative interpretations of the non-particiapiton-crime relationship, whereby states find increasingly sophisticated ways of resolving structural problems by requiring specified forms of participation and by using the powers of civil and criminal law to secure them. The governance of unemployment can then be understood as an active means of governing crime preventatively. But the two also thereby become connected in ways that invoke criminalisation as an important concept for understanding the governance of non-participation.

Keywords:   criminalisation, governance, governing through crime, governmentalisation, non-particiapiton-crime relationship, social control, unemployment

University Press Scholarship Online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter.

Please, subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

To troubleshoot, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us .